Re: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???????
Hello All Dave wrote; I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Easy solution, Split the difference and call it a CO3.3 Thanks, Tom The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 - Original Message - From: Dave Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4??? Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix in my collection that I purchased a few years back, and with the receipt it was classified as a CO3.4, but I looked it up in the book Meteorites from A to Z which is a marvelous reference book that I use alot, and it says it is classified as a CO3.2. I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Is there some kind of conflict with this particular meteorite in its classification, or just a couple of misprints? Thanks for your help in advance!!! Dave IMCA #2725 __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???????
No way Felix is 3.2. Jones and Scott (1990) had it at 3.2, but more recent data show it to be significantly higher. Kainsaz is a solid 3.2, and all properties of Felix show it to be more equilibrated than Kainsaz. Data on TL (Sears) and on amoeboid olivine inclusions (Chizmadia) show Felix to be more like 3.3-3.4. My own studies of matrix in CO's support 3.4 for Felix. So, call it 3.3/3.4. jeff 02:38 PM 6/11/2003 -0700, Tom aka James Knudson wrote: Hello All Dave wrote; I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Easy solution, Split the difference and call it a CO3.3 Thanks, To The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 - Original Message - From: Dave Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4??? Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix in my collection that I purchased a few years back, and with the receipt it was classified as a CO3.4, but I looked it up in the book Meteorites from A to Z which is a marvelous reference book that I use alot, and it says it is classified as a CO3.2. I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Is there some kind of conflict with this particular meteorite in its classification, or just a couple of misprints? Thanks for your help in advance!!! Dave IMCA #2725 __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184 US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383 954 National Center Reston, VA 20192, USA __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4???????
Thanks to everyone for finally settling the Felix mystery as one well known list member wrote to me. It really had me perplexed for awhile. Have a great evening everyone! Dave --- Jeff Grossman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No way Felix is 3.2. Jones and Scott (1990) had it at 3.2, but more recent data show it to be significantly higher. Kainsaz is a solid 3.2, and all properties of Felix show it to be more equilibrated than Kainsaz. Data on TL (Sears) and on amoeboid olivine inclusions (Chizmadia) show Felix to be more like 3.3-3.4. My own studies of matrix in CO's support 3.4 for Felix. So, call it 3.3/3.4. jeff 02:38 PM 6/11/2003 -0700, Tom aka James Knudson wrote: Hello All Dave wrote; I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Easy solution, Split the difference and call it a CO3.3 Thanks, To The proudest member of the IMCA 6168 - Original Message - From: Dave Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:12 PM Subject: [meteorite-list] Felix... CO3.2 or CO3.4??? Greetings Listees. I have this nice piece of Felix in my collection that I purchased a few years back, and with the receipt it was classified as a CO3.4, but I looked it up in the book Meteorites from A to Z which is a marvelous reference book that I use alot, and it says it is classified as a CO3.2. I`ve talked to two notable and well respected list members about this and one says he found it listed as a CO3.2 and the other found it listed as a CO3.4. Is there some kind of conflict with this particular meteorite in its classification, or just a couple of misprints? Thanks for your help in advance!!! Dave IMCA #2725 __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Dr. Jeffrey N. Grossman phone: (703) 648-6184 US Geological Survey fax: (703) 648-6383 954 National Center Reston, VA 20192, USA __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com __ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
