Re: Big stack HUGE coredump
Mark Kettenis wrote: Does the attached diff fix your problem? Yes, it does. Thanks! -- Alexander Nasonov
bgp routing question
hi, is there a way to announce the same AS an different locations? lets say 123.123.123.0/23 is mine and i want to have 123.123.123.0/24 @location1 and 23.123.124.0/24 @location2, right now i have the problem that the bgpd seems to drop the routes to each other, means the networks are reachable from everywhere, so it seems to work, but they cannot reach each other.. erich
Re: relayd http check connection failures; hoststated operates correctly
Hi,
I ran into the same problem you did, I thought it was something I
was doing wrong until I read your email...
Here is the fix I came up with.
--- check_tcp.c-current Mon Feb 25 15:11:40 2008
+++ check_tcp.c Mon Feb 25 23:48:45 2008
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
if (fcntl(s, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK) == -1)
goto bad;
+ gettimeofday(cte-table-conf.timeout, NULL);
bcopy(cte-table-conf.timeout, tv, sizeof(tv));
if (connect(s, (struct sockaddr *)cte-host-conf.ss, len) == -1) {
if (errno != EINPROGRESS)
I should check for return codes on gettimeofday but here it is anyway...
I submited a bug report too.
-Brad
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:16:29 -0800
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: relayd http check connection failures; hoststated operates
correctly
hello,
perhaps it's something that i'm doing wrong here, or a difference
in the way that relayd works compared to hoststated. but here
goes.. i'm attempting to get relayd configured to replace my existing
hoststated setup, doing layer 7 load balancing of web servers.
what's happening is with every http check done, relayd returns a
connect failure. in doing a tcpdump i see the session is
brought up by relayd to the destination servers, the server responds
with a syn/ack, and then a rst is sent by the system running relayd.
...
i have a similar hoststated configuration running on the very same
system, load balancing the very same hosts. it operates as expected,
with the hosts being seen as up and available.
i have attached relayd debug log output, my relayd configuration
file, as well as hoststated debug and the hoststated config.
could someone perhaps shed some light on what i'm doing wrong, if
anything? perhaps a bug in the http check/tcp check code?
if i could be cc'd on any replies, i'd appreciate it. i'm not
currently subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cheers,
-ben
startup
init_filter: filter init done
tcp_write: connect timed out
relay_privinit: adding relay www
init_tables: created 0 tables
hce_notify_done: aa.bb.cc.209 (tcp_write: connect failed)
protocol 0: name http
host aa.bb.cc.209, check http code (3ms), state unknown - down,
availability 0.00%
flags: 0x0004
tcp_write: connect timed out
type: hce_notify_done: aa.bb.cc.211 (tcp_write: connect failed)
http
host aa.bb.cc.211, check http code (4ms), state unknown - down,
availability 0.00%
pfe_dispatch_imsg: state -1 for host 3 aa.bb.cc.209
request pfe_dispatch_imsg: state -1 for host 2 aa.bb.cc.211
append $SERVER_ADDR:$SERVER_PORT to X-Forwarded-By
request append $REMOTE_ADDR to X-Forwarded-For
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
adding 2 hosts from table webhosts:80
adding 2 hosts from table webhosts:80
adding 2 hosts from table webhosts:80
adding 2 hosts from table webhosts:80
adding 2 hosts from table webhosts:80
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
tcp_write: connect timed out
hce_notify_done: aa.bb.cc.209 (tcp_write: connect failed)
tcp_write: connect timed out
hce_notify_done: aa.bb.cc.211 (tcp_write: connect failed)
^Chost check engine exiting
kill_tables: deleted 0 tables
flush_rulesets: flushed rules
pf update engine exiting
socket relay engine exiting
socket relay engine exiting
terminating
[EMAIL PROTECTED] socket relay engine exiting
socket relay engine exiting
socket relay engine exiting
startup
decremented the demote state of group 'carp'
init_filter: filter init done
relay_privinit: adding relay www
init_tables: created 0 tables
protocol 0: name http
flags: 0x0004
type: http
request append $SERVER_ADDR:$SERVER_PORT to
X-Forwarded-By
request append $REMOTE_ADDR to X-Forwarded-For
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
relay_init: max open files 1024
adding 2 hosts from table http_hosts
adding 2 hosts from table http_hosts
adding 2 hosts from table http_hosts
adding 2 hosts from table http_hosts
adding 2 hosts from table http_hosts
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
relay_launch: running relay www
hce_notify_done: aa.bb.cc.209 (tcp_read_buf: check succeeded)
host aa.bb.cc.209, check http code (115ms), state unknown - up,
availability 100.00%
pfe_dispatch_imsg: state 1 for host 1 aa.bb.cc.209
hce_notify_done: aa.bb.cc.209 (tcp_read_buf: check succeeded)
host aa.bb.cc.209, check http code (116ms), state unknown - up,
availability 100.00%
pfe_dispatch_imsg: state 1 for
Re: relayd http check connection failures; hoststated operates correctly
Brad Arrington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I ran into the same problem you did, I thought it was something I
was doing wrong until I read your email...
Here is the fix I came up with.
--- check_tcp.c-current Mon Feb 25 15:11:40 2008
+++ check_tcp.c Mon Feb 25 23:48:45 2008
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@
if (fcntl(s, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK) == -1)
goto bad;
+ gettimeofday(cte-table-conf.timeout, NULL);
bcopy(cte-table-conf.timeout, tv, sizeof(tv));
if (connect(s, (struct sockaddr *)cte-host-conf.ss, len)
== -1) { if (errno != EINPROGRESS)
I should check for return codes on gettimeofday but here it is
anyway... I submited a bug report too.
I'll handle the bug report, thanks for reporting.
Re: spamd and freemail hosts
Aaron Martinez wrote: Does anyone have any thoughts on white listing freemail hosts like hotmail and yahoo? I know that people do spam somewhat from these places, but I thought it was mainly from people forging the domains and I do get a lot of valid email that is not getting though. I also host a couple domains and want to be prepared if people start complaining that they aren't getting mail. Is there a way to whitelist domains on a per-recipient domain basis? Thanks in advance. Aaron Martinez Freemail hosts like yahoo, hotmail and google have a huge number of servers which are used to send the email coming from this domains. The problem I found some time ago, was that the retries didn't come always from the same server. This simply blows up the greylist principle. For some of this domains I use the SPF information to whitelist them. Unfortunately this is not the solution for yahoo because they don't seem to have any SPF record on their dns... Pedro Almeida
Re: 4.3-beta
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:20 PM, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just loaded up 4.3-beta. :-) 1. Installed to compact flash (CF) media (wd0). Media supports PIO mode 4 only (no dma) but ... whoa ... 4.3 is noticeably faster on this CF media! During the past 4.2 install the install progress soother displayed --stalled-- quite a few times as it progressed during the cd-to-cf writes. The 4.3 install never, not once, --stalled--. Very nice performance bump. Nice work! 2. bwi wireless card working for the very first time. :-) 3. Then I went long and tried to config bwi0 as an access point and discovered mediaopt hostap is not an available option. :-( Will hostap functionality be coming soon? Or is it a limit of the chipset? All in all and so far everything else seems to be normal and working per usual. Does anyone want me to post dmesg or anything else that may be helpful to the dev's? Say what and where to and it shall be done. http://openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#SendDmesg -Bryan
Re: OpenBSD 4.2 with ftp-proxy, named, spamd - corrections
Hi, have some corrections; spamlogd did not update the whitelist counters, so: in /etc/rc.conf it reads: spamlogd_flags=-i pflog0 should be: spamlogd_flags= and in /etc/pf.conf, instead of rdr pass on $WORLD proto tcp from spamd-white to \ $WORLD port smtp - $MAIL and pass in log quick on $WORLD inet proto tcp from any to \ $MAIL port smtp keep state it should read rdr on $WORLD proto tcp from spamd-white to \ $WORLD port smtp - $MAIL port smtp and pass in log quick on $WORLD inet proto tcp from spamd-white to \ $MAIL port smtp keep state Cheers, Klaus :)
Re: spamd and freemail hosts
On 2008-02-26, OpenBSD - Wire Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Freemail hosts like yahoo, hotmail and google have a huge number of servers which are used to send the email coming from this domains. The problem I found some time ago, was that the retries didn't come always from the same server. This simply blows up the greylist principle. They often come from within the same /24 though. Most (!spamd) greylisting implementations mask off the last byte of the address to avoid this problem and greylisting.org by policy no longer adds common-queue senders to their lists if they're all from within a /24. imo this problem is less likely to be seen on a very large mail system, since enough mail is going through that most of the common-queue pool is likely to stay whitelisted by spamlogd, but I think it can sometimes be a problem on smaller installations.
Re: bgp routing question
sure.. my fault, just assume the networks are right. and this is not my problem ;) Alexander Hall schrieb: Erich wrote: hi, is there a way to announce the same AS an different locations? lets say 123.123.123.0/23 is mine and i want to have 123.123.123.0/24 @location1 and 23.123.124.0/24 @location2, right now i have the problem that the bgpd seems to drop the routes to each other, means the networks are reachable from everywhere, so it seems to work, but they cannot reach each other.. 123.123.124.0/24 would not lie within the 123.123.123.0/23 network (and nor would 23.123.124.0/24, of course :). I guess this is not your problem, though. (And I am not in any position to help you with BGPD issues). /Alexander
Re: Howto Pass googlebot on Webserver [SOLVED]
Insan Praja SW wrote: On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:31:29 +0700, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/25/08, Insan Praja SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Misc@, While testing my brandnew 4.3-beta AMD64.MP webserver, I apply a simple pf.conf to let some connection in and all out. But something interesting came out, pf actually blocks my webserver googlebot apps originated from the server, which is strange since I use pass out all. So, I'm wondering if anybody on Misc@ could help me out with this. I appreciate any replies related to this. Thanks, block drop in quick inet from 127.0.0.1 to any hmmm Well, It must bad since the hmmm word came out.. :D But really, even after I removed the antispoof dan the scrub, nothin changes.. and, finally change block log all to block in log all it solve the problem.. I wonder why... because the last rule is to pass out all. Isn't pf plays last matching rule? No later rule will override the above rule, because it includes the 'quick' keyword. SD
Re: Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) Quad nic with huge packet delay and packet loss
Hello again, On 25/02/2008, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2008-02-25, openbsd firewall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to build an OpenBSD pf cluster using 6 interfaces, 2 Intel 1000 onboard with chipset 82547GI, and a quad port Intel 1000 nic (PCI-X) with chipset 82546GB. Trying to ping the switch connected to one of the quad ports gives me the following terrible results: round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 1.822/43.125/161.863/34.999 ms First thing to try is 4.3-beta (in the snapshots dir on your local ftp.openbsd.org mirror). Installed 4.3-beta and no good. Still have huge ping delays. 39 packets transmitted, 39 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 1.408/64.221/278.094/59.537 ms I have installed Linux in the other node to sort out any hardware problems and things look a bit better, altough far from perfect. 25 packets transmitted, 25 received, 0% packet loss, time 24008ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.250/6.212/43.861/11.269 ms Where could be the source of this ? IRQ conflict or driver problems with that PCI-X slot ? Thanks, John dmesg output: OpenBSD 4.3-beta (GENERIC) #665: Mon Feb 25 12:14:26 MST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz (GenuineIntel 686-class) 2.80 GHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,CNXT-ID,xTPR real mem = 4024909824 (3838MB) avail mem = 3912945664 (3731MB) mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 07/27/04, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfb830, SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0800 (44 entries) bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies, LTD version 6.00 PG date 07/27/2004 bios0: Supermicro P4SCT apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2 (slowidle) apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xf/0xdf64 pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfde60/224 (12 entries) pcibios0: PCI Exclusive IRQs: 3 4 7 9 11 pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:31:0 (Intel 6300ESB LPC rev 0x00) pcibios0: PCI bus #4 is the last bus bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 cpu0 at mainbus0 pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios) pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 Intel 82875P Host rev 0x02 ppb0 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 Intel 82875P CSA rev 0x02 pci1 at ppb0 bus 1 em0 at pci1 dev 1 function 0 Intel PRO/1000CT (82547GI) rev 0x00: irq 7, address 00:30:48:80:af:64 ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 Intel 6300ESB PCIX rev 0x02 pci2 at ppb1 bus 2 ppb2 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 Pericom PI7C21P100 PCIX-PCIX rev 0x01 pci3 at ppb2 bus 3 em1 at pci3 dev 4 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 11, address 00:1b:21:10:0e:2c em2 at pci3 dev 4 function 1 Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 4, address 00:1b:21:10:0e:2d em3 at pci3 dev 6 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 7, address 00:1b:21:10:0e:2e em4 at pci3 dev 6 function 1 Intel PRO/1000MT QP (82546GB) rev 0x03: irq 3, address 00:1b:21:10:0e:2f Marvell 88SX5041 SATA rev 0x03 at pci2 dev 4 function 0 not configured ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI rev 0x0a pci4 at ppb3 bus 4 vga1 at pci4 dev 9 function 0 ATI Rage XL rev 0x27 wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation) wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation) em5 at pci4 dev 10 function 0 Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI) rev 0x00: irq 3, address 00:30:48:80:af:65 ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 Intel 6300ESB LPC rev 0x02: 24-bit timer at 3579545Hz pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 Intel 6300ESB IDE rev 0x02: DMA, channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility pciide0: channel 0 disabled (no drives) atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 1 drive 0 scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: TEAC, CD-224E, 1.9A SCSI0 5/cdrom removable cd0(pciide0:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2 pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 Intel 6300ESB SATA rev 0x02: DMA, channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI pciide1: using irq 7 for native-PCI interrupt wd0 at pciide1 channel 1 drive 0: HDS722525VLSA80 wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 238475MB, 488397168 sectors wd0(pciide1:1:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 5 ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 Intel 6300ESB SMBus rev 0x02: irq 4 iic0 at ichiic0 spdmem0 at iic0 addr 0x50: 1GB DDR SDRAM ECC PC2700CL2.5 spdmem1 at iic0 addr 0x51: 1GB DDR SDRAM ECC PC2700CL2.5 spdmem2 at iic0 addr 0x52: 1GB DDR SDRAM ECC PC2700CL2.5 spdmem3 at iic0 addr 0x53: 1GB DDR SDRAM non-parity PC2700CL2.5 isa0 at ichpcib0 isadma0 at isa0 pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5 pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot) pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0 pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61 midi0 at pcppi0: PC speaker spkr0 at pcppi0 wbsio0 at isa0 port 0x2e/2: W83627HF rev 0x17 lm1 at wbsio0 port 0x290/8: W83627HF npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using
Re: bgp routing question
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Erich wrote: hi, is there a way to announce the same AS an different locations? lets say 123.123.123.0/23 is mine and i want to have 123.123.123.0/24 @location1 and 23.123.124.0/24 @location2, right now i have the problem that the bgpd seems to drop the routes to each other, means the networks are reachable from everywhere, so it seems to work, but they cannot reach each other.. You need an iBGP sessions between the two routers. This is the only way the two routers will accept the routes/as pathes of the other one. For eBGP sessions loop free AS pathes are enforced. -- :wq Claudio
Re: Intel PRO/1000MT (82546GB) Quad nic with huge packet delay and packet loss
On 2008/02/26 12:18, openbsd firewall wrote: Installed 4.3-beta and no good. Still have huge ping delays. Where could be the source of this ? IRQ conflict or driver problems with that PCI-X slot ? I would first suspect IRQ routing problems (i.e. the OS can't work out from the information supplied by the BIOS which IRQ lines are routed to which devices). These days it's not uncommon for the $PIR and/or MPBIOS tables in the BIOS to be wrong in the BIOS, only ACPI having the right information on how to route interrupts. In -current ACPI is enabled by default but on a single CPU system APM (if enabled, which it is by default) takes priority. To disable APM at the boot prompt, b -c. then at the ukc prompt, disable apm. If this helps you can make it stick with # cd / # config -e -o bsd.no-apm bsd disable apm quit # ln bsd.no-apm nbsd mv nbsd bsd this reconfigures the kernel into a new file, installs it to /bsd and leaves a copy around as /bsd.no-apm in case you forget about it and do an upgrade. bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 07/27/04, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfb830, oh, you might also want to try a new BIOS.
Re: bgp routing question
Claudio Jeker schrieb: On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:51:05AM +0100, Erich wrote: hi, is there a way to announce the same AS an different locations? lets say 123.123.123.0/23 is mine and i want to have 123.123.123.0/24 @location1 and 23.123.124.0/24 @location2, right now i have the problem that the bgpd seems to drop the routes to each other, means the networks are reachable from everywhere, so it seems to work, but they cannot reach each other.. You need an iBGP sessions between the two routers. This is the only way the two routers will accept the routes/as pathes of the other one. For eBGP sessions loop free AS pathes are enforced. ah ok, thx so far :) and it shouldnt be an issue if those ibgp sessions are going over serval hops? erich
iperf results not good: 31% system, 69% interrupt, 0% idle!
I just installed a Netgear GA311 (re) into a 500MHz Netra T1 running 4.2 (sparc64) Running `iperf -s` on it shows only 187 Mbits/sec, which surprised me because other iperf-targets plugged into same switch show ~600 Mbits/sec Looking at `top` shows why: 31% system, 69% interrupt, 0% idle and the iperf process 25% CPU What is going on? - is the re driver not good? Thanks! Kent
Re: iperf results not good: 31% system, 69% interrupt, 0% idle!
On 2008-02-26, Kent Watsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just installed a Netgear GA311 (re) into a 500MHz Netra T1 running 4.2 (sparc64) Running `iperf -s` on it shows only 187 Mbits/sec, which surprised me because other iperf-targets plugged into same switch show ~600 Mbits/sec Looking at `top` shows why: 31% system, 69% interrupt, 0% idle and the iperf process 25% CPU What is going on? - is the re driver not good? What's going on is that your machine is busy processing interrupts. If you want higher performance from what is a fairly slow machine, you really want a nic with interrupt mitigation. (as for the next question you'll have after reading that: search the archives...)
Re: spamd and freemail hosts
On 2/26/08, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: imo this problem is less likely to be seen on a very large mail system, since enough mail is going through that most of the common-queue pool is likely to stay whitelisted by spamlogd, but I think it can sometimes be a problem on smaller installations. E.g., I can't subscribe to the pf mailing list with my google apps account because of this.
Re: 4.3-beta
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:20 AM, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just loaded up 4.3-beta. :-) 1. Installed to compact flash (CF) media (wd0). Media supports PIO mode 4 only (no dma) but ... whoa ... 4.3 is noticeably faster on this CF media! During the past 4.2 install the install progress soother displayed --stalled-- quite a few times as it progressed during the cd-to-cf writes. The 4.3 install never, not once, --stalled--. Very nice performance bump. Nice work! 2. bwi wireless card working for the very first time. :-) 3. Then I went long and tried to config bwi0 as an access point and discovered mediaopt hostap is not an available option. :-( Will hostap functionality be coming soon? Or is it a limit of the chipset? All in all and so far everything else seems to be normal and working per usual. Does anyone want me to post dmesg or anything else that may be helpful to the dev's? Say what and where to and it shall be done. Thanks!!! /Scott Had the same --stalled-- problems with 4.2 and Releases before it. I noticed that it won't stall while using the floppy install image instead of the cd image ( I still wonder why... ) Now I give 4.3 Beta a try with a cd. ~ vb
Re: pop-before-smtp and spamd
Juan Miscaro wrote: Are there standard solutions for dealing with the obvious collision between pop-before-smtp and spamd (in greylisting mode)? I know many will say to use SMTP AUTH but right now I want to try to get my current setup to work. My first idea was to hack the pop-before-smtp Perl script to have the thing (daemon) add connecting/authenticating sender IPs to a pf whitelist table. I'm running OpenBSD 4.2 (stable) with Postfix 2.5. Why not use port 587 to send mail, instead of port 25, and only allow SMTP Auth from this port. Cam
SME's Lean to Green Webinar: March 4
ANNOUNCING AN SME NEW WEBINAR... The Society of Manufacturing Engineers is hosting a free webinar: What is Lean-to-Green Sustainability? Why is it important? How does it work? You'll learn that it leverages Lean in several important respects: - It provides a substantial competitive edge, - It does not require large up-front investment, - It is about people and profits and planet - It uses many of the tools that Lean uses, and - It applies in virtually all industries and organizations You don't have to be Lean to aim for Sustainability, but it probably helps to be on the path! - Case example from a fellow manufacturer Click here to register for SME's free webinar. https://smeorg.webex.com/mw0304l/mywebex/default.do?service=1siteurl=smeorg; main_url=%2Fmc0705l%2Fe.do%3Fsiteurl%3Dsmeorg%26AT%3DMI%26EventID%3D103329637 %26Host%3D1e9a52b90a52795d4040%26RG%3D1 --- Darcy Winslow of Nike to Present Organizers of the first annual Lean and Green Summit announced the completion of the conference agenda. This next generation event will feature keynote presenter Darcy Winslow of Nike. Darcy is head of Nike's Women's Footwear Division and is a champion for the company's sustainability efforts. Attendees of the Summit will learn from industry professionals who display a high degree of business acumen as they address their company's impact on the world around them. Don't miss this opportunity! Register today! www.leanandgreensummit.com --- Summit Agenda Thursday, July 17th 8:00am - 9:30am Opening Program and Keynote Presentation Darcy Winslow General Manager for Women's Shoes, Nike 9:30am - 9:45am Break 9:45am - 11:15am Engineering Sustainable Operational Processes Presenter: Dave Gustashaw, Interface, Inc. In this session you will be introduced to what it truly means to be sustainable. As Dave Gustashaw will explain, sustainable operations aren't what most people think. By explaining Interface's journey, you will learn to look at sustainability through a different lens and how it's not simply about compliance. In fact, if you address sustainability as Interface has, compliance takes a backseat as a non-issue. World Cafe and the Technology of Participation See next article for explanations of these tools. 11:15am - 11:30am Break 11:30am - 12:30pm Networking Lunch 12:30pm - 12:45pm Break 12:45pm - 2:15pm Design for the Environment Presenters: Mike Gnam and Paul Chalmer from the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences In this session you will be presented with a holistic view of design, with implications of materials selected. Learn lean (set-based) approaches to design. The session will also cover concepts of cradle-to-cradle and design chemistry, life-cycle analysis and implications for business processes and the value proposition. World Cafe and the Technology of Participation 2:15pm-2:30pm Break 2:30pm-4:00pm People in a Green Organization Presenter: Jeff Harvey, President and CEO of Burgerville One of the largest barriers to Lean is often people and corporate culture. It's no different when your company moves on the road to Green and sustainability. Hear from Jeff Harvey, President and CEO of Burgerville how they address the people and culture side of their business. FROM BURGERVILLE'S WEBSITE... Central to the heart of the company, Burgerville people are at the center of what allows our company to live its values to their fullest extent. Without strong, vibrant, healthy people, there can be no healthy families or healthy community. At Burgerville, we believe in developing people throughout our organization. Leading and thriving in the midst of change calls for alert, reflective and creative people-people who are flexible in the face of change and who bring their spirit and imagination to bear on the problems and issues at hand. By growing their leadership abilities, employees learn how to powerfully manage change and serve with love not matter the circumstances they encounter. Leadership at this level contributes innovation and creates sustainable impact, which grows our business and serves our community. World Cafe and the Technology of Participation Friday, July 18th 8:00 am-9:30am Performance Measurement Presenters: Panel of Measurement Experts How do you measure whether you are truly sustainable or not? What is your true impact on nature? Unfortunately, there's a proliferation of different set of metrics, so how do you make sense of what metrics make sense for your organization. In this session you will learn how to define metrics for green and sustainability, so a company can measure its progress and understand what are the important few things to measure (and not the trivial many). Discuss how these metrics integrate (or don't integrate) with traditional financial metrics. Understand the conflicts with finance and directive management that come with dedication to lean and sustainability. World Cafe and the Technology of Participation
Re: P2V with VMWare - ERR M
Nick, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions. As you successfully detected, i have done some brute force with no luck. Thank you for your tip about dump/restore, i applied it with success. With the help of a OpenBSD live CD i managed to do some instant dump restore over the network. For this i used a command sequence like the following for each partition: # mount /dev/sd0a /mnt/hd1 # cd /mnt/hd1 # ssh 192.168.1.52 dump -0f - /dev/sd0a | restore -rvf - # cd / # umount /dev/sd0a At the end I installed the boot loader as described in the manpages with success. What was confusing me was that fdisk /dev/sd0c returns the same as the proper fdisk /dev/sd0 which mixed up my idea of the things. Fabian Fabian Heusser wrote: Hello I have an old box (3.6) which makes a lot of noise, so i like to virtualize it. I made an Image with acronis and converted it with vmware converter. When i start the virtual machine Loading... ERR M is shown. (dmesg at the bottom) I loaded cd36.iso as cdrom and at the boot prompt tried the following: machine boot hd0b - ERR M I'm surprised you get THAT error, but it is a nonsense command. boot hd0a:/bsd - Invalid argument failed(22). will try /bsd also with hd0b, hd0c um. did you really think that /bsd might be on the b, c, or d partitions?? if i boot with the cd, select shell and run the following # mount /dev/sd0c /mnt i get Inappropriate filetype or format. also with /dev/sd0a - d I'd *hope* you can't mount sd0c like that. If i run # cp /usr/mdec/boot /boot # /usr/mdec/installboot -v /boot /usr/mdec/biosboot sd0 i get the following output: -8-- boot: /boot proto: /usr/mdec/biosboot device: /dev/rsd0c /usr/mdec/biosboot: entry point 0 proto bootblock size 512 installboot: cross-device install -8-- but the error persists. You couldn't read the file system, so you figured you would just run a utility to alter a random sector someplace on the disk. Did you notice the little error message? cross-device install??? Read the man page, read the FAQ, and think about that command. Does anyone have an idea what i'm doing wrong? Almost everything so far. You can't just type random commands without understanding what you are saying to the computer. What you are doing is very, very dangerous. If you want to get some idea what went wrong, boot a CD, and do a disklabel sd0 and fdisk sd0, see what that tells you. There was obviously something that went very wrong with your imaging transfer process, which doesn't surprise me, the process of migrating OpenBSD is so simple, it is hard to get anyone worried about making a special tool, 'specially since it wouldn't have this kind of flexibility. Quit using special tools, and use the OS. SIMPLE way: dump(8) each existing partition to a file, move the file, then restore(8) the files to the partitions of the new disk. Install your boot loader (PROPERLY this time), and done. And YES, I am being deliberately vague about how to do this. You need to spend some time with the man pages and the FAQ and thinking about how things work, not magic commands to type. The PROPER way of doing this, however, being this is a many year old, unmaintained install, is to build a new 4.2 or 4.3 system, install the apps, and transfer the data files. I'm guessing it is a screwed up system, or it would have been properly maintained and be running 4.2 now. So, why would you want to blindly migrate a mess to new hardware? Nick.
Re: pop-before-smtp and spamd
--- Cameron Schaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Juan Miscaro wrote: Are there standard solutions for dealing with the obvious collision between pop-before-smtp and spamd (in greylisting mode)? I know many will say to use SMTP AUTH but right now I want to try to get my current setup to work. My first idea was to hack the pop-before-smtp Perl script to have the thing (daemon) add connecting/authenticating sender IPs to a pf whitelist table. I'm running OpenBSD 4.2 (stable) with Postfix 2.5. Why not use port 587 to send mail, instead of port 25, and only allow SMTP Auth from this port. Right now I'm talking about using pop-before-smtp. /juan Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
Re: pop-before-smtp and spamd
pop-before-smtp is highly insecure. Use SMTP auth. -Adam On Feb 26, 2008, at 6:33 PM, Juan Miscaro wrote: --- Cameron Schaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Juan Miscaro wrote: Are there standard solutions for dealing with the obvious collision between pop-before-smtp and spamd (in greylisting mode)? I know many will say to use SMTP AUTH but right now I want to try to get my current setup to work. My first idea was to hack the pop-before-smtp Perl script to have the thing (daemon) add connecting/authenticating sender IPs to a pf whitelist table. I'm running OpenBSD 4.2 (stable) with Postfix 2.5. Why not use port 587 to send mail, instead of port 25, and only allow SMTP Auth from this port. Right now I'm talking about using pop-before-smtp. /juan Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! http://www.flickr.com/gift/
