Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-07 Thread Josep L. Guallar-Esteve
On Friday 04 July 2003 10:51 pm, SysAdmin wrote:
 I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it
 stayed up and running. Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages
 get delivered to the lists 

Do you have a valid question? Or are you just ranting?

If you have a valid question, please provide enough data so we can be of help 
and, together solve the problem. We are no mind readers, just mailman users.

If you are just ranting, please use an appropiate media. I'd recommend you 
/dev/null

 Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
 recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
 much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
 Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.

 Bill

Interestingly, I don't babysit my mailman. If you want to go back to 
Majordomo, please do. Although this will not solve your problems with 
mailman.



Regards,
Josep
-- 
Josep L. Guallar-Esteve Eastern Radiologists, Inc.
Systems and Network Administration  http://www.easternrad.com


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-06 Thread Vivek Khera
 S == SysAdmin  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

S Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
S recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
S much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
S Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.

I don't baby sit my Mailman.  Ever.  It just runs and runs.  It was
trivial to set up (using the FreeBSD ports for both Mailman and
Postfix).

Lyris was also that way, but it is WY expensive and really not
worth the money compared with what you can get with Mailman, IMO.
But if you're having trouble setting it up, then perhaps Lyris is
worth a look...

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


RE: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-06 Thread Karen G. Schneider
:S Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
:S recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
:S much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
:S Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.

Is it possible your needs might be better met with an outsourced mailing list solution?
While we have the in-house expertise to manage Mailman, my cost analyses have 
demonstrated
this is not a good use of our limited programming time.  Perhaps you can find a 
provider
who offers Mailman at a reasonable rate.

I tested Lyris for a year (outsourced solution, from Sparklist) and I was unimpressed.

Karen G. Schneider



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-05 Thread Heather J. Lubinsky
I just wanted to say - once you get mailman set up and running - it should
not need any babysitting.
I have run Lsoft's Listserv, Majordormo, and about 10 different list servers
and this one - once you get the kinks from your system worked out is the
most flexible and the best.

I have also been thrilled with the help I have gotten on this list.  I
currently run an older version because the server I am on uses an older
version of python - but one of my friends runs the newer version and said
for the first few weeks she had to work like a dog getting the bugs out and
doing little fixes but with help from this list - she is now running like
me - no  worries.

And I am rather tough (at least I think so) on the list server:
(see my stats that a few members helped me create at
http://www.pcolist.org/report.html)
also with a bit of help and learning how to tweak things I have simplified
many things that used to take me a lot of time - we change headers and
footers a lot and that used to be a pain but using the same type of idea
that was given to me for the list statistics I was able to change all of the
list headers and footers by just editing a text file and then running a
command - 1 minute later everything is all set.

Our lists are mostly discussion lists and we have both fully moderated and
moderated only by email address lists and it makes it a snap.  I am the
sever admin and I spend maybe 1 hour a month researching addresses or a
wacky problem and the list admin who moderates and handles all list problems
says real list problems only take her 2-3 hours a month and the rest are our
user problems.

And our focus is dealing with women in crisis - most are not even computer
literate - so we really feel this list software is worth it - and it is
FREE!

Anyway - thanks for all those who have helped in the past and will help in
the future and for a great product that to a newbie linux user isn't all
that bad.

Heather Lubinsky
Director of Operations, PCOSA

- Original Message - 
From: Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 9:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman


At 7:51 PM -0700 2003/07/04, SysAdmin wrote:

  Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
  recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
  much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
  Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.

I've been administering mail systems for over ten years.  I've
also been administering mailing lists for about that long.  I've used
majordomo, and we've recently upgraded to mailman 2.1.2 on the
mailing lists I'm now administering.

I can tell you, with some authority, that mailman is many orders
of magnitude better than majordomo, with more features, and easier
and more flexible to manage, both for people who are old hands at
mailing list administration and people who have never done it before
in their life.


I really don't want to begin to contemplate what would be
necessary for us to switch back to majordomo.


Now, if you want to get some help with mailman, provide us more
information about your configuration and just what exactly is not
working well, and maybe we can help.  Otherwise, you're wasting your
time and ours.

-- 
==
Brad Knowles, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
 -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/heather%40pcgal.com


--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-05 Thread schuetzen
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:


Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so

HAVE NOT tried it but many recommend Lyris.
fwiw
chas
--
powered by Linux, Suse 8.2 Pro + Agent under Wine emulator
Charles L Hamilton, Houston, TX  chasm @ texas. net  www.schuetzen.net

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


[Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-04 Thread SysAdmin

I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least it
stayed up and running. Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages
get delivered to the lists (yes, I've already gone thru the FAQ and
validated that everything is correctly configured, the cronjobs are
running, etc.), and now it's stopped subscribing new users, too. It
presents the listinfo pages correctly, appears to complete the subscribe
transaction correctly, but the address doesn't get subscribed and the
moderator/admin never gets notified to approve the request. It's like it
just vanishes into the ether. I have to manually restart Mailman at least
twice a day, just to get it to not perform correctly. I don't know what
I'd have to do t get it running right...or maybe it's not possible to ever
get it running right. 

Anyone have a better mailing list tool than Mailman that you can
recommend? I'd like to have something that I don't have to babysit so
much. As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to
Majordomo (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.

Bill



--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] So far, I'm very disappointed with Mailman

2003-07-04 Thread J C Lawrence
On Fri, 4 Jul 2003 19:51:44 -0700 (PDT) 
SysAdmin  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've had nothing but problems with it. Majordomo sucked, but at least
 it stayed up and running. 

This is hardly a way to get either sympathy or help.

 Mailman's processes are all there, but no messages get delivered...

Then post the data that's needed to resolve the problem.  You know the
mantra and the ritual: what do the logs say?

 As much as I hate to do it, I might just have to go back to Majordomo
 (it has much better documentation, too). Sigh.

I ship between 1 and 2 million messages a day through Mailman without
any problems or SysAdm intervention.  In the real of Mailman sites I'm
fairly tiny.

-- 
J C Lawrence
-(*)Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   He lived as a devil, eh?  
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/  Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.

--
Mailman-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/

This message was sent to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe or change your options at
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org