Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-15 Thread Mary via mailop

it is typical for shared hosting

but in my case, its useful for splitting different departments of the same 
company



On 15 Oct 2022 18:28:47 -0400 John Levine via mailop  wrote:

> It appears that Mary via mailop  said:
> >
> >I've never heard of SmarterMail server, I use dovecot.
> >
> >Dovecot allows me to setup 100+ domains on the same server, each with its 
> >own certificate, thus always giving a valid TLS connection
> >without any certificate warnings.  
> 
> Does your IMAP server really have 100+ different names?  That seems
> like a lot of effort for little benefit.
> 
> R's,
> John
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-15 Thread Thomas Walter via mailop

Hey John,

On 16.10.22 00:28, John Levine via mailop wrote:

It appears that Mary via mailop  said:


I've never heard of SmarterMail server, I use dovecot.

Dovecot allows me to setup 100+ domains on the same server, each with its own 
certificate, thus always giving a valid TLS connection
without any certificate warnings.


I've just learned that postfix 3.4 allows SNI based certificates…


Does your IMAP server really have 100+ different names?  That seems
like a lot of effort for little benefit.


imap.customer1.example
imap.customer2.example
imap.customer3.example
imap.customer4.example
...

Some day you don't want to explain "please use imap.provider.example to 
avoid certificate warnings" to each customer anymore.


Also they usually want to use their own domain for everything.

Regards,
Thomas

--
Thomas Walter
Datenverarbeitungszentrale

FH Münster
- University of Applied Sciences -
Corrensstr. 25, Raum B 112
48149 Münster

Tel: +49 251 83 64 908
Fax: +49 251 83 64 910
www.fh-muenster.de/dvz/


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-15 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that Grant Taylor via mailop  said:
>So MTA-to-MTA probably doesn't mater much if at all.  

That used to be true but now your life will be easier if your cert's
name matches the MTA's name. That's the name of the mail host, not the
names of the mail domains it handles.

If you are the sort of person who gives his MTA multiple names via
multiple MX'es, it is possible to make the certs work for that but I
wouldn't recommend it.

> However MUA-to-MTA probably does matter.

Yes, the certs for POP, IMAP, and submission better have the right name.

A free Let's Encrypt cert is fine for all of these.

R's,
John

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-15 Thread John Levine via mailop
It appears that Mary via mailop  said:
>
>I've never heard of SmarterMail server, I use dovecot.
>
>Dovecot allows me to setup 100+ domains on the same server, each with its own 
>certificate, thus always giving a valid TLS connection
>without any certificate warnings.

Does your IMAP server really have 100+ different names?  That seems
like a lot of effort for little benefit.

R's,
John
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-14 Thread Grant Taylor via mailop

On 10/14/22 10:41 AM, ml+mailop--- via mailop wrote:
Almost no MTA cares about the certificate content unless explicitly 
configured to do so.


Emphasis on MTA.

I've witnessed Thunderbird, and heard tell of other /MUAs/, caring about 
the CertSubject and AltNames matching the name used to connect to said MTA.


So MTA-to-MTA probably doesn't mater much if at all.  However MUA-to-MTA 
probably does matter.




--
Grant. . . .
unix || die



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-14 Thread Michael Ellis via mailop
Ak ok I see, thanks!

-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of ml+mailop--- via 
mailop
Sent: October 14, 2022 12:42 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Cc: ml+mai...@esmtp.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

"What's the problem you are trying to solve?"

Almost no MTA cares about the certificate content unless explicitly
configured to do so. Some check the names (CertSubject or AltNames),
and some are "misconfigured" to require a cert signed by some
specific CAs.

Testing with just one or two other systems won't tell you much.

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-14 Thread ml+mailop--- via mailop
"What's the problem you are trying to solve?"

Almost no MTA cares about the certificate content unless explicitly
configured to do so. Some check the names (CertSubject or AltNames),
and some are "misconfigured" to require a cert signed by some
specific CAs.

Testing with just one or two other systems won't tell you much.

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-14 Thread Mary via mailop

I've never heard of SmarterMail server, I use dovecot.

Dovecot allows me to setup 100+ domains on the same server, each with its own 
certificate, thus always giving a valid TLS connection without any certificate 
warnings.



On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:56:42 -0400 Michael Ellis via mailop  
wrote:

> Ok this ESP guy is an excellent programmer but a bit lacking in all else.
> 
> Can anyone diagnose his issue? Its not my wheelhouse either?
> 
> Do you know about certificates for mail servers? I’m trying out the 
> SmarterMail server and had some confusion about how to configure secure 
> access. I assumed SmarterMail would allow a certificate per domain but they 
> don’t. Instead they have certificates based on the protocol. I stuck a 
> goolara.com certificate in and then Outlook desktop asked if I wanted to use 
> the certificate when I tried to connect via IMAP SSL (993). I allowed it, but 
> this isn’t something I experienced when using on-line mail servers, so I 
> wonder how they handle secure connections without giving that certificate 
> warning. Do you know?
> 
> Also, the sending side is confusing me some. Google is reporting that the 
> connection was secure and doesn’t give that annoying warning about not being 
> encrypted, but I’m sending for a domain that is different than my certificate 
> so I’m not sure why that is allowed. I have configured my Symphonie software 
> to use STARTTLS and encrypt the connection but I only do it if I’ve received 
> a SSL cert from the customer for that domain. But is that not necessary? Can 
> the connection be secure with any domain’s certificate and still be accepted 
> by the ISPs?
> 
> Any help gratefully accepted
> 
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


[mailop] Certificate Question

2022-10-14 Thread Michael Ellis via mailop
Ok this ESP guy is an excellent programmer but a bit lacking in all else.

Can anyone diagnose his issue? Its not my wheelhouse either?

Do you know about certificates for mail servers? I’m trying out the SmarterMail 
server and had some confusion about how to configure secure access. I assumed 
SmarterMail would allow a certificate per domain but they don’t. Instead they 
have certificates based on the protocol. I stuck a goolara.com certificate in 
and then Outlook desktop asked if I wanted to use the certificate when I tried 
to connect via IMAP SSL (993). I allowed it, but this isn’t something I 
experienced when using on-line mail servers, so I wonder how they handle secure 
connections without giving that certificate warning. Do you know?

Also, the sending side is confusing me some. Google is reporting that the 
connection was secure and doesn’t give that annoying warning about not being 
encrypted, but I’m sending for a domain that is different than my certificate 
so I’m not sure why that is allowed. I have configured my Symphonie software to 
use STARTTLS and encrypt the connection but I only do it if I’ve received a SSL 
cert from the customer for that domain. But is that not necessary? Can the 
connection be secure with any domain’s certificate and still be accepted by the 
ISPs?

Any help gratefully accepted

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop