[meteorite-list] NASA Funds Space Center, Partner, To Develop Instrument For Asteroid Sample Return Mission

2003-01-08 Thread Ron Baalke


University Relations
University of Arkansas

CONTACT:
Derek Sears
Director, Arkansas-Oklahoma Center for Space and Planetary
  Science
Professor of chemistry, Fulbright College
(479) 575-5204, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Melissa Blouin
Science and research communications manager
(479) 575-, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

FOR RELEASE MONDAY, JANUARY 6, 2003

NASA FUNDS SPACE CENTER, PARTNER, TO DEVELOP INSTRUMENT FOR
SPACE MISSION

FAYETTEVILLE, Ark. -- The Arkansas-Oklahoma Center for Space
and Planetary Science has moved one step closer to launching
an asteroid sample return collector thanks to funding from
NASA.

NASA recently announced a grant of $330,000 awarded to the
University of Arkansas- and Oklahoma State University-based
center and its industrial partner, SpaceWorks of Tucson,
Ariz., to develop a sample collector for use with the
space center's Hera space mission. 

Hera is a proposal being led by the space center to send a
spacecraft to three near-Earth asteroids, reconnoiter for
2-1/2 months, then swoop down to collect samples from
three sites and return those samples to Earth. 

Derek Sears, director of the space center and principal
investigator for the mission, said the center has worked
with SpaceWorks for about three years. 

They have helped us develop mission concepts and
trajectories, and they have helped us in testing
collector ideas, he said. They are a first-rate
group and we are very pleased that NASA has shown the
confidence in their ideas and in the Hera mission to
provide this support. This sign of support is probably
worth more than the dollar figure.

The SpaceWorks collector consists of a plastic tray on
the end of a flexible arm that is pressed into the
surface of the asteroid by the spacecraft. The arm then
folds back to place the tray with four times its own
weight of surface material in a sample return capsule
for return to Earth.

SpaceWorks will supervise the project and handle the
mechanical aspects of building the collector. The space
center will test the collector, using the Andromeda
environmental chamber and microgravity flight tests.
Collaborators at the Virginia Technical Institute will
provide the plastic material. The microgravity tests
will be performed on board NASA's reduced gravity
facility, an aircraft that flies in parabolic loops
so as to simulate the microgravity of a small asteroid.

The Hera proposal will be submitted to NASA in the summer
of 2003. In the meantime, the team wants to demonstrate
the technical feasibility of the idea by constructing
the prototype and performing tests, Sears said.



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] eBay Sale Meteorite Crater Study Kit

2003-01-08 Thread Thomas H. Webb

Hello list,
I have this item ending on eBay tonight: #2153094725.  Take a look.
Thanks,
Thomas


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] micro spherules (gutter meteoritics)

2003-01-08 Thread Robert Wendi Beauford
While these are valid points, and I respect his work, it is painfully
obvious that Marco has never duplicated the experiment as I set it out in my
article of a couple of years ago.
The magnetite grains that make sorting of ground level samples so difficult,
because their weight selects against transport by wind, make up only a tiny
percentage of the material found at roof level.  The dust found at roof
level is primarily silicate, and is easily minimized or removed by magnet
and filter sorting.
I say easily, but it's relative - it takes a couple of hours to do even this
simple sorting well on a half cup of material.  That's nothing compared to
the challenge of sorting spherules from black sands in surface or subsurface
samples I've compared to.  Roof top samples contain hundreds of times more
magnetite grains than spherules.  Ground level soil samples contain millions
of times more magnetite grains than spherules.  This effect will be
magnified in deflationary areas, but dramatically minimized in ice.
He is absolutely correct that any assumption that a significant portion of
the magnetically responsive material found at roof level is of
extra-terrestrial origin is false.  Of the gross matter recovered, I would
estimate microspherules make up less than 1 particle in a very big number
(well over a million).  After extensive mechanical and magnetic sorting, I
would estimate they make up 1 particle in 1000 to 1, but are easily seen
and separated, as the perfect spherules are so strikingly different in shape
and sheen from the various iron bearing silicates and magnetite grains.
By mass, they do not account for so large a figure, even after sorting, as 1
in 1000, or 1 in 1, as they are among the smaller particles.
I would be happy to provide samples if anyone would like to make an effort
to refute or confirm.
- Robert Beauford  : )

Message: 13
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 18:05:18 -0800 (PST)
From: Robert Verish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite-list Meteoritecentral [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] re: Meteoric Dust

Here's some good info' that should go into the List
Archives, since this subject comes up now and then:

--- Attached Message ---

Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 12:58:24 +0100
From: Casper ter Kuile (original message from Marco)

Subject: (meteorobs) re: Meteoric Dust

Ed [Cannon?Majden?] bombarded me as expert on cosmic
dust particles in a recent email...
;-)

Indeed I did some work in this field; recovering
(successfully) cosmic spherules from 400,000 yrs old
sediment from an archaeological excavation.
Analysis at the UNM showed at least one of these to be
genuine. So at least I've seen these things and some
experience with searching them under the microscope.
Would not consider me an expert though. But I do have
a few things to say:

Unfortunately, much of the magnetic particles to be
collected with a collector on rooftop-level will
probably not be meteoritic. As Ed rightfully remarkes,
industrial waste products will [be found] among them,
and
magnetic spherulic particles are a known form of
these. In addition, small magnetite crystals which
form a natural, often abundant, component of soils,
undoubtedly will be among them. I actually feel that
with such an experiment (collecting with a rooftop
collector), it is most likely that the vast majority
of magnetic particles collected will NOT be meteoric
dust particles at all.

In my own experiment I used a sediment sample
collected from a sealed (and thus pristine) level
predating (considerably - by 400,000 years) the onset
of any form of industrial pollution. And even there, I
found (after many evenings of searching behind the
micro, and after first using a magnetic separation
technique to extract the magnetic particles) only a
handfull of possible cosmic spherules, picked out from

uncountable quantities of clearly non-meteoric
particles, mostly magnetite grains.
(The search image was for perfect spherules, as these
are not likely to be natural terrestrial products,
although even here, one has to be careful, magnetite
grains from soils have a crystal appearance, although
this is not always clearly apparent. Industrial
pollution however can be almost perfectly spherulic
too).

Thus, the remark from the old newspaper quoted,
especially the second half, that:
Almost all the meteor dust in the bucket will contain
iron; other particles will not. Thus any grains picked
up by a magnet can be safely assumed to be meteor
dust is certainly NOT correct, as there are many
[airborne] magnetic particles that have nothing to do
with meteorites at all: not only the industrial waste
products, but also magnetic soil particles blown
about.

If you want to find meteoric dust, the best thing to
do is try your hands at a sample which is likely
pristine and predating the onset of industrial
pollution. This is one reason (the other is connected
to maximizing collection surfaces) why scientists in
this field often turn to searching in samples 

[meteorite-list] A Meteorite? No, It's Just a Bowling Ball

2003-01-08 Thread Ron Baalke


http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Jan/01082003/utah/18283.asp

A Meteorite? No, It's Just a Bowling Ball 
BY GLEN WARCHOL 
THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE 
January 8, 2003

ON THE SALT FLATS 

If art imitates life, then science, at least in Utah, imitates the 
Late Show with David Letterman. 

Letterman and Galileo, two wiseguys who made their marks by dropping 
objects from great heights, could be consultants on an experiment 
being considered by the Salt Lake Astronomical Society. 

For years, Utah amateur astronomers have believed the Bonneville Salt 
Flats are prime meteorite hunting grounds. The terrain is smooth and 
white -- the perfect background for finding space rocks, says Patrick 
Wiggins, NASA Solar System ambassador to Utah. 

Meteors strike the Earth nearly every day. Fortunately, usually only 
tiny fragments survive. Still, Utah has had more than a dozen known 
good-size meteorite impacts. 

A year ago, volunteers drove the flats, scanning the surface for 
out-of-place rocks. Aside from rusted junk and objects dropped by 
the military over the years, they didn't have much luck. A major 
problem was that they had no idea what a meteorite impact in the 
salt would look like. 

Astronomy buffs, who share important characteristics with 8-year-olds, 
put on their thinking caps. Someone said, 'How can we simulate a 
meteorite impact?'  remembers Wiggins. The idea of a light aircraft 
dropping a bowling ball came up and that sounded kinda fun. Also 
under consideration are boulders, shot puts, and -- we can only 
hope -- canned hams. 

NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory's meteorite expert Ron Baalke is 
dubious. Meteors don't tend to be round like a bowling ball. 
But, a scientist at heart, he admits, Dropping bowling balls sounds 
like an interesting experiment. 

Robert Haag, an Arizonan who deals in meteorites with scientists and 
collectors, is also skeptical, but asks, Where do I sign up to 
drop the bowling balls? 

Wiggins says the experiment is still in the early stages. We have an 
aircraft lined up.  And we've had a couple of members donate bowling 
balls -- one with the proviso that it not be traced back to him. 

Which brings up a big issue: finding the bowling ball after it impacts 
at 100 to 200 mph.  Ideas vary from fitting the ball with a radio 
transmitter or a long streamer. The most breathtaking idea is from 
Wiggins, a skydiver. 

I could fall with the ball for a while to observe, he says. I'll 
just hope it doesn't get ab
ove me. 
That, of course, would bring into play physics of the Roadrunner cartoon 
variety. 

Wiggins admits the idea is a lark and could go several scary directions 
in research and development. 

There's a rocket group in town that lofts bowling balls, he says. We've 
also heard about a guy in Tooele who has a cannon that shoots bowling balls. 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] Astronomers Poised To Apply Novel Way To Look For Comets Beyond Neptune

2003-01-08 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-01/dlnl-apt010703.php

Public release date: 7-Jan-2003
Contact: Anne Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
925-422-9799
DOE/Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

Astronomers poised to apply novel way to look for comets beyond Neptune

SEATTLE, Washington- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory astronomers are
major partners in a scientific collaboration that will conduct an extremely
novel search for small, comet-like bodies in the outer solar system using
four half-meter telescopes. The work was described today at the winter
meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

Rather than look for the light reflected directly by these objects (as is
customary astronomy practice), this project will search for those very rare
moments when one of these objects passes between the telescopes and a nearby
background star. This brief eclipse lasts less than a second, but will
allow the scientists to study objects that are much too faint to be seen in
reflected sunlight, even with the largest telescopes.

This work was presented today by Sun-Kung King, on behalf of the TAOS
Project (TAOS: Taiwanese-American Occultation Survey) and by Matthew Lehner
of the University of Pennsylvania. King is an astronomer from the Institute
of Astronomy and Astrophysics of the Academia Sinica in Taiwan. Lawrence
Livermore National Laboratory scientists have played a key role in the
design and building of the telescopes and are members of TAOS.

The region probed by TAOS is known as the Kuiper Belt, and sometimes as the
Edgeworth-Kuiper Belt, after the two scientists who independently proposed
its existence more than 50 years ago. There were only two objects (Pluto and
its moon Charon) known in this region until the 1990s, when a flood of
exciting discoveries of new bodies was started by David Jewitt (at the
University of Hawaii) and Jane Luu (then at UC Berkeley). Despite hundreds
of discoveries later, much more remains unknown.

All theories of this region predict that there are many more small objects
than large objects. Conventional telescope searches principally find objects
that are larger in diameter than about 100 kilometers. An ambitious program
with the Hubble Space Telescope may find objects as small as 10 kilometers
in size. The scientists in TAOS believe they will be able to extend this
lower limit to about 3 kilometers. It is believed there are billions of
objects this small in the outer solar system.

The TAOS survey will provide data on remnants of our early solar system and
early planet formation, said Kem Cook, a TAOS astronomer who works at
Livermore's Institute for Geophysics and Planetary Physics. It will provide
us insight into how the solar system evolved. We'll be looking at the
smallest objects than anyone else has seen.

Current observations and theories can say very little about regions many
times farther from the sun than Neptune. TAOS is unique among astronomical
surveys in its ability to probe these great distances. TAOS is able to do
this because it does not rely on reflected sunlight. These small objects are
thought to be directly related to the new comets that wander into the
planetary system. Composed of dust and ice, they begin to evaporate when
they come closer to the sun, producing the spectacular and beautiful tails
that astronomers believe are the oldest objects in the solar system, which
makes them especially interesting.

The small objects we will detect are much too faint to be seen directly,
even by the largest telescopes in the world, King said. We will find them
silhouetted against the background stars, which will make it possible for us
to detect them.

TAOS will consist of four telescopes (only half a meter in diameter), which
will be used to monitor up to 2,000 stars. The telescopes will operate in
the central highlands of Taiwan.

The optical performance of the TAOS telescopes proved difficult to achieve
in a compact design.

We depended on LLNL precision engineering, optical design and fabrication
capabilities to build these telescopes, Cook said. Without that expertise
we would not have been able to build the TAOS telescopes.

The TAOS collaboration is made up of: King, A. Wang, C.Y. Wen, S.Y. Wang,
and T. Lee from the Academia Sinica's Institute of Astronomy and
Astrophysics in Taiwan; C. Alcock, R. Dave, J. Giammarco and Lehner from the
University of Pennsylvania; Cook, S. Marshall and R. Porrata from the
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; W.P. Chen and Z.W. Zhang from the
National Central University in Taiwan; Y.I. Byun from Yonsei University in
South Korea; J. Lissauer from NASA's Ames Research Center; and I. De Pater,
C. Liang and J. Rice from UC Berkeley.

TAOS is funded by the Academia Sinica and the National Central University,
which receive support from the Ministry of Education and the National
Science Council in Taiwan; by the Korean Research Foundation in South Korea;
and by NASA at the University of Pennsylvania and the Lawrence 

[meteorite-list] Philippine tektites

2003-01-08 Thread drtanuki
Dear List:
Does anyone have a copy of  Beyer's publications on Philippine
tektites?  If so, please contact me off list.  Thank you.  Dirk
Ross...Tokyo


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] looking for some meteorites

2003-01-08 Thread Ing. Christian ANGER
Hi list !

I am looking for micromount pieces of the following meteorites:

Who has one of them for sale or trade ?

Pervomaisky
Tazewell
Perryville
Springwater (3-5 grams)
Shaw
Sahara 99527
NWA 830

please contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Cheers,
Christian




IMCA #2673
www.austromet.com

Ing. Christian ANGER
Korngasse 6   
2405 Bad Deutsch-Altenburg  
AUSTRIA

email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] First Neptune Trojan Discovered

2003-01-08 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.noao.edu/outreach/press/pr03/pr0302.html

National Optical Astronomy Observatory
Tucson, Arizona

For More Information:

Douglas Isbell
Public Information Officer
National Optical Astronomy Observatory
Phone: 520/318-8214
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Kristi Phillips
Lowell Observatory
Phone: 928/774-3358, x232
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: 2:00 a.m. PST, January 8, 2003

RELEASE NO: NOAO 03-02

First Neptune Trojan Discovered

Astronomers have discovered a small body orbiting the Sun
at the distance of Neptune whose orbit makes it the first
known member of a long-sought population of objects known
as Neptune Trojans.

This small body, known as 2001 QR322, leads Neptune around
its orbit in such a way as to maintain -- on average --
approximately equal distance from Neptune and the Sun. As
such, it mimics the Trojan asteroids of Jupiter, which
orbit the Sun in two clouds approximately 60 degrees
ahead of and behind Jupiter. The first Jovian Trojan was
discovered in 1906, and approximately 1,560 such objects
are known today. However, until the discovery of
2001 QR322, Trojan-like objects associated with other
giant planets had not been found. 

2001 QR322 was discovered in the course of the Deep
Ecliptic Survey, a NASA-funded survey of the outer solar
system that uses the National Science Foundation's
telescopes at Kitt Peak National Observatory near Tucson,
AZ, and Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. 

Astronomers from Lowell Observatory, the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, the University of California
at Berkeley, the University of Hawaii, the University
of Pennsylvania, and the Large Binocular Telescope
Observatory comprise the Deep Ecliptic Survey team. 

The team first detected 2001 QR322 on August 21, 2001,
in deep digital images taken with the 4-meter Blanco
Telescope at Cerro Tololo by Marc Buie, Robert Millis,
and Lawrence Wasserman of Lowell Observatory. However,
several subsequent observations, made with a variety
of telescopes over the past 16 months, coupled with
numerical orbit integrations of the trajectory of the
asteroid, were required to prove that 2001 QR322 is
indeed a Neptune Trojan. The object is estimated to be
approximately 230 kilometers (140 miles) in diameter
and, like Neptune, requires about 166 years to complete
each circuit of its orbit.

Neptunian Trojans were long suspected to exist and it
is gratifying to finally know that they do, says team
member Eugene Chiang of the University of California at
Berkeley. The orbit of 2001 QR322 is remarkably stable;
projections of its trajectory into the future reveal
that it can co-orbit with Neptune for at least billions
of years. It is likely that 2001 QR322 is a dynamically
pristine object whose orbital eccentricity and inclination
have been largely unaltered by processes that afflicted
the majority of bodies in the outer solar system. 

A graphic that describes the orbit of 2001 QR322 is
available. 

Kitt Peak and Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory are
part of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO),
which is operated by the Association of Universities for
Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc., under a cooperative
agreement with the National Science Foundation. 

The survey team's research is supported in part by the
NASA Planetary Astronomy Program through grants to Lowell
Observatory, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
and the University of Hawaii; by the National Science
Foundation through a grant to the University of
California at Berkeley; by the Space Telescope Science
Institute through grants to University of Pennsylvania
and by the University of California at Berkeley; by the
University of California at Berkeley through a Faculty
Research Award; and by the Friends of Lowell Observatory.

NOTE: Marc Buie, Robert Millis, and Larry Wasserman can
be reached at 928/774-3358 or via email at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Eugene Chiang can be reached at 510/642-2131 or via email
at: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

For more information about the Deep Ecliptic Survey, see:
 http://www.lowell.edu/Research/DES/

IMAGE CAPTION:
The left-hand panel displays a bird's-eye view of the
outer solar system, with the orbits of Jupiter (J),
Saturn (S), Uranus (U), and Neptune (N) about the Sun
shown schematically. The dark tube of points lying on 
Neptune's orbit marks the path of the newly discovered
Trojan object 2001 QR322, relative to Neptune. The
Trojan shuttles back and forth along Neptune's orbit
as indicated by the red and green curved arrows. Each
full shuttling takes about 10,000 years to complete.

The small inset rectangle at left is magnified in the
right-hand panel. When plotted over time, 2001 QR322
traces a local corkscrew pattern. The red curve traces
the path of the Trojan as it travels away from Neptune,
as indicated by the red arrows. The green curve traces
the trajectory of the Trojan as it approaches Neptune.
Each full twist of the 

[meteorite-list] Looking for NWA 061

2003-01-08 Thread Gibeon
Hallo List,

I am looking for a nice piece of NWA061 for my collection.

Who has some of this for sale or trade?

Please contact me off list.

Best regards
===
Hanno Strufe Home position on planet Earth
Langenbergstrasse 32 N 49.21 092;
66954 Pirmasens E 007.53 558; 358 m
Germany
Phone + Fax: +49 6331 225 105
www.strufe.net
IMCA #4267
===


[meteorite-list] Tucson Information Page

2003-01-08 Thread Paul Harris
Greetings Dealers and List!

Dealers, please start sending in your Tucson plans for our information page.
We will be posting the link on our main page of meteorite.com and on
MeteoriteTimes.com in the next day or two.

Thank you!

Paul and Jim




**
  Paul Harris   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Jim Tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  The Meteorite Exchange, Inc.  http://www.meteorite.com
  MeteoriteTimes.com Magazine http://www.meteoritetimes.com
  PMB#455 P.O. Box 7000, Redondo Beach, CA 90277 USA
  FAX Number(310) 316-1032
**



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] HELP, I need photo for a nice project!

2003-01-08 Thread vincent jacques
Hello all list!

For the new meteorite display in Natural History Museum of Belgium (IRScNB), I look for many photos. These photos will be include in manywindowson a luminous "meteorite wall". Credit referencewill be written undereach photo.Photos must be in gif / jpg /pdf / png format, and perfect quality. Thedimension is not important (not too little of course) 

I look for following photos:
Complete view of Hoba meteorite
Ourique "crater" impact (portugal, H4,1998 dec.28)
Main mass of Zagami
Diurnal bolide
Mjolnir crater (40 Km)
Kaalijarvi crater or Morasko crater
A very weathered and oxidisedmeteorite
Photo of Groenland expedition after the 1997 event.
A very high resolution photo of Taguish lake fragment
A nice photo of saharian, with Sahara landscape
A nice Antarctic meteorite on ice field
Lunar slices- DAG 262- 400- etc...(differents matrix are welcome)
JPL or NIPR laboratory environment
Very nice perfectly oriented meteorite (Adamana or others)
NWA011

I think that it's the end...
I thank you very much, 
Cordially,
Vincent JACQUES [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]MSN Search, le moteur de recherche qui pense comme vous ! Cliquez-ici 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] woodbine, il meteorite and the other STEVE ARNOLD

2003-01-08 Thread STEVE ARNOLD
Hi list. I just want to let everyone know that I talked to the other steve arnold tonight and he is doing just fine. On another note, I am looking for a piece of the woodbine, illinois meteorite. Does anyone have any forsale?Or does anyone eant to let any go? Let me know.
steve arnold, chicagoSteve r. Arnold, Chicago, il, 60107
The midwest meteorite collector!
I.M.C.A. member #6728
Website url http://stormbringer60120.tripod.comDo you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Re: [meteorite-list] Tucson Information Page

2003-01-08 Thread MARK BOSTICK
Hello Paul and list,

Paul wrote: Dealers, please start sending in your Tucson plans for our
information page.
We will be posting the link on our main page of meteorite.com and on
MeteoriteTimes.com in the next day or two.


I will be in Tucson from Feb. 6, the day before the activities start, to
Feb. 9, the sunday and last day of the meteorite part of Tucson. If any list
member is going and would like to get together, please e-mail me off list
for my cell phone number.

Sounds like a nice break.  A big thank you to those that worked in  planning
the different events, your time and exspense is appreciated by all.  I will
not be stuck in a selling room this year and look forward to seeing
everybody.

Mark Bostick

Thanks, Mark Bostick

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] The Death Of A Dream

2003-01-08 Thread Paul Harris
Dear List and MT Writers,

I just got off the phone with Jim and I regret to inform you that 
MeteoriteTimes.com died tonight.

We had a dream of giving back to the meteorite community some of what we 
have received.  Jim and
I spent much of what little free time we had on producing the 
magazine.  What we lacked was the
time it takes to police each and every word, each and every picture, each 
and every link.   We lacked
the time and clairvoyance to realize when material was not mentioned.

We did not spend our free time and creative energies to be spoken to as we 
have been.
We did not spend our free time and creative energies to cause infighting 
between others.
We did not spend our free time and creative energies to have to bother the 
list with e-mails like this.

To the vast majority who will miss the magazine, I truly apologize and I'm 
sorry.

Paul



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Another mag bites the dust!

2003-01-08 Thread James Tobin

Dear List,
After a brief conversation with Paul it was agreed that we would pull the
MeteoriteTimes magazine down off the web and pick up our toys and go home.
And I had a neat article already written for next month.

We tried to offer valuable information and good science. What we fought the
whole time was a battle to keep out the personal agendas of dealers who
were contributors. Editing and worrying about any information concerning
pricing. Careful that there was never mention of others dealers names by
dealers, and ebay auction results and many more things. That is beside the
fact that some of the material submitted was just badly thought out and
poor science.

Well, whether out of rushing around with the holidays and trying to get an
issue out; we missed a couple things this month. They became  matters of
concern to certain individuals. Frankly, I have spent the week moderating
the disputes of dealers in the meteorite business over things that we had
little or no involvement in, except that they were written or done by
contributing writers.

This was never what the magazine was to be about. None of this has anything
to do with the joy of studying meteorites and sharing stories. It involves
egos and business. So when Paul called today with another problem created
by one of our contributors, we came to the easy decision to drop the
magazine. This reflects our general philosophy of life. As hard as we work,
if the things we do in our spare time are not fun, we don't do them.

Both of us have very little spare time. I work on average 55 hours a week
in a high stress environment. Responsible for the entire operation of the
production floor of a large printing company. He is working similarly
stressful hours.

As has so often be seen on this list, we are a community with some
individuals who do not always work and play well with others. I have this
week (and so has Paul) been in the nasty position of trying to balance long
standing dear friendships with disputes created because we provided a place
for the exchange of ideas. I will never choose losing friend over anything.
It is my hope that when the dust settles that these individuals that I care
deeply about will still choose to call me friend. I choose not to be
hardened and ignore that there are friendships at stake. One meteorite
investigator offended a dealer who is his friend. It occurred because of a
photo used on our magazine. I took the blame for not seeing the offending
element in the picture. But the thumbnail in our article did not have the
element. The larger picture linked to our thumbnail which is not on our
server was different. I took the blame I should have looked at every link
to see what was there, probably a hundred links in this issue.  Today, it
is an argument over one person taking unfair advantage to promote
themselves and their business; while not mentioning the activities of a
similar kind by someone else. And these individuals are all good friends of
ours.

After raising four children and now having five grandchildren, I have
despite my old nature become a pretty open person about my feelings. And
all this saddens me and is frankly breaking my heart. To say the least it
has taken the joy out of doing the magazine. 

With that said I offer an apology to anyone feeling slighted by anything we
offered in the magazine. I have felt all week that there were maybe still
black feathers in my mouth from the big meals of crow I have been eating.

Paul and I spoke as I said rather briefly to agreed to this, and ended by
saying we would send messages from our guts to the list, without discussing
our posts with each other. I'm am just as interested as you to read what he
says.

Art I apologize to you also, this is the first non-meteoritic email I have
ever sent, breaking one more rule today.   

Jim Tobin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Meteorite Exchange




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



[meteorite-list] No Longer Hosting A Tucson Information Page

2003-01-08 Thread Paul Harris
Dear List,

Do to the fact that we might be held liable for mentioning
one person more than another we will NOT be hosting a Tucson
Information page as we have in the past years.

How sad...

Paul





__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list