Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 3/3] i915: store reference to the context within struct intel_fence

2016-10-14 Thread Emil Velikov 
On 27 July 2016 at 15:30, Emil Velikov  wrote:
> On 16 July 2016 at 01:02, Mauro Rossi  wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm sending the v2 re-spin of patch as per i965, rechecked twice
>> line-by-line with Tomasz's one.
>>
>> Building ok, marshmallow-x86 booting ok and here are the results of Android
>> CTS egl and gles2 x86 target tests
>>
>> Android CTS 6.0_r7 build:2906653
>> 07-16 00:52:42 I/DeviceManager: Detected new device 192.168.1.7:
>> cts-tf > list r
>> Session Pass   Fail Not Executed  Start time   Plan name
>> Device serial(s)
>> 0(EGL)  1410   24   0 2016.07.16_00.21.30  NA
>> unknown
>> 1(GLES2)  13832 82   0 2016.07.16_00.24.23  NA
>> unknown
>> cts-tf >
>>
>> I get the same results as per i965GM
>>
> Thanks Mauro.
>
> Can we get an ack/nack/r-b from any of the Intel devs ? How do you
> feel on getting this in -stable ?
> FTR the series is identical to the i965 patches by Chad/me/Tomasz
> barring a few s/i915/i965/ style changes.
>
I've dropped the stable tag, added the above test results and fixed a
few missing 'intel_sync' -> 'intel_gl_sync'.

Thanks Mauro ! Can you please check through the list [1] and let me
know if anything else is outstanding ?
Emil

[1] 
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/project/mesa/patches/?submitter=15603
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH 3/3] i915: store reference to the context within struct intel_fence

2016-07-27 Thread Emil Velikov 
On 16 July 2016 at 01:02, Mauro Rossi  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sending the v2 re-spin of patch as per i965, rechecked twice
> line-by-line with Tomasz's one.
>
> Building ok, marshmallow-x86 booting ok and here are the results of Android
> CTS egl and gles2 x86 target tests
>
> Android CTS 6.0_r7 build:2906653
> 07-16 00:52:42 I/DeviceManager: Detected new device 192.168.1.7:
> cts-tf > list r
> Session Pass   Fail Not Executed  Start time   Plan name
> Device serial(s)
> 0(EGL)  1410   24   0 2016.07.16_00.21.30  NA
> unknown
> 1(GLES2)  13832 82   0 2016.07.16_00.24.23  NA
> unknown
> cts-tf >
>
> I get the same results as per i965GM
>
Thanks Mauro.

Can we get an ack/nack/r-b from any of the Intel devs ? How do you
feel on getting this in -stable ?
FTR the series is identical to the i965 patches by Chad/me/Tomasz
barring a few s/i915/i965/ style changes.

Thanks
Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev