Also failing tests of 1.4.5 on Solaris 9 Sparc

2010-08-12 Thread Dagobert Michelsen

Hi,

I just tried to compile memcached on Solaris 9 Sparc from the OpenCSW  
buildfarm and got

also some errors during testing:

<29 server listening (udp)
<29 server listening (udp)
<30 new binary client connection.
<30 connection closed.
Invalid value for binding protocol: http
 -- should be one of auto, binary, or ascii
t/00-startup.t ... 17/18 Number of threads must be greater than 0
t/00-startup.t ... ok
t/64bit.t  skipped: Skipping 64-bit tests on 32-bit build
t/binary-get.t ... ok
t/binary-sasl.t .. This server is not built with SASL support.
t/binary-sasl.t .. ok
t/binary.t ... 2/3361
#   Failed test 'Expected read length'
#   at t/binary.t line 539.
#  got: '8'
# expected: '24'
Use of uninitialized value $ident_hi in multiplication (*) at t/ 
binary.t line 545.
Use of uninitialized value $ident_lo in addition (+) at t/binary.t  
line 545.
Use of uninitialized value $remaining in numeric eq (==) at t/binary.t  
line 547.


#   Failed test 'Expected read length'
#   at t/binary.t line 539.
#  got: '16'
# expected: '24'

#   Failed test 'Got proper response magic'
#   at t/binary.t line 543.
#  got: '0'
# expected: '129'
Use of uninitialized value $ident_hi in multiplication (*) at t/ 
binary.t line 545.
Use of uninitialized value $ident_lo in addition (+) at t/binary.t  
line 545.


#   Failed test 'Flags is set properly'
#   at t/binary.t line 63.
#  got: undef
# expected: '19'
Argument "somevalue" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at t/binary.t  
line 64.

Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric eq (==) at t/binary.t line 64.

#   Failed test 'Expected opaque'
#   at t/binary.t line 560.
#  got: '4197732150'
# expected: '3383607077'

#   Failed test 'Didn't get a result from get'
#   at t/binary.t line 76.
#  got: '3'
# expected: '0'
Can't call method "not_found" without a package or object reference at  
t/binary.t line 77.

# Looks like you planned 3361 tests but ran 258.
# Looks like you failed 6 tests of 258 run.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 258.
t/binary.t ... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 3109/3361 subtests
t/bogus-commands.t ... ok
t/cas.t .. ok
t/daemonize.t  ok
t/dash-M.t ... ok
t/evictions.t  ok
t/expirations.t .. ok
t/flags.t  ok
t/flush-all.t  ok
t/getset.t ... ok
t/incrdecr.t . ok
t/issue_104.t  ok
t/issue_108.t  ok
t/issue_14.t . ok
t/issue_22.t . ok
t/issue_29.t . ok
t/issue_3.t .. ok
t/issue_41.t . ok
t/issue_42.t . ok
t/issue_50.t . ok
t/issue_61.t . ok
t/issue_67.t . ok
t/issue_68.t . ok
t/issue_70.t . ok
t/item_size_max.t  1/7 Item max size cannot be less than 1024 bytes.
t/item_size_max.t  2/7 Cannot set item size limit higher than 128  
mb.
t/item_size_max.t  4/7 WARNING: Setting item max size above 1MB is  
not recommended!

 Raising this limit increases the minimum memory requirements
 and will decrease your memory efficiency.
WARNING: Setting item max size above 1MB is not recommended!
 Raising this limit increases the minimum memory requirements
 and will decrease your memory efficiency.
t/item_size_max.t  ok
t/line-lengths.t . ok
t/lru.t .. ok
t/maxconns.t . ok
t/multiversioning.t .. ok
t/noreply.t .. ok
t/stats-detail.t . ok
t/stats.t  ok
t/udp.t .. ok
t/unixsocket.t ... ok
t/whitespace.t ... 1/168
#   Failed test 'Makefile (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'config.h (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'config.log (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'config.status (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-assoc.o (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-daemon.o (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-debug (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-debug.profile/tcovd (see devtools/clean- 
whitespace.pl)'

#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-hash.o (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-items.o (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-memcached.o (see devtools/clean- 
whitespace.pl)'

#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-slabs.o (see devtools/clean-whitespace.pl)'
#   at t/whitespace.t line 39.

#   Failed test 'memcached-stats.o (see devtools/clean-w

Re: Also failing tests of 1.4.5 on Solaris 9 Sparc

2010-08-12 Thread Dagobert Michelsen

Hi Dustin,

Am 12.08.2010 um 18:25 schrieb Dustin:

 We don't have anyone working on sparc at the moment.  Would love
fixes.  :)


You haven't? What happend to Trond Norbye? Anyway, if anyone is  
interested

in developing memcached on Solaris I can offer an account on the OpenCSW
buildfarm which is equipped with Solaris 8/9/10 Sparc and x86 and Sun
Studio 11/12/12u1 + GCC3/GCC4 compilers for compatibility testing.
I for myself are mainly working on packaging for Solaris and elaborate
porting work is usually not possible in my timeframe.
  http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/


Best regards

  -- Dago


Re: Memcached-1.4.5 Solaris 10 Error

2011-03-03 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Felipe,

Am 03.03.2011 um 20:01 schrieb Felipe Cerqueira:
> thanks for your reply.
> 
> I'm using libevent-2.0.10-stable.
> 

> I have compiled everything on solaris 9 with gcc version 3.4.0.
> 
> Now, trying to resolv the problem, I have download from SFW
> memcached-1.2.6-sol10-sparc-local.gz. Its too old and depends of
> libevent 1.2a (older than memcached). rs
> 
> But, installing from this packages, its works fine.
> 
> So, I think its a problem with cross compilation of libevent between
> solaris 9 and 10.
> 
> I'll compile on solaris 10 and return here the result.

I have prepared a full libevent 2.0.10 in both 32 and 64 bit for
Solaris 9 and 10, both x86 and Sparc for OpenCSW:
  http://www.opencsw.org/packages/CSWlibevent2-0-5/
The only critical thing to note is that the tests must be run with a "bash"
instead of /bin/sh.

Memcached had some issue which you can see from my build recipe:
  http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gar/browser/csw/mgar/pkg/memcached/trunk
Experimental packages for Solaris 9 and additional ones for Solaris 10 x86 with
DTrace support both 32/64 bit are available from
  http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/experimental.html#memcached
However, as Sparc on Solaris 10 does not pass the testsuite in 64 bit
completely I don't know if there are other issue, so tests are definitely
welcome. You can do so easiest by
  pkgadd -d http://mirror.opencsw.org/opencsw/pkgutil-`uname -p`.pkg
  /opt/csw/bin/pkgutil -t 
http://buildfarm.opencsw.org/opencsw/experimental/memcached -i memcached

The current version officially distributed from OpenCSW is 1.4.3, also 32/64 
bit,
which should run fine. It was the last version btw. to compile OOTB on Solaris.

It would be nice if you would give them a try and let me know if you
encounter any issues.


Best regards

  -- Dago



Re: Memcached 1.4.6-rc1

2011-07-13 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Dormando,

Am 12.07.2011 um 21:48 schrieb dormando:
> http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/ReleaseNotes146rc1
> 
> If no new major bugs are reported in the next day or two, I'll cut this as
> -final.

I get a failed assertion on Solaris 9 Sparc with Sun Studio 12:

> t/binary.t ... 287/3376 
> #   Failed test 'Expected read length'
> #   at t/binary.t line 543.
> #  got: '39'
> # expected: '24'
> 
> #   Failed test 'Got proper response magic'
> #   at t/binary.t line 547.
> #  got: '243'
> # expected: '129'


Additionally I have a fix for a buggy older patch:
https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/3


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to 
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896



Re: MemCache cache location

2013-07-24 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi,

Am 24.07.2013 um 11:59 schrieb Jitendra Soni :
> I am using Memcahe for caching in AMF and I have given localhost:11211 as 
> Memcahed server but not able to find where its writing (means location of 
> cache folder) the cache in Solaris. Can you please let me know how to check 
> cache directory path?


You can see the opened files in Solaris with
  pfiles 
or (if it is not always opened) with
  truss -f -p 


Best regards

  -- Dago

-- 
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to 
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: ready for release

2016-06-17 Thread Dagobert Michelsen
Hi Dormando,

Am 17.06.2016 um 10:39 schrieb dormando :
> https://github.com/memcached/memcached/pull/127 is now "done", as much as
> it'll be done for this release. More work in future releases.
> 
> I've already pulled the next branch into master. I'll be cutting this in
> the morning unless someone has a major problem with it between now and
> then :)

Not a major problem, but the testsuite on Solaris x86 on 32 and 64 bit has 
issues:
  https://buildfarm.opencsw.org/buildbot/waterfall?category=memcached

> #   Failed test 'canary ==
> BBB...
> #   at 
> /export/home/buildbot/slave/memcached-solaris10-i386/build/t/lib/MemcachedTest.pm
>  line 59.
> #  got: 'END
> # '
> # expected: 'VALUE canary 0 66560
> # BBB...
> # END
> # '
> 
> # Looks like you failed 1 test of 224.




Best regards

  — Dago

--
"You don't become great by trying to be great, you become great by wanting to 
do something,
and then doing it so hard that you become great in the process." - xkcd #896

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"memcached" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail