Re: [MBZ] WD- 40 Snopes
Larry T wrote: there has been some recent accusations that Snopes is not as non-partisan as they claim -- when quoting them make sure there's not a unstated reason for them to take the position they have. My impression of the founders back when the site started was that they were very (progressive) MARK XIST politically. They carefully presented all the facts they could verify, then interpreted them with a leftward slant. So the political chain mails from the left side would be "True", while a similarly factual political chain mail from the right side would be "True (but it doesn't mean as much as the sender claims it does)". Mitch. Lets call a spade a spade. Mark xist. "pro gressive" = regressive repressive totalitarian ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] WD- 40 Snopes
Larry T wrote: there has been some recent accusations that Snopes is not as non-partisan as they claim -- when quoting them make sure there's not a unstated reason for them to take the position they have. My impression of the founders back when the site started was that they were very progressive politically. They carefully presented all the facts they could verify, then interpreted them with a leftward slant. So the political chain mails from the left side would be "True", while a similarly factual political chain mail from the right side would be "True (but it doesn't mean as much as the sender claims it does)". Mitch. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
Re: [MBZ] WD- 40 Snopes
there has been some recent accusations that Snopes is not as non-partisan as they claim -- when quoting them make sure there's not a unstated reason for them to take the position they have. LarryT On 7/19/2013 3:25 PM, Michael Canfield wrote: My only problem with Snopes and the fish oil thing is that the info they state is NOT what it says on the MSDS for WD40! All of you keep arguing and quoting Snopes. Look at the MSDS yourself. Mike On Jul 11, 2013 11:52 PM, "Fmiser" wrote: Rich wrote: Funny, I juwt read this thread then see my uncle has posted this on his FB: I NEVER KNEW THIS! Some of those are not so smart. Others I plain don't believe. (Statue of Liberty? _sure!_) What Snopes has to say. http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/household/wd-40.asp -- Philip ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
