Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Gadi Evron writes:

  crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful
  feature?

I think that, as Mark alludes to, this feature would be harder to
implement usefully than you'd think.  It sounds easy, but remember, in
a very large share cases where it would be useful *your mail system is
already broken*.  A trivial example: most of the cases where I've
wanted something like it, the host was crashed, and simply not
available.  In other cases, it seems that Mailman is for some reason
unable to send mail; why would it be more able to send mail received
via HTTP than mail received by SMTP?


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Bill Catambay

1. Mailman aliases not working (like in my case)
2. Unable to access my email, but have access to web (which is common 
for those of us behind corporate firewalls)

3. My email is broken, but my internet it still working

However, even with these reasons, I wouldn't consider it a big deal, 
especially if it's difficult to implement.  After my list is working 
again, I'll probably forget all about it.  :)



At 5:48 PM +0900 on 11/23/09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:



Gadi Evron writes:

  crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful
  feature?

I think that, as Mark alludes to, this feature would be harder to
implement usefully than you'd think.  It sounds easy, but remember, in
a very large share cases where it would be useful *your mail system is
already broken*.  A trivial example: most of the cases where I've
wanted something like it, the host was crashed, and simply not
available.  In other cases, it seems that Mailman is for some reason
unable to send mail; why would it be more able to send mail received
via HTTP than mail received by SMTP?



--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Bill Catambay writes:

  1. Mailman aliases not working (like in my case)
  2. Unable to access my email, but have access to web (which is common 
  for those of us behind corporate firewalls)
  3. My email is broken, but my internet it still working
  
  However, even with these reasons, I wouldn't consider it a big deal, 
  especially if it's difficult to implement.  After my list is working 
  again, I'll probably forget all about it.  :)

Note that I didn't deny use cases, I said it would be hard to
implement usefully.  For example, in the case that the mailman aliases
aren't working, people *will* reply: when do you expect it back up?
Because the mail system is currently not working, these will come
through in a batch when things are fixed.  What do to about them,
especially since they're completely useless in this scenario?  There
is also the issue of what to put in From, and things like that.  Will
there be one-size-fits-all solution, or will the emergency poster have
to set them appropriately?  In the latter case, are there traps that
the poster should avoid?  Do the appropriate settings depend on other
list settings (eg, reply-to munging)?

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Gadi Evron

Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:

Gadi Evron writes:

  crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful
  feature?

I think that, as Mark alludes to, this feature would be harder to
implement usefully than you'd think.  It sounds easy, but remember, in
a very large share cases where it would be useful *your mail system is
already broken*.  A trivial example: most of the cases where I've
wanted something like it, the host was crashed, and simply not
available.  In other cases, it seems that Mailman is for some reason
unable to send mail; why would it be more able to send mail received
via HTTP than mail received by SMTP?



Actually, I spoke of a possible _announcement_ feature, not an emergency 
feature.


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Gadi Evron

Bill Catambay wrote:

1. Mailman aliases not working (like in my case)
2. Unable to access my email, but have access to web (which is common 
for those of us behind corporate firewalls)

3. My email is broken, but my internet it still working

However, even with these reasons, I wouldn't consider it a big deal, 
especially if it's difficult to implement.  After my list is working 
again, I'll probably forget all about it.  :)


Yes, but are list admins always mailman admins or have access to the 
machine?


The only questions which seem relevant are:
1. Is this useful enough?
2. Does it fit with Mailman's vision?
3. How difficult is it to implement?






At 5:48 PM +0900 on 11/23/09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:



Gadi Evron writes:

  crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful
  feature?

I think that, as Mark alludes to, this feature would be harder to
implement usefully than you'd think.  It sounds easy, but remember, in
a very large share cases where it would be useful *your mail system is
already broken*.  A trivial example: most of the cases where I've
wanted something like it, the host was crashed, and simply not
available.  In other cases, it seems that Mailman is for some reason
unable to send mail; why would it be more able to send mail received
via HTTP than mail received by SMTP?






--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.

Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Brad Knowles
On Nov 22, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:

 Brad Knowles wrote:
 At the very least, you should find a different provider where they actually 
 give you the support you require.
 
 Brad, crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful feature?

I can see that it might be a useful feature, yes.

However, the laundry list of useful features that could be added to Mailman 
is several miles long and almost as wide, and I'm not qualified to judge where 
on that laundry list this particular feature would/should fall -- I'll leave 
that to the Mailman developers, like Barry and Mark.

--
Brad Knowles bradknow...@shub-internet.org
LinkedIn Profile: http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Sapiro
Gadi Evron wrote:

Actually, I spoke of a possible _announcement_ feature, not an emergency 
feature.


I see two requests in this thread. The original appeared to be a
request for a way to send a regular post to a list via the admin web
interface, which would be useful in cases where for whatever reason,
the list was working but email delivery to the list was not.

The second request, which might also satisfy the first if it were
implemented as a web service, seems to be for a way to send a message
right now to all members of a list (or all lists?) regardless of
digest and nomail settings.

For reasons already mentioned by Stephen and others, I don't think the
first is useful enough to justify, but the second is something we can
consider for MM3.

-- 
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Bill Catambay

At 7:32 PM +0900 on 11/23/09, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:



Bill Catambay writes:

  1. Mailman aliases not working (like in my case)
  2. Unable to access my email, but have access to web (which is common
  for those of us behind corporate firewalls)
  3. My email is broken, but my internet it still working
 
  However, even with these reasons, I wouldn't consider it a big deal,
  especially if it's difficult to implement.  After my list is working
  again, I'll probably forget all about it.  :)

Note that I didn't deny use cases, I said it would be hard to
implement usefully.  For example, in the case that the mailman aliases
aren't working, people *will* reply: when do you expect it back up?
Because the mail system is currently not working, these will come
through in a batch when things are fixed.  What do to about them,
especially since they're completely useless in this scenario?  There
is also the issue of what to put in From, and things like that.  Will
there be one-size-fits-all solution, or will the emergency poster have
to set them appropriately?  In the latter case, are there traps that
the poster should avoid?  Do the appropriate settings depend on other
list settings (eg, reply-to munging)?


Well, for what it's worth, in *my* situation, all posts come to me, 
which I am currently just holding, including when do you expect it 
back up but really more of thanks for all the work you do 
messages.  This is one of the reasons I like to moderate the list 
this way, as I do often get direct emails that were intended for the 
list, and this way I can read them and appropriately file them (i.e., 
they won't be going out to the list once the list is working).


As far as what to put in the FROM, I would say the name could be 
Foo-list Emergency Notification, and in the FROM email would be the 
foo-list email (which, in my case, come to me), or perhaps just to 
the foo-list-owner email (which should work okay for other lists as 
well).

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Barry Warsaw

On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:


The second request, which might also satisfy the first if it were
implemented as a web service, seems to be for a way to send a message
right now to all members of a list (or all lists?) regardless of
digest and nomail settings.


Actually, MM2 already implements this, though the UI is crufty.  Send  
a message with an Urgent: header that contains the admin password and  
it's supposed to be sent as a direct message to all subscribers.


-Barry



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Bill Catambay

At 7:56 AM -0800 on 11/23/09, Mark Sapiro wrote:




I see two requests in this thread. The original appeared to be a
request for a way to send a regular post to a list via the admin web
interface, which would be useful in cases where for whatever reason,
the list was working but email delivery to the list was not.

The second request, which might also satisfy the first if it were
implemented as a web service, seems to be for a way to send a message
right now to all members of a list (or all lists?) regardless of
digest and nomail settings.

For reasons already mentioned by Stephen and others, I don't think the
first is useful enough to justify, but the second is something we can
consider for MM3.


The second works for me.
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Bill Catambay

At 11:05 AM -0500 on 11/23/09, Barry Warsaw wrote:



The second request, which might also satisfy the first if it were
implemented as a web service, seems to be for a way to send a message
right now to all members of a list (or all lists?) regardless of
digest and nomail settings.


Actually, MM2 already implements this, though the UI is crufty. 
Send a message with an Urgent: header that contains the admin 
password and it's supposed to be sent as a direct message to all 
subscribers.



If by send a message, you mean email a message to the normal 
foo-list email address, then I'm back to square one (i.e., it will 
never reach anyone on the list because of the aliases being whacked).

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Sapiro
Barry Warsaw wrote:

On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:

 The second request, which might also satisfy the first if it were
 implemented as a web service, seems to be for a way to send a message
 right now to all members of a list (or all lists?) regardless of
 digest and nomail settings.

Actually, MM2 already implements this, though the UI is crufty.  Send  
a message with an Urgent: header that contains the admin password and  
it's supposed to be sent as a direct message to all subscribers.


I knew I'd seen that somewhere. Problem was I looked for it as an RFE
and not as an existing feature :)

-- 
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Barry Warsaw

On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:


I knew I'd seen that somewhere. Problem was I looked for it as an RFE
and not as an existing feature :)


:)
-Barry



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 09:42 -0600, Brad Knowles wrote:
 However, the laundry list of useful features that could be added to
 Mailman is several miles long and almost as wide, and I'm not
 qualified to judge where on that laundry list this particular feature
 would/should fall -- I'll leave that to the Mailman developers, like
 Barry and Mark.

This is just a thought, since I'm not familiar with the technical
details of implementing it, but it seems to be a trend.

An ever-increasing number of software packages support the installation
of 3rd party extensions, said extensions supporting the activities of
installation, deactivation and removal, leaving the core system
unaltered.  This provides end users (mail admins in the case of Mailman)
with the option of installing as few or as many extra features as they
need or want, and offloads the task of providing everything that
everyone wants from the core developers onto a wider community of
peripheral developers who know how to work with the core package's
extension API.  Mailman has a hint of this capability already, in the
withlist utility which I've used with great success to develop a program
to expunge lists of clueless AOL users who complain to AOL that opt-in
list posts they receive from a Mailman-served list are spam.

I have no idea how this might be implemented, but I've worked with
Python a bunch and I'm seriously impressed with its power and
flexibility.  There's nothing that can't be done with Python except mend
a broken heart and fix breakfast.

goes off to fix breakfast 

-- 
Lindsay Haisley   | Never expect the people who caused a problem
FMP Computer Services |  to solve it.  - Albert Einstein
512-259-1190  |
http://www.fmp.com|

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Bill Catambay

At 1:32 PM +0200 on 11/23/09, Gadi Evron wrote:


Actually, I spoke of a possible _announcement_ feature, not an 
emergency feature.


Announcement feature would be better, since it's not always going 
to be an emergency (and would still work in my situation).

--
,,,
   (o o)
===oOO==(_)==OOo=

Bill Catambay
Santa Clara, CA
bill.catam...@excaliburworld.com
Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen,
and thinking what nobody has thought.

.oooO  Oooo.
(   )==(   )=
 \ () /
  \_)  (_/
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Sapiro
Bill Catambay wrote:

If by send a message, you mean email a message to the normal 
foo-list email address, then I'm back to square one (i.e., it will 
never reach anyone on the list because of the aliases being whacked).


But, I hope you understand that your specific need/situation - email
delivery to the list broken by the hosting provider, by incompletely
implementing your requested change in the delivery of the normal list
posting address and a new 'moderator posting' address on a Friday with
insufficient testing and then leaving for the weekend - is so rare as
to possibly never occur again.

-- 
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Bill Catambay

At 8:52 AM -0800 on 11/23/09, Mark Sapiro wrote:



Bill Catambay wrote:


If by send a message, you mean email a message to the normal
foo-list email address, then I'm back to square one (i.e., it will
never reach anyone on the list because of the aliases being whacked).



But, I hope you understand that your specific need/situation - email
delivery to the list broken by the hosting provider, by incompletely
implementing your requested change in the delivery of the normal list
posting address and a new 'moderator posting' address on a Friday with
insufficient testing and then leaving for the weekend - is so rare as
to possibly never occur again.



Very true.  (especially after the support survey I just completed)
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Mark Sapiro
Terri Oda wrote:

Maybe a nice in-between solution would be making sure the 
FAQ/Documentation had an entry saying if you need to get an emergency 
message out and Mailman is not working, here's how to get the whole 
subscriber list and send a Bcc'ed mail  Anyone want to volunteer to 
stick that in the wiki so people can find it in the future?


There is already a FAQ at http://wiki.list.org/x/aYA9 that gives the
various ways to get a membership list. The problem is than in many if
not most Mailman is not working cases, none of these methods will
work.

-- 
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Barry Warsaw

On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Lindsay Haisley wrote:

An ever-increasing number of software packages support the  
installation

of 3rd party extensions, said extensions supporting the activities of
installation, deactivation and removal, leaving the core system
unaltered.  This provides end users (mail admins in the case of  
Mailman)
with the option of installing as few or as many extra features as  
they

need or want, and offloads the task of providing everything that
everyone wants from the core developers onto a wider community of
peripheral developers who know how to work with the core package's
extension API.  Mailman has a hint of this capability already, in the
withlist utility which I've used with great success to develop a  
program

to expunge lists of clueless AOL users who complain to AOL that opt-in
list posts they receive from a Mailman-served list are spam.


This is a goal of Mailman 3.  bin/withlist will still be there  
(largely unchanged), but the intent is to also support a plugin  
architecture to make it easy to extend Mailman in other ways, e.g. by  
adding handlers and other elements.


-Barry



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-23 Thread Barry Warsaw

On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Bill Catambay wrote:

If by send a message, you mean email a message to the normal foo- 
list email address, then I'm back to square one (i.e., it will never  
reach anyone on the list because of the aliases being whacked).


Honestly, I don't see Mailman doing anything about this.  If the MTA  
configuration is broken, you'll have to find other ways to communicate  
with your users until this is fixed.


-Barry



PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org

Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Adam McGreggor
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:55:31AM -0800, Bill Catambay wrote:
 Given my current situation (as rare as this situation may be), I have 
 come to realize that an emergency broadcast feature would be an 
 indispensable tool to have right now.  Since my host made the alias 
 change on my mailing list, but did not create the MX record for the 
 new email, it is currently impossible to post to our mailing list via 
 email.  

Fall back to A record(s)?

 I can't even tell people why the list isn't working.

*spit* if you feel you must, and can access the web-interface, why not
pull a list of subscribers, and blindly mail all of them. 

 With an emergency broadcast feature on the website (a way to send a 
 message to the list using the Mailman mailing list admin page), I 
 could at least get word to everyone that the mailing list will be 
 down until Monday.

Although if there are no DNS records for the list, MTAs will
probably reject your pseudo-list mail as part of their checks: so
whilst the mail may send, it won't necessarily be received.

I'd think using competent service providers, with prompt fix-times
would be more useful.


-- 
``Any person who knowingly causes a nuclear weapon test explosion
  or any other nuclear explosion is guilty of an offence''
  (Nuclear Explosions Act, 1998)
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Mark Sapiro
Bill Catambay wrote:

Given my current situation (as rare as this situation may be), I have 
come to realize that an emergency broadcast feature would be an 
indispensable tool to have right now.  Since my host made the alias 
change on my mailing list, but did not create the MX record for the 
new email, it is currently impossible to post to our mailing list via 
email.  I can't even tell people why the list isn't working.


I think you misunderstood my prior post. The issue has nothing directly
to do with MX records. The problem (I think) is the MX records for the
domain (DNS records are for domains, not email addresses) point to
servers that apparently have not been configured to relay the
foo-list-mod local address to the Mailman server. This is a MTA
configuration issue on the MX MTAs, not a DNS issue.


With an emergency broadcast feature on the website (a way to send a 
message to the list using the Mailman mailing list admin page), I 
could at least get word to everyone that the mailing list will be 
down until Monday.


This could be done with bin/inject on the Mailman server to inject a
message directly into Mailman's in/ queue bypassing the MTA, but you
don't have the required access. Since you don't have the required
access, I do see the need in your case, but this won't happen before
MM3 if then.

You could do as Adam McGreggor suggests and just send one or more BCC
type emails to the subscribers. See http://wiki.list.org/x/aYA9.

-- 
Mark Sapiro m...@msapiro.netThe highway is for gamblers,
San Francisco Bay Area, Californiabetter use your sense - B. Dylan

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Brad Knowles
On Nov 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
 This could be done with bin/inject on the Mailman server to inject a
 message directly into Mailman's in/ queue bypassing the MTA, but you
 don't have the required access. Since you don't have the required
 access, I do see the need in your case, but this won't happen before
 MM3 if then.

We can repeat the mantra -- Mailman was *NEVER* designed to be used in a 
Service Provider environment, especially not with multiple customers who may 
have very different needs, and most especially not when the Service Provider in 
question doesn't actually provide any of the necessary support to go along with 
the software.

If I could shoot every single service provider who just threw up whatever kind 
of crap they thought they could make stick and make a point of avoiding all the 
necessary support, there would be many, many fewer crappy providers in this 
world.


At the very least, you should find a different provider where they actually 
give you the support you require.

--
Brad Knowles bradknow...@shub-internet.org
LinkedIn Profile: http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Bill Catambay
The weekend crew at my ISP are general tech support (i.e., they 
really only handle internet connection issues).  My ISP does have an 
Operations group which usually are pretty knowledgeable, but I they 
simply aren't working on the weekend.


For what it's worth, they are the best ISP I have had in 20 years 
(and I've been through a few).  They are rated #1 in customer support 
in the Bay Area for a reason, and for that reason I would never find 
a new ISP.  I'm still hopeful that they can get me through the 
Mailman customization I am requesting.


When I used Autoshare listserver software, it ran on my home server 
(a Mac), and I never had to rely on anyone for support (handled 
everything myself).  Unfortunately, that software has not been 
updated in over 10 years and is no longer supported (there isn't even 
a version that runs on Mac OS X, only a classic version).  I noticed 
my ISP offered mailing lists (using Mailman), and I made the move 
this year to migrate all my lists.


Bill

At 2:35 PM -0600 on 11/22/09, Brad Knowles wrote:


We can repeat the mantra -- Mailman was *NEVER* designed to be used 
in a Service Provider environment, especially not with multiple 
customers who may have very different needs, and most especially not 
when the Service Provider in question doesn't actually provide any 
of the necessary support to go along with the software.


If I could shoot every single service provider who just threw up 
whatever kind of crap they thought they could make stick and make a 
point of avoiding all the necessary support, there would be many, 
many fewer crappy providers in this world.



At the very least, you should find a different provider where they 
actually give you the support you require.



--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Larry Stone
On 11/22/09 2:53 PM, Bill Catambay at and...@excaliburworld.com wrote:

 When I used Autoshare listserver software, it ran on my home server
 (a Mac), and I never had to rely on anyone for support (handled
 everything myself).  Unfortunately, that software has not been
 updated in over 10 years and is no longer supported (there isn't even
 a version that runs on Mac OS X, only a classic version).  I noticed
 my ISP offered mailing lists (using Mailman), and I made the move
 this year to migrate all my lists.

Assuming you can still run servers at home with your ISP, you can run
Mailman on Max OS X. While Apple provides a modified version with OS X
Server, it is easy to install from source on OS X client and instructions to
do so can be found in the Archived.

I am currently running Mailman 2.1.12 on Leopard (on a PPC iMac not that
that will make any difference).
 
-- 
Larry Stone
lston...@stonejongleux.com
http://www.stonejongleux.com/


--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread LuKreme
On 22-Nov-2009, at 13:53, Bill Catambay wrote:
 When I used Autoshare listserver software, it ran on my home server (a Mac), 
 and I never had to rely on anyone for support (handled everything myself).  
 Unfortunately, that software has not been updated in over 10 years and is no 
 longer supported (there isn't even a version that runs on Mac OS X, only a 
 classic version).  I noticed my ISP offered mailing lists (using Mailman), 
 and I made the move this year to migrate all my list


Run mailman on your OS X machine. Setup postfix on your OS X machine to relay 
via your ISP.

There you go, no muss, no fuss, and no relying on anyone else.

-- 
I thought that they were angels, but to my surprise, we climbed
aboard their starship, we headed for the skies.

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Sales at Just Brits



On Nov 22, 2009, at 9:36 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote:


 This could be done with bin/inject on the Mailman server to inject a
 message directly into Mailman's in/ queue bypassing the MTA, but you
 don't have the required access. Since you don't have the required
 access, I do see the need in your case, but this won't happen before
 MM3 if then.
  


We can repeat the mantra -- Mailman was *NEVER* designed to be used in a 
Service Provider environment, especially not with multiple customers who may 
have very different needs, and most especially not when the Service Provider in 
question doesn't actually provide any of the necessary support to go along with 
the software.

If I could shoot every single service provider who just threw up whatever kind 
of crap they thought they could make stick and make a point of avoiding all the 
necessary support, there would be many, many fewer crappy providers in this 
world.


At the very least, you should find a different provider where they actually 
give you the support you require.

--
Brad Knowles bradknow...@shub-internet.org
LinkedIn Profile: http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu

--




And I would suspect Brad, that would include most [if not all] CPanel
installs.  I've had three ISPs WITH CP and the CP version of MM.
NONE of the ISP Tech 'levels' know [and apparently do NOT care]
next to nothing about MM.

In a couple on instances I have HAD to tell Bluehost Level 3 Tech
what to do THANKS to MM-users Listers [from reading their probs]
with the inputs of Mark being the Godsend VBG !!!

Ed





















































































































































































--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Gadi Evron

Brad Knowles wrote:

At the very least, you should find a different provider where they actually 
give you the support you require.


Brad, crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful feature?

I remember a few occasion when I needed to grab the subscribers list and
email everyone personally. Doing it from the main interface could be
useful as an announcement feature, although I am unsure if it fits
with what the vision of mailman is.




--
Brad Knowles bradknow...@shub-internet.org
LinkedIn Profile: http://tinyurl.com/y8kpxu

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/ge%40linuxbox.org




--
Gadi Evron,
g...@linuxbox.org.

Blog: http://gevron.livejournal.com/

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread LuKreme
On 22-Nov-2009, at 17:14, Gadi Evron wrote:
 Brad, crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful feature?

It could be useful in a very narrow set of circumstances. the question is, is 
it worth putting resources into such a feature for those very few times this 
would be useful?

My sense is that getting the list of users and sending a Bcc to them is a 
workable solution, but I'm not tied to that position.

-- 
If I were willing to change my morals for convenience or financial gain,
we wouldn't be arguing, because I'd already *be* a Republican. 
-- Wil Shipley

--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org


Re: [Mailman-Users] Feature request: Emergency Broadcast

2009-11-22 Thread Terri Oda

LuKreme wrote:

On 22-Nov-2009, at 17:14, Gadi Evron wrote:

Brad, crappy providers aside, do you think this might be a useful feature?


It could be useful in a very narrow set of circumstances. the question is, is 
it worth putting resources into such a feature for those very few times this 
would be useful?

My sense is that getting the list of users and sending a Bcc to them is a 
workable solution, but I'm not tied to that position.


I'm going to go with useful, but not useful enough to put major 
resources into implementing


Maybe a nice in-between solution would be making sure the 
FAQ/Documentation had an entry saying if you need to get an emergency 
message out and Mailman is not working, here's how to get the whole 
subscriber list and send a Bcc'ed mail  Anyone want to volunteer to 
stick that in the wiki so people can find it in the future?


(Or just write up a quick definition and email me, and I can stick it in 
the wiki in the appropriate place.)


 Terri
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users
Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3
Security Policy: http://wiki.list.org/x/QIA9
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailman-users%40python.org/
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/mailman-users/archive%40jab.org