Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Dave Crossland
On 21 April 2016 at 11:13, Sanchit Bansal  wrote:

> Should I push it and will it be merged into master ?


Make a pull request :)

https://guides.github.com/introduction/flow/
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sanchit Bansal
Hey guys

I cloned the repo and did some changes to the site. Should I push it and
will it be merged into master ?

Also what time tomorrow are the results being published.
On 21-Apr-2016 8:36 pm, "Dave Crossland"  wrote:

>
> On 21 April 2016 at 09:36, Sean DALY  wrote:
>
>> what's the best way to comment/point out an issue? Do I need to create an
>> account with Github or will my SL wiki account work?
>
>
> Yes, create a github account and file issues in
> https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs/issues :)
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Dave Crossland
On 21 April 2016 at 09:36, Sean DALY  wrote:

> what's the best way to comment/point out an issue? Do I need to create an
> account with Github or will my SL wiki account work?


Yes, create a github account and file issues in
https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs/issues :)
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Walter Bender 
wrote:

> The site is hosted in github now [1], so we can accept pull requests (or
> comments/issues) for changes. Could you please let us know what typos you
> found?
>
> [1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs
>


Ah hi Walter what's the best way to comment/point out an issue? Do I need
to create an account with Github or will my SL wiki account work?
Sean
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Walter Bender
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Sean DALY  wrote:

> Hi Dave
>
> I'm not being negative, just surprised that the site was changed. My ideal
> process is to involve marketers in marketing, but that's very unusual for
> FLOSS projects :-)
>
> In fact the homepage does cycle the logo variants - that's good!
>
> There are typos in the text though... who can fix those?
>

The site is hosted in github now [1], so we can accept pull requests (or
comments/issues) for changes. Could you please let us know what typos you
found?

[1] https://github.com/sugarlabs/www-sugarlabs


> I am relieved to see that the press page survived at its permalink.
>

:)

>
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY  wrote:
>>
>>> I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already.
>>>
>>
>> I would like to ask you to be more positive about the new members of the
>> community being enthusiastic about contributing.
>>
>>
>>> FWIW, the Sugar branding calls for randomly switching between the logo
>>> color schemes [1] on reload. The old site (where ?) did this
>>>
>>
>> What is your ideal process for changing the Sugar Branding Guidelines?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dave
>>
>
>
> ___
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
>
>


-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org

___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi

I'm confused  :) The www-sugarlabs repo hasn't been updated for 19 days?
How was the site changed?

On 21 April 2016 at 09:18, Sean DALY  wrote:

> Hi Dave
>
> I'm not being negative, just surprised that the site was changed. My ideal
> process is to involve marketers in marketing, but that's very unusual for
> FLOSS projects :-)
>
> In fact the homepage does cycle the logo variants - that's good!
>
> There are typos in the text though... who can fix those?
>
> I am relieved to see that the press page survived at its permalink.
>
> Sean
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY  wrote:
>>
>>> I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already.
>>>
>>
>> I would like to ask you to be more positive about the new members of the
>> community being enthusiastic about contributing.
>>
>>
>>> FWIW, the Sugar branding calls for randomly switching between the logo
>>> color schemes [1] on reload. The old site (where ?) did this
>>>
>>
>> What is your ideal process for changing the Sugar Branding Guidelines?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dave
>>
>
>


-- 
Cheers
Dave
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sean DALY
Hi Dave

I'm not being negative, just surprised that the site was changed. My ideal
process is to involve marketers in marketing, but that's very unusual for
FLOSS projects :-)

In fact the homepage does cycle the logo variants - that's good!

There are typos in the text though... who can fix those?

I am relieved to see that the press page survived at its permalink.

Sean


On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dave Crossland  wrote:

> Hi
>
> On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY  wrote:
>
>> I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already.
>>
>
> I would like to ask you to be more positive about the new members of the
> community being enthusiastic about contributing.
>
>
>> FWIW, the Sugar branding calls for randomly switching between the logo
>> color schemes [1] on reload. The old site (where ?) did this
>>
>
> What is your ideal process for changing the Sugar Branding Guidelines?
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi

On 21 April 2016 at 09:08, Sean DALY  wrote:

> I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already.
>

I would like to ask you to be more positive about the new members of the
community being enthusiastic about contributing.


> FWIW, the Sugar branding calls for randomly switching between the logo
> color schemes [1] on reload. The old site (where ?) did this
>

What is your ideal process for changing the Sugar Branding Guidelines?

Cheers
Dave
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing


Re: [Marketing] [Sugar-devel] GSoC 2016 Website Redesign

2016-04-21 Thread Sean DALY
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Juan Carlos Murillo  wrote:

> Also, if there is a range of different colors for the logo, then a good
> idea might be to use the same logo color for the websites that have more
> related content between them (i.e. homepage and activities).


I didn't realize the existing site had been scrapped already.

FWIW, the Sugar branding calls for randomly switching between the logo
color schemes [1] on reload. The old site (where ?) did this

Sean

[1] https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Logo
___
Marketing mailing list
Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing