Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

[Brandon Long via mailop]

One question I'd ask for submission servers, if your expected use case is
mail clients, is whether they even support the concept of partial success.

I don't think any support a real ux for it, but maybe some will keep a
scoreboard of successful recipients and keep retrying the message with the
other ones... But even that seems likely to be a bad user experience.

For submission, I'd probably err on the side of just accepting all of the
rcpt to commands,and then make a judgement at DATA time.  And yes the rfc
doesn't specify any 4xx responses for data, and the submission rfc has even
less information.

If your submission server is not user clients but say input to an esp, and
so more individualized programs wanting more specific info, maybe per rcpt
makes sense.

I'm not in front of our code to take a look at what our code is for this,
though.

Brandon


On Sep 11, 2017 5:30 PM, "Luis E. Muñoz via mailop" 
wrote:

Over the years I've seen rate limiting responses as 421 and 451 (with the
first being the most frequent). Is there a consensus in what the correct
code should be?

I'm going through RFC-5821 and none of the codes mentioned there seem to be
a perfect match to "hitting a rate limit for an authenticated user" in my
submission servers.

Given the above, I'm leaning towards using 421, returned after each and
every MAIL TO command.

Thanks in advance.

-lem

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

[Grant Taylor via mailop]

On 09/11/2017 06:52 PM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
Indeed, I would like the sender to know right away. In my use case I 
intend to place this on a MSA, so I would expect to see few if any mail 
servers -- but in any event it's good to consider this case.


I agree that MUAs will ideally show the error to the end user.  However 
I would not count on such happening.


I could see how someone could configure their MTA to authenticate to 
your MSA as a smart host.  -  This might even be proper in this situation.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

[Grant Taylor via mailop]

On 09/11/2017 06:22 PM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
I'm going through RFC-5821 and none of the codes mentioned there seem to 
be a perfect match to "hitting a rate limit for an authenticated user" 
in my submission servers.


Are you wanting to rate limit incoming email being delivered to local users?

Or are you wanting to limit (compromised?) users relaying email out to 
the world through your server?


Given the above, I'm leaning towards using 421, returned after each and 
every MAIL TO command.


Copying the contents from RFC 5321 for convenience.

421   Service not available, closing transmission channel (This 
may be a reply to any command if the service knows it must shut down)


450  Requested mail action not taken: mailbox unavailable (e.g., mailbox 
busy or temporarily blocked for policy reasons)


451  Requested action aborted: local error in processing

I would expect that 421 would end up closing the TCP connection, thus 
not something issues in response to multiple successive RCPT TO commands.


451 (and the other 45x errors) seem to be related to local recipients. 
-  Thus I probably wouldn't use 451 if the recipient is not local.


If I wasn't going to shut down the TCP connection, I'd be inclined to 
return a 450.  The requested action is being blocked (but the sender is 
free to try again) and you are temporarily blocking for policy reasons.



Thanks in advance.


Just my $0.02 worth.  Take it with some slat.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

[Luis E. Muñoz via mailop]

On 11 Sep 2017, at 17:38, Michael Peddemors wrote:


Do you really want them to retry in this situation?


This is a very good question. I think the answer depends on who will I 
be showing the error to. If I'm on my laptop happily sending emails out 
it really doesn't matter much I think, as the MUA will probably display 
a dialog to the user and leave the message in some temporary folder.


Compromised users/rate limiter users, you probably aren't sure which 
but if you do not want them to send any more while they are rate 
limited, you probably should set a permanent error.


Yes, this makes all the sense in the world.

Otherwise you might find a back load of messages in the person's 
outgoing server might trigger another rate limiting event right away.


Also, you probably want the sender to know right away, correct?


Indeed, I would like the sender to know right away. In my use case I 
intend to place this on a MSA, so I would expect to see few if any mail 
servers -- but in any event it's good to consider this case.


Best regards

-lem
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Best rate limiting response?

[Michael Peddemors]

Do you really want them to retry in this situation?

Compromised users/rate limiter users, you probably aren't sure which but 
if you do not want them to send any more while they are rate limited, 
you probably should set a permanent error.


Otherwise you might find a back load of messages in the person's 
outgoing server might trigger another rate limiting event right away.


Also, you probably want the sender to know right away, correct?

We send a 554 error in those cases..



On 17-09-11 05:22 PM, Luis E. Muñoz via mailop wrote:
Over the years I've seen rate limiting responses as 421 and 451 (with 
the first being the most frequent). Is there a consensus in what the 
correct code should be?


I'm going through RFC-5821 and none of the codes mentioned there seem to 
be a perfect match to "hitting a rate limit for an authenticated user" 
in my submission servers.


Given the above, I'm leaning towards using 421, returned after each and 
every MAIL TO command.


Thanks in advance.

-lem



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop






--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."

Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic

A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Best rate limiting response?

[Luis E. Muñoz via mailop]

Over the years I've seen rate limiting responses as 421 and 451 (with 
the first being the most frequent). Is there a consensus in what the 
correct code should be?


I'm going through RFC-5821 and none of the codes mentioned there seem to 
be a perfect match to "hitting a rate limit for an authenticated user" 
in my submission servers.


Given the above, I'm leaning towards using 421, returned after each and 
every MAIL TO command.


Thanks in advance.

-lem___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Contact at Naver

[Marc Bradshaw via mailop]

Hi All,

I am looking for a contact at naver.com, attempts to contact via abuse
and postmaster addresses have failed. Does anyone know a suitable person
to contact?
--
 
  Marc Bradshaw - Deliverability/Abuse at FastMail
  m...@fastmailteam.com | @marcbradshaw[1]



Links:

  1. https://twitter.com/marcbradshaw
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Brandon Long via mailop]

We're aware of the issue and investigating.

Thanks for the notice.

Brandon

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Todd Herr  wrote:

> No apology necessary, Matt; I was more interested in sanity checking what
> we were seeing.
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Matt Gilbert <
> matthew.gilb...@mailchimp.com> wrote:
>
>> That’s correct Todd, this hasn’t impacted our actual delivery at all that
>> we can see. It appears to be only in what postmaster tools is displaying,
>> rather than the actual reputation. Sorry for not being clearer on that
>> point in my initial response.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt Gilbert
>> - Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
>> - delivery.mailchimp.com
>>
>> On September 11, 2017 at 12:28:03 PM, Todd Herr (toddmh...@gmail.com)
>> wrote:
>>
>> When you say "impacting 100% of our IPs as well" are you really seeing an
>> impact on delivery, or are you just seeing likely erroneous data displayed
>> in Google's Postmaster Tools.
>>
>> We're seeing the same data as everyone else, but we haven't yet seen that
>> there's been a real impact on delivery or engagement.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Matt Gilbert <
>> matthew.gilb...@mailchimp.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re seeing
>>> 100% bad reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any updates about
>>> this will be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt Gilbert
>>> - Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
>>> - delivery.mailchimp.com
>>>
>>> On September 11, 2017 at 5:00:07 AM, ewald kessler | webpower (
>>> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl) wrote:
>>>
>>> Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad
>>> reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that
>>> date at all.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
>>> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
>>> t: +31 342 423 262 <+31%20342%20423%20262>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:
>>>
 Hi Vaibhav,

 I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
 A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.

 All of them have always been green before.

 I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
 "ideas" about what is green or red).

 Stefano

 --
 Stefano Bagnara
 Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
 VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs


 On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
 > Hey,
 >
 > I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for
 9th
 > Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
 >
 > Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
 >
 > --Vaibhav

 ___
 mailop mailing list
 mailop@mailop.org
 https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

>>>
>>> ___
>>> mailop mailing list
>>> mailop@mailop.org
>>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> mailop mailing list
>>> mailop@mailop.org
>>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Todd
>> 703.220.4153 <(703)%20220-4153>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Todd
> 703.220.4153 <(703)%20220-4153>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Todd Herr]

No apology necessary, Matt; I was more interested in sanity checking what
we were seeing.

Thanks for the reply.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Matt Gilbert <
matthew.gilb...@mailchimp.com> wrote:

> That’s correct Todd, this hasn’t impacted our actual delivery at all that
> we can see. It appears to be only in what postmaster tools is displaying,
> rather than the actual reputation. Sorry for not being clearer on that
> point in my initial response.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Gilbert
> - Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
> - delivery.mailchimp.com
>
> On September 11, 2017 at 12:28:03 PM, Todd Herr (toddmh...@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> When you say "impacting 100% of our IPs as well" are you really seeing an
> impact on delivery, or are you just seeing likely erroneous data displayed
> in Google's Postmaster Tools.
>
> We're seeing the same data as everyone else, but we haven't yet seen that
> there's been a real impact on delivery or engagement.
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Matt Gilbert <
> matthew.gilb...@mailchimp.com> wrote:
>
>> This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re seeing
>> 100% bad reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any updates about
>> this will be appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt Gilbert
>> - Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
>> - delivery.mailchimp.com
>>
>> On September 11, 2017 at 5:00:07 AM, ewald kessler | webpower (
>> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl) wrote:
>>
>> Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad
>> reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that
>> date at all.
>>
>> --
>> Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
>> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
>> t: +31 342 423 262 <+31%20342%20423%20262>
>>
>>
>> On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>>
>>> I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
>>> A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.
>>>
>>> All of them have always been green before.
>>>
>>> I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
>>> "ideas" about what is green or red).
>>>
>>> Stefano
>>>
>>> --
>>> Stefano Bagnara
>>> Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
>>> VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
>>> > Hey,
>>> >
>>> > I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for
>>> 9th
>>> > Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
>>> >
>>> > Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
>>> >
>>> > --Vaibhav
>>>
>>> ___
>>> mailop mailing list
>>> mailop@mailop.org
>>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Todd
> 703.220.4153 <(703)%20220-4153>
>
>


-- 
Todd
703.220.4153
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Luis E. Muñoz via mailop]

On 11 Sep 2017, at 9:16, Matt Gilbert wrote:

This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re 
seeing 100% bad reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any 
updates about this will be appreciated.


+1

All IPs with traffic in the last 24 hours for us. IPs that were 
quiescent are showing no data.


Best regards

-lem
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Matt Gilbert]

That’s correct Todd, this hasn’t impacted our actual delivery at all that we 
can see. It appears to be only in what postmaster tools is displaying, rather 
than the actual reputation. Sorry for not being clearer on that point in my 
initial response.

Thanks,
Matt Gilbert
- Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
- delivery.mailchimp.com

On September 11, 2017 at 12:28:03 PM, Todd Herr (toddmh...@gmail.com) wrote:

When you say "impacting 100% of our IPs as well" are you really seeing an 
impact on delivery, or are you just seeing likely erroneous data displayed in 
Google's Postmaster Tools.

We're seeing the same data as everyone else, but we haven't yet seen that 
there's been a real impact on delivery or engagement.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Matt Gilbert  
wrote:
This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re seeing 100% bad 
reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any updates about this will be 
appreciated.

Thanks,
Matt Gilbert
- Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
- delivery.mailchimp.com

On September 11, 2017 at 5:00:07 AM, ewald kessler | webpower 
(ewald.kess...@webpower.nl) wrote:

Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad 
reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that date at 
all.

--
Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
t: +31 342 423 262


On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,

I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.

All of them have always been green before.

I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
"ideas" about what is green or red).

Stefano

--
Stefano Bagnara
Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs


On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th
> Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
>
> Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
>
> --Vaibhav

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop




--
Todd
703.220.4153___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Todd Herr]

When you say "impacting 100% of our IPs as well" are you really seeing an
impact on delivery, or are you just seeing likely erroneous data displayed
in Google's Postmaster Tools.

We're seeing the same data as everyone else, but we haven't yet seen that
there's been a real impact on delivery or engagement.

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Matt Gilbert <
matthew.gilb...@mailchimp.com> wrote:

> This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re seeing
> 100% bad reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any updates about
> this will be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt Gilbert
> - Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
> - delivery.mailchimp.com
>
> On September 11, 2017 at 5:00:07 AM, ewald kessler | webpower (
> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl) wrote:
>
> Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad
> reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that
> date at all.
>
> --
> Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
> t: +31 342 423 262 <+31%20342%20423%20262>
>
>
> On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>
>> I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
>> A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.
>>
>> All of them have always been green before.
>>
>> I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
>> "ideas" about what is green or red).
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>> --
>> Stefano Bagnara
>> Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
>> VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs
>>
>>
>> On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for
>> 9th
>> > Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
>> >
>> > Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
>> >
>> > --Vaibhav
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>


-- 
Todd
703.220.4153
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Matt Gilbert]

This issue looks to be impacting 100% of our IPs as well. We’re seeing 100% bad 
reputation since 9/9 on all of our DKIM domains. Any updates about this will be 
appreciated.

Thanks,
Matt Gilbert
- Deliverability Engineer, MailChimp
- delivery.mailchimp.com

On September 11, 2017 at 5:00:07 AM, ewald kessler | webpower 
(ewald.kess...@webpower.nl) wrote:

Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad 
reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that date at 
all.

--
Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
t: +31 342 423 262


On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:
Hi Vaibhav,

I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.

All of them have always been green before.

I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
"ideas" about what is green or red).

Stefano

--
Stefano Bagnara
Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs


On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th
> Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
>
> Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
>
> --Vaibhav

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

[Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl]

Il 11/09/2017 17:48, Brandon Long via mailop ha scritto:
I know we've had false positives in our PDF scanners before, if you can 
make an example available by url to me, I can file a bug for our av folks.


Brandon

On Sep 11, 2017 4:03 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll" > wrote:



On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 12:27 +0200, Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl wrote:


Ok, the email is here
http://www.ristrutturami.eu/email_with_pdf.zip
Thank's
--
TosNet.it   


Roberto Tagliaferri

Responsabile Progettazione & Produzione
TosNet s.r.l. - Internet Service Provider
*Office*:   +39 0574 875 100
*Mobile*:   +39 329 591 3899
*Fax*:  +39 0574 875 199
*Email*:r.tagliafe...@tosnet.it 
*Web*:  www.tosnet.it 
*Skype*:ilrobyt 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

[Brandon Long via mailop]

I know we've had false positives in our PDF scanners before, if you can
make an example available by url to me, I can file a bug for our av folks.

Brandon

On Sep 11, 2017 4:03 AM, "Ken O'Driscoll"  wrote:

>
> On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 12:27 +0200, Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl wrote:
> > I scan the files in virustotal but nothing.
>
> PDFs with forms that submit to external sources, link to suspect sites etc.
> may not be flagged by traditional virus scanners however they can still
> pose a security risk and are flagged as such by more specialist filters.
>
> > Where's the problem?
>
> It's difficult to even speculate without seeing a sample of the full email
> (including all headers) and the PDF file.
>
> Ken.
>
> --
> Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email
> t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com
>
> Need to understand deliverability? Now there's a book:
> www.wemonitoremail.com/book
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Nick Schafer]

I'm seeing the same so it definitely appears to be an issue on Google's
side.

Nick Schafer
Technical Account Manager, Mailgun 
Add me on LinkedIn 

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:57 AM, ewald kessler | webpower <
ewald.kess...@webpower.nl> wrote:

> Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad
> reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that
> date at all.
>
> --
> Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
> ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
> t: +31 342 423 262 <+31%20342%20423%20262>
>
>
> On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:
>
>> Hi Vaibhav,
>>
>> I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
>> A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.
>>
>> All of them have always been green before.
>>
>> I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
>> "ideas" about what is green or red).
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>> --
>> Stefano Bagnara
>> Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
>> VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs
>>
>>
>> On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for
>> 9th
>> > Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
>> >
>> > Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
>> >
>> > --Vaibhav
>>
>> ___
>> mailop mailing list
>> mailop@mailop.org
>> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>>
>
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

[Ken O'Driscoll]

On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 12:27 +0200, Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl wrote:
> I scan the files in virustotal but nothing.

PDFs with forms that submit to external sources, link to suspect sites etc.
may not be flagged by traditional virus scanners however they can still
pose a security risk and are flagged as such by more specialist filters.

> Where's the problem?

It's difficult to even speculate without seeing a sample of the full email
(including all headers) and the PDF file.

Ken.

-- 
Ken O'Driscoll / We Monitor Email
t: +353 1 254 9400 | w: www.wemonitoremail.com

Need to understand deliverability? Now there's a book:
www.wemonitoremail.com/book

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] problem with gmail and pdf

[Roberto Tagliaferri - Tosnet srl]

Hi, i've some script that send email with a pdf (created with html2pdf libray).

Some days ago all the emails ware rejected with this error:

Reporting-MTA: dns; dns.tosnet.it
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 14A592E01BE
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822;i...@ristrutturami.eu
Arrival-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:46:43 +0200 (CEST)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; x...@gmail.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.7.0
Remote-MTA: dns; gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 552-5.7.0 This message was blocked because its content
presents a potential 552-5.7.0 security issue. Please visit 552-5.7.0
https://support.google.com/mail/?p=BlockedMessage  to review our 552 5.7.0
message content and attachment content guidelines. 186si5217840wmp.233 -
gsmtp

I scan the files in virustotal but nothing.

Where's the problem?

--
TosNet.it   


Roberto Tagliaferri

Responsabile Progettazione & Produzione
TosNet s.r.l. - Internet Service Provider
*Office*:   +39 0574 875 100
*Mobile*:   +39 329 591 3899
*Fax*:  +39 0574 875 199
*Email*:r.tagliafe...@tosnet.it 
*Web*:  www.tosnet.it 
*Skype*:ilrobyt 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[ewald kessler | webpower]

Clearly this is an issue on the Google side. Where all IP's have a bad
reputation for September 9, there is no domain reputation data for that
date at all.

--
Deliverability & Abuse Management, www.webpower-group.com
ewald.kess...@webpower.nl
t: +31 342 423 262


On 11 September 2017 at 10:24, Stefano Bagnara  wrote:

> Hi Vaibhav,
>
> I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
> A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.
>
> All of them have always been green before.
>
> I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
> "ideas" about what is green or red).
>
> Stefano
>
> --
> Stefano Bagnara
> Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
> VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs
>
>
> On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th
> > Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
> >
> > Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
> >
> > --Vaibhav
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Stefano Bagnara]

Hi Vaibhav,

I see the same for 2 DKIM domains (each one with a dozen IP.. all red).
A third domain doesn't have data for 9 sept yet.

All of them have always been green before.

I guess it is a Google issue (or they drastically changed their
"ideas" about what is green or red).

Stefano

--
Stefano Bagnara
Apache James/jDKIM/jSPF
VOXmail/Mosaico.io/VoidLabs


On 11 September 2017 at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th
> Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
>
> Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.
>
> --Vaibhav

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Maarten Oelering]

We can confirm that we see the same on other accounts. Everything is red on the 
9th.

Maarten Oelering
Postmastery

> On 11 Sep 2017, at 09:39, Vaibhav  wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th 
> Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?
> 
> Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end. 
> 
> --Vaibhav
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Re: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Or you have a new customer, or a new list, that has issues.  Considered that 
possibility?

 

From: mailop  on behalf of Vaibhav 

Date: Monday, 11 September 2017 at 1:22 PM
To: 
Subject: [mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

 

I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th Sept 
report. Does anyone observed the same ?

Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end. 

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

[mailop] Reg. Gmail Postmaster IP issue

[Vaibhav]

Hey,

I have observed that Gmail Postmaster showing all IP in BAD state for 9th
Sept report. Does anyone observed the same ?

Seems like issue from Gmail Postmaster end.

--Vaibhav
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop