Re: [mailop] Massive bounce report campaign

2022-11-29 Thread Dan Malm via mailop

On 2022-11-23 10:39, Cyril - ImprovMX via mailop wrote:
Blocking the recipient had the effect that we don't accept emails for 
them anymore, so anyone sending an email via ImprovMX to one of their 
domain will have a 5xx response on the RCPT command.
That was our initial strategy, the default when we block an account: we 
let the sender know the email wasn't accepted.


But in this case, I realized one thing: It's possible that the sender 
could retry, increasing the number of connections at every new bounce. 
So I've updated the policy on this specific account to accept but 
silently drop any emails for them.


Silently dropping the mails seems like a bad strategy to me. That would 
mean you accept DATA and waste your bandwidth and processing power on 
those. If there was no reaction on you returning a 5XX then my strategy 
would be to return a 4XX. If the 70K connections per minute actually 
translates to 70K unique emails per minute then a defer queue rising by 
70K per minute should be at a scale that I expect gets noticed even by 
Microsoft.


--
BR/Mvh. Dan Malm, Systems Engineer, One.com


OpenPGP_0x328258BA5141B0F4.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Giant Yahoo thread headers

2022-11-29 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that WIlliam Fisher via mailop  said:
>What are other folks doing with the massive thread headers
>from yahoo?

Assuming you mean the giant junk headers they add, the answer is
nothing, of course. They've been there for ages, you just ignore them.

R's,
John
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Giant Yahoo thread headers

2022-11-29 Thread Benny Pedersen via mailop

WIlliam Fisher via mailop skrev den 2022-11-29 23:11:

What are other folks doing with the massive thread headers
from yahoo?


masive in what way ?

long lines ?

or many long lines ?

fixing it would break threads imho


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


[mailop] Giant Yahoo thread headers

2022-11-29 Thread WIlliam Fisher via mailop

What are other folks doing with the massive thread headers
from yahoo?



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] How to delegate DMARC reporting to third-party providers for inbound mails

2022-11-29 Thread Alan Hodgson via mailop
On Tue, 2022-11-29 at 09:15 -0500, Muyeed Ali via mailop wrote:

> -- Got it. Wanted to avoid a self-managed service. But if any
> third-party solution does not work, will try to integrate rspamd
> with Postfix and keep in mind the loop-y behavior.

opendmarc is an easy integration and just needs a MySQL database and
a cron job to send reports off its own logs.

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Gmail and emojis

2022-11-29 Thread Allen Kevorkov via mailop
 Hey Brandon,
I don't think it pissed anyone off, at least not to the point that the message 
should have been blocked and bounced entirely. They re-sent the same message 
and subject without the emoji and it delivered without a problem with expected 
engagement metrics. Seemed like a pretty harsh spam filter overreaction to an 
emoji
Allen


On Monday, November 28, 2022 at 05:56:34 PM EST, Brandon Long via mailop 
 wrote:  
 
 Huh, wonder if that got caught in an existing spam rule, an ML inferred rule, 
or just that quickly pissed off users to mark it as spam?
Brandon
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 8:27 AM Allen Kevorkov via mailop  
wrote:

Happy Cyber Monday, ya'll.
Not sure who needs to hear this, but sender with high domain / IP rep added a 
checkmark emoji ✅ to their From name and Gmail blocked it entirely as 
unsolicited mail... on Black Friday. Gmail is 70% of their customer list... I 
mean, I get it, probably not the wisest move, but...
Hope this helps someone someday.

~ Allen K___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
  ___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] How to delegate DMARC reporting to third-party providers for inbound mails

2022-11-29 Thread Muyeed Ali via mailop
Hi Alessandro,
What software do you run on port 25?
-- I currently use postfix as my MTA.

I don't know on any third party doing that job.  Indeed, for them to send
DMARC reports, you'd need to provide them with your authentication results
per sending IP number, which is the data contained in DMARC reports. You
probably have to delegate email authentication to a third party as well.
-- I understand that. Since turning on DMARC reporting, I have
received some reports for emails sent to a few servers supporting DMARC
reporting but the reports came from Google, Microsoft, Fastmail, etc. I was
actually looking to replicate this scenario but have no idea how to.

Hi Tobias,
What works well for me is rspamd [1], but there is also a tool for postfix
(iirc; maybe somebody else can weigh in there). Similarly, there should be
something for TLS-RPT.
-- Got it. Wanted to avoid a self-managed service. But if any third-party
solution does not work, will try to integrate rspamd with Postfix and keep
in mind the loop-y behavior.

Thanks.




On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 8:36 AM Tobias Fiebig via mailop 
wrote:

> Heho,
> As said by Alessandro; You will have to make the tool you are currently
> using for validating DKIM/SPF -> DMARC generate and send the reports.
>
> What works well for me is rspamd [1], but there is also a tool for postfix
> (iirc; maybe somebody else can weigh in there). Similarly, there should be
> something for TLS-RPT.
>
> What you should keep in mind when setting this up, though, is that you can
> actually run into rather loop-y behavior if you originate your dmarc
> reports from a domain that requests reports itself (best practice would be
> originating from a subdomain not requesting reports; you could also exclude
> originating reports for that domain, at least with rspamd):
> - You get a mail
> - You sent a report
> - Other party gets a mail (the report)
> - Other party sends out report (because they got a mail from you)
> - You get a mail...
>
> For my setup, that is something I still plan to fix. :-|
>
> With best regards,
> Tobias
>
> [1] https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html
>
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
>
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] How to delegate DMARC reporting to third-party providers for inbound mails

2022-11-29 Thread Tobias Fiebig via mailop
Heho,
As said by Alessandro; You will have to make the tool you are currently using 
for validating DKIM/SPF -> DMARC generate and send the reports.

What works well for me is rspamd [1], but there is also a tool for postfix 
(iirc; maybe somebody else can weigh in there). Similarly, there should be 
something for TLS-RPT.

What you should keep in mind when setting this up, though, is that you can 
actually run into rather loop-y behavior if you originate your dmarc reports 
from a domain that requests reports itself (best practice would be originating 
from a subdomain not requesting reports; you could also exclude originating 
reports for that domain, at least with rspamd):
- You get a mail
- You sent a report
- Other party gets a mail (the report)
- Other party sends out report (because they got a mail from you)
- You get a mail...

For my setup, that is something I still plan to fix. :-|

With best regards,
Tobias

[1] https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/dmarc.html

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] How to delegate DMARC reporting to third-party providers for inbound mails

2022-11-29 Thread Alessandro Vesely via mailop

Hi Muyeed,

On Tue 29/Nov/2022 04:30:28 +0100 Muyeed Ali via mailop wrote:


I have a self-managed SMTP server and want to make my domain DMARC compliant. I 
have added a DMARC record to my domain and also want to be able to send DMARC 
reports if a sending entity asks for one.



What software do you run on port 25?  In particular, DMARC reporting hinges on 
the results of email authentication, that is DKIM and SPF evaluation on 
received messages.  That is usually performed by a mail filter combined with 
the MTA software.



Which third-party services may I refer to that can handle the DMARC reporting 
task for me? I know Google, Microsoft, and some other providers do this but 
could not find any appropriate link on how to use these providers to 
send reports on my behalf.



I don't know on any third party doing that job.  Indeed, for them to send DMARC 
reports, you'd need to provide them with your authentication results per 
sending IP number, which is the data contained in DMARC reports.



Note that I want to enable DMARC reporting for inbound emails (want to send 
DMARC reports to those who want them) via a third-party provider. For outbound 
emails, I have added a subdomain that can receive reports, so, no worries there.


I also don't want to set up my own reporting software, that just adds up to the 
hassle.



You probably have to delegate email authentication to a third party as well. 
The party that filters your incoming messages —verifying DKIM signatures and 
SPF values before forwarding to your server— is the one that can do DMARC 
reporting for you.



Best
Ale
--






___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop