Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Will be fesetenv fixed?
On 12/22/2016 11:52 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 12/21/2016 4:27 AM, JonY wrote: >> On 12/21/2016 07:29 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: >>> Comments? Zidane, can you try this? >> David, can you also test against the gfortran testsuites? > > Since mingw-w64 doesn't have any gfortran testsuites, I assume you want > me to run gcc's. Running "make -k check-fortran"before applying my fix > shows a BUNCH of failures. Since I know squat about fortran, I'm not > sure if this is because my environment is set up wrong, or if there are > normally this many errors. My gcc source is also somewhat old. > >> Kai asks to make sure there are no new failures introduced by this change. > > I suppose the most significant metric is how many failures are added (or > removed) by applying my patch. It turns out, the number of failures is > unchanged: > > === gfortran Summary === > > # of expected passes42031 > # of unexpected failures788 > # of expected failures 80 > # of unsupported tests 180 > > Logfile available upon request. > >> Thanks for looking into it. > > What's next? OK, clear to apply to master, thanks for testing! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Will be fesetenv fixed?
On 12/22/2016 6:52 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: > On 12/21/2016 4:27 AM, JonY wrote: >> On 12/21/2016 07:29 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: >>> Comments? Zidane, can you try this? >> David, can you also test against the gfortran testsuites? > > Since mingw-w64 doesn't have any gfortran testsuites, I assume you want > me to run gcc's. Running "make -k check-fortran"before applying my fix > shows a BUNCH of failures. Since I know squat about fortran, I'm not > sure if this is because my environment is set up wrong, or if there are > normally this many errors. My gcc source is also somewhat old. > >> Kai asks to make sure there are no new failures introduced by this change. > > I suppose the most significant metric is how many failures are added (or > removed) by applying my patch. It turns out, the number of failures is > unchanged: > > === gfortran Summary === > > # of expected passes42031 > # of unexpected failures788 > # of expected failures 80 > # of unsupported tests 180 > > Logfile available upon request. > >> Thanks for looking into it. > > What's next? > Often these failures are nothing more than the result containing CRLF where the expectation is LF only. -- Earnie -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Will be fesetenv fixed?
On 12/21/2016 4:27 AM, JonY wrote: > On 12/21/2016 07:29 AM, David Wohlferd wrote: >> Comments? Zidane, can you try this? > David, can you also test against the gfortran testsuites? Since mingw-w64 doesn't have any gfortran testsuites, I assume you want me to run gcc's. Running "make -k check-fortran"before applying my fix shows a BUNCH of failures. Since I know squat about fortran, I'm not sure if this is because my environment is set up wrong, or if there are normally this many errors. My gcc source is also somewhat old. > Kai asks to make sure there are no new failures introduced by this change. I suppose the most significant metric is how many failures are added (or removed) by applying my patch. It turns out, the number of failures is unchanged: === gfortran Summary === # of expected passes42031 # of unexpected failures788 # of expected failures 80 # of unsupported tests 180 Logfile available upon request. > Thanks for looking into it. What's next? dw -- Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
