Re: [mailop] [E] Yahoo placement feeds?
Kyle? Or optipub? If you send an email to the support address listed on the website (which I think you did several times) you will get an automatic response telling you more. I suggest actually reading through that. On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 21:18 Opti Pub via mailop wrote: > > > Is anybody from Yahoo on here that can help, or does anybody have any > advice on how to get access? > ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?
On Fri, 9 Jun 2023, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: On 09.06.2023 at 09:36 Alessandro Vesely via mailop wrote: RFC 6652 provides for setting ra= and rr= tags, which are themselves flagged as errors by most SPF checking sites... Does someone use those SPF tags or has any practical experience with them and ever received some reports? Or do those tags only exist in theory, like ruf in DMARC records? I am a one user domain; I get dmarc.rua reports most days. I received six dmarc.ruf reports in response to a message I sent to the enterprise firefox users list in April, and seventeen ruf reports so far this year. dmarc.ruf reports are not common, but on a busy site there will be enough to need to have a policy for them. I hadn't heard of the SPF tags before Friday. -- Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK and...@aitchison.me.uk ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
Re: [mailop] SPF: Does include: a host without TXT entry invalidate the whole SPF entry?
On Fri 09/Jun/2023 19:14:31 +0200 Slavko via mailop wrote: Dňa 9. júna 2023 16:07:28 UTC používateľ Andrew C Aitchison via mailop napísal: I asked one of the checker websites about that and recieved the reply: RFC6652 is a proposed standard from 2012, but was replaced by DMARC in 2015. DMARC reports on both SPF and DKIM. But that is their point of view, as RFC 6652 doesn't seem to be marked as obsolete or so... Actually, DMARC failure reports (aka forensic reports) include just DMARC data; that is, whether it was DKIM or SPF which failed, along with relevant identifiers and their alignment. RFC 7489 adds: Note that a failure report generator MAY also independently produce an AFRF message for any or all of the underlying authentication methods. IME, few receivers produce failure reports and none of them add the underlying stuff. Best Ale -- ___ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
