[Marxism-Thaxis] Change

2009-08-27 Thread c b
PROMISES, PROMISES: Early Katrina praise for Obama
By BEN EVANS and BECKY BOHRER, Associated Press Writers Ben Evans And
Becky Bohrer, Associated Press Writers 1 hr 55 mins ago
WASHINGTON – As a presidential candidate, Barack Obama pledged to
right the wrongs he said bogged down efforts to rebuild the Gulf Coast
after Hurricane Katrina. Seven months into the job, he's earning high
praise from some unlikely places.

Gov. Bobby Jindal, R-La., says Obama's team has brought a more
practical and flexible approach. Many local officials offer similar
reviews. Even Doug O'Dell, former President George W. Bush's recovery
coordinator, says the Obama administration's "new vision" appears to
be turning things around.

Not too long ago, Jindal said in a telephone interview, Louisiana
governors didn't have "very many positive things" to say about the
Federal Emergency Management Agency.

But Jindal said he had a lot of respect for the current FEMA chief,
Craig Fugate, and his team. "There is a sense of momentum and a desire
to get things done," the governor said.

Added O'Dell: "I think the results are self-evident."

The retired Marine general served what he calls a frustrating stint as
Bush's recovery coordinator last year. "What people have said to me is
that for whatever reason, problems that were insurmountable under
previous leadership are getting resolved quickly," O'Dell said.

"And I really hate to say that because (the top FEMA leaders) in my
time there were good, hardworking, earnest men, but they were also the
victims of their own bureaucracy."

It's not that Obama has miraculously mended the Gulf Coast since
Katrina struck on Aug. 29, 2005. The storm killed more than 1,600
people in Louisiana and Mississippi and caused more than $40 billion
in property damage. Hurricane Rita followed nearly a month later, with
billions of dollars in additional damage and at least 11 more deaths.

On the fourth anniversary of Katrina, many communities remain broken,
littered with boarded-up houses and overgrown vacant lots. Hundreds of
projects — including critical needs such as sewer lines, fire stations
and a hospital — are entangled in the bureaucracy or federal-local
disputes over who should pick up the tab.

Like Bush, Obama has critics who say he's not moving aggressively enough.

Chris Kromm, director of the Institute for Southern Studies, an
advocacy group, said the coast is "still waiting for Washington to
show leadership."

In many areas, such as long-term coastal rehabilitation and rebuilding
levees, it's too early to determine whether Obama will live up to the
many promises he made.

But on several fronts, there is evidence of progress.

Victor Ukpolo, chancellor of Southern University at New Orleans, said
the administration has been able to "move mountains" for his school,
virtually wiped out by Katrina and the breached levees.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has visited the campus
twice and awarded $32 million to replace four buildings.

"It's really awesome," Ukpolo said. "There's been so much progress."

Tommy Longo, mayor of Waveland, Miss., said it got so bad toward the
end of Bush's tenure that "you almost couldn't get them to return a
phone call, and you certainly weren't going to get them to make any
big decisions."

"It has been refreshing to be back working with people who are hungry
and want to make a difference," said Longo, a Democrat. "Who knows, a
few years from now, at the end of Obama's term it may be back to the
same ol', same ol', but it is refreshing now."

Obama backed up his pledge to name an experienced FEMA administrator
by appointing Fugate, a career emergency management professional from
Florida. By contrast, Bush's director was Michael Brown, a lawyer who
worked at the International Arabian Horse Association. He resigned
after Katrina.

In half a year, Obama's team says it has cleared at least 75 projects
that were in dispute, including libraries, schools and university
buildings. The administration has embraced a new, independent
arbitration panel for the most stubborn disputes, and assigned senior
advisers to focus on the rebuilding.

The administration recently reversed a FEMA rule that barred
communities from building fire stations and other critical projects in
vulnerable areas. Local officials said the rule could have effectively
killed off some places.

The Bush administration's flat-footed response to Katrina left a
lasting stain on Bush's legacy, and the sluggish pace of the long-term
recovery has drawn continued criticism.

Local officials and civic leaders long have complained about the
changing cast of FEMA representatives who review project worksheets
and demand repeated inspections or additional paperwork. In some
cases, agency workers have subtracted costs that local officials
thought were settled.

Along with battling red tape, community officials say FEMA often
stubbornly refused to pay for work that should have qualified for
federal aid.

Under Bush, FEM

[Marxism-Thaxis] Change in mode of exploitation

2005-11-11 Thread Charles Brown
WL: This is not true because bourgeois property does not arise on the basis
of 
private property but rather on the basis of a certain stage in the
development 
of the productive forces - commodity production, that compels a change in
the 
form of private property. Private property exists before bourgeois property,

which is the "final and most complete expression of the system of producing
and 
appropriating products that is based on class antagonisms on the
exploitation 
of the many by the few." 


CB: Commodity production exists before the bourgeoisie , too. It exists on
the "periphery" of pre-capitalist societies , where the predominant mode of
production is not commodity production. Commodithy production does not arise
, as you say, "on the basis of a certain stage in the development of the
productive forces. " Commodity production as a predominant tendency in the
mode of production , (including qualitatively new: labor power existing as a
commodity), develops out of the class struggles of feudalism, evidently
especially in the countryside of Britain. This predominant tendency defined
in _Capital_ has always existed in contradiction with various recurring
specially oppressed or unfree commodity productive sectors or segments, such
as slavery, indentured servants, jim crow sharecropping, colonial fascist
oppressed, etc.  




___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


[Marxism-Thaxis] Change to Win endorses Obama

2008-02-25 Thread Charles Brown
Change to Win endorses Obama 
 Search WWW  Search pww.org  
 
  Archive  Online eXtra  
Author: John Wojcik
 People's Weekly World Newspaper, 02/22/08 14:26 
 
  
Citing his promise to re-negotiate the North American Free Trade Agreement 
(NAFTA) and saying that it is time for the race for the Democratic presidential 
nomination to end, the seven union, six million member Change to Win 
federation, on Feb. 21, endorsed Sen. Barack Obama. 

In a telephone conference with reporters, CtW Chair Anna Burger said the 
federation acted now, essentially, to push Obama to wins in the coming 
primaries, including Texas and Ohio. 

“One reason we endorsed now is because we think we can make a difference,” 
Burger said. “It’s time to bring this process to a close. There’s a movement 
building here and the winds of change are blowing for Barack Obama, and it 
could possibly be time for (Hillary Clinton) to recognize they’re blowing for 
him. We’re hoping to get to that point sooner rather than later.” 

“Obama’s stands on trade, on achieving the American Dream and on the war in 
Iraq – he was against it even while in the Illinois state senate before 
entering the U.S. Senate – really resonated with our members,” Burger 
continued. 

“NAFTA passed when Bill Clinton was president,” Burger said, referring to the 
trade pact that labor opposed at the time and maintains today is the cause of 
millions of job losses. "We have seen and lived through the impact of bad trade 
policies on working families in this country,” Burger said. 

Obama has said often that, if elected, he would tell the Mexican president and 
the Canadian prime minister that NAFTA would have to be re-negotiated. 

The CtW endorsement means that four of its seven unions – SEIU, UFCW, Teamsters 
and UNITE HERE – are joining forces now to make phone calls, leaflet and 
canvass in the upcoming primary states. The Laborers and Carpenters have yet to 
complete their internal canvassing while the seventh CtW union, the 
Farmworkers, endorsed Clinton. 

“But they’re comfortable with our decision,” Burger said. 

Ohio, Rhode Island and Texas vote March 4. Pennsylvania votes April 22. The 
biggest impact of the CtW endorsement may be in Ohio where Burger said CtW 
already has staffers on the ground and where member unions are mobilizing in 
different cities. CtW unions have 175,000 members in Ohio and Burger said the 
federation intends to get 110,000 votes for Obama out of that total. CtW unions 
have 60,000 members in Texas and 20,000 in Rhode Island. 





___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


[Marxism-Thaxis] Change from the bottom up

2010-06-22 Thread c b
Production Mode Ode

Maybe the Gulf oil disaster will force some changes, from the bottom
up in a sense not thought of.

The relations of production have become a fetter on the forces of
production. They have to be burst asunder like the pipeline has burst
asunder.

Charles

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis


Re: [Marxism-Thaxis] Change in mode of exploitation

2005-11-11 Thread Waistline2
CB: Commodithy production does not arise, as you say, "on the basis of a 
certain stage in the development of the productive forces."

WL: Really. 

This is what I wrote and you quote: 

"bourgeois property does not arise on the basis of private property but 
rather on the basis of a certain stage in the development of the productive 
forces 
- commodity production, that compels a change in the form of private 
property."  

1) "bourgeois property does not arise" means to me bourgeois property rather 
than the rise of commodity production. We are most certainly in agreement that 
the commodity form exists thousands of years before bourgeois property. 

What the quoted sentence means is: 

"Bourgeois property . . .  arise . . . on the basis of a certain stage in the 
development of the productive forces - commodity production, that compels a 
change in the form of private property."  


Waistline 

___
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis