Re: [mapserver-users] On a wms-request force the add of a layer when another layer is requested
Hi, Layer2 should come always together with Layer1 If you put this line in Layer2 definitions REQUIRES "[Layer1]" Without testing I cannot guarantee that I remember it right. For me the logic of keyword "REQUIRES" feels reversed because my brain says that Layer2 is rather required by Layer1. Perhaps native English speakers think it is OK and explicit like it is now. -Jukka Rahkonen- Andrea Peri wrote: Hi, I'm using MapServer trunk version. Thx to Stephen Woodbridge response, (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2012-May/072326.html) I'm able to avoid the use of a single layer of a group. Now I have another (perhaps) more complex question. I need to realize a map file with a configuration that when the Layer1 is ligh-on from the user (using a wms request), the map response will contains also another "Layer2". But I cannot use the "group" element because the two layers (Layer1 and layer2) are not in the same group. They are in two distinct and different groups. So I guess to allow this should be available a command like "requires", but that force the light-on of Layer2 instead of deny the light-on of the layer1. Is this available on mapServer ? thx, -- - Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù - ___ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
Re: [mapserver-users] On a wms-request force the add of a layer when another layer is requested
Hi Jukka, The REQUIRES element work this mode: Layer2 is visible only when also Layer1 is in the request So a request like this: ...&layers=layer1,layer2 is visible layer1 + layer2 In a request like this: ...&layers=layer2 nothing is visible. Instead I need this other possibility: on a request ...&layers=layer2 the result visible is: Layer1 + Layer2 Thx, Andrea. 2012/5/29 Rahkonen Jukka > ** > Hi, > > Layer2 should come always together with Layer1 If you put this line in > Layer2 definitions > > REQUIRES "[Layer1]" > > Without testing I cannot guarantee that I remember it right. For me the > logic of keyword "REQUIRES" feels reversed because my brain says that > Layer2 is rather required by Layer1. Perhaps native English speakers think > it is OK and explicit like it is now. > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > > > -- > Andrea Peri wrote: > Hi, > I'm using MapServer trunk version. > > Thx to Stephen Woodbridge response, > (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2012-May/072326.html) > > I'm able to avoid the use of a single layer of a group. > > Now I have another (perhaps) more complex question. > > I need to realize a map file with a configuration that > when the Layer1 is ligh-on from the user (using a wms request), the map > response will contains also another "Layer2". > > But I cannot use the "group" element because the two layers (Layer1 and > layer2) are not in the same group. > They are in two distinct and different groups. > > So I guess to allow this should be available a command like "requires", > but that force the light-on of Layer2 instead of deny the light-on of the > layer1. > > Is this available on mapServer ? > > thx, > > -- > - > Andrea Peri > . . . . . . . . . > qwerty àèìòù > - > > -- - Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù - ___ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
Re: [mapserver-users] On a wms-request force the add of a layer when another layer is requested
But doesn't it work so that &layers=1 gives you layer1+layer2? If you then move REQUIRES from Layer2 to Layer1 then &layers=2 should give you layer2+layer1. I will make a test tomorror. -Jukka Rahkonen- Andrea Peri wrote: Hi Jukka, The REQUIRES element work this mode: Layer2 is visible only when also Layer1 is in the request So a request like this: ...&layers=layer1,layer2 is visible layer1 + layer2 In a request like this: ...&layers=layer2 nothing is visible. Instead I need this other possibility: on a request ...&layers=layer2 the result visible is: Layer1 + Layer2 Thx, Andrea. 2012/5/29 Rahkonen Jukka mailto:jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi>> Hi, Layer2 should come always together with Layer1 If you put this line in Layer2 definitions REQUIRES "[Layer1]" Without testing I cannot guarantee that I remember it right. For me the logic of keyword "REQUIRES" feels reversed because my brain says that Layer2 is rather required by Layer1. Perhaps native English speakers think it is OK and explicit like it is now. -Jukka Rahkonen- Andrea Peri wrote: Hi, I'm using MapServer trunk version. Thx to Stephen Woodbridge response, (http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/2012-May/072326.html) I'm able to avoid the use of a single layer of a group. Now I have another (perhaps) more complex question. I need to realize a map file with a configuration that when the Layer1 is ligh-on from the user (using a wms request), the map response will contains also another "Layer2". But I cannot use the "group" element because the two layers (Layer1 and layer2) are not in the same group. They are in two distinct and different groups. So I guess to allow this should be available a command like "requires", but that force the light-on of Layer2 instead of deny the light-on of the layer1. Is this available on mapServer ? thx, -- - Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù - -- - Andrea Peri . . . . . . . . . qwerty àèìòù - ___ mapserver-users mailing list mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users
