Re: [Marxism] Neoliberalism: not so bad? | Michael Roberts Blog

2019-03-13 Thread Barry Brooks via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*


http://www.leftbusinessobserver.com/Radio.html

January 10, 2019 Quinn Slobodian, author of Globalists: The End of Empire and 
the Birth of Neoliberalism, on the history, theory, and practice of the doctrine


Neoliberals hate the state. Or do they? In the first intellectual history of 
neoliberal globalism, Quinn Slobodian follows a group of thinkers from the 
ashes of the Habsburg Empire to the creation of the World Trade Organization to 
show that neoliberalism emerged less to shrink government and abolish 
regulations than to redeploy them at a global level.

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Marxism] Neoliberalism: not so bad? | Michael Roberts Blog

2019-03-12 Thread Michael Meeropol via Marxism
  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

I don;t know Louis -- I think neoliberalism is a useful term for the
current structure of capitalism -- I am pretty persuaded by the SSA school
*(I reviewed Kotz's most recent book for Challenge a year or so ago).

Capitalism has gone through a few different iterations in the 20th (now
21st) century(ies) and the neo-liberal version is particularly disgusting
for ordinary people (the post WWII period was pretty good for segments of
the working class -- even relatively improving the lives of people of color
and women in general ---) --- since 1980, no such improvements and lots of
back-sliding ---

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 8:00 AM Louis Proyect via Marxism <
marxism@lists.csbs.utah.edu> wrote:

>   POSTING RULES & NOTES  
> #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
> #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
> *
>
> I don’t really like the term ‘neoliberal’ because it is used lazily as
> an alternative to pro-capitalist policies or even to the word
> ‘capitalism’ itself. In doing so, it causes confusion in explanations
> about trends and failures in capitalist development.  What flows is the
> argument that if ‘neoliberalism’ is ended, then we can return to
> ‘managed capitalism’ or social democracy’, neither of which, in my view,
> should be used to suggest something different from the capitalist mode
> of production itself.
>
> And if leftists continue to use ‘neoliberalism’ as a term to replace
> capitalism (or as some nasty ‘free market version), they open the door
> to the sort of nonsense that economic journalist Noah Smith concocted
> last week, as expressed in his Bloomberg piece: “Neoliberalism should
> not be a dirty word on the left”.
>
> full:
> https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2019/03/12/neoliberalism-not-so-bad/
> _
> Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
> Set your options at:
> https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/mameerop%40gmail.com
_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com

[Marxism] Neoliberalism: not so bad? | Michael Roberts Blog

2019-03-12 Thread Louis Proyect via Marxism

  POSTING RULES & NOTES  
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
*

I don’t really like the term ‘neoliberal’ because it is used lazily as 
an alternative to pro-capitalist policies or even to the word 
‘capitalism’ itself. In doing so, it causes confusion in explanations 
about trends and failures in capitalist development.  What flows is the 
argument that if ‘neoliberalism’ is ended, then we can return to 
‘managed capitalism’ or social democracy’, neither of which, in my view, 
should be used to suggest something different from the capitalist mode 
of production itself.


And if leftists continue to use ‘neoliberalism’ as a term to replace 
capitalism (or as some nasty ‘free market version), they open the door 
to the sort of nonsense that economic journalist Noah Smith concocted 
last week, as expressed in his Bloomberg piece: “Neoliberalism should 
not be a dirty word on the left”.


full: 
https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2019/03/12/neoliberalism-not-so-bad/

_
Full posting guidelines at: http://www.marxmail.org/sub.htm
Set your options at: 
https://lists.csbs.utah.edu/options/marxism/archive%40mail-archive.com