Re: [MBZ] Flukes

2010-03-16 Thread John Reames

Hmm...
I did not know that the bar graph was just the last digit. I know the  
main display refreshes at 4Hz and the bar at 40Hz.


--
John W Reames
jwrea...@comcast.net
Home: +14106646986
Mobile: +14437915905

On Mar 16, 2010, at 10:28, Jim Cathey  wrote:

The bar graph updates at 10x the speed of the digital display.   
Additionally, the digital display updates faster on 3,5 digit mode  
than 4.5 digit mode (at least that's what the manual on my fluke 89  
says...)


The _normal_ mode for the 83/85/87 is 3+ digit mode, not 4+ digits.
You have to hold down a button when you turn it on to get the high
accuracy (but slow) mode.  (It's the backlight button, so my old
83 doesn't have that one.)

From way back, a 1/2 digit specification was used when there was
a most-significant "0/1" digit, they were calling the Fluke's 0-3
3/4 of a digit last I looked, though it's a lot closer to half.
Maybe they renormalized?

The bargraph is very different between the 83 and the 87.  Normally
I prefer the 83's where it's a growing bar from 0-4 representing
the entire reading; the 87's is a moving segment that represents only
one digit of the reading, but that was perfect for the oxygen sensor
which has less than 1V output, so the digit it picked was the most
significant varying one.  (That is, the 83 throbbed along in the
bottom 1/4 of the analog display, the 87 swept across nearly the
whole thing.  I find it useful to have both meters, and the 83 is
my 'daily driver' because it's easier on the batteries and the
display digits are fractionally larger.  Besides, that's the one
I paid retail for, I'm going to get my money's worth out of it!)

I'm a bit surprised the analog bargraph display variation isn't
a user-selectable mode, maybe it is on the later Series?  (Mine
are all original series---Mark nothing.)

My only complaint is that the test leads have a nasty habit of  
developing a bad connection up inside the probes...


I haven't had that yet.  I do find that using the Fluke on the
cars is hard on the probes.  I've fried the tips off of the probes,
and it turns out that the insulation isn't rated for exhaust manifold
temperatures!

I need more probes.  Oh, and one of their Scopemeters to go along  
with!


-- Jim



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


[MBZ] Flukes

2010-03-16 Thread Jim Cathey
The bar graph updates at 10x the speed of the digital display.  
Additionally, the digital display updates faster on 3,5 digit mode 
than 4.5 digit mode (at least that's what the manual on my fluke 89 
says...)


The _normal_ mode for the 83/85/87 is 3+ digit mode, not 4+ digits.
You have to hold down a button when you turn it on to get the high
accuracy (but slow) mode.  (It's the backlight button, so my old
83 doesn't have that one.)

From way back, a 1/2 digit specification was used when there was
a most-significant "0/1" digit, they were calling the Fluke's 0-3
3/4 of a digit last I looked, though it's a lot closer to half.
Maybe they renormalized?

The bargraph is very different between the 83 and the 87.  Normally
I prefer the 83's where it's a growing bar from 0-4 representing
the entire reading; the 87's is a moving segment that represents only
one digit of the reading, but that was perfect for the oxygen sensor
which has less than 1V output, so the digit it picked was the most
significant varying one.  (That is, the 83 throbbed along in the
bottom 1/4 of the analog display, the 87 swept across nearly the
whole thing.  I find it useful to have both meters, and the 83 is
my 'daily driver' because it's easier on the batteries and the
display digits are fractionally larger.  Besides, that's the one
I paid retail for, I'm going to get my money's worth out of it!)

I'm a bit surprised the analog bargraph display variation isn't
a user-selectable mode, maybe it is on the later Series?  (Mine
are all original series---Mark nothing.)

My only complaint is that the test leads have a nasty habit of 
developing a bad connection up inside the probes...


I haven't had that yet.  I do find that using the Fluke on the
cars is hard on the probes.  I've fried the tips off of the probes,
and it turns out that the insulation isn't rated for exhaust manifold
temperatures!

I need more probes.  Oh, and one of their Scopemeters to go along with!

-- Jim



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Flukes

2009-06-10 Thread archer


- Original Message - 
From: "Jim Cathey" 

To: "Mercedes Discussion List" 
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: [MBZ] Flukes


Since the Fluke will mainly be used for voltage, amperage, and 
resistance the more specialized functions won't really be needed.  
Accuracy is the main requirement.  Think I'll look around for an 83.  
Thanks again, Jim.


I believe they're all equally accurate, so far as working
on cars is concerned.  I'm not sure that newer series' display
sizes match the original series, which is what I have, so if
that's important to you check that carefully.  There are times
that the backlight of the 87 would be nice to have, bigger
digits don't help in the dark.

Honestly I think you'd probably be happy with _any_ 80-series
Fluke that you ended up with, provided it wasn't broken.  I am.
I was trying to high-grade the 83 with the 87, but only after
having both was I able to find that I still preferred the 83
fractionally for most of my uses.  I only bought the 83 in the
first place because it was cheaper, I couldn't justify the
true-RMS feature which added something like $100 to the price.

The 87 has a faster conversion time, which can be a factor
in certain types of pulsed signal measurements such as when
I was working on the boat ignition.  (Which I'm just about
to start doing again, boating season being upon us and all.)

My only real complaint about the Flukes is the cost of the
ammeter fuses.  They're more than a Harbor Freight DMM!
So be careful when measuring current.

Meter leads don't last forever, btw.  They're well out
in harm's way.

-- Jim


I'll try not to blow any fuses, Jim, but BTDT.  (o:]
Thanks,
Gerry

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Flukes

2009-06-10 Thread Jim Cathey
Since the Fluke will mainly be used for voltage, amperage, and 
resistance the more specialized functions won't really be needed.  
Accuracy is the main requirement.  Think I'll look around for an 83.  
Thanks again, Jim.


I believe they're all equally accurate, so far as working
on cars is concerned.  I'm not sure that newer series' display
sizes match the original series, which is what I have, so if
that's important to you check that carefully.  There are times
that the backlight of the 87 would be nice to have, bigger
digits don't help in the dark.

Honestly I think you'd probably be happy with _any_ 80-series
Fluke that you ended up with, provided it wasn't broken.  I am.
I was trying to high-grade the 83 with the 87, but only after
having both was I able to find that I still preferred the 83
fractionally for most of my uses.  I only bought the 83 in the
first place because it was cheaper, I couldn't justify the
true-RMS feature which added something like $100 to the price.

The 87 has a faster conversion time, which can be a factor
in certain types of pulsed signal measurements such as when
I was working on the boat ignition.  (Which I'm just about
to start doing again, boating season being upon us and all.)

My only real complaint about the Flukes is the cost of the
ammeter fuses.  They're more than a Harbor Freight DMM!
So be careful when measuring current.

Meter leads don't last forever, btw.  They're well out
in harm's way.

-- Jim



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com