[meteorite-list] The ultimate Type Collection List

2012-09-03 Thread Mendy Ouzillou
Hello everyone,

One more email to keep everyone busy.

I'd like to put together the ultimate Type Collection list and am quite sure
someone has already started one.  I'd like to use this for myself as well as
post it on my website for everyone to enjoy.  

Here is what I am looking for:
1) A complete list of meteorite types.  For example, from shergottite there
are Basaltic, Lherzolitic and Olivine-phyric. Maybe there are some unusual
variations or anomalous versions of these as well.
2) Specific meteorite(s) that best represent that category.  These examples
should be obtainable (i.e. no Antarctic specimens that fall under treaty
restrictions) even if incredibly hard to find.  If you have some of these
specimens for sale, I would be happy to provide a link to the specific page
on your website.

Whatever you have, I will be happy to receive.  I will merge, edit and
format and then share with everyone.

Best,

Mendy

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The ultimate Type Collection List

2012-09-03 Thread Galactic Stone Ironworks
Hi Mendy,

Here is a type list and collecting guide I put together, drawing
largely on David Weir's authoritative website -
http://www.galactic-stone.com/pages/types

There are a couple of types that are almost impossible to find on the
collector market, like Kakangari.  There are also some types that are
not commonly agreed upon, or are no longer approved as official
nomenclature, like Olivine Diogenite.  If I recall correctly, this is
a type that is no longer being accepted for approval and they are now
lumped in with the rest of the diogenites.  And speaking of which,
there are sub-types that are difficult to acquire, but are not
official types, like Noritic Diogenite.

Building a complete type collection is a daunting task that many
collectors eventually abandon, but it's still a worthy goal.  :)

Best regards,

MikeG

-- 
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-



On 9/3/12, Mendy Ouzillou ouzil...@yahoo.com wrote:
 Hello everyone,

 One more email to keep everyone busy.

 I'd like to put together the ultimate Type Collection list and am quite
 sure
 someone has already started one.  I'd like to use this for myself as well
 as
 post it on my website for everyone to enjoy.

 Here is what I am looking for:
 1) A complete list of meteorite types.  For example, from shergottite there
 are Basaltic, Lherzolitic and Olivine-phyric. Maybe there are some unusual
 variations or anomalous versions of these as well.
 2) Specific meteorite(s) that best represent that category.  These examples
 should be obtainable (i.e. no Antarctic specimens that fall under treaty
 restrictions) even if incredibly hard to find.  If you have some of these
 specimens for sale, I would be happy to provide a link to the specific page
 on your website.

 Whatever you have, I will be happy to receive.  I will merge, edit and
 format and then share with everyone.

 Best,

 Mendy

 __

 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The ultimate Type Collection List

2012-09-03 Thread Jeff Grossman
No, olivine diogenite is a classification that is accepted for the Met 
Bull, and there are several in press in MB100.


I remind everybody that there is no such thing as official nomenclature 
[of meteorite classifications].  The nomcom tends to be conservative, 
and generally does not start adopting new kinds of classifications until 
they come into use in the literature, beyond the original proposer's 
work.  But nomcom does not vote to certify new terms, or anything of the 
sort.  Nobody does.


Jeff

On 9/3/2012 12:19 PM, Galactic Stone  Ironworks wrote:

Hi Mendy,

Here is a type list and collecting guide I put together, drawing
largely on David Weir's authoritative website -
http://www.galactic-stone.com/pages/types

There are a couple of types that are almost impossible to find on the
collector market, like Kakangari.  There are also some types that are
not commonly agreed upon, or are no longer approved as official
nomenclature, like Olivine Diogenite.  If I recall correctly, this is
a type that is no longer being accepted for approval and they are now
lumped in with the rest of the diogenites.  And speaking of which,
there are sub-types that are difficult to acquire, but are not
official types, like Noritic Diogenite.

Building a complete type collection is a daunting task that many
collectors eventually abandon, but it's still a worthy goal.  :)

Best regards,

MikeG



__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The ultimate Type Collection List

2012-09-03 Thread Galactic Stone Ironworks
Hi Jeff,

Thanks for the clarification.  I recall hearing something not long ago
about a type that would no longer be accepted for publication in the
Bulletin.  What type was that?  Or, did I completely remember that
wrong?

Best regards,

MikeG

-- 
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/GalacticStone
RSS - http://www.galactic-stone.com/rss/126516
-


On 9/3/12, Jeff Grossman jngross...@gmail.com wrote:
 No, olivine diogenite is a classification that is accepted for the Met
 Bull, and there are several in press in MB100.

 I remind everybody that there is no such thing as official nomenclature
 [of meteorite classifications].  The nomcom tends to be conservative,
 and generally does not start adopting new kinds of classifications until
 they come into use in the literature, beyond the original proposer's
 work.  But nomcom does not vote to certify new terms, or anything of the
 sort.  Nobody does.

 Jeff

 On 9/3/2012 12:19 PM, Galactic Stone  Ironworks wrote:
 Hi Mendy,

 Here is a type list and collecting guide I put together, drawing
 largely on David Weir's authoritative website -
 http://www.galactic-stone.com/pages/types

 There are a couple of types that are almost impossible to find on the
 collector market, like Kakangari.  There are also some types that are
 not commonly agreed upon, or are no longer approved as official
 nomenclature, like Olivine Diogenite.  If I recall correctly, this is
 a type that is no longer being accepted for approval and they are now
 lumped in with the rest of the diogenites.  And speaking of which,
 there are sub-types that are difficult to acquire, but are not
 official types, like Noritic Diogenite.

 Building a complete type collection is a daunting task that many
 collectors eventually abandon, but it's still a worthy goal.  :)

 Best regards,

 MikeG


 __

 Visit the Archives at
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list