[libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Marc Paré

Article title says it all. You can find it here:

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/387199/microsoft-government-switch-to-open-source-will-cause-dissatisfaction

Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response section 
or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.


Cheers,

Marc



--
Marc Paré
m...@marcpare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Italo Vignoli
On 21/02/14 11:04, Marc Paré wrote:

 Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response section
 or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.

I have set a phone call with the journalist at 3PM UTC, to provide our
comments to the article (and especially to the productivity concept
which MS is using to divert the focus from their format).

-- 
Italo Vignoli - italo.vign...@gmail.com
mob IT +39.348.5653829 - mob EU +39.392.7481795
sip it...@libreoffice.org - skype italovignoli
GPG Key ID - 0xAAB8D5C0
DB75 1534 3FD0 EA5F 56B5 FDA6 DE82 934C AAB8 D5C0

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Jay Lozier


On 02/21/2014 06:04 AM, Marc Paré wrote:

Article title says it all. You can find it here:

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/387199/microsoft-government-switch-to-open-source-will-cause-dissatisfaction 



Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response 
section or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.


Cheers,

Marc



When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that people 
need proprietary MS formats to be efficient. Reading between the lines 
I also sensed that MS is very concerned about losing the European market 
to FOSS and open standards/formats. If national governments move away 
from MS, those doing business with the government are likely to follow 
and this will percolate country wide. If European governments and 
businesses are hostile to MS this will have an effect on international 
businesses.


Ultimately MS faces two choices: adopt open standards/formats and open 
source their products or face resistance due to people, companies, and 
governments believing they are doing the bidding of the US NSA.


--
Jay Lozier
jsloz...@gmail.com


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Kracked_P_P---webmaster

On 02/21/2014 09:30 AM, Jay Lozier wrote:


On 02/21/2014 06:04 AM, Marc Paré wrote:

Article title says it all. You can find it here:

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/news/387199/microsoft-government-switch-to-open-source-will-cause-dissatisfaction 



Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response 
section or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.


Cheers,

Marc



When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that people 
need proprietary MS formats to be efficient. Reading between the 
lines I also sensed that MS is very concerned about losing the 
European market to FOSS and open standards/formats. If national 
governments move away from MS, those doing business with the 
government are likely to follow and this will percolate country wide. 
If European governments and businesses are hostile to MS this will 
have an effect on international businesses.


Ultimately MS faces two choices: adopt open standards/formats and open 
source their products or face resistance due to people, companies, and 
governments believing they are doing the bidding of the US NSA.




I do not think making MS Office open source will be done, but the true 
support of the open document formats [ODF] will be a good step for them 
to take, and it should have been done when ODF became THE International 
Office file format standard.  They did not like the fact that their 
OOXML format did not become it.


MS and its public relations with European countries and businesses seems 
to extend back over 10 years.  It seemed to me that MS thought their 
control over the office suite market gave them the right to force the 
users to do and except anything that MS tells them to do, buy, and 
accept, what an office package can be use for and needed for in the 
users businesses and homes.


At one point, after MSO 2007 came out, our Library of Congress started 
publishing documents in the .docx format.  Since their mandate was to 
allow these files and documents be freely accessible to the public.  
They had to republish those documents to .doc since there was a cry 
saying that to get the freely accessible files you had to buy a new 
office package, and that makes it not free and places money into MS's 
pocket as ransom to get our government's documents.  Europe seems not 
to be as easy going with MS's antics as the US is.


So MS may be feeling the loss of money from Europe as a threat to their 
company's core business.  So they attack the FOSS movement for open 
formats in office suites.  The insist that if you do not use our 
proprietary formats then you cannot do proper business with each other.  
Well, business is getting along with ODF just fine.  If the businesses 
need to use an MS format, then they may go back to pre-OOXML ones, which 
most FOSS office suites seem to work with very well.  But, since more 
and more International businesses are moving away from proprietary 
formats and using the International Standard - ODF - then MS should just 
do the right thing and fully support ODF as well.  Then the file format 
issue will not be an issue in the fight to keep their office suite 
market share.


YES, FUD is a weapon that MS loves to use.  But the real problem for MS 
will not go away if they do not act like all their suggestions are a 
commandment from the god of the computer world.  The US NSA is not as 
bad as MS in trying to force people to do what they want, but the NSA is 
more covert in their efforts.  But NSA vs. MSO is like comparing apples 
and oranges.  So, it should not be part of the description of what MS is 
doing in the office suite market.






--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Jonathon


On February 21, 2014 6:30:41 AM PST, Jay Lozier wrote:

When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that people  need 
proprietary MS formats to be efficient. 

In one sense, MS is being truthful. There is a huge ecosystem built around 
Microsoft's file formats: CRM, ERP, and similar software.   However, there is 
nothing preventing the companies that create that software from also 
supportingt ODF in their products. (NOTE: I am assuming that Microsoft has not 
forced those vendors to sign contracts that prohibit them supporting 
non-Microsoft file formats. Given Microsoft's history, such a prospect is 
possible.)

A second datapoint is that the major a11y vendors do not include support for 
FLOSS in the offerings.  (Two of the biggest vendors have flat out promised 
that their software will never work correctly with  FLOSS program.)

I also sensed that MS is very concerned about losing the European market  to 
FOSS and open standards/formats. 

Microsoft's issue with Europe is that unlike BRICS, bribes are more likely to 
have the company put into goal, than achieve the desired outcome.

governments believing they are doing the bidding of the US NSA.

Any government that relies on any software produced by a foreign firm, is a 
government that is subjecting itself to known security flaws.
-- 
Your language. Your documents. Your way.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Le Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:03:43 -0800,
Jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com a écrit :

 
 
 On February 21, 2014 6:30:41 AM PST, Jay Lozier wrote:
 
 When I read the article I got the sense of MS FUD claiming that
 people  need proprietary MS formats to be efficient. 
 
 In one sense, MS is being truthful. There is a huge ecosystem built
 around Microsoft's file formats: CRM, ERP, and similar software.
 However, there is nothing preventing the companies that create that
 software from also supportingt ODF in their products. (NOTE: I am
 assuming that Microsoft has not forced those vendors to sign
 contracts that prohibit them supporting non-Microsoft file formats.
 Given Microsoft's history, such a prospect is possible.)
 
 A second datapoint is that the major a11y vendors do not include
 support for FLOSS in the offerings.  (Two of the biggest vendors have
 flat out promised that their software will never work correctly with
 FLOSS program.)
 
 I also sensed that MS is very concerned about losing the European
 market  to FOSS and open standards/formats. 
 
 Microsoft's issue with Europe is that unlike BRICS, bribes are more
 likely to have the company put into goal, than achieve the desired
 outcome.
 
 governments believing they are doing the bidding of the US NSA.
 
 Any government that relies on any software produced by a foreign
 firm, is a government that is subjecting itself to known security
 flaws.



Thank you everyone for your comments that have at the moment not helped
the UK Gov make up its mind :-)
May I suggest to everyone who'd like to help or express his/her views
to post them directly on the UK Government Consultation website? That's
where it'll have the most impact. Over here we're just preaching to the
choir.

Thank you,


-- 
Charles-H. Schulz 
Co-founder, The Document Foundation,
Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin
Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint
Mobile Number: +33 (0)6 98 65 54 24.


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [libo-marketing-priv] [libreoffice-marketing] Microsoft: government switch to open source will cause dissatisfaction

2014-02-21 Thread Cor Nouws
Italo Vignoli wrote (21-02-14 14:05)
 On 21/02/14 11:04, Marc Paré wrote:
 
 Not sure if we need to post a rebuttal argument in the response section
 or retaliate with an article disputing MS arguments.
 
 I have set a phone call with the journalist at 3PM UTC, to provide our
 comments to the article (and especially to the productivity concept
 which MS is using to divert the focus from their format).

So some weeks now I've some idea on mind that comes in neatly maybe at
this point.
Obviously, the idea is not the most original one, but if set up with the
right details (tone towards people, program etc.) it might turn out well.

From my contacts with administrations, I know that those that are
working with ODF (LibreOffice) or considering to work with it, often are
in a situation where 'defensiveness' and 'isolation' are prominent
emotions. It's not easy to keep (set) it up against the main stream.

Now I expect that the 'isolation part' could be tackled when people meet
at a proper forum/situation.
That could for example be a sort of (mini) congress where experiences
and sharing of wishes (cooperation) are on the agenda. Make the agenda
and theme(s) focus on the target audience, and I'm sure many will like
to join. Thus it has be be say one and a half day congress in a central
city, so that the people can do in in two day's (and an evening).
Sponsoring to make price reasonable would be a good idea probably.
Target audience thus primary administrations working with or seriously
considering so LibreOffice (OpenOffice-x). Those should be contacted
personally as much as possible.

So this will cost serious time at least, and thus serious money.
However, looking at the goals of TDF, and the great (maybe one could
even say 'vital') importance to help these front-line-adaptors go
further, it might be an idea to spend money to make such a project run?

I started describing the idea by targeting the 'isolation part' of my
(non scientific) analyses of the situation.
But obviously, such a plan has the potential to work on the feeling of
'defensiveness' to. And it might be very helpful in stimulating others
to take the chance too?

What do you think?

Cheers,
Cor

-- 
Cor Nouws
GPD key ID: 0xB13480A6 - 591A 30A7 36A0 CE3C 3D28  A038 E49D 7365 B134 80A6
- vrijwilliger http://nl.libreoffice.org
- volunteer http://www.libreoffice.org
- The Document Foundation Membership Committee Member


-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: marketing+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted