Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-12-04 Thread Graeme Slogrove via mailop
Correct, 1.1.1.1 is the anycast address that clients use. The resolvers behind 
that anycast address will be part of the listed IP addresses.

Servers will not see the query coming from 1.1.1.1.

Regards,
Graeme Slogrove

-Original Message-
From: mailop  On Behalf Of Jose Morales Velazquez 
via mailop
Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 9:12 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. 
anyone? Brandon?


-
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.
-

I believe they do not add the DNS IP 1.1.1.1 or any other to the list of IPs 
because the list is of access IP addresses used make requests to servers from 
their proxies backends.

Like, on the Cloudflare DNS for your domain you add a hostname record pointing 
to one of your server's IP addresses and enable Cloudflare's proxy on it, then 
Cloudflare will mask your IP address to external queries on their 1.1.1.1 DNS 
server or your domain's assigned DNS server from Cloudflare with one of the 
proxy server they assigned to your record. Now when someone requests that 
hostname they will see the Cloudflare Proxy IP assigned to the hostname and in 
the backend, cloudflare will route the communication thru one of these IP 
addresses on that list of IPs to your servers.

Example: Set firewalls /ACLs to only allow access from these IP addresses to 
your webservers, so that only CLoudflare's proxied records can connect to them.


Sincerely,
Jose


On 12/4/2023 1:53 PM, Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop wrote:
>   Interestingly, 1.1.1.1, which is Cloudflare's famous public DNS
> resolver, is not included in that list of IPv4 addresses:
>
>   IP Ranges | Cloudflare
>   https://www.cloudflare.com/ips/
>
>   Their main reference page (above) doesn't seem to mention it, but I
> wonder if it might be prudent to whitelist it as well (in addition to
> Cloudflare's official list) to ensure smoother operations overall.
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I believe you can enumerate cloudflare IPs via :
>>
>> https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v4
>> https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v6
>>
>> It's likely an overfit situation (not just resolvers), but it's something.
>>
>> -tony
>>
>> On 12/2/23 21:57, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote:
>>> Always happy to help! And wauh, times flies by these days...
>>>
>>> First of all - I completely agree with you, that several things
>>> could be better here ;-).
>>>
>>> Taking the four major ones, the top list, from best to worst, might
>>> be
>>> like:
>>>
>>> 1. OpenDNS
>>> 2. Google
>>> 3. Quad 9/PCH
>>> 4. Cloudflare
>>>
>>> Given your mention of "internal documentation", maybe there could be
>>> something more for you to document, if you haven't already:
>>>
>>> Google does, as mentioned previously, document their resolver
>>> infrastructure on the Web, contrary to many others, but also with a JSON:
>>>
>>> -> API/JSON: https://www.gstatic.com/ipranges/publicdns.json
>>>
>>> OpenDNS is also documenting theirs, and also have PTR on the
>>> outgoing resolver IP, but unfortunately, the PTR **doesn't always**
>>> point to one of their OpenDNS.* domain names, which could be confusing:
>>>
>>> Reaching OpenDNS Copenhagen:
>>> - 146.112.135.70 (r7.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
>>> - 2a04:e4c0:17::73 (r10.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
>>>
>>> Reaching OpenDNS London:
>>> - 208.69.34.73 (m53.lon.opendns.com)
>>> - 2a04:e4c0:10::91 (r3.compute.lon1.edc.strln.net)
>>>
>>> It is however consistent with their locations as retrieved from here:
>>>
>>> -> Web: https://www.opendns.com/data-center-locations/
>>> -> JSON:
>>> https://umbrella-dns-requests.marketops.umbrella.com/api/data-center
>>> -locations
>>>
>>> Currently, it seems very much a hit and miss, mostly miss, when
>>> reaching any IP address with PTR records, through Quad 9. I haven't
>>> ever seen Quad 9 document it like OpenDNS or Google.
>>>
>>> With Cloudflare, I've never see any of their outbound resolver IP
>>> addresses have any PTR records. I haven't ever seen Cloudflare
>>> do

Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-12-04 Thread Jose Morales Velazquez via mailop
I believe they do not add the DNS IP 1.1.1.1 or any other to the list of 
IPs because the list is of access IP addresses used make requests to 
servers from their proxies backends.


Like, on the Cloudflare DNS for your domain you add a hostname record 
pointing to one of your server's IP addresses and enable Cloudflare's 
proxy on it, then Cloudflare will mask your IP address to external 
queries on their 1.1.1.1 DNS server or your domain's assigned DNS server 
from Cloudflare with one of the proxy server they assigned to your 
record. Now when someone requests that hostname they will see the 
Cloudflare Proxy IP assigned to the hostname and in the backend, 
cloudflare will route the communication thru one of these IP addresses 
on that list of IPs to your servers.


Example: Set firewalls /ACLs to only allow access from these IP 
addresses to your webservers, so that only CLoudflare's proxied records 
can connect to them.



Sincerely,
Jose


On 12/4/2023 1:53 PM, Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop wrote:

Interestingly, 1.1.1.1, which is Cloudflare's famous public DNS
resolver, is not included in that list of IPv4 addresses:

IP Ranges | Cloudflare
https://www.cloudflare.com/ips/

Their main reference page (above) doesn't seem to mention it, but I
wonder if it might be prudent to whitelist it as well (in addition to
Cloudflare's official list) to ensure smoother operations overall.


Hello,

I believe you can enumerate cloudflare IPs via :

https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v4
https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v6

It's likely an overfit situation (not just resolvers), but it's something.

-tony

On 12/2/23 21:57, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote:

Always happy to help! And wauh, times flies by these days...

First of all - I completely agree with you, that several things could be
better here ;-).

Taking the four major ones, the top list, from best to worst, might be
like:

1. OpenDNS
2. Google
3. Quad 9/PCH
4. Cloudflare

Given your mention of "internal documentation", maybe there could be
something more for you to document, if you haven't already:

Google does, as mentioned previously, document their resolver
infrastructure on the Web, contrary to many others, but also with a JSON:

-> API/JSON: https://www.gstatic.com/ipranges/publicdns.json

OpenDNS is also documenting theirs, and also have PTR on the outgoing
resolver IP, but unfortunately, the PTR **doesn't always** point to one
of their OpenDNS.* domain names, which could be confusing:

Reaching OpenDNS Copenhagen:
- 146.112.135.70 (r7.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
- 2a04:e4c0:17::73 (r10.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)

Reaching OpenDNS London:
- 208.69.34.73 (m53.lon.opendns.com)
- 2a04:e4c0:10::91 (r3.compute.lon1.edc.strln.net)

It is however consistent with their locations as retrieved from here:

-> Web: https://www.opendns.com/data-center-locations/
-> JSON:
https://umbrella-dns-requests.marketops.umbrella.com/api/data-center-locations

Currently, it seems very much a hit and miss, mostly miss, when reaching
any IP address with PTR records, through Quad 9. I haven't ever seen
Quad 9 document it like OpenDNS or Google.

With Cloudflare, I've never see any of their outbound resolver IP
addresses have any PTR records. I haven't ever seen Cloudflare document
it like OpenDNS or Google.

With the above possible ways to retrieve the OpenDNS and Google data,
you have the option to automate e.g. a weekly update of their resolver
addresses, if you feel for something like that in any way. ;)


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop



___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-12-04 Thread Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop
Interestingly, 1.1.1.1, which is Cloudflare's famous public DNS 
resolver, is not included in that list of IPv4 addresses:

IP Ranges | Cloudflare
https://www.cloudflare.com/ips/

Their main reference page (above) doesn't seem to mention it, but I 
wonder if it might be prudent to whitelist it as well (in addition to 
Cloudflare's official list) to ensure smoother operations overall.

> Hello,
> 
> I believe you can enumerate cloudflare IPs via :
> 
> https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v4
> https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v6
> 
> It's likely an overfit situation (not just resolvers), but it's something.
> 
> -tony
> 
> On 12/2/23 21:57, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote:
> > Always happy to help! And wauh, times flies by these days...
> > 
> > First of all - I completely agree with you, that several things could be 
> > better here ;-).
> > 
> > Taking the four major ones, the top list, from best to worst, might be 
> > like:
> > 
> > 1. OpenDNS
> > 2. Google
> > 3. Quad 9/PCH
> > 4. Cloudflare
> > 
> > Given your mention of "internal documentation", maybe there could be 
> > something more for you to document, if you haven't already:
> > 
> > Google does, as mentioned previously, document their resolver 
> > infrastructure on the Web, contrary to many others, but also with a JSON:
> > 
> > -> API/JSON: https://www.gstatic.com/ipranges/publicdns.json
> > 
> > OpenDNS is also documenting theirs, and also have PTR on the outgoing 
> > resolver IP, but unfortunately, the PTR **doesn't always** point to one 
> > of their OpenDNS.* domain names, which could be confusing:
> > 
> > Reaching OpenDNS Copenhagen:
> > - 146.112.135.70 (r7.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
> > - 2a04:e4c0:17::73 (r10.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
> > 
> > Reaching OpenDNS London:
> > - 208.69.34.73 (m53.lon.opendns.com)
> > - 2a04:e4c0:10::91 (r3.compute.lon1.edc.strln.net)
> > 
> > It is however consistent with their locations as retrieved from here:
> > 
> > -> Web: https://www.opendns.com/data-center-locations/
> > -> JSON: 
> > https://umbrella-dns-requests.marketops.umbrella.com/api/data-center-locations
> > 
> > Currently, it seems very much a hit and miss, mostly miss, when reaching 
> > any IP address with PTR records, through Quad 9. I haven't ever seen 
> > Quad 9 document it like OpenDNS or Google.
> > 
> > With Cloudflare, I've never see any of their outbound resolver IP 
> > addresses have any PTR records. I haven't ever seen Cloudflare document 
> > it like OpenDNS or Google.
> > 
> > With the above possible ways to retrieve the OpenDNS and Google data, 
> > you have the option to automate e.g. a weekly update of their resolver 
> > addresses, if you feel for something like that in any way. ;)
> > 
> 
> ___
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


-- 
Postmaster - postmas...@inter-corporate.com
Randolf Richardson - rand...@inter-corporate.com
Inter-Corporate Computer & Network Services, Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
https://www.inter-corporate.com/


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-12-04 Thread Tony Maszeroski via mailop

Hello,

I believe you can enumerate cloudflare IPs via :

https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v4
https://www.cloudflare.com/ips-v6

It's likely an overfit situation (not just resolvers), but it's something.

-tony

On 12/2/23 21:57, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote:

Always happy to help! And wauh, times flies by these days...

First of all - I completely agree with you, that several things could be 
better here ;-).


Taking the four major ones, the top list, from best to worst, might be 
like:


1. OpenDNS
2. Google
3. Quad 9/PCH
4. Cloudflare

Given your mention of "internal documentation", maybe there could be 
something more for you to document, if you haven't already:


Google does, as mentioned previously, document their resolver 
infrastructure on the Web, contrary to many others, but also with a JSON:


-> API/JSON: https://www.gstatic.com/ipranges/publicdns.json

OpenDNS is also documenting theirs, and also have PTR on the outgoing 
resolver IP, but unfortunately, the PTR **doesn't always** point to one 
of their OpenDNS.* domain names, which could be confusing:


Reaching OpenDNS Copenhagen:
- 146.112.135.70 (r7.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
- 2a04:e4c0:17::73 (r10.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)

Reaching OpenDNS London:
- 208.69.34.73 (m53.lon.opendns.com)
- 2a04:e4c0:10::91 (r3.compute.lon1.edc.strln.net)

It is however consistent with their locations as retrieved from here:

-> Web: https://www.opendns.com/data-center-locations/
-> JSON: 
https://umbrella-dns-requests.marketops.umbrella.com/api/data-center-locations


Currently, it seems very much a hit and miss, mostly miss, when reaching 
any IP address with PTR records, through Quad 9. I haven't ever seen 
Quad 9 document it like OpenDNS or Google.


With Cloudflare, I've never see any of their outbound resolver IP 
addresses have any PTR records. I haven't ever seen Cloudflare document 
it like OpenDNS or Google.


With the above possible ways to retrieve the OpenDNS and Google data, 
you have the option to automate e.g. a weekly update of their resolver 
addresses, if you feel for something like that in any way. ;)




___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-12-02 Thread Arne Jensen via mailop

Always happy to help! And wauh, times flies by these days...

First of all - I completely agree with you, that several things could be 
better here ;-).


Taking the four major ones, the top list, from best to worst, might be like:

1. OpenDNS
2. Google
3. Quad 9/PCH
4. Cloudflare

Given your mention of "internal documentation", maybe there could be 
something more for you to document, if you haven't already:


Google does, as mentioned previously, document their resolver 
infrastructure on the Web, contrary to many others, but also with a JSON:


-> API/JSON: https://www.gstatic.com/ipranges/publicdns.json

OpenDNS is also documenting theirs, and also have PTR on the outgoing 
resolver IP, but unfortunately, the PTR **doesn't always** point to one 
of their OpenDNS.* domain names, which could be confusing:


Reaching OpenDNS Copenhagen:
- 146.112.135.70 (r7.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)
- 2a04:e4c0:17::73 (r10.compute.cph1.edc.strln.net)

Reaching OpenDNS London:
- 208.69.34.73 (m53.lon.opendns.com)
- 2a04:e4c0:10::91 (r3.compute.lon1.edc.strln.net)

It is however consistent with their locations as retrieved from here:

-> Web: https://www.opendns.com/data-center-locations/
-> JSON: 
https://umbrella-dns-requests.marketops.umbrella.com/api/data-center-locations


Currently, it seems very much a hit and miss, mostly miss, when reaching 
any IP address with PTR records, through Quad 9. I haven't ever seen 
Quad 9 document it like OpenDNS or Google.


With Cloudflare, I've never see any of their outbound resolver IP 
addresses have any PTR records. I haven't ever seen Cloudflare document 
it like OpenDNS or Google.


With the above possible ways to retrieve the OpenDNS and Google data, 
you have the option to automate e.g. a weekly update of their resolver 
addresses, if you feel for something like that in any way. ;)


--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Arne Jensen



Den 15-11-2023 kl. 01:19 skrev Michael Peddemors via mailop:

Okay, not great at conforming to industry methods ;)

Thanks for that direct link, need to update our internal 
documentation, but still no excuse for Google not to have reverse DNS 
in place on these IPs.


Thanks Arne.

On 2023-11-13 21:59, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote:

Den 13-11-2023 kl. 23:35 skrev Michael Peddemors via mailop:
Of course, Google never SWIP's their segments very well, but with no 
PTR records, not much to go on..


Not much to go on, hmm ...

... Have you tried the Google Public DNS documentation? :)

large DNS Queries coming from this range, anyone know if it has 
legit usage?


 - 192.178.65.2 = 10357
 - 192.178.65.5 = 10327
 - 192.178.65.8 = 9997
 - 192.178.65.1 = 9602
 - 192.178.65.7 = 9538
 - 192.178.65.4 = 9492
 - 192.178.65.3 = 9467
 - 192.178.65.9 = 9378
 - 192.178.65.6 = 8608
 - 192.178.65.10 = 8557

Those, and the /28 from your Subject line should all be covered by 
192.178.65.0/26?


-> https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq#locations


192.178.65.0/26 iad
192.178.65.64/26 del
192.178.65.128/25 cmh
[...]


Seems to be the IAD (Washington, DC) area of Google Public DNS to me.

--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Arne Jensen


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop





___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-11-14 Thread Michael Peddemors via mailop

Okay, not great at conforming to industry methods ;)

Thanks for that direct link, need to update our internal documentation, 
but still no excuse for Google not to have reverse DNS in place on these 
IPs.


Thanks Arne.

On 2023-11-13 21:59, Arne Jensen via mailop wrote:

Den 13-11-2023 kl. 23:35 skrev Michael Peddemors via mailop:
Of course, Google never SWIP's their segments very well, but with no 
PTR records, not much to go on..


Not much to go on, hmm ...

... Have you tried the Google Public DNS documentation? :)

large DNS Queries coming from this range, anyone know if it has legit 
usage?


 - 192.178.65.2 = 10357
 - 192.178.65.5 = 10327
 - 192.178.65.8 = 9997
 - 192.178.65.1 = 9602
 - 192.178.65.7 = 9538
 - 192.178.65.4 = 9492
 - 192.178.65.3 = 9467
 - 192.178.65.9 = 9378
 - 192.178.65.6 = 8608
 - 192.178.65.10 = 8557

Those, and the /28 from your Subject line should all be covered by 
192.178.65.0/26?


-> https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq#locations


192.178.65.0/26 iad
192.178.65.64/26 del
192.178.65.128/25 cmh
[...]


Seems to be the IAD (Washington, DC) area of Google Public DNS to me.

--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Arne Jensen


___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop



--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."

Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada

This email and any electronic data contained are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and are not intended to represent those of the company.

___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


Re: [mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-11-13 Thread Arne Jensen via mailop

Den 13-11-2023 kl. 23:35 skrev Michael Peddemors via mailop:
Of course, Google never SWIP's their segments very well, but with no 
PTR records, not much to go on..


Not much to go on, hmm ...

... Have you tried the Google Public DNS documentation? :)

large DNS Queries coming from this range, anyone know if it has legit 
usage?


 - 192.178.65.2 = 10357
 - 192.178.65.5 = 10327
 - 192.178.65.8 = 9997
 - 192.178.65.1 = 9602
 - 192.178.65.7 = 9538
 - 192.178.65.4 = 9492
 - 192.178.65.3 = 9467
 - 192.178.65.9 = 9378
 - 192.178.65.6 = 8608
 - 192.178.65.10 = 8557

Those, and the /28 from your Subject line should all be covered by 
192.178.65.0/26?


-> https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/faq#locations


192.178.65.0/26 iad
192.178.65.64/26 del
192.178.65.128/25 cmh
[...]


Seems to be the IAD (Washington, DC) area of Google Public DNS to me.

--
Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Arne Jensen
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop


[mailop] New Google DNS Servers? 192.178.65.0/28 NO PTR records.. anyone? Brandon?

2023-11-13 Thread Michael Peddemors via mailop
Of course, Google never SWIP's their segments very well, but with no PTR 
records, not much to go on.. large DNS Queries coming from this range, 
anyone know if it has legit usage?


 - 192.178.65.2 = 10357
 - 192.178.65.5 = 10327
 - 192.178.65.8 = 9997
 - 192.178.65.1 = 9602
 - 192.178.65.7 = 9538
 - 192.178.65.4 = 9492
 - 192.178.65.3 = 9467
 - 192.178.65.9 = 9378
 - 192.178.65.6 = 8608
 - 192.178.65.10 = 8557

NetRange:   192.178.0.0 - 192.179.255.255
CIDR:   192.178.0.0/15
NetName:GOOGLE
NetHandle:  NET-192-178-0-0-1
Parent: NET192 (NET-192-0-0-0-0)
NetType:Direct Allocation
OriginAS:   AS15169
Organization:   Google LLC (GOGL)
RegDate:2012-07-12
Updated:2012-07-12
Ref:https://rdap.arin.net/registry/ip/192.178.0.0



OrgName:Google LLC


--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."

Michael Peddemors, President/CEO LinuxMagic Inc.
Visit us at http://www.linuxmagic.com @linuxmagic
A Wizard IT Company - For More Info http://www.wizard.ca
"LinuxMagic" a Registered TradeMark of Wizard Tower TechnoServices Ltd.

604-682-0300 Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
___
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop