Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-28 Thread Max Dillon via Mercedes
That's what I use in my 124 cars.

I haven't looked around for a better price yet.  I think Napa had a sale once 
for about $6 per quart, long time ago.
-- 
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
'87 300TD
'95 E300

On November 28, 2016 7:24:53 PM EST, Curley McLain via Mercedes 
 wrote:
>Is this a deal?  $9 a quart does not seem like a deal to me.
>
>The warrior woman sent this via email:
>
>Mobil 1 112980 Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid - 1 Quart (Pack
>of 6)
>by Mobil 1
>4.8 out of 5 stars88 customer reviews  | 74 answered questions
>Price:$53.02 Free Shipping for Prime Members
>
>
>Is this fluid correct for 722.3 transmissions?  Or is it the stuff for 
>the 6 and 7 spd trans?
>
>___
>http://www.okiebenz.com
>
>To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
>To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
>http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-28 Thread Dan Penoff via Mercedes
This is the correct stuff:

https://www.fcpeuro.com/products/auto-trans-fluid-0009899203

Buy $50 worth of stuff and shipping is free. 

Only thing I use in my W126 and W123

Dan


> On Nov 28, 2016, at 7:24 PM, Curley McLain via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> Is this a deal?  $9 a quart does not seem like a deal to me.
> 
> The warrior woman sent this via email:
> 
> Mobil 1 112980 Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid - 1 Quart (Pack of 6)
> by Mobil 1
> 4.8 out of 5 stars88 customer reviews  | 74 answered questions
> Price:$53.02 Free Shipping for Prime Members
> 
> 
> Is this fluid correct for 722.3 transmissions?  Or is it the stuff for the 6 
> and 7 spd trans?
> 
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
> 
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
> 
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
> 
> 


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-28 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes

Is this a deal?  $9 a quart does not seem like a deal to me.

The warrior woman sent this via email:

Mobil 1 112980 Synthetic Automatic Transmission Fluid - 1 Quart (Pack of 6)
by Mobil 1
4.8 out of 5 stars88 customer reviews  | 74 answered questions
Price:$53.02 Free Shipping for Prime Members


Is this fluid correct for 722.3 transmissions?  Or is it the stuff for 
the 6 and 7 spd trans?


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-28 Thread Floyd Thursby via Mercedes

Probably the DNC

--FT


On 11/28/16 5:20 PM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes wrote:

Yeah, a trip to Delusionville.  Does someone pay you to spread these
falsehoods?

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Curley McLain via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:


The founders had inspired genius.  (most would argue divinely inspired
genius)

If I had to guess, There were probably 2 million votes in LA county that
were not legal votes (illegal alien, double votes, etc)   Take those away
and maybe DJT won LA county.  Wouldn't that be a trip!


Floyd Thursby via Mercedes 
November 27, 2016 at 10:06 AM
This is an interesting map that shows geographic distribution of the vote
winners by county:

http://i0.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/
election-2016-county-map.png?w=600

The article with it is somewhat interesting but seems to have a bit of
bias:

http://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/

I saw a comment from someone that said if the blue areas prevailed it
would be sorta like a "Hunger Games" kind of situation where the elite
metro areas basically controlled the rest of the country, the residents of
whom would basically have no say in the matter if not for the electoral
college arrangement.

The article says:

As with most maps that represent information using color, red/blue
election maps are great for communicating categorical data (in this case,
/which candidate won county X?/). But they don’t do a very good job
conveying magnitude  (/how
important is county X compared to other counties?/).

For example, *L.A. County * alone has a population of over
*10 million*. That’s more than the combined population of 10 entire states.
*Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota,
Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont,* and *Wyoming* together have a total
population of just over *9 million*?

Which says that LA County could basically be the key to a Clinton "win"
since the margin is like 1.5M votes at this point, and I think her margin
was larger than that in LA County?  And LA County would basically negate
the votes of 10 states that comprise a very large geographic area though
low-density.

--FT





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



--
--FT
Winston Churchill:
“Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or 
petty,
never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense.
Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the 
enemy.”


___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-28 Thread Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes
Yeah, a trip to Delusionville.  Does someone pay you to spread these
falsehoods?

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Curley McLain via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:

> The founders had inspired genius.  (most would argue divinely inspired
> genius)
>
> If I had to guess, There were probably 2 million votes in LA county that
> were not legal votes (illegal alien, double votes, etc)   Take those away
> and maybe DJT won LA county.  Wouldn't that be a trip!
>
>> Floyd Thursby via Mercedes 
>> November 27, 2016 at 10:06 AM
>> This is an interesting map that shows geographic distribution of the vote
>> winners by county:
>>
>> http://i0.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/
>> election-2016-county-map.png?w=600
>>
>> The article with it is somewhat interesting but seems to have a bit of
>> bias:
>>
>> http://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/
>>
>> I saw a comment from someone that said if the blue areas prevailed it
>> would be sorta like a "Hunger Games" kind of situation where the elite
>> metro areas basically controlled the rest of the country, the residents of
>> whom would basically have no say in the matter if not for the electoral
>> college arrangement.
>>
>> The article says:
>>
>> As with most maps that represent information using color, red/blue
>> election maps are great for communicating categorical data (in this case,
>> /which candidate won county X?/). But they don’t do a very good job
>> conveying magnitude  (/how
>> important is county X compared to other counties?/).
>>
>> For example, *L.A. County > -u-s-cities-can-you-fit-inside-tokyo/>* alone has a population of over
>> *10 million*. That’s more than the combined population of 10 entire states.
>> *Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota,
>> Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont,* and *Wyoming* together have a total
>> population of just over *9 million*?
>>
>> Which says that LA County could basically be the key to a Clinton "win"
>> since the margin is like 1.5M votes at this point, and I think her margin
>> was larger than that in LA County?  And LA County would basically negate
>> the votes of 10 states that comprise a very large geographic area though
>> low-density.
>>
>> --FT
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ___
> http://www.okiebenz.com
>
> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
>
> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
>
>
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-27 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes
The founders had inspired genius.  (most would argue divinely inspired 
genius)


If I had to guess, There were probably 2 million votes in LA county that 
were not legal votes (illegal alien, double votes, etc)   Take those 
away and maybe DJT won LA county.  Wouldn't that be a trip!

Floyd Thursby via Mercedes 
November 27, 2016 at 10:06 AM
This is an interesting map that shows geographic distribution of the 
vote winners by county:


http://i0.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/election-2016-county-map.png?w=600 



The article with it is somewhat interesting but seems to have a bit of 
bias:


http://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/

I saw a comment from someone that said if the blue areas prevailed it 
would be sorta like a "Hunger Games" kind of situation where the elite 
metro areas basically controlled the rest of the country, the 
residents of whom would basically have no say in the matter if not for 
the electoral college arrangement.


The article says:

As with most maps that represent information using color, red/blue 
election maps are great for communicating categorical data (in this 
case, /which candidate won county X?/). But they don’t do a very good 
job conveying magnitude  
(/how important is county X compared to other counties?/).


For example, *L.A. County 
* 
alone has a population of over *10 million*. That’s more than the 
combined population of 10 entire states. *Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode 
Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, 
Vermont,* and *Wyoming* together have a total population of just over 
*9 million*?


Which says that LA County could basically be the key to a Clinton 
"win" since the margin is like 1.5M votes at this point, and I think 
her margin was larger than that in LA County?  And LA County would 
basically negate the votes of 10 states that comprise a very large 
geographic area though low-density.


--FT





___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] Somebody needs to think about this

2016-11-27 Thread Floyd Thursby via Mercedes
This is an interesting map that shows geographic distribution of the 
vote winners by county:


http://i0.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/election-2016-county-map.png?w=600

The article with it is somewhat interesting but seems to have a bit of 
bias:


http://metrocosm.com/election-2016-map-3d/

I saw a comment from someone that said if the blue areas prevailed it 
would be sorta like a "Hunger Games" kind of situation where the elite 
metro areas basically controlled the rest of the country, the residents 
of whom would basically have no say in the matter if not for the 
electoral college arrangement.


The article says:

As with most maps that represent information using color, red/blue 
election maps are great for communicating categorical data (in this 
case, /which candidate won county X?/). But they don’t do a very good 
job conveying magnitude  
(/how important is county X compared to other counties?/).


For example, *L.A. County 
* 
alone has a population of over *10 million*. That’s more than the 
combined population of 10 entire states. *Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode 
Island, Montana, Delaware, South Dakota, Alaska, North Dakota, Vermont,* 
and *Wyoming* together have a total population of just over *9 million*?


Which says that LA County could basically be the key to a Clinton "win" 
since the margin is like 1.5M votes at this point, and I think her 
margin was larger than that in LA County?  And LA County would basically 
negate the votes of 10 states that comprise a very large geographic area 
though low-density.


--FT


On 11/27/16 10:43 AM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes wrote:

If anybody doesn't believe what Curley said about the Dems encouraging illegal
voting...maybe they'll believe what Obama had to say on the subject:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfgEvgVC6Qs



On November 27, 2016 at 9:39 AM Curley McLain via Mercedes
 wrote:
Trump won if you only take out the illegal aliens who are ineligible to
vote, but who voted anyway at the encouragement of the (J) party.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



--
--FT
Winston Churchill:
“Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or 
petty,
never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense.
Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the 
enemy.”

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com