Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi List,

I was disturbed to find a bunch of malarkey in the way of images produced by
Stan.  I believe Marcin has a legitimate claim but to watch other dealers
try to take advantage is ridiculous. Marcin has seen a huge amount of NWA
869 (Not Official) and owns a piece of NWA 904.  He reported earlier
yesterday that it is different.

Stan is full of hot air.  He is just sore because a dealer manufactured
classification of NWA 1839 was posted to the List and both NAU and UW are
aware of it.  That's correct, the latest information posted to the List was
not even a working copy, just something put together to compete against NWA
3133 by an amateur, it crossed way over the line.  NWA 1839 was reported as
weighing about 122 grams to the NomCom and as an L7 yet over 500 grams has
been claimed to the List by Stan and at first it he claimed it was paired
with NWA 011, explain this.  This is all in the archives so check it out
yourself.

I have no idea why an unofficial stone is being compared to NWA 904.  This
argument was settled two years ago, NWA 904 is different from NW 787 which
is assumed paired to NWA 869.  I refuse to recognize NWA 869 because it has
never been classified.  Do the right thing and send a type specimen in. If
somebody wants to provide me with 20 grams of what everybody agrees is NWA
869 I will send it in and have it studied properly, until then it is an
unclassified stone.

Truthfully

Adam






- Original Message - 
From: stan . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g




   Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.
 
 far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as
my
 NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same
meteorite.

 http://img106.exs.cx/img106/764/869and904.jpg
 one of the slices in that photo is a piece of 904 from the hupes, the
other
 is a piece of 869 from dean. both great hunks of meteorite... wanna guess
 what one is what?


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Meteoryt.net
 The one on the left is NWA 904 and right is NWA 869! Or was that the other
 way around!?!?! ;-)

This was hard to decide which one is 869 but photo was small :). Anyway I'm
not saying that 904 is different from 969 becouse I have only one slice. But
Im sure that this specimen I have is different from any other NWA869 I cut
and polish. Look at crust, flat complete surface. How many NWA869 have that
surface ?

-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Bernhard \Rendelius\ Rems
I think the problem arises from the fact that sellers have sold a lot of
stuff under NWA 869. I have a couple of so called NWA 869s, and it's
hard to believe they all come from the same fall.

However, I can say that NWA 904, at least the slice I got from the
Hupes, does NOT look like NWA 869 in any way, nor does the one I got
from Steve The Latefallsalesman Arnold. The matrix is different. Most
of my NWA 869 look rather greyish on the inside, the NWA 904 has a
brown/orange hue. Brecciation is somewhat different as well. 



  _  

Best regards,
Bernhard Rendelius Rems 

CEO RPGDot Network 

 
This outgoing mail has been virus-checked.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Meteoryt.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a
Slice,MAIN MASS 1, 968g

 The one on the left is NWA 904 and right is NWA 869! Or was that the
other
 way around!?!?! ;-)

This was hard to decide which one is 869 but photo was small :). Anyway
I'm
not saying that 904 is different from 969 becouse I have only one slice.
But
Im sure that this specimen I have is different from any other NWA869 I
cut
and polish. Look at crust, flat complete surface. How many NWA869 have
that
surface ?

-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread dean bessey
Ok, I am sick of this. Want some meteorite trade
secrets and the inside scoup on some scams? If so dont
fall asleap while reading my manuscript here.
Adam keeps saying NWA869 is unofficial which is
correct but its been classified. Alan rubin classified
it twice as L4 and L5, matteo got an 3.8-6 and another
french dealer got 3.8. Farmer has it classified.
Obviously Paired NWA904 has been classified. There is
no meteorite that is like NWA869. Its a very
brecciated meteorite. Look at this one for example.
http://www.meteoriteshop.com/ebay/nwa869two.jpg
There is another university actually interested in it
and is doing a big research project on many kilos. It
is easy to recogonize NWA869 (Or whatever you want to
call it - NWA869 has taken on the most commonly
accepted name I guess because I have been so vocal
with promoting hundreds of kilos of it). For the
record it will not appear in the bulletin this year
(So yes, will remain unofficial for another year so
the stupid unofficial arguement can continue to be
made) because it is such a varied meteorite that has
created so much discussion that Michael Zolonsky asked
to get a sample to look at himself. I plan on sending
him a good brecciated sample showing 3 different
meteorites but I havent been able to contact him for a
couple weeks. Scientiest sare very busy nowadays with
institutions so underfunded.
One can take the fact that scientists dont have time
to go through the expensive motions to pair chondrites
and then say It is wrong to make pairing judgements
knowing full well that it wont get done but that dont
disprove the fact that they are the same meteorite.
NWA869 will most likely be the biggest strewnfield
from the desert and one of the largest chondrite
strewnfields in the world. It great that the biggest
one had to be such a nice and interesting and varied
meteorite. You can wish them different because that
would make them worth more but fact is if you paid $1
a gram for one of the paired stones that several
dealers are selling as low TKW you have been ripped
off - and since every dealer can recogonize NWA869 the
dealer knew that he ripped you off. Plain and simple.
Wishing wont make it something else anymore than
wishing wont make BCCs fake mnoon rock real. And using
the lame arguement that no scientists has
scientifically paired every single one of 75,000
stones just dont wash. We all know they are the same. 

I will go further because I am sick of this. What is
happening with NWA869 and NWA1109 is nothing short of
fraud. And there are 3 or 4 dealers involved. NWA869
is a great meteorite and one can easily take one of
the more brecciated ones (With the black inclusions or
melt which makes it more interesting) and call it
something else. At least one dealer is selling it as
his own find. Take a particularly nice one and get it
classified and sell it for $1 a gram and argue like
the fake moon rock people that they are real. Threaten
lawsuits if necessary to scare people.
NWA1109 is more interesting. We were all once buying
it for upwards of $20 a gram in morocco once and
everybody thought it was an howardite. (Although I
have a kilo piece now that I would part with foor
$7500) The diogenite levels has to be 10% to make it a
howardite. Every dealer knows this so whats happening
with 3 or 4 dealers (Including some in europe so I am
not singling one dealer out here - or even two
dealers) is to find a piece with more than 10%
diogenite material and get that classified and then
the whole stone is a howardite worth $75 a gram
instead of $15. You only need a half square inch of
material with 10% diopgenite material to get the
entire stone officially in the met bulletin as a
howardite. NWA1109 is a great meteorite and a  whole
host of dealers are taking obviously paired stones and
finding a piece with 10% diogenite material and then
getting the howardite classification. Paired NWA1644
(Classified by MIT as a polymict eucrite because the
sample that I gave them only had 6% diogenite
material) had a customer send his piece to a
university in germany (He wanted official verification
that I was selling a real meteorite as he was very
sceptical that I was selling a meteorite) and came
back howardite because that sample that he gav eto the
university had the 10% requirement. So NWA1644 has
been properly classified as both but it appears in teh
bulletin as a eucrite.
There are lots of inclusions and weird things in
NWA1109 and you could also probably get really exotic
classifications if one tried to get really fancy with
inclusions - but I dont see large numbers of dealers
doing that and the scam is generally to get howardite
classifications. NWA1109 could well be an howardite. 
It is borderline but officially a eucrite. 
Remember something important here. The nomads work in
groups and
when the try and sell to people like me, farmer and
everybody else they basically usually pull a scam.
They split up the fall and offer me 50 grams, farmer
50 grams, the hupes 50 

RE: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Bernhard \Rendelius\ Rems
Dean,

most of us know the practices of the dealers and the nomads, I think.
There is no way to correct the problem, though. Those collecting NWAs
will have to live with it. On the other hand, we get nice material for a
low price.

  _  

Best regards,
Bernhard Rendelius Rems 

CEO RPGDot Network 

 
This outgoing mail has been virus-checked.




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread dean bessey
--- Bernhard \Rendelius\ Rems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Dean,
 most of us know the practices of the dealers and the
 nomads, I think.
 There is no way to correct the problem, though.
 Those collecting NWAs
 will have to live with it. On the other hand, we get
 nice material for a
 low price.
 
I agree with you on that one. I believe that we are
getting stuff at a price below what a normal market
condition would be. And the deliberate faking and
clouding of TKW is making it better for collectors -
especially on the rare stuff.  For example, Lets say
that some rare meteorite genuinely only has 90 grams
TKW and should be worth $200 a gram. I am taking this
potential Faking TKW discount into effect in what I
am willing to pay and then I sell it at a markup from
what I bought it at meaning that the collector gets a
rare meteorite at a fraction of what it should sell
for.
Cheers
DEAN




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Michael L Blood
Hi Dean,
GREAT post - thanks for saying the obvious! I didn't
feel it was my place to step into a NWA debate to state
the obvious, myself, as, due to my health, I have NEVER
gone there. 
I noted with great interest the LACK of response to
your post! Well, now doesn't that speak volumes?!
It is refreshing to hear just the plane TRUTH stated
free of the quacking of the ducks.
Best wishes, Michael




on 11/24/04 7:29 AM, dean bessey at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ok, I am sick of this. Want some meteorite trade
 secrets and the inside scoup on some scams? If so dont
 fall asleap while reading my manuscript here.
 Adam keeps saying NWA869 is unofficial which is
 correct but its been classified. Alan rubin classified
 it twice as L4 and L5, matteo got an 3.8-6 and another
 french dealer got 3.8. Farmer has it classified.
 Obviously Paired NWA904 has been classified. There is
 no meteorite that is like NWA869. Its a very
 brecciated meteorite. Look at this one for example.
 http://www.meteoriteshop.com/ebay/nwa869two.jpg
 There is another university actually interested in it
 and is doing a big research project on many kilos. It
 is easy to recogonize NWA869 (Or whatever you want to
 call it - NWA869 has taken on the most commonly
 accepted name I guess because I have been so vocal
 with promoting hundreds of kilos of it). For the
 record it will not appear in the bulletin this year
 (So yes, will remain unofficial for another year so
 the stupid unofficial arguement can continue to be
 made) because it is such a varied meteorite that has
 created so much discussion that Michael Zolonsky asked
 to get a sample to look at himself. I plan on sending
 him a good brecciated sample showing 3 different
 meteorites but I havent been able to contact him for a
 couple weeks. Scientiest sare very busy nowadays with
 institutions so underfunded.
 One can take the fact that scientists dont have time
 to go through the expensive motions to pair chondrites
 and then say It is wrong to make pairing judgements
 knowing full well that it wont get done but that dont
 disprove the fact that they are the same meteorite.
 NWA869 will most likely be the biggest strewnfield
 from the desert and one of the largest chondrite
 strewnfields in the world. It great that the biggest
 one had to be such a nice and interesting and varied
 meteorite. You can wish them different because that
 would make them worth more but fact is if you paid $1
 a gram for one of the paired stones that several
 dealers are selling as low TKW you have been ripped
 off - and since every dealer can recogonize NWA869 the
 dealer knew that he ripped you off. Plain and simple.
 Wishing wont make it something else anymore than
 wishing wont make BCCs fake mnoon rock real. And using
 the lame arguement that no scientists has
 scientifically paired every single one of 75,000
 stones just dont wash. We all know they are the same.
 
 I will go further because I am sick of this. What is
 happening with NWA869 and NWA1109 is nothing short of
 fraud. And there are 3 or 4 dealers involved. NWA869
 is a great meteorite and one can easily take one of
 the more brecciated ones (With the black inclusions or
 melt which makes it more interesting) and call it
 something else. At least one dealer is selling it as
 his own find. Take a particularly nice one and get it
 classified and sell it for $1 a gram and argue like
 the fake moon rock people that they are real. Threaten
 lawsuits if necessary to scare people.
 NWA1109 is more interesting. We were all once buying
 it for upwards of $20 a gram in morocco once and
 everybody thought it was an howardite. (Although I
 have a kilo piece now that I would part with foor
 $7500) The diogenite levels has to be 10% to make it a
 howardite. Every dealer knows this so whats happening
 with 3 or 4 dealers (Including some in europe so I am
 not singling one dealer out here - or even two
 dealers) is to find a piece with more than 10%
 diogenite material and get that classified and then
 the whole stone is a howardite worth $75 a gram
 instead of $15. You only need a half square inch of
 material with 10% diopgenite material to get the
 entire stone officially in the met bulletin as a
 howardite. NWA1109 is a great meteorite and a  whole
 host of dealers are taking obviously paired stones and
 finding a piece with 10% diogenite material and then
 getting the howardite classification. Paired NWA1644
 (Classified by MIT as a polymict eucrite because the
 sample that I gave them only had 6% diogenite
 material) had a customer send his piece to a
 university in germany (He wanted official verification
 that I was selling a real meteorite as he was very
 sceptical that I was selling a meteorite) and came
 back howardite because that sample that he gav eto the
 university had the 10% requirement. So NWA1644 has
 been properly classified as both but it appears in teh
 bulletin as a eucrite.
 There are lots of 

Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread stan .

Stan is full of hot air.  He is just sore because a dealer manufactured
classification of NWA 1839 was posted to the List and both NAU and UW are
aware of it.  That's correct, the latest information posted to the List was
not even a working copy, just something put together to compete against NWA
3133 by an amateur, it crossed way over the line.  NWA 1839 was reported as
weighing about 122 grams to the NomCom and as an L7 yet over 500 grams has
been claimed to the List by Stan and at first it he claimed it was paired
with NWA 011, explain this.  This is all in the archives so check it out
yourself.

the TRUTH about the pairing of nwa nwa 1839 and 3133 -
go to:
http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~glg100-p/Meteorite.html
this is the offical Northern Arizona University web page maintianed by Dr  
Bunch and Dr Wittke

scroll down to the bottom of the page where a summary of meteorite 
classifications is located
click on 'primitive achonderites'
scroll down to the middle of the page where the heading 'primitive ungrouped 
achonderites' is seen.

you will SPECIFICALLY see where the fine researchers at NAU are publically 
calling NWA 3133 and 1839 THE SAME METEORITE.

dispute that Adam - unless you want to say that Dr. Bunch and Dr. Whittke 
dont know what they are tlaking about you have no ground to stand on.

to anyone that is curious about this issue - LOOK at the archives. I never 
once said that nwa 1839 and nwa 011 were paired. i described nwa 1839 by 
saying it was 'as cool as nwa 011' unless the nomcom recently changed the 
verbage associated with pairings, saying something is as cool as another 
meorite is NOT the same as saying they are paired.

what is the big deal here? well look at ebay auctions - adam is trying to 
sell nwa 3133 for 400$ a gram iirc - I'd more than happily sell the small 
pieces of nwa 1839 I have for 100$ a gram i owunder why he is so unhappy 
about a pairing determination between the two nwa's

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Adam Hupe
Stan,

Have you had your materiel tested? Go back and talk to NAU about the pairing
status of NWA 1839 and NWA 3133.  It is still up in air regardless of what
was put on the web-site because testing has not yet proved a pairing.  There
are some differences between the two so more testing is needed.

Why was a fabricated classification posted to the List in regards to NWA
1839?  Maybe you should ask Dr. Bunch about this, as well and report back to
us.

Adam

- Original Message - 
From: stan . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:18 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g




 
 Stan is full of hot air.  He is just sore because a dealer manufactured
 classification of NWA 1839 was posted to the List and both NAU and UW are
 aware of it.  That's correct, the latest information posted to the List
was
 not even a working copy, just something put together to compete against
NWA
 3133 by an amateur, it crossed way over the line.  NWA 1839 was reported
as
 weighing about 122 grams to the NomCom and as an L7 yet over 500 grams
has
 been claimed to the List by Stan and at first it he claimed it was paired
 with NWA 011, explain this.  This is all in the archives so check it out
 yourself.


 the TRUTH about the pairing of nwa nwa 1839 and 3133 -

 go to:
 http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~glg100-p/Meteorite.html

 this is the offical Northern Arizona University web page maintianed by Dr
 Bunch and Dr Wittke

 scroll down to the bottom of the page where a summary of meteorite
 classifications is located
 click on 'primitive achonderites'
 scroll down to the middle of the page where the heading 'primitive
ungrouped
 achonderites' is seen.

 you will SPECIFICALLY see where the fine researchers at NAU are publically
 calling NWA 3133 and 1839 THE SAME METEORITE.

 dispute that Adam - unless you want to say that Dr. Bunch and Dr. Whittke
 dont know what they are tlaking about you have no ground to stand on.

 to anyone that is curious about this issue - LOOK at the archives. I never
 once said that nwa 1839 and nwa 011 were paired. i described nwa 1839 by
 saying it was 'as cool as nwa 011' unless the nomcom recently changed the
 verbage associated with pairings, saying something is as cool as another
 meorite is NOT the same as saying they are paired.

 what is the big deal here? well look at ebay auctions - adam is trying to
 sell nwa 3133 for 400$ a gram iirc - I'd more than happily sell the small
 pieces of nwa 1839 I have for 100$ a gram i owunder why he is so
unhappy
 about a pairing determination between the two nwa's




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread stan .

Have you had your materiel tested?
yes, the material i am offering currently IS nwa 1839 part of the original 
mass that was studied by NAU

Go back and talk to NAU about the pairing
status of NWA 1839 and NWA 3133.
I dont need to talk to the researchers again - they are publically saying 
that nwa 3133 and 1839 are paired. thats good enough for me.

It is still up in air regardless of what
was put on the web-site because testing has not yet proved a pairing.  
There
are some differences between the two so more testing is needed.
so what you are saying is NAU didnt know what they were doing when they made 
statements on their web site a week or so ago that said nwa 3133 and 1839 
are paired?

Why was a fabricated classification posted to the List in regards to NWA
1839?  Maybe you should ask Dr. Bunch about this, as well and report back 
to
us.
funny you should mention that adam, i DID email Dr. Bunch and in short his 
reply does NOT confirm your claims.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread Adam Hupe
Stan,

If you have something official please present it for consideration.  The
official weight of NWA 1839 is 122 grams.  Regardless of what a Moroccan may
tell you about additional stones, something of this magnitude has to be
tested.  If more weight is being claimed for NWA 1839 it should be tested
and claimed in a NomCom approved way.  Do not forget that there are other
laboratories working on this besides NAU that have not weighed in the issue
yet.  I have seen nothing official in regards to a NWA 1839/3133 pairing.  I
have also never seen an updated classification submission.  As a matter of
fact, I have never seen a NWA 1839 specimen.  With out the facts I make no
assumptions regarding pairings.  If in doubt, have it checked out.

Adam


- Original Message - 
From: stan . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g




 Have you had your materiel tested?

 yes, the material i am offering currently IS nwa 1839 part of the original
 mass that was studied by NAU

 Go back and talk to NAU about the pairing
 status of NWA 1839 and NWA 3133.

 I dont need to talk to the researchers again - they are publically saying
 that nwa 3133 and 1839 are paired. thats good enough for me.

 It is still up in air regardless of what
 was put on the web-site because testing has not yet proved a pairing.
 There
 are some differences between the two so more testing is needed.

 so what you are saying is NAU didnt know what they were doing when they
made
 statements on their web site a week or so ago that said nwa 3133 and 1839
 are paired?

 Why was a fabricated classification posted to the List in regards to NWA
 1839?  Maybe you should ask Dr. Bunch about this, as well and report back
 to
 us.

 funny you should mention that adam, i DID email Dr. Bunch and in short his

 reply does NOT confirm your claims.


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-24 Thread stan .

If you have something official please present it for consideration.
I dont need to wait till the reclassifcation is published to consider it. 
NAU is now saying publically that nwa 3133 and 1389 are the same meteorite - 
that is good enough for me. if you rather wait till after something is 
published, thats your perogative.

The
official weight of NWA 1839 is 122 grams.  Regardless of what a Moroccan 
may
tell you about additional stones, something of this magnitude has to be
tested.
ONE MORE TIME FOR THE CHEAP SEATS. the material I am offering at 100$ a gram 
was cut off of the aproximatly 122g main mass of nwa 1839 by the owner of 
said stone. it IS nwa 1839. The additional stone i own is in my collection 
and not a part of this discussion. The only reason why I had mentioend it is 
because I belive it WILL be classified as the same stuff and I want to 
provide any potential customers with as much good faith information about 
TKW as i can. I'm sure no customer out there would comaplin that the TKW for 
the material was estimated on the high side instead of low when all is said 
and done.


 Do not forget that there are other
laboratories working on this besides NAU that have not weighed in the issue
yet.
thats fine, but NAU's deterimination is good enough for me.
I have seen nothing official in regards to a NWA 1839/3133 pairing.
just because you ahvent seen something doesnt mean it exists (official or 
otherwise). i have never seen the beetles play a live concert - does that 
mean that 'yesterday' is a frabrication and not a real hit song?

I have also never seen an updated classification submission.  As a matter 
of
fact, I have never seen a NWA 1839 specimen.  With out the facts I make no
assumptions regarding pairings.  If in doubt, have it checked out.
adam, if you ahvent seen any of these things, i'd say that the ONLY thing 
that means is that you are NOT qualified to make any statements about any 
possible pairing between these two numbers. The fine people at NAU HAVE seen 
the meteorites, I'll take their word for any possible pairing.

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Michael Farmer
h, they are very similar. collection in a slice that must be why I 
get 15 cents a gram for my 787, and they get 1 $ or more a gram for theirs.
Marketing...
- Original Message - 
From: Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN MASS 
1, 968g


Im confused.
Is NWA 904 L5 paired with NWA787 L6 ?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3239item=2288230208rd=1
Becouse I have 191g slice from THIS endpiece purchased as NWA787 L6 from
Hupes in 06.2002.
I mean not slice from somewhere on endpiece but NEXT slice from this 
cutted
surface with the same pattern and inclusions positions. I recognize this
becouse its one of the best chondrite slices I have.

So what it is at least? 904 or 787 ? L5 or L6 ?
-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread dean bessey
Sorta looks like NWA869 to me. 
Buy hey. Those pairings are s hard to
figure out. And since I havent studied a thin section
in detail with expensive equipment and 3 PHDs and am
solely basing my opinion only on having seen about
1600 kilos of this stuff, I am probably not that
qualified to make an opinion on pairing.
Your friendly neighbourhood frozen in Canadian
DEAN
PS:
Want more? 15 cents a gram. All that you want. Just
paypal to this email address. I will cover the
postage.


--- Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 h, they are very similar. collection in a
 slice that must be why I 
 get 15 cents a gram for my 787, and they get 1 $ or
 more a gram for theirs.
 Marketing...
 - Original Message - 
 From: Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:06 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite,
 Collection in a Slice,MAIN MASS 
 1, 968g
 
 
  Im confused.
  Is NWA 904 L5 paired with NWA787 L6 ?
 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3239item=2288230208rd=1
 
  Becouse I have 191g slice from THIS endpiece
 purchased as NWA787 L6 from
  Hupes in 06.2002.
  I mean not slice from somewhere on endpiece but
 NEXT slice from this 
  cutted
  surface with the same pattern and inclusions
 positions. I recognize this
  becouse its one of the best chondrite slices I
 have.
 
  So what it is at least? 904 or 787 ? L5 or L6 ?
 
  -[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
  http://www.Meteoryt.net
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.PolandMET.com  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
  [ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society
 ]
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 




__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! 
http://my.yahoo.com 
 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Adam Hupe
Dean,

Why would I compare it an unofficial meteorite?  NWA 869 is not even a
NomCom recognized number.  Your right, let somebody more qualified than
yourself make pairing judgements.

All the best,

Adam



- Original Message - 
From: dean bessey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:20 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g


 Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.
 Buy hey. Those pairings are s hard to
 figure out. And since I havent studied a thin section
 in detail with expensive equipment and 3 PHDs and am
 solely basing my opinion only on having seen about
 1600 kilos of this stuff, I am probably not that
 qualified to make an opinion on pairing.
 Your friendly neighbourhood frozen in Canadian
 DEAN
 PS:
 Want more? 15 cents a gram. All that you want. Just
 paypal to this email address. I will cover the
 postage.
 

 --- Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  h, they are very similar. collection in a
  slice that must be why I
  get 15 cents a gram for my 787, and they get 1 $ or
  more a gram for theirs.
  Marketing...
  - Original Message - 
  From: Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:06 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite,
  Collection in a Slice,MAIN MASS
  1, 968g
 
 
   Im confused.
   Is NWA 904 L5 paired with NWA787 L6 ?
  
 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=3239item=2288230208rd=1
  
   Becouse I have 191g slice from THIS endpiece
  purchased as NWA787 L6 from
   Hupes in 06.2002.
   I mean not slice from somewhere on endpiece but
  NEXT slice from this
   cutted
   surface with the same pattern and inclusions
  positions. I recognize this
   becouse its one of the best chondrite slices I
  have.
  
   So what it is at least? 904 or 787 ? L5 or L6 ?
  
   -[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
   http://www.Meteoryt.net
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.PolandMET.com
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
   [ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society
  ]
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 




 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
 http://my.yahoo.com


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Meteoryt.net
 Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.

far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as my
NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same meteorite.


Becouse Adam usualy make more nicest photos and to not saying something
without proofs, here it is:
http://www.meteoryt.net/ebay/nwa787_191a.jpg
This 3 red big inclusions comes from center to bottom is the same comes from
top to center on Adams NWA904. Also top right corner of my piece is broken,
the same as bottom right of Adams NWA904.
http://www.meteoryt.net/ebay/nwa787_191b.jpg
other side and true mirrior polishing :)))

Its not the most importand thing that I need to Know now. Im just little
curious :))
Also maybe this will help to sell this beautifull endpiece.

And no thanks Dean, I dont want NWA869. You just make to big flood of this
on ebay to have still a hope for find a client for this meteorite. :)))

I better make a profit here and advertise my Beautifull BJURBOLE L/LL4 fresh
105 old Finish Fall
http://www.polandmet.com/_bjurbole.htm

-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
[ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi Marcin,

The picture of the slice you took sure looks like NWA 904 to me.  If it
indeed has paperwork stating it is NWA 787, obviously a mistake has been
made.  Send back the old ID card or scan it and we will provide you with the
correct one.  We have sold over 10,000 specimens so it possible to make
mistakes.  The key is to correct them when found.

All the best,

Adam



- Original Message - 
From: Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g


  Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.

 far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as my
 NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same meteorite.


 Becouse Adam usualy make more nicest photos and to not saying something
 without proofs, here it is:
 http://www.meteoryt.net/ebay/nwa787_191a.jpg
 This 3 red big inclusions comes from center to bottom is the same comes
from
 top to center on Adams NWA904. Also top right corner of my piece is
broken,
 the same as bottom right of Adams NWA904.
 http://www.meteoryt.net/ebay/nwa787_191b.jpg
 other side and true mirrior polishing :)))

 Its not the most importand thing that I need to Know now. Im just little
 curious :))
 Also maybe this will help to sell this beautifull endpiece.

 And no thanks Dean, I dont want NWA869. You just make to big flood of this
 on ebay to have still a hope for find a client for this meteorite. :)))

 I better make a profit here and advertise my Beautifull BJURBOLE L/LL4
fresh
 105 old Finish Fall
 http://www.polandmet.com/_bjurbole.htm

 -[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
 http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
 [ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Comcast Mail
Ouch,

Adam thats some sloppy work my friend. Maybe we all need to take a look at
the meteorites we bought from you.Who knows what we really got ??
Maybe you should spend more time going over your work than bragging on the
list

BE
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 6:49 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g


 Hi Marcin,

 The picture of the slice you took sure looks like NWA 904 to me.  If it
 indeed has paperwork stating it is NWA 787, obviously a mistake has been
 made.  Send back the old ID card or scan it and we will provide you with
the
 correct one.  We have sold over 10,000 specimens so it possible to make
 mistakes.  The key is to correct them when found.

 All the best,

 Adam



 - Original Message -
 From: Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:49 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
 MASS 1, 968g


   Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.
 
  far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as
my
  NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same
meteorite.
 
 
  Becouse Adam usualy make more nicest photos and to not saying something
  without proofs, here it is:
  http://www.meteoryt.net/ebay/nwa787_191a.jpg
  This 3 red big inclusions comes from center to bottom is the same comes
 from
  top to center on Adams NWA904. Also top right corner of my piece is
 broken,
  the same as bottom right of Adams NWA904.
  http://www.meteoryt.net/ebay/nwa787_191b.jpg
  other side and true mirrior polishing :)))
 
  Its not the most importand thing that I need to Know now. Im just little
  curious :))
  Also maybe this will help to sell this beautifull endpiece.
 
  And no thanks Dean, I dont want NWA869. You just make to big flood of
this
  on ebay to have still a hope for find a client for this meteorite. :)))
 
  I better make a profit here and advertise my Beautifull BJURBOLE L/LL4
 fresh
  105 old Finish Fall
  http://www.polandmet.com/_bjurbole.htm
 
  -[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
  http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.PolandMET.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.Gao-Guenie.com  GSM +48(607)535 195
  [ Member of: Polish Meteoritical Society ]
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread stan .

 Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.
far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as my
NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same meteorite.
http://img106.exs.cx/img106/764/869and904.jpg
one of the slices in that photo is a piece of 904 from the hupes, the other 
is a piece of 869 from dean. both great hunks of meteorite... wanna guess 
what one is what?

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Michael Farmer
Guys, I too have seen thousands of kilos of these meteorites.
THEY ARE THE SAME!
It is also NWA 787.
I had the first number, NWA 787, then every time I returned to Morocco, more 
and more came out, Dean got his classified, Greg and Adam got their 
classified etc.
The classes may vary as this is one of if not the largest known stony 
meteorite on the planet, and certainly has variation within the mass which 
can be found in the fragments.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: stan . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN 
MASS 1, 968g



 Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.
far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as my
NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same meteorite.
http://img106.exs.cx/img106/764/869and904.jpg
one of the slices in that photo is a piece of 904 from the hupes, the 
other is a piece of 869 from dean. both great hunks of meteorite... wanna 
guess what one is what?

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice, MAIN MASS 1, 968g

2004-11-23 Thread Jeff Kuyken
The one on the left is NWA 904 and right is NWA 869! Or was that the other
way around!?!?! ;-)

Cheers,

Jeff Kuyken
I.M.C.A. #3085
www.meteorites.com.au



- Original Message -
From: stan .
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NWA904 Meteorite, Collection in a Slice,MAIN
MASS 1, 968g




  Sorta looks like NWA869 to me.

far from this Dean. Maybe this is not that big different from NWA869 as my
NWA1906 from Mike NWA1906 :-D but this is for sure not the same meteorite.

http://img106.exs.cx/img106/764/869and904.jpg
one of the slices in that photo is a piece of 904 from the hupes, the other
is a piece of 869 from dean. both great hunks of meteorite... wanna guess
what one is what?


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list