Re: [Mailman-Users] Lost the raw archive link?
- From the 2.1.4 NEWS file: - New mm_cfg.py/Defaults.py variable PUBLIC_MBOX which allows the site administrator to disable public access to all the raw list mbox files (this is not a per-list configuration). So, try setting that to Yes in mm_cfg.py. I don't know without testing it whether you need to re-archive the list to make this take effect or not. Exactly what I needed. Thanks for being a second pair of eyes. -- warren woodward XMission DSL Domo/Mailman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (801) 303-0819 (877) XMISSION -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
[Mailman-Users] lost the raw archive link
Surely I'm missing something obvious (as usual), but this one has me stumped. A list owner requested I eliminate his current archives so he can begin anew for the quarter. I did this, as I have a few other times in the past, using the guidelines in the FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.003.htp In short, I deleted the /$HOME/archives/private/listname directory, erased the listname.mbox/listname.mbox and re archived. No problem, this works as always and the list is now accepting archived anew as intended. The problem is that the list owner pointed out that doing this seems to have eliminated the option to download the full raw archive which he uses regularly. I am stumped as to why. I looked at a couple other lists on which I've performed this action in the past, and see that the same result has occured. Is it safe to just add this link in the archive index.html? Or is it going to be overwritten again when /bin/arch is next exectuted? And is there a way to perform this archive housekeeping that prevents this from happening? -- warren woodward XMission DSL Domo/Mailman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (801) 303-0819 (877) XMISSION -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
[Mailman-Users] Lost the raw archive link?
Surely I'm missing something obvious (as usual), but this one has me stumped. A list owner requested I eliminate his current archives so he can begin anew for the quarter. I did this, as I have a few other times in the past, using the guidelines in the FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py?req=showfile=faq03.003.htp In short, I deleted the /$HOME/archives/private/listname directory, erased the listname.mbox/listname.mbox and re archived. No problem, this works as always and the list is now accepting archived anew as intended. The problem is that the list owner pointed out that doing this seems to have eliminated the option to download the full raw archive which he uses regularly. I am stumped as to why. I looked at a couple other lists on which I've performed this action in the past, and see that the same result has occured. Is it safe to just add this link in the archive index.html? Or is it going to be overwritten again when /bin/arch is next exectuted? And is there a way to perform this archive housekeeping that prevents this from happening? -- warren woodward XMission DSL Domo/Mailman [EMAIL PROTECTED] (801) 303-0819 (877) XMISSION -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Re: [Mailman-Users] Lost the raw archive link?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Warren Woodward wrote: In short, I deleted the /$HOME/archives/private/listname directory, erased the listname.mbox/listname.mbox and re archived. No problem, this works as always and the list is now accepting archived anew as intended. The problem is that the list owner pointed out that doing this seems to have eliminated the option to download the full raw archive which he uses regularly. I am stumped as to why. I looked at a couple other lists on which I've performed this action in the past, and see that the same result has occured. Is it safe to just add this link in the archive index.html? Or is it going to be overwritten again when /bin/arch is next exectuted? And is there a way to perform this archive housekeeping that prevents this from happening? - From the 2.1.4 NEWS file: - New mm_cfg.py/Defaults.py variable PUBLIC_MBOX which allows the site administrator to disable public access to all the raw list mbox files (this is not a per-list configuration). So, try setting that to Yes in mm_cfg.py. I don't know without testing it whether you need to re-archive the list to make this take effect or not. - -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp == Be it our wealth, our jobs, or even our homes; nothing is safe while the legislature is in session. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. iD8DBQFBSG3Nuv+09NZUB1oRAvLiAJ9S2Jbtt3AxJzz0b6bfRas11bY9iQCgqdA8 OuXOi9SMiKRZtwi19ESWD+k= =gANF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
