Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mesa: Make _mesa_is_stencil_format() consistent with _mesa_is_depth_format().
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:53:33 -0700, Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com wrote: On 11/23/2011 01:37 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: There was only one consumer of this API, meta.c, which was intending to ask is this format just stencil index (and nothing else)?. Instead, if one tried to glDrawPixels of GL_DEPTH_STENCIL-type formats, it would just try to draw the stencil parts. Nothing good came of this. This function looks rather silly at this point, but I'm leaving it in place to be the obvious parallel API to _mesa_is_depth_format(). Note that if you want the old behavior, you should use it as (_mesa_is_stencil_format() || _mesa_is_depthstencil_format()) like is commonly done for depth-related tests. --- src/mesa/main/image.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/main/image.c b/src/mesa/main/image.c index 914a999..d91b4ca 100644 --- a/src/mesa/main/image.c +++ b/src/mesa/main/image.c @@ -848,7 +848,6 @@ _mesa_is_stencil_format(GLenum format) { switch (format) { case GL_STENCIL_INDEX: - case GL_DEPTH_STENCIL: return GL_TRUE; default: return GL_FALSE; I'd guess/hope this compiles down to: return format == GL_STENCIL_INDEX; Either way, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com Confirmed. For once, gcc does what we would hope! pgpQD6YgUh919.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mesa: Make _mesa_is_stencil_format() consistent with _mesa_is_depth_format().
There was only one consumer of this API, meta.c, which was intending to ask is this format just stencil index (and nothing else)?. Instead, if one tried to glDrawPixels of GL_DEPTH_STENCIL-type formats, it would just try to draw the stencil parts. Nothing good came of this. This function looks rather silly at this point, but I'm leaving it in place to be the obvious parallel API to _mesa_is_depth_format(). Note that if you want the old behavior, you should use it as (_mesa_is_stencil_format() || _mesa_is_depthstencil_format()) like is commonly done for depth-related tests. --- src/mesa/main/image.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/main/image.c b/src/mesa/main/image.c index 914a999..d91b4ca 100644 --- a/src/mesa/main/image.c +++ b/src/mesa/main/image.c @@ -848,7 +848,6 @@ _mesa_is_stencil_format(GLenum format) { switch (format) { case GL_STENCIL_INDEX: - case GL_DEPTH_STENCIL: return GL_TRUE; default: return GL_FALSE; -- 1.7.7.3 ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mesa: Make _mesa_is_stencil_format() consistent with _mesa_is_depth_format().
On 11/23/2011 01:37 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: There was only one consumer of this API, meta.c, which was intending to ask is this format just stencil index (and nothing else)?. Instead, if one tried to glDrawPixels of GL_DEPTH_STENCIL-type formats, it would just try to draw the stencil parts. Nothing good came of this. This function looks rather silly at this point, but I'm leaving it in place to be the obvious parallel API to _mesa_is_depth_format(). Note that if you want the old behavior, you should use it as (_mesa_is_stencil_format() || _mesa_is_depthstencil_format()) like is commonly done for depth-related tests. --- src/mesa/main/image.c |1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/main/image.c b/src/mesa/main/image.c index 914a999..d91b4ca 100644 --- a/src/mesa/main/image.c +++ b/src/mesa/main/image.c @@ -848,7 +848,6 @@ _mesa_is_stencil_format(GLenum format) { switch (format) { case GL_STENCIL_INDEX: - case GL_DEPTH_STENCIL: return GL_TRUE; default: return GL_FALSE; I'd guess/hope this compiles down to: return format == GL_STENCIL_INDEX; Either way, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul bri...@vmware.com ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev