Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback

2014-11-18 Thread Dale Moore
 Check the Sendmail source.  It seems to me that the version I checked
 (8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to.

Yep.  8.14.9 still has the bug that I see first referenced back in 2004.
The routine in sendmail/srvrstmp.c where I suspect the bug resides 
is a small 2800 lines long.

I'll be happy to see what I can accomplish.

Dale Moore


___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang


Re: [Mimedefang] helo callback

2014-11-07 Thread David F. Skoll
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014 13:06:29 -0500
Dale Moore dale.mo...@cs.cmu.edu wrote:

 Client: Helo naughtywords
 Mimedefang filter_helo: return('REJECT', 'I do not like
 naughtywords'); Server: 220 somehost.cs.cmu.edu Hello
 someclient.cs.cmu.edu [128.2.x.x], pleased to meet you

 Client: Mail From:somevalidaddr...@cs.cmu.edu
 Mimedefang filter_sender: return('CONTINUE');
 Server: 554 5.7.1 I do not like naughtywords

[...]

 Explanations appreciated.

Check the Sendmail source.  It seems to me that the version I checked
(8.14.5) lets the HELO go by successfully even if the milter says not to.

Regards,

David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang