Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the GNOME logo]

2012-04-18 Thread Bryen M Yunashko
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 19:23 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> Why?  Because we would have to argue what set of components is
> equivalent to "powered by GNOME".  The argument might seem simple
> until you actually start doing it.  There might be maintainers who
> might object to having their project labeled as "powered by GNOME"
> because it would feel like we were taking advantage of them.  There is
> also the whole GNU/Linux mess..  

Why would there be an argument?  I don't think anyone here is assuming
that we're going to go around like some Labeling Police to these other
projects and insist they include "powered by GNOME" somewhere in their
offerings.  Its completely up to them to decide whether to have the
label or not.

If they feel some inner sense of ethical duty to pay homage to GNOME
with "powered by GNOME" labeling, awesome.  If they choose not to, their
right.  

Bryen

-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: Friends of GNOME campaign

2012-04-18 Thread Stormy Peters
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:32 PM, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:

>  >
> > Website/infrastructure campaign.
> > One resource that many GNOME users and contributors take for granted
> > are the websites and infrastructure that support the GNOME project in
> > various way. In the marketing meeting we had back in October it was
> > stated that the website/infrastructure was not in ideal shape
> > (http://goo.gl/eB0um). I know that the past months great progress have
> > been made with the websites (foundation website migration to new
> > design).
> >
>
> I'm not sure this would be effective for a campaign.  Yes you raise
> valid points about why we could use additional funds to cover
> infrastructure, but from a human-appeal POV, I don't think a campaign
> about web infrastructure is going to make someone dig into their pockets
> to donate, unless they happen to be close to GNOME already.  This
> campaign would leave out those who might donate out of a basic human
> appeal.
>
>
A few years ago when I ran a survey, most donors were close to the project
and wanted to contribute but did not have either time or skills. The sys
admin campaign was definitely a success.

Stormy
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Re: [Fwd: Question about the trademark policy and usage of the GNOME logo]

2012-04-18 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Bryen M Yunashko wrote:

>
> If they feel some inner sense of ethical duty to pay homage to GNOME
> with "powered by GNOME" labeling, awesome.  If they choose not to, their
> right.
>
>
I'm okay with this if they want to volunteer doing that.  I'm not going to
complain.

sri


>  Bryen
>
>
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list


Introduction

2012-04-18 Thread Anthony Papillion
Hello List,

I'm a long time user of the GNOME desktop but a new subscriber to the
list. Just taking a few moments to introduce myself and say hello to
everyone.

I'm a 37 year old software developer, entrepreneur, and activist, living
in Oklahoma. I've been using Linux since around 2001 with Red Hat being
my first introduction to the OS. Since then, I've tried a variety of
distros, finally finding my home in Debian and Ubuntu. 

Looking forward to jumping in and helping out with marketing (I do a lot
of it for my company) and forward to meeting all of you folks.

Cheers,
Anthony Papillion

-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list