Uretim Yonetimi Zirvesi Kayitlari Baslamistir

2008-10-23 Thread Seminer Haberleri
URETIM ve SUREC YONETIMINDE YENI DINAMIKLER ZIRVESI

21  22 Kas}m 2008 / Cuma  Cumartesi / 09.30  18.00 / ]stanbul Hilton /
900 YTL+KDV

w w w  b o s p h o r u s c o n f e r e n c e sc o m

Bug|n bir i~letme, bir |r|n|n|n k|resel pazarda yer edinmesini
hedefliyorsa, |retim faaliyetlerindeki s|reglerini nas}l olu~turmal}d}r?
Rekabet g|c|n| artt}rmak, |retimin s|reklilipini saplamak ve k|resel
marka olmak igin ne yapmal}d}r?
Gvz|m; uygun |retim yvnetim sistemlerini olu~turmakla beraber g|ncel
teknolojik yat}r}mlar} gergekle~tirmek olabilir.
]~letmeler |retim s|reglerinin; s|rekli g|ncel bilgi ve teknolojilerle
desteklenmesi, |r|n|n minimum hata ve maliyetle |retilmesini saplayarak
kaliteli, k|resel, rekabet edebilir |r|nler ortaya g}karacakt}r.
S|regleri dopru tan}mlanm}~, insana deper veren teknolojik |retim yvnetim
sistemleriyle donanm}~ i~letmenin |retecepi |r|nler, pazarda kalitesiyle
|st|nl|k ve rekabet saplayarak g|venli yer edinecektir.
Sizleri, \retim ve S|reg Yvnetiminde Yeni Dinamikler Zirvesinde, insan
ve teknoloji i~birlipine vnem veren, |retimde k|resel dinamikleri ve
deneyimlerini payla~acak konu~mac}lar}m}zla bulu~turmay} diliyoruz.

Katilim Sartlari ve Bilgi Icin : 0 216/486 30 95 PBX

Konusmacilar:

Atila AKKAS, MBA Uluslararasi Is, Bilgi ve Yonetim Sistemleri A.S., Bilgi
Guvenligi Dernegi Kurucu Uyesi
Ahmet ARKAN, Arkan Sirketler Grubu Yonetim Kurulu Baskani, Kocaeli Sanayi
Odasi Disiplin Kurulu Baskani
Gulsum AZERI, Turkiye Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari A.S. Duzcam Grup Baskani
Tayyar BACAK, Anadolu Bilisim Hizmetleri A.S Genel Muduru
Doc. Dr. Murat BASKAK
Mustafa CAGAN, Microsoft Genel Mudur Yardimcisi
Durmus DOVEN, Reysas Yonetim Kurulu Baskani
Ceyda EREM, CNR Holding Yonetim Kurulu Baskani
Atilla FILIZ, Uretim Yonetimi Uzmani/ Yazar
Hakan GUNER, Yonetim Danismani
Seref HAMARAT, Vestel Elektronik Genel Mudur Yardimcisi
Dr. Umut H. INAN
Murat KASAROGLU, Link Genel Mudur
Sertac NISLI, Ipek Kagit Genel Muduru
Nevzat OZTANGUT, Garanti Yatirim Menkul Kiymetler A.S. Icra Kurulu Uyesi
ve Yonetim Kurulu uyesi. Turkiye Sermaye Piyasasi Araci Kuruluslari
Birligi Baskani.
Baha SIPAHI, Danisman, Nortel Netas Eski Isletmeler Lideri
Resit SOLEY, Corvus WineYard
Ugur SUEL, Deloitte Turkiye, Danismanlik Bolumu, Kurucu Ortak
Necdet UYGURER, Yonetim Danismani
Cenk YUKSEL, 3M Turkiye Fabrika Uretim Muduru

Oturum Konulari:
Global Degisimlerin Uretime Etkileri
Uretim ve Surec Yonetiminde Yenilikci Modeller
Rekabet Uretimi Nasil Etkiliyor
Uretim Dunyasinda Kuresel Oyuncu Olabilme, Kalabilme
Mukemmellige Dogru Surec Yonetimi
Uretim Yonetiminde Lojistigin Yeri ve Onemi
Global Uretimde Neredeyiz?
Alti Sigma Isiginda Surec Yonetimi
Uretim Sureclerinde Onceliklere Odaklanma
Surec Iyilestirmede Yeni Yaklasimlar
Tedarik Zincirlerinde Etkin Surec Yonetiminin Yeri ve Onemi
Stoklu ve Stoksuz Calismanin Getirdikleri - Goturdukleri
Uretim Yonetiminde Etkili Kaynak Planlama ile Verimliligin Artirilmasi
Olcek Ekonomisi  Fokus Ekonomisi Paradoksunun Uretim Sirketleri Buyume
Stratejilerine Etkisi
"Dunya Markasi Olmak Etkin Marka Olmak mi, Etkin Kurum Imaji mi?
Uretim Odakliliktan Marka Odakliliga Gecis
Cevik Uretim ve Ari Kovani Calisma Stilleri - Agile Manufacturing &
Beehive
Surec Iyilestirmede Kisitlar Teorisi
Yalin Uretim ve Otesi
Yoneylem Arastirmasi ve Uretim Yonetimi
Sonuc Odakli Yonetim mi Surec Odakli Yonetim mi
Uretim Sistemlerinde Kalite Gelistirme Metodolojisi
Surdurulebilir Bir Kalite Sisteminde Altyapinin Onemi
Yenilikcilik (inovasyon) ve Kalite Gelistirme Surecleri
Urun Yasam Kalitesini Arttirmada Tasarim Surecinin Rolu
Hizmet Sureclerinde 'Algilanan Kalite' Olgusu
Uretimde Teknolojinin Onemi
Bilgi ve Teknoloji Kullaniminin Rekabetcilige Etkisi
Yonetim Bilisim Sistemlerinin Uretim Yonetimindeki Rolu ve Onemi  ERP
Uretim Yonetimi Yazilim Secimlerinde Dogru Karar  Dogru Zaman

Uretim Yonetiminde Bilisim Teknolojisi Onemi ve Rekabetcilige Etkisi

STRATEJIK SATINALMA YONETIMI WORKSHOP HAFTASI
Satinalma Yonetiminin Onde Gelen Uzmanlariyla Stratejik Satinalma
Yonetimi Seminerleri Dizisi

11  12  13  14  15 Kasim 2008 / Taksim Elit World Otel

Programlarin her biri = gunluk seminerler olup moduler katilima da
aciktir. Modul adedi 200 YTL+KDV, Tum programa kat}l}m bedeli 1.800
YTL+KDV'dir.

Katilim Sartlari ve Bilgi Icin : 0 216/486 30 95 PBX

Stratejik Satinalmada Satis Karsilama, Ilkeli Muzakere ve Pazarlik
Teknikleri
Necdet UYGURER / 11 Kasim 2008 / 09.30  12.00
Konular:
Satin Alma ve Satis Iliskisi, Nasil Olmalidir?, Satin Almacilar Icin
Psikolojik Profilinizi Ogrenmek, Satin Alma ve Satisin Ilk Karsilasmasi,
Kontrol Kazanimi Icin Kurallar, Ilk Karsilasmada En Sik Yapilan Satin
Alma Yanlislari, Satin Alinacak Urun Veya Hizmet Pazarini Arastirmak Icin
Alisilmamis Yontemler, Satin Almanin Istemesi Gereken Yazili Bilgiler Ve
Belgeler, Satiscinin Deneyim Duzeyi ve Satis Profiline Gore Kurulmasi
Gerekli Iletisim, En Sik Rastlanan Satin Alma Engelleri Ve Bu Klasik
Engelleri Satista Asma Yontemleri, Pazarli

Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Brian
--- On Thu, 10/23/08, mak maxie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: mak maxie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thursday, October 23, 2008, 3:54 AM
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>  
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports
> signed binaries.

This is the same dude that still hasn't provided good answers to djbdns as to 
what supposedly was found wrong with their dns program.

Here's the related thread:

http://marc.info/?t=1219834&r=1&w=2



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Breen Ouellette
Obviously someone made a mistake running that story, as April 1st is
still over half a year away.

Breeno


mak maxie wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>  
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
> _
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msn.com.hk



Re: oT - ffsdrv / ufs2tools free alternative , to read ffs AND/OR BSD SWAP in xp..

2008-10-23 Thread Neko
okay some of you have suggested ext2ifs and ffsdrv, both prog might
work with bsd configured as primary on a secondary drive , but mine is
on the same drive as windows in an extended partition, (8)

ifs and ffs are as sloppy as a welfare recipient

so far i have found that 
http://www.acc.umu.se/~bosse/

swapfs and ext2fs and reiserfs works,
im setup in OPENBSD THOU,

and i need a driver that would do the same as these two,

i dont are if they cant write, as long as i can read ill be happy,
^^
allthou writing to the openbsd swap part would be nice
^^
i have 8 os on this SAME harddrive, reading the extended partition
^^ 
that are bsd with my micosoft xp/vista would be welcome, and would
^
save me LOTS of space havin to import everything out of my bsd's ftp
thats on the SaMe drive.


any good suggestion welcomed


--- On Wed, 10/22/08, Neko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Neko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: oT - ffsdrv / ufs2tools free alternative , to read ffs AND/OR BSD 
> SWAP in xp..
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2008, 9:14 PM
> Hi,
> 
> after a few trial i haven't got much chance with the
> ffsdrv, and the code
> seems kinda old,  i *think* some changes occured in the
> lasts version
> that make this obsolete,  im about to have a poke at
> ufs2tools, anyways
> this is what im hacking rite now. (tbc)
> 
> i didn't have any luck finding a nice
> program like Swapfs for openbsd's swap (again to be
> open under m$).
> 
> if someone have seen some of these projects that are
> updated or new
> around, it would be good to share the info , get the
> knowledge back
> in google... (anything that would work and isn't a
> pretentious 499$).
> 
> 
> in any case i will try and hack the rawfs/filefs code, and
> get as much
> src on the table as i can, since this is becoming a
> necessity.
> 
> 
> thanks
> 
> neko



Re: Intel quad port PRO/1000QP 82575GB chipset

2008-10-23 Thread Chris Kuethe
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Prabhu Gurumurthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I installed 4.4 (current) on Dell 2950, dmesg at the bottom, I am having
> trouble seeing the Intel quad port PRO/1000 QP card in OpenBSD.
>
> When I look into /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/{pcidevs, pcidevs.h} I see that the
> chipset is listed, Does it require a firmware of some sort, because em(4)
> does not list this chipset, however it lists the card, which implies this
> card has more chipsets.
>
> In pcidevs.h:
> #define  PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_82575GB_QUAD_CPR  0x10d6  /* PRO/1000 QP
> (82575GB) */

try patch it in to sys/dev/pci/if_em.c, there's a big table near the
top of this file listing all the devices the driver supports... this
might work, or it might need something else (like the em variant found
in lenovo X200's)

> As I side note, this system has 32G of memory, any chance it would work? I
> can only see 3GB maximum on 4.3/amd64 mp kernel.

this has already been discussed this month. the answers you seek are
in the archives.

> Thanks!
>
> dmesg:
>
> OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #947: Tue Oct 21 16:00:28 MDT 2008
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
> cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.67
> GHz
> cpu0:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPR
> real mem  = 2142142464 (2042MB)
> avail mem = 2062811136 (1967MB)
> mainbus0 at root
> bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 04/29/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xffe90,
> SMBIOS
> rev. 2.5 @ 0x7fb9c000 (67 entries)
> bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version "2.3.1" date 04/29/2008
> bios0: Dell Inc. PowerEdge 2950
> acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
> acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC SPCR HPET MCFG WD__ SLIC ERST HEST BERT EINJ
> TCPA
> acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5)
> acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
> acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
> cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
> cpu0: apic clock running at 332MHzcpu1 at mainbus0: apid 4 (application
> processor)
> cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu1:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPR
> cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor)
> cpu2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu2:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPR
> cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 6 (application processor)
> cpu3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu3:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPRcpu4 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
> cpu4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu4:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPR
> cpu5 at mainbus0: apid 5 (application processor)
> cpu5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu5:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR
> cpu6 at mainbus0: apid 3 (application processor)
> cpu6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu6:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPR
> cpu7 at mainbus0: apid 7 (application processor)
> cpu7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2.66
> GHz
> cpu7:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,
> xTPR
> ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
> ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 8
> acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
> acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 4 (PEX2)
> acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 5 (UPST)
> acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 6 (DWN1)
> acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 8 (DWN2)
> acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 1 (PEX3)
> acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 0 (PE2P)
> acpiprt6: no apic found for irq 64
> acpiprt6: no apic found for irq 65
> acpiprt6: no apic found for irq 78
> acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 13 (PEX4)
> acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 15 (PEX6)
> acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus 2 (SBEX)
> acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus 17 (COMP)
> acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3
> acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3
> acpicpu2 at acpi0: C3
> acpicpu3 at acpi0: C3acpicpu4 at acpi0: C3
> acpicpu5 at acpi0: C3
> ac

Intel quad port PRO/1000QP 82575GB chipset

2008-10-23 Thread Prabhu Gurumurthy
I installed 4.4 (current) on Dell 2950, dmesg at the bottom, I am  
having trouble seeing the Intel quad port PRO/1000 QP card in OpenBSD.


When I look into /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/{pcidevs, pcidevs.h} I see that  
the chipset is listed, Does it require a firmware of some sort,  
because em(4) does not list this chipset, however it lists the card,  
which implies this card has more chipsets.


In pcidevs.h:
#define  PCI_PRODUCT_INTEL_82575GB_QUAD_CPR  0x10d6  /* PRO/1000  
QP (82575GB) */


As I side note, this system has 32G of memory, any chance it would  
work? I can only see 3GB maximum on 4.3/amd64 mp kernel.


Thanks!

dmesg:

OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #947: Tue Oct 21 16:00:28 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.67 GHz
cpu0:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPR
real mem  = 2142142464 (2042MB)
avail mem = 2062811136 (1967MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 04/29/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @  
0xffe90, SMBIOS

rev. 2.5 @ 0x7fb9c000 (67 entries)
bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version "2.3.1" date 04/29/2008
bios0: Dell Inc. PowerEdge 2950
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC SPCR HPET MCFG WD__ SLIC ERST HEST BERT  
EINJ TCPA

acpi0: wakeup devices PCI0(S5)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: apic clock running at 332MHzcpu1 at mainbus0: apid 4  
(application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu1:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPR
cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor)
cpu2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu2:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPR
cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 6 (application processor)
cpu3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu3:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPRcpu4 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu4: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu4:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPR
cpu5 at mainbus0: apid 5 (application processor)
cpu5: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu5:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,xTPR

cpu6 at mainbus0: apid 3 (application processor)
cpu6: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu6:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPR
cpu7 at mainbus0: apid 7 (application processor)
cpu7: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class)  
2.66 GHz
cpu7:  
FPU 
,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS- 
CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,CX16,

xTPR
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 8
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 4 (PEX2)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 5 (UPST)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 6 (DWN1)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus 8 (DWN2)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus 1 (PEX3)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 0 (PE2P)
acpiprt6: no apic found for irq 64
acpiprt6: no apic found for irq 65
acpiprt6: no apic found for irq 78
acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 13 (PEX4)
acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 15 (PEX6)
acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus 2 (SBEX)
acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus 17 (COMP)
acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3
acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3
acpicpu2 at acpi0: C3
acpicpu3 at acpi0: C3acpicpu4 at acpi0: C3
acpicpu5 at acpi0: C3
acpicpu6 at acpi0: C3
acpicpu7 at acpi0: C3
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x9000! 0xc9000/0x1000 0xca000/0x1e00  
0xcc000/0x5e00 0xec000/0x4000!

ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep disabled by BIOS
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 5000X Host" rev 0x12
ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x12
pci1 at ppb0 bus 4
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci2 at ppb1 bus 5
ppb2 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "In

Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Anathae Townsend
If you read the nearly top line of that page you'll notice that it request
that you read the date of the message before going ape shit.

Unfortunately, Adaptec has fallen from OpenBSD Heaven.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 3:22 PM
To: Theo de Raadt; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: RES: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879 

Theo,

I will keep bothering Adaptec and IBM then.

There is a popular speech in my country ( I am brazilian). It is: I am
brazilian and I WILL NEVER GIVE UP.

One day they will wake up and I hope to be alive to see it happening.

Btw, Is this true: http://mongers.org/openbsd/hardware

Cause there you said you use adaptec. Wow.. how come?
If it not work under openbsd, you should not even suggest/say their
name. right?

I tought my problem is due to my SAS hard drives.

If we wont able to have it working, I will replace my Adaptec
controller.
I already mailed my local IBM vendor about that.

I don't want cause any trouble. I just love using OpenBSD and I mailed
this list cause I bought a US$6000 server and its still off.  I don't
wanna see it running windows 2003( bleh ).

Peace.



Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Ricardo Augusto de Souza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Btw, Is this true: http://mongers.org/openbsd/hardware
>
> Cause there you said you use adaptec. Wow.. how come?
> If it not work under openbsd, you should not even suggest/say their
> name. right?

Wow.  You can find that page, but you can't read it.

"Note the date on the included mail messages before you go apeshit."



RES: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Theo,

I will keep bothering Adaptec and IBM then.

There is a popular speech in my country ( I am brazilian). It is: I am
brazilian and I WILL NEVER GIVE UP.

One day they will wake up and I hope to be alive to see it happening.

Btw, Is this true: http://mongers.org/openbsd/hardware

Cause there you said you use adaptec. Wow.. how come?
If it not work under openbsd, you should not even suggest/say their
name. right?

I tought my problem is due to my SAS hard drives.

If we wont able to have it working, I will replace my Adaptec
controller.
I already mailed my local IBM vendor about that.

I don't want cause any trouble. I just love using OpenBSD and I mailed
this list cause I bought a US$6000 server and its still off.  I don't
wanna see it running windows 2003( bleh ).

Peace.

-Mensagem original-
De: Theo de Raadt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 18:07
Para: Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Cc: misc@openbsd.org; Marcos Laufer - Ipv4networks.com
Assunto: Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

> I just got an email from Marcos Laufer and he already contacted
Adaptec.
> It seems he have some 'news'.
> I hope they are good news.

If Adaptec had good news, they would probably have told us "here is
the documentation you asked for" in the last 6 years since we asked.

There is nothing they will tell you that has any benefit to us.  Don't
If you find something out, don't bother telling the mailing lists.
There would be no point, since it will just be nice words; nice, but
useful, and as lying and deceitful as their words for the last 6
years.

If Adaptec wanted to change the situation, they have had more than
enough time.



Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Theo de Raadt
> I just got an email from Marcos Laufer and he already contacted Adaptec.
> It seems he have some 'news'.
> I hope they are good news.

If Adaptec had good news, they would probably have told us "here is
the documentation you asked for" in the last 6 years since we asked.

There is nothing they will tell you that has any benefit to us.  Don't
If you find something out, don't bother telling the mailing lists.
There would be no point, since it will just be nice words; nice, but
useful, and as lying and deceitful as their words for the last 6
years.

If Adaptec wanted to change the situation, they have had more than
enough time.



RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
I just got an email from Marcos Laufer and he already contacted Adaptec.
It seems he have some 'news'.
I hope they are good news.


I was reading his posts and I am very disappointed with Adaptec and IBM.
I will also email them about it.

I also found this:
http://www.adaptec.com/en-US/downloads/unix/sco_unix?productId=ASR-2120S&dn=A
daptec+SCSI+RAID+2120S
It4s adaptec driver to Unix SCO.

Is this usefull to solve this current problem?


-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Ricardo
Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 17:24
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

Finally here is the dmesg


OpenBSD 4.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #645: Wed Mar 12 11:31:03 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2
GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,
CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,TM2,C
X16,xTPR
real mem  = 3220541440 (3071MB)
avail mem = 3122683904 (2978MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/08/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd841,
SMBIOS   rev. 2.4 @
0xbffcee80 (86 entries)
bios0: vendor IBM version "-[GFE136BUS-1.09]-" date 02/08/2008
bios0: IBM IBM System x3550 -[7978B1U]-
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2, can't enable ACPI
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xb000 0xcb000/0x1800 0xcc800/0x1800
0xce000/0x5000!
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 5000X Host" rev 0x31
ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE x8" rev 0x31
pci1 at ppb0 bus 16
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci2 at ppb1 bus 17
ppb2 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci3 at ppb2 bus 19
ppb3 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci4 at ppb3 bus 18
ppb4 at pci1 dev 0 function 3 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE-PCIX" rev 0x01
pci5 at ppb4 bus 20
ppb5 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci6 at ppb5 bus 35
ppb6 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE x8" rev 0x31
pci7 at ppb6 bus 7
ppb7 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci8 at ppb7 bus 34
ppb8 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci9 at ppb8 bus 3
ppb9 at pci9 dev 0 function 0 "ServerWorks PCIE-PCIX" rev 0xc3
pci10 at ppb9 bus 4
bnx0 at pci10 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: irq 7
ppb10 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci11 at ppb10 bus 2
"Adaptec ASR-2120S" rev 0x02 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 not configured
"Intel 5000 DMA" rev 0x31 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 not configured
pchb1 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
pchb2 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
pchb3 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
pchb4 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "Intel 5000 Reserved" rev 0x31
pchb5 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 "Intel 5000 Reserved" rev 0x31
pchb6 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 "Intel 5000 FBD" rev 0x31
pchb7 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 "Intel 5000 FBD" rev 0x31
ppb11 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x09
pci12 at ppb11 bus 5
ppb12 at pci12 dev 0 function 0 "ServerWorks PCIE-PCIX" rev 0xc3
pci13 at ppb12 bus 6
bnx1 at pci13 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: irq 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 11
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb13 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xd9
pci14 at ppb13 bus 1
vga1 at pci14 dev 1 function 0 "ATI ES1000" rev 0x02
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB LPC" rev 0x09: PM
disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 6321ESB IDE" rev 0x09: DMA,
channel 0 c  onfigured to
compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0:  SCSI0
5/cdrom re  movable
cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
"Intel 6321ESB SMBus" rev 0x09 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at 

Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Marcos Laufer - Ipv4networks.com
It's the same problem i had with the IBM x3650:

"Adaptec ASR-2120S" rev 0x02 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 not configured


The driver is not enabled by default. 

I established conversation with Adaptec, and i will post all of it
soon.



On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:24:27PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
> Finally here is the dmesg
> 
> 
> OpenBSD 4.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #645: Wed Mar 12 11:31:03 MDT 2008
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
> cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2
> GHz
> cpu0:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,
> CF
> LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,TM2,C
> X16,xTPR
> real mem  = 3220541440 (3071MB)
> avail mem = 3122683904 (2978MB)
> mainbus0 at root
> bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/08/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd841,
> SMBIOS   rev. 2.4 @
> 0xbffcee80 (86 entries)
> bios0: vendor IBM version "-[GFE136BUS-1.09]-" date 02/08/2008
> bios0: IBM IBM System x3550 -[7978B1U]-
> acpi0 at bios0: rev 2, can't enable ACPI
> bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xb000 0xcb000/0x1800 0xcc800/0x1800
> 0xce000/0x5000!
> cpu0 at mainbus0
> pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
> pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 5000X Host" rev 0x31
> ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE x8" rev 0x31
> pci1 at ppb0 bus 16
> ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
> pci2 at ppb1 bus 17
> ppb2 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
> pci3 at ppb2 bus 19
> ppb3 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
> pci4 at ppb3 bus 18
> ppb4 at pci1 dev 0 function 3 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE-PCIX" rev 0x01
> pci5 at ppb4 bus 20
> ppb5 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
> pci6 at ppb5 bus 35
> ppb6 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE x8" rev 0x31
> pci7 at ppb6 bus 7
> ppb7 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
> pci8 at ppb7 bus 34
> ppb8 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
> pci9 at ppb8 bus 3
> ppb9 at pci9 dev 0 function 0 "ServerWorks PCIE-PCIX" rev 0xc3
> pci10 at ppb9 bus 4
> bnx0 at pci10 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: irq 7
> ppb10 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
> pci11 at ppb10 bus 2
> "Adaptec ASR-2120S" rev 0x02 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 not configured
> "Intel 5000 DMA" rev 0x31 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 not configured
> pchb1 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
> pchb2 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
> pchb3 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
> pchb4 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "Intel 5000 Reserved" rev 0x31
> pchb5 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 "Intel 5000 Reserved" rev 0x31
> pchb6 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 "Intel 5000 FBD" rev 0x31
> pchb7 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 "Intel 5000 FBD" rev 0x31
> ppb11 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x09
> pci12 at ppb11 bus 5
> ppb12 at pci12 dev 0 function 0 "ServerWorks PCIE-PCIX" rev 0xc3
> pci13 at ppb12 bus 6
> bnx1 at pci13 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: irq 3
> uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
> uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 11
> uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
> ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
> usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
> uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
> ppb13 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xd9
> pci14 at ppb13 bus 1
> vga1 at pci14 dev 1 function 0 "ATI ES1000" rev 0x02
> wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
> ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB LPC" rev 0x09: PM
> disabled
> pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 6321ESB IDE" rev 0x09: DMA,
> channel 0 c  onfigured to
> compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
> atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
> scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
> cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0:  SCSI0
> 5/cdrom re  movable
> cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
> pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
> "Intel 6321ESB SMBus" rev 0x09 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
> usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
> uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
> uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
> uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> isa0 at ichpcib0
> isadma0 at isa0
> pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
> pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
> pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
> wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
> npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
> pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
> bi

Re: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Ricardo Augusto de Souza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
> (https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
> IGR-64315&brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.

> Anyone already run openBSD in a server like this? Suggestions?

Look for similar systems in other mailing list posts.

http://marc.info/?t=12234140242&r=1&w=2



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Stuart VanZee
Wow, that sure makes a good sound byte... but

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/ms08-067.mspx

I rest my case...  No one thing is the end-all be-all of security.
Signed binaries... my ass...

s

> From: mak maxie
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:54 AM
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Modern operating systems are flawed by design,
> including OpenBSD.
>
>
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
> _
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msn.com.hk



RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Finally here is the dmesg


OpenBSD 4.3 (RAMDISK_CD) #645: Wed Mar 12 11:31:03 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
cpu0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2
GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,
CF
LUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,TM2,C
X16,xTPR
real mem  = 3220541440 (3071MB)
avail mem = 3122683904 (2978MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 02/08/08, BIOS32 rev. 0 @ 0xfd841,
SMBIOS   rev. 2.4 @
0xbffcee80 (86 entries)
bios0: vendor IBM version "-[GFE136BUS-1.09]-" date 02/08/2008
bios0: IBM IBM System x3550 -[7978B1U]-
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2, can't enable ACPI
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xb000 0xcb000/0x1800 0xcc800/0x1800
0xce000/0x5000!
cpu0 at mainbus0
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 5000X Host" rev 0x31
ppb0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE x8" rev 0x31
pci1 at ppb0 bus 16
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci2 at ppb1 bus 17
ppb2 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci3 at ppb2 bus 19
ppb3 at pci2 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x01
pci4 at ppb3 bus 18
ppb4 at pci1 dev 0 function 3 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE-PCIX" rev 0x01
pci5 at ppb4 bus 20
ppb5 at pci0 dev 3 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci6 at ppb5 bus 35
ppb6 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE x8" rev 0x31
pci7 at ppb6 bus 7
ppb7 at pci0 dev 5 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci8 at ppb7 bus 34
ppb8 at pci0 dev 6 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci9 at ppb8 bus 3
ppb9 at pci9 dev 0 function 0 "ServerWorks PCIE-PCIX" rev 0xc3
pci10 at ppb9 bus 4
bnx0 at pci10 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: irq 7
ppb10 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 5000 PCIE" rev 0x31
pci11 at ppb10 bus 2
"Adaptec ASR-2120S" rev 0x02 at pci11 dev 0 function 0 not configured
"Intel 5000 DMA" rev 0x31 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 not configured
pchb1 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
pchb2 at pci0 dev 16 function 1 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
pchb3 at pci0 dev 16 function 2 "Intel 5000 Error Reporting" rev 0x31
pchb4 at pci0 dev 17 function 0 "Intel 5000 Reserved" rev 0x31
pchb5 at pci0 dev 19 function 0 "Intel 5000 Reserved" rev 0x31
pchb6 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 "Intel 5000 FBD" rev 0x31
pchb7 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 "Intel 5000 FBD" rev 0x31
ppb11 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB PCIE" rev 0x09
pci12 at ppb11 bus 5
ppb12 at pci12 dev 0 function 0 "ServerWorks PCIE-PCIX" rev 0xc3
pci13 at ppb12 bus 6
bnx1 at pci13 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5708" rev 0x12: irq 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 11
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 6321ESB USB" rev 0x09: irq 5
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb13 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xd9
pci14 at ppb13 bus 1
vga1 at pci14 dev 1 function 0 "ATI ES1000" rev 0x02
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 6321ESB LPC" rev 0x09: PM
disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 6321ESB IDE" rev 0x09: DMA,
channel 0 c  onfigured to
compatibility, channel 1 configured to compatibility
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0:  SCSI0
5/cdrom re  movable
cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
"Intel 6321ESB SMBus" rev 0x09 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 not configured
usb1 at uhci0: USB revision 1.0
uhub1 at usb1 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb2 at uhci1: USB revision 1.0
uhub2 at usb2 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
isa0 at ichpcib0
isadma0 at isa0
pckbc0 at isa0 port 0x60/5
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
pckbc0: using irq 1 for kbd slot
wskbd0 at pckbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
npx0 at isa0 port 0xf0/16: reported by CPUID; using exception 16
pccom0 at isa0 port 0x3f8/8 irq 4: ns16550a, 16 byte fifo
biomask ff65 netmask ffed ttymask ffef
rd0: fixed, 3800 blocks
uhidev0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "vendor 0x04b3 USB
Optical M  ouse" rev
2.00/2.00 addr 2
uhidev0: iclass 3/1
uhid at uhidev0 not configured
uhidev1 at uhub1 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 " USB Keyboard" rev
1.10/2.8  0 addr 3
uhidev1: iclass 3/1
ukbd0 at uhidev1
wskbd1 at ukbd0 mux 1
wskbd1: connecting to wsdisplay0
uhidev2 at uhub1 po

Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Ross Cameron
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:54 PM, mak maxie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.


Uhm WRONG, my embedded Linux distro's that I build for my clients only run
signed binaries.
There is NO SUPPORT in them for unsigned binaries of any kind.



Re: load balanced carp and local routes

2008-10-23 Thread Coach
Post your config files and you will be more likely to get correct answers,
otherwise it is more of a guessing game.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 10:24 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: load balanced carp and local routes

Greetings list.

I have a set of four load-balanced carp servers. Here are there
hostname.carp files:

box1: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes 1:0,2:100,3:100,4:100

box2: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes 1:100,2:0,3:100,4:100

box3: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes 1:100,2:100,3:0,4:100

box4: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
carpnodes 1:100,2:100,3:100,4:0

We notice that the first box (or whichever box holds vhid 1, advskew 0)
has the following route:
10.104.72.010.104.72.0UH 04  - carp0

Thus when box1 pings the carp IP, it responds to itself and none of the
other carp hosts sees the traffic.

This behavior is expected, and useful to us.

The other three boxes however do not have this route, possessing instead
a route for the carp IP that points to em0:
10.104.72.0 00:00:5e:00:01:01  UHLc127000  -   em0

When one of the other three boxes attempts to ping the carp IP all four
boxes sees the traffic and none of them responds.

This behaviour is neither expected, nor useful to us.

So my question is, what is carp thinking in this configuration? Am I
wrong to expect that all four load balanced carp hosts should contain a
local route to the carpdev for a shared carp IP? Why would
vhid1,advskew0 be different than the other three?

Thanks in advance.

--dave josephsen

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]



Re: RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Marco Peereboom
How about a dmesg?

You can yap all day long but if you don't provide what people need to
help you you'll get no good answer.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 05:33:48PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:
> What do u mean with mini menu after post?
> I created RAID  using IBM ServerGuide 7.4.13
> 
> I also tested with no RAID.. it also failed.
> 
> 
> -Mensagem original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
> Marcin
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 15:50
> Para: misc@openbsd.org
> Assunto: Re: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879
> 
> 2008/10/23 John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I have tried on an IBM server, but could not get it working. If you
> > succed, let me know.
> >
> > I believe raid controller is not supported.
> >
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I'm not sure if this could be of any help, but I had very similar
> problems with installation of Linux, until I found out that you HAVE
> TO create raid array or the controller won't expose drives to the OS.
> I expected it to work in a  kind of "pass-through" mode by default,
> when you can access drives from the OS, but this wasn't the case.
> 
> So, please make sure you have created a RAID using mini menu after
> POST, before you start OpenBSD installation process
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Marcin



RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
What do u mean with mini menu after post?
I created RAID  using IBM ServerGuide 7.4.13

I also tested with no RAID.. it also failed.


-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
Marcin
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 15:50
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: Re: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008/10/23 John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have tried on an IBM server, but could not get it working. If you
> succed, let me know.
>
> I believe raid controller is not supported.
>

Hello,

I'm not sure if this could be of any help, but I had very similar
problems with installation of Linux, until I found out that you HAVE
TO create raid array or the controller won't expose drives to the OS.
I expected it to work in a  kind of "pass-through" mode by default,
when you can access drives from the OS, but this wasn't the case.

So, please make sure you have created a RAID using mini menu after
POST, before you start OpenBSD installation process

Regards,
--
Marcin



Re: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Marcin
2008/10/23 John Nietzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have tried on an IBM server, but could not get it working. If you
> succed, let me know.
>
> I believe raid controller is not supported.
>

Hello,

I'm not sure if this could be of any help, but I had very similar
problems with installation of Linux, until I found out that you HAVE
TO create raid array or the controller won't expose drives to the OS.
I expected it to work in a  kind of "pass-through" mode by default,
when you can access drives from the OS, but this wasn't the case.

So, please make sure you have created a RAID using mini menu after
POST, before you start OpenBSD installation process

Regards,
-- 
Marcin



Re: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread John Nietzsche
I have tried on an IBM server, but could not get it working. If you
succed, let me know.

I believe raid controller is not supported.

Regards,

Gustavo.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Ricardo Augusto de Souza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
> (https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
> IGR-64315&brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.
>
>
>
> I used IBM Server Guide to create array.
>
>
>
> My server has 4GB RAM.  HD is SATA 15000 RPM.
>
>
>
> Anyone already run openBSD in a server like this? Suggestions?
>
>
>
> Thanks



Re: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 03:49:11PM -0200, Ricardo Augusto de Souza wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> 
> I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
> (https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
> IGR-64315&brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.
> 
> 
> 
> I used IBM Server Guide to create array.
> 
> 
> 
> My server has 4GB RAM.  HD is SATA 15000 RPM.
> 
> 
> 
> Anyone already run openBSD in a server like this? Suggestions?

I suggest you read www.openbsd.org/mail.html. especially the piece
about a dmesg.

-Otto



RES: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
I got a mistake.
My hard drives are SAS, not SATA.



-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 23 de outubro de 2008 14:49
Para: misc@openbsd.org
Assunto: OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

Hi,



I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
(https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndo
cid=M
IGR-64315&brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.



I used IBM Server Guide to create array.



My server has 4GB RAM.  HD is SATA 15000 RPM.



Anyone already run openBSD in a server like this? Suggestions?



Thanks



OpenBSD on IBM System X3550 7879

2008-10-23 Thread Ricardo Augusto de Souza
Hi,



I am trying to install openBSD 4.3 -stable in a IBM System X3550 7879
(https://www-304.ibm.com/systems/support/supportsite.wss/docdisplay?lndocid=M
IGR-64315&brandind=508 ) but install didn4t found hard disks.



I used IBM Server Guide to create array.



My server has 4GB RAM.  HD is SATA 15000 RPM.



Anyone already run openBSD in a server like this? Suggestions?



Thanks



Re: Packets sent with wrong SPI

2008-10-23 Thread (private) HKS
What other information can I provide on this?

-HKS

On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:13 PM, (private) HKS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenBSD 4.3.
>
> I'm trying to get a couple IPSec VPNs up and am running into
> increasingly bizarre behavior in my test environment. The current
> issue is that packets are being sent encoded with the wrong SPI.
>
> Router A has two interfaces: 10.123.0.46/24 and 10.100.0.1/16.
> Router B has one interface: 10.123.0.48/24.
>
> I can get A and B encrypting traffic between 10.123.0.46 and
> 10.123.0.48 with no problem, but when I add flows for 10.100.0.0/16
> the SPIs start getting mixed up. Specifically, pings from 10.123.0.46
> (A) to 10.123.0.48 (B) use the wrong SPII am using manual keying to
> eliminate isakmpd as a source of other issues (that were probably my
> fault somehow). The keys are the defaults included in the ipsec.conf
> example since this is a test environment.
>
> Here is router A's ipsec.conf:
> --
> flow esp from 10.123.0.46 to 10.123.0.48 local 10.123.0.46 peer
> 10.123.0.48 type require
> esp tunnel from 10.123.0.46 to 10.123.0.48 spi 0x00010002:0x00020001
> authkey 
> 0x54f79f479a32814347bb768d3e01b2b58e49ce674ec6e2d327b63408c56ef4e8:0x7f48ee352c626cdc2a731b9d90bd63e29db2a9c683044b70b2f4441521b622d6
> enckey 0xb341aa065c3850edd6a61e150d6a5fd3:0xf7795f6bdd697a43a4d28dcf1b79062d
>
> flow esp from 10.100.0.0/16 to 10.123.0.48 peer 10.123.0.48 type require
> esp tunnel from 10.100.0.0/16 to 10.123.0.48 spi 0x00010004:0x00040001
> authkey 
> 0x54f79f479a32814347bb768d3e01b2b58e49ce674ec6e2d327b63408c56ef4e8:0x7f48ee352c626cdc2a731b9d90bd63e29db2a9c683044b70b2f4441521b622d6
> enckey 0xb341aa065c3850edd6a61e150d6a5fd3:0xf7795f6bdd697a43a4d28dcf1b79062d
> --
>
> Output from router A's ipsecctl -sa looks like you would expect:
> --
> FLOWS:
> flow esp in from 10.123.0.48 to 10.100.0.0/16 peer 10.123.0.48 type require
> flow esp out from 10.100.0.0/16 to 10.123.0.48 peer 10.123.0.48 type require
> flow esp in from 10.123.0.48 to 10.123.0.46 local 10.123.0.46 peer
> 10.123.0.48 type require
> flow esp out from 10.123.0.46 to 10.123.0.48 local 10.123.0.46 peer
> 10.123.0.48 type require
>
> SAD:
> esp tunnel from 10.123.0.46 to 10.123.0.48 spi 0x00010002 auth
> hmac-sha2-256 enc aes
> esp tunnel from 10.100.0.0 to 10.123.0.48 spi 0x00010004 auth
> hmac-sha2-256 enc aes
> esp tunnel from 10.123.0.48 to 10.123.0.46 spi 0x00020001 auth
> hmac-sha2-256 enc aes
> esp tunnel from 10.123.0.48 to 10.100.0.0 spi 0x00040001 auth
> hmac-sha2-256 enc aes
> --
>
> Attempting to ping 10.123.0.48 from 10.123.0.46 gets no response, and
> tcpdump -i enc0 shows this:
> --
> tcpdump: listening on enc0, link-type ENC
> 09:15:11.230658 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0x00010004: 10.123.0.46
>> 10.123.0.48: icmp: echo request (encap)
> 09:15:12.240381 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0x00010004: 10.123.0.46
>> 10.123.0.48: icmp: echo request (encap)
> 09:15:13.250028 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0x00010004: 10.123.0.46
>> 10.123.0.48: icmp: echo request (encap)
> 09:15:14.260702 (authentic,confidential): SPI 0x00010004: 10.123.0.46
>> 10.123.0.48: icmp: echo request (encap)
> --
>
> Which is clearly the wrong SPI. If I try to ping in the reverse
> direction, B sends its packets with the correct SPI while the replies
> are encoded for 0x00010004. Removing the subnet lines from ipsec.conf
> corrects this issue.
>
> Is this a bug in IPsec or something I'm doing wrong?
>
> Thanks for the help. dmesg follows.
>
> -HKS
>
>
> OpenBSD 4.3 (GENERIC) #698: Wed Mar 12 11:07:05 MDT 2008
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
> cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6550 @ 2.33GHz ("GenuineIntel"
> 686-class) 2.33 GHz
> cpu0: 
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,SSE3,DS-CPL
> real mem  = 267939840 (255MB)
> avail mem = 251031552 (239MB)
> mainbus0 at root
> bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 12/06/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @
> 0xfd880, SMBIOS rev. 2.31 @ 0xe0010 (45 entries)
> bios0: vendor Phoenix Technologies LTD version "6.00" date 12/06/2006
> bios0: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform
> apm0 at bios0: Power Management spec V1.2
> apm0: AC on, battery charge unknown
> acpi at bios0 function 0x0 not configured
> pcibios0 at bios0: rev 2.1 @ 0xfd880/0x780
> pcibios0: PCI IRQ Routing Table rev 1.0 @ 0xfdf30/176 (9 entries)
> pcibios0: PCI Interrupt Router at 000:07:0 ("Intel 82371FB ISA" rev 0x00)
> pcibios0: PCI bus #2 is the last bus
> bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0x8000 0xc8000/0x1000 0xc9000/0x1000
> 0xdc000/0x4000! 0xe/0x4000!
> cpu0 at mainbus0
> pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (no bios)
> pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82443BX AGP" rev 0x01
> ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 82443BX AGP" rev 0x01
> pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
> piixpcib0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel 82371AB PIIX4 ISA" rev 0x08
> pciide0 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 "Intel 82371AB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA,
> channel 0 configured to compati

startx strange behaviour

2008-10-23 Thread Cesare Gargano
Hi all!
If I start X with startx command and then open a xterm and run 'ps a', I get:

..
13237 ??  R   0:04.69 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0 -auth /home/gar/.serverauth.6053 
(Xorg)
18053 ??  I   0:00.01 X: [priv] (Xorg)
 9547 p1  Ss  0:00.02 -ksh (ksh)
 1024 p1  R+  0:00.00 ps -xa
26534 C0  Is  0:00.06 -ksh (ksh)
 6053 C0  I+  0:00.01 /bin/sh ./bin/startx
21582 C0  I+  0:00.01 xinit /home/gar/.xinitrc -- /usr/X11R6/bin/X -auth 
/home/gar/.serverauth.6053
26851 C0  I   0:00.00 sh /home/gar/.xinitrc
..

mh, ok.

If I start X with startx command and _server options_, like this:
$ startx -- -br -nolisten tcp -once
and then open a xterm and run 'ps a', I get:

..
13237 ??  R   0:04.69 /usr/X11R6/bin/X :0 -auth /home/gar/.serverauth.6054 
(Xorg)
18053 ??  I   0:00.01 X: [priv] (Xorg)
 9547 p1  Ss  0:00.02 -ksh (ksh)
 1024 p1  R+  0:00.00 ps -xa
26534 C0  Is  0:00.06 -ksh (ksh)
27672 C0  I+  0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/X11R6/bin/startx /usr/X11R6/bin/startx 
/usr/X11R6/bin/startx /usr/X11R6/bin/startx ...
12927 C0  I+  0:00.01 xinit /home/gar/.xinitrc -- /usr/X11R6/bin/X -br 
-nolisten tcp -once -auth /home/gar/.serverauth.27672
17622 C0  I   0:00.00 sh /home/gar/.xinitrc
..

Now, is this line a bit strange?
27672 C0  I+  0:00.01 /bin/sh /usr/X11R6/bin/startx /usr/X11R6/bin/startx 
/usr/X11R6/bin/startx /usr/X11R6/bin/startx ...

For each server argument passed to startx _after_ '--', there is a
/usr/.../startx, caused by (in /usr/X11R6/bin/startx):

..
whoseargs="client"
while [ x"$1" != x ]; do
case "$1" in
# '' required to prevent cpp from treating "/*" as a C comment.
/''*|\./''*)
if [ "$whoseargs" = "client" ]; then
if [ x"$clientargs" = x ]; then
client="$1"
else
clientargs="$clientargs $1"
fi
else
if [ x"$serverargs" = x ]; then
server="$1"
else
serverargs="$serverargs $1"
fi
fi
;;
--)
whoseargs="server"
;;
*)
if [ "$whoseargs" = "client" ]; then
clientargs="$clientargs $1"
else
# display must be the FIRST server argument
if [ x"$serverargs" = x ] && \
 expr "$1" : ':[0-9][0-9]*$' > /dev/null 2>&1; then
display="$1"
else
serverargs="$serverargs $1"
fi
fi
;;
esac
shift
done
.

comments?

C.



OpenBSD 4.3 - openldap - slaptest not found

2008-10-23 Thread soko.tica
I've been trying to set OpenBSD 4.3 (release) primary domain
controller according to howto o Danielle Mazzechio
http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, I'm not able to execute
slaptest -u as root, but once I'm logged as user, sudo slaptest -u
executes and config file test succeedes.

Any idea about the cause of this? Many thanks in advance.

Excerpt below:

# install -d -o _openldap /var/run/openldap
# slaptest -u
ksh: slaptest: not found
# exit
$ sudo slaptest -u
Password:
/blahblah (ignored)
config file testing succeeded



Re: OpenBSD 4.3 - openldap - slaptest not found

2008-10-23 Thread Almir Karic
most likelly /usr/local/sbin is not in your root's PATH, do
PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/sbin" as root and slaptest should be found. 

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 04:50:30PM +0200, soko.tica wrote:
> I've been trying to set OpenBSD 4.3 (release) primary domain
> controller according to howto o Danielle Mazzechio
> http://www.kernel-panic.it/openbsd/pdc/ and I'm facing a strange
> problem I'm not able to figure. Following the instructions, upon
> configuration of /etc/openldap/slapd.conf, I'm not able to execute
> slaptest -u as root, but once I'm logged as user, sudo slaptest -u
> executes and config file test succeedes.
> 
> Any idea about the cause of this? Many thanks in advance.
> 
> Excerpt below:
> 
> # install -d -o _openldap /var/run/openldap
> # slaptest -u
> ksh: slaptest: not found
> # exit
> $ sudo slaptest -u
> Password:
> /blahblah (ignored)
> config file testing succeeded



Re: alix 2c3 and i2c

2008-10-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-10-23, Per-Erik Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has the header no real function or is the driver for the i2c bus not 
> written yet or do I need to enable it in some way?

I don't think it's been written for the CS5536 yet, I haven't checked
but if it's similar to the SC1100 you may be able to take gscsio(4) as
a starting point. Try comparing the SC1100 and CS5536 data books.



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Chris Bennett
If anyone is concerned about their binaries not being signed, please 
burn a CD with your binaries contained.

Send it to me.
I will then sign your CD (they make felt markers just for these tasks) 
and send it back to you!!


Ted Unangst wrote:


The awesome power of the gmail spam filter had kept me from seeing
this message until you replied, but now I feel compelled to respond.

1.  Windows is not the only OS that supports signed binaries.
2.  Signed binaries solve nothing.




Re: alix 2c3 and i2c

2008-10-23 Thread Girish Venkatachalam
On 16:16:02 Oct 23, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
> A while ago I purchased an alix board.
> The plan is to hook up some external i2c sensors to it.
> I see the i2c-header on the board, but while reviewing the dmesg I cannot 
> find anything related to i2c.
>
> Has the header no real function or is the driver for the i2c bus not 
> written yet or do I need to enable it in some way?
> Reading the code under i2c gives me hints about bitbanging the gpio, but 
> that is just guessing.
>

How can i squared c driver not be written yet? ;)

Do you think OpenBSD will run on so many platforms without supporting
this bus?

I go to /usr/src/sys/dev/i2c and find some files there.

Any guess what those files do?

-Girish



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> bwahahahahahahahahaah that was awesome!
>
> signed binaries, that made my day.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:54:27PM +0800, mak maxie wrote:
> > http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
> >
> > Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed
> > binaries.
> > _
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://msn.com.hk
>

That's exactly what I thought on reading. Really gave me a good laugh.
Maybe someone should tell that guy that also signed software can have
buffer overflows etc. and thus allow running arbitrary code? We've
already seen that on the XBox etc. where everything is signed, and yet
Linux runs there :).

--
Jonathan

[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had 
a name of signature.asc]



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Marco Peereboom
bwahahahahahahahahaah that was awesome!

signed binaries, that made my day.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:54:27PM +0800, mak maxie wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>  
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
> _
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msn.com.hk



Re: 4.4 (back) in Canada

2008-10-23 Thread Juan Miscaro
2008/10/21 Don Hiatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just received 4.4 in Vancouver, BC along with my sweet new T-Shirt. :-)
>

Got my disc yesterday in Montreal.

/juan



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Fergus Wilde

mak maxie wrote:

http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
 
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.

_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msn.com.h
  


Ah, the first troll of winter! Must mean troll Xmas is coming.



alix 2c3 and i2c

2008-10-23 Thread Per-Erik Persson

A while ago I purchased an alix board.
The plan is to hook up some external i2c sensors to it.
I see the i2c-header on the board, but while reviewing the dmesg I 
cannot find anything related to i2c.


Has the header no real function or is the driver for the i2c bus not 
written yet or do I need to enable it in some way?
Reading the code under i2c gives me hints about bitbanging the gpio, but 
that is just guessing.




IKE V2 on openBSD

2008-10-23 Thread Christoph Leser
I'd like to ask the community:

Will IKE V2 ever become available on a larger scale and will it
eventually replace V1 sometime?

Regards



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Terry
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 06:54:27PM +0800, mak maxie wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>  
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
> _
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msn.com.hk
> 

It appears to me that he's in panic mode trying to keep people from
switching over to other OS that doesn't need his anti-virus software.

-- 
Terry



[London] Linux live expo...

2008-10-23 Thread michael enoma aghayere
Hi people,

I've been asked by wvdputte@ (aka Wim) to remind you all that he is
available to sign autographs today, tomorrow and on Saturday at the
LinuxLiveExpo at Olympia. He also has with him some OpenBSD goodies
for sale including t-shirts, hoods and install media. Please stop by
if you are in the neighbourhood.
Details of the event and how to get there can be found at:
http://www.linuxexpolive.co.uk

Over and out.

Oh, and if you are still in the neighbourhood from 6.00pm onwards and
fancy an "After show networking meeting" stroll along to the Prince
Albert, 11 Pembridge Road, London W11 3HQ where a few UNIX type geeks
will be congregating to discuss amongst many things the current
"credit crunch" over a pint of real Ale or lager shandy.

-- 
~michael
www.BSDqed.com



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread mak maxie
RTFA. b9^b:



> Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:21:26 -0400

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> Subject: Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; misc@openbsd.org

> 

> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt

>  wrote:

>> mak maxie wrote:

>>> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219

>>>

>>> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.

>>

>> wow, that's a really good point. i think i'm going to switch back to

>> microsoft windows.

> 

> The awesome power of the gmail spam filter had kept me from seeing

> this message until you replied, but now I feel compelled to respond.

> 

> 1.  Windows is not the only OS that supports signed binaries.

> 2.  Signed binaries solve nothing.



_

d;%e?i#e?o<e/g
(MSN Messenger

http://get.live.com/getlive/overview



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mak maxie wrote:
>> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>>
>> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
>
> wow, that's a really good point. i think i'm going to switch back to
> microsoft windows.

The awesome power of the gmail spam filter had kept me from seeing
this message until you replied, but now I feel compelled to respond.

1.  Windows is not the only OS that supports signed binaries.
2.  Signed binaries solve nothing.



OpenBSD and VIA CX700 chipset?

2008-10-23 Thread Juan Miscaro
Hi gang.  I'm looking at setting up a small box for the new 4.4
release.  Does this release support the VIA CX700 chipset?  I have
found references to OpenBSD and VIA CPUs and the odd controller but
not the chipset itself.  The actual board I'm looking at is here:

http://www.logicsupply.com/products/lt1eag

Thanks in advance,

/juan



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Jacob Yocom-Piatt
mak maxie wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>  
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
> _
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://msn.com.hk
>
>   


wow, that's a really good point. i think i'm going to switch back to
microsoft windows.



Re: Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread Nick Holland
mak maxie wrote:
> http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
>  
> Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.

Ah, so that's why Windows has proven so resistant to spyware
and malware!  I've always wondered!


That's evidence of a Slow News Day.
Obviously, I need better press relations, I've been saying
"running an alternate OS does not lead to automatic security",
for a very long time, and I've been hardly the only one.

What's next?  "Newsflash:  Water is wet!  Fire is Hot!
youtube at 11:00"

(Anyone else remember back in the 1980s when viruses were
running rampant on Macs, and one PC commentator said, "I
don't even think it is possible to write a virus for the PC".)

Signed everything is obviously no solution.  Stupid people
can still blow the hell out of virtually any security
system they can administer.  Remember the OpenSSH "exploit"
in binary-only form which 1: required that you run it as
root.  2: said, "Yep, I just exploited your OpenSSH!" by
sophisticated use of printf(). 3: while running, it
e-mailed your network config and password configs to
someone so they could later demonstrate a real exploit:
stupid administrators).

I just saw a demonstration of the limitations of "signing".
An administrator got overly happy for the successful
acquisition and installation of a SSL cert for a webserver,
sent a note of rejoycing and thanks to about 20 people,
with the SSL cert in the middle of the e-mail.
D'oh!  A whole bunch of people just got the ability to
spoof that website.  Worse?  Only two people out of the
approximately twenty noticed the importance of what had
happened.

The problem is, people consider security an annoyance to
work around and be grateful when the hoops have been jumped
through, not something that has to be taken seriously.

Technology is no solution for stupidity.  Plain and simple.
you heard it here 1056th.  I'll be waiting for the media
interviews.

Nick.



Installing GIMP help files

2008-10-23 Thread Mark Beihoffer
Hello,

I've been trying to install the GNU Image Manipulation Program help
files on OpenBSD 4.3 for a while now, and no luck.

In most other distributions the help files are a separate package, but
there is no OpenBSD package for them and nothing in the ports tree.

I downloaded the help files from ftp://ftp.gimp.org/pub/gimp/help/ as
recommended by http://www.gimp.org/downloads/ and extracted the bzip2
files, then tried to follow the INSTALL document.

>./configure
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... no
checking for nawk... nawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking whether make is GNU make... configure: error: make not found

I installed gmake from packages and tried again, and it still couldn't
find GNU make. There is nothing in the README or the INSTALL file that
indicates I can set a flag to locate make during configuration.

What should I do?

Thanks,

- Mark Beihoffer
http://www.dragonfly-networks.com



Modern operating systems are flawed by design, including OpenBSD.

2008-10-23 Thread mak maxie
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php?id=264209080&rid=-219
 
Microsoft Windows is the only operating that supports signed binaries.
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://msn.com.hk



Re: mp3 player USB issue (ehci0: port reset timeout)

2008-10-23 Thread Chess Griffin
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when attaching my Sansa USB player the kernel reports the following:
>
> ehci0: port reset timeout
> ehci_freex: xfer=0xd1b11000 not busy, 0x4f4e5155
>

I get a similar error when I attach my Sansa Clip usb mp3 player:

ehci0: port reset timeout
ehci_freex: xfer=0xd2ae0300 not busy, 0x4f4e5155

This is using the October 21, 2008 4.4-current snapshot.  I only
recently purchased this mp3 player so I can't say whether it worked
previously.  dmesg is below.

Thanks,
Chess


OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC.MP) #947: Tue Oct 21 16:00:28 MDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC.MP
cpu0: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 3.40 GHz
cpu0: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR
real mem  = 2145509376 (2046MB)
avail mem = 2066059264 (1970MB)
mainbus0 at root
bios0 at mainbus0: AT/286+ BIOS, date 11/30/06, BIOS32 rev. 0 @
0xffe90, SMBIOS rev. 2.3 @ 0xf0450 (73 entries)
bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version "A11" date 11/30/2006
bios0: Dell Inc. OptiPlex GX620
acpi0 at bios0: rev 2
acpi0: tables DSDT FACP SSDT APIC BOOT ASF! MCFG HPET
acpi0: wakeup devices VBTN(S4) PCI0(S5) PCI4(S5) PCI2(S5) PCI3(S5)
PCI1(S5) PCI5(S5) PCI6(S5) MOU_(S3) USB0(S3) USB1(S3) USB2(S3)
USB3(S3)
acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits
acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat
cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor)
cpu0: apic clock running at 199MHz
cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor)
cpu1: Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.40GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 3.40 GHz
cpu1: 
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,SBF,SSE3,MWAIT,DS-CPL,EST,CNXT-ID,CX16,xTPR
ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 8 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 24 pins
ioapic0: misconfigured as apic 0, remapped to apid 8
acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz
acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 4 (PCI4)
acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus 2 (PCI2)
acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus 3 (PCI3)
acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus 1 (PCI1)
acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCI5)
acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (PCI6)
acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0)
acpicpu0 at acpi0
acpicpu1 at acpi0
acpibtn0 at acpi0: VBTN
bios0: ROM list: 0xc/0xb000 0xcb000/0x2000! 0xcd000/0x3000
cpu0: Enhanced SpeedStep disabled by BIOS
pci0 at mainbus0 bus 0: configuration mode 1 (bios)
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82945G Host" rev 0x02
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 "Intel 82945G PCIE" rev 0x02: apic 8 int
16 (irq 11)
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
vga1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "ATI Radeon X300" rev 0x00
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
agp0 at vga1: no integrated graphics
radeondrm0 at vga1: ATI Radeon RV370 X300 SE(0), 1.29.0 20080613
"ATI Radeon X300 Sec" rev 0x00 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 not configured
ppb1 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 16 (irq 11)
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
bge0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 "Broadcom BCM5751" rev 0x01, BCM5750 A1
(0x4001): apic 8 int 16 (irq 11), address 00:18:8b:18:02:47
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM5750 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 0
ppb2 at pci0 dev 28 function 1 "Intel 82801GB PCIE" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 17 (irq 10)
pci3 at ppb2 bus 3
uhci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 0 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 21 (irq 9)
uhci1 at pci0 dev 29 function 1 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 22 (irq 5)
uhci2 at pci0 dev 29 function 2 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 18 (irq 3)
uhci3 at pci0 dev 29 function 3 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 23 (irq 10)
ehci0 at pci0 dev 29 function 7 "Intel 82801GB USB" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 21 (irq 9)
usb0 at ehci0: USB revision 2.0
uhub0 at usb0 "Intel EHCI root hub" rev 2.00/1.00 addr 1
ppb3 at pci0 dev 30 function 0 "Intel 82801BA Hub-to-PCI" rev 0xe1
pci4 at ppb3 bus 4
auich0 at pci0 dev 30 function 2 "Intel 82801GB AC97" rev 0x01: apic 8
int 23 (irq 10), ICH7 AC97
ac97: codec id 0x41445374 (Analog Devices AD1981B)
ac97: codec features headphone, 20 bit DAC, No 3D Stereo
audio0 at auich0
ichpcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel 82801GB LPC" rev 0x01: PM disabled
pciide0 at pci0 dev 31 function 1 "Intel 82801GB IDE" rev 0x01: DMA,
channel 0 configured to compatibility, channel 1 configured to
compatibility
atapiscsi0 at pciide0 channel 0 drive 0
scsibus0 at atapiscsi0: 2 targets, initiator 7
cd0 at scsibus0 targ 0 lun 0: <_NEC, DVD+-RW ND-3530A, 103C> ATAPI
5/cdrom removable
cd0(pciide0:0:0): using PIO mode 4, Ultra-DMA mode 2
pciide0: channel 1 ignored (disabled)
pciide1 at pci0 dev 31 function 2 "Intel 82801GB SATA" rev 0x01: DMA,
channel 0 configured to native-PCI, channel 1 configured to native-PCI
pciide1: using apic 8 int 20 (irq 5) for native-PCI interrupt
wd0 at pciide1 channel 0 drive 0: 
wd0: 16-sector PIO, LBA48, 152587MB, 31250 sectors
wd1 at pciide1 channel 0 dr

Re: load balanced carp and local routes

2008-10-23 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:24 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings list.
>
> I have a set of four load-balanced carp servers. Here are there
> hostname.carp files:
>
> box1: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
> carpnodes 1:0,2:100,3:100,4:100
>
> box2: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
> carpnodes 1:100,2:0,3:100,4:100
>
> box3: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
> carpnodes 1:100,2:100,3:0,4:100
>
> box4: inet 10.104.72.0 255.255.224.0 NONE carpdev em0 balancing ip-stealth
> carpnodes 1:100,2:100,3:100,4:0
>
> We notice that the first box (or whichever box holds vhid 1, advskew 0)
> has the following route:
> 10.104.72.010.104.72.0UH 04  - carp0
>
> Thus when box1 pings the carp IP, it responds to itself and none of the
> other carp hosts sees the traffic.

Not sure about this. I would agree if with what you say if instead of
carp0 you'd have lo0 in the entry. Having carp0 means the packet will
be sent to the CARP interface for processing and hence over the
network to the muticast MAC address of the CARP interface, where all
nodes in the group will see it.

>
> This behavior is expected, and useful to us.
>
> The other three boxes however do not have this route, possessing instead
> a route for the carp IP that points to em0:
> 10.104.72.0 00:00:5e:00:01:01  UHLc127000  -   em0
>
> When one of the other three boxes attempts to ping the carp IP all four
> boxes sees the traffic and none of them responds.
>
> This behaviour is neither expected, nor useful to us.
>
> So my question is, what is carp thinking in this configuration? Am I
> wrong to expect that all four load balanced carp hosts should contain a
> local route to the carpdev for a shared carp IP? Why would
> vhid1,advskew0 be different than the other three?

I don't think CARP works they way you expect.

For each incoming packet, and when using IP balancing, all nodes in
the CARP group have to see the traffic (this is achieved by using a
multicast MAC address). Even if it's one of the nodes pinging the CARP
IP, this process will still apply (loopback processing should not be
done). The nodes will apply a hash function to (source IP, destination
IP) modulo 4 of the packet received on the CARP interface and the one
that sees the result match its vhid will process the packet. Only one
node will have the result of the previous function match its vhid when
its master.

>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --dave josephsen
>
> [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
>
>



-- 
http://www.felipe-alfaro.org/blog/disclaimer/



Re: strange problem with carp

2008-10-23 Thread Henning Brauer
* Sebastian Reitenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-23 09:26]:
> Due to the fact that the provider
> only allows traffic from a given MAC address, I had to fake the mac of the
> phsical interfaces on the host to be the same as the MAC of the carp
> interface. That was the only way I got this working at all.

working? certainly not, or you have a very low definition of
"working".
heck, if it was "working" you would not write this email.
hint: that cannot work.

> So far, no problem, this works fairly well.

ure, unless you try to actually do carp.

> With no IP address assigned on the vlan23 interface, everything works fine.

no IP, no carp announcements.

> But with the IP address assigned to the vlan23 interface, the slave it is
> going into master mode too.

sure. because it cannot see the carp announcements, because, due to
your mac address fuckup, they never make it to carp.

> Or any other idea how I could get this to work?

stop fucking with the mac addresses.

-- 
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam



Re: LDAP and OpenBSD

2008-10-23 Thread Gavin Norman
Sorry,

ldapsearch works fine sorry. I was referring to ypldap in that issue.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:27:53 +0200, Uwe Werler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then please upgrade to the current version because there was a strange
> bug in Rev 1.7 of ldapclient.c.
> 
>> I already tested it on the command line with ldapsearch. I ran slapd
>> with debugging on the command line to stderr. It indicates that
>> entries were found, but you don't see ypldap actually receiving those
>> entries.
>> 
>> Regards.
>> 
>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:04:36 +0200, Uwe Werler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Am Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:02:18 +1100
>> > schrieb Gavin Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > 
>> >> I attempted the steps based on your experience with ypldap.
>> >>
>> >> I downloaded a snapshot 2 days ago and setup a fresh install on a
>> >> virtual machine.
>> >>
>> >> However I get the following after running ypldap:
>> >>
>> >> # ypldap -dv
>> >> startup [debug mode]
>> >> configuration starting
>> >> applying configuration
>> >> connecting to directories
>> >> starting directory update
>> >> starting directory update
>> >> updates are over, cleaning up trees now
>> >> flattening trees
>> >>
>> >> I never receive the "pushing lines: ..." output.
>> >>
>> >> Here is my ypldap.conf:
>> >> interval 60  # how many seconds between retries
>> >> domain "domain.net.au"  # only one domain for now
>> >>
>> >> provide map "passwd.byname"
>> >> provide map "passwd.byuid"
>> >> provide map "group.byname"
>> >> provide map "group.bygid"
>> >>
>> >> directory "ldap server" {
>> >> binddn "cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
>> >> bindcred ""
>> >> basedn "ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
>> >>
>> >> passwd filter "(objectClass=posixAccount)"
>> >> attribute name maps to "uid"
>> >> fixed attribute passwd "*"
>> >> fixed attribute class "ldap"
>> >> attribute uid maps to "uidNumber"
>> >> attribute gid maps to "gidNumber"
>> >> attribute gecos maps to "cn"
>> >> attribute home maps to "homeDirectory"
>> >> attribute shell maps to "loginShell"
>> >> attribute change maps to "shadowLastChange"
>> >> fixed attribute expire "0"
>> >>
>> >> group filter "(objectClass=posixGroup)"
>> >> attribute groupname maps to "cn"
>> >> fixed attribute grouppasswd "*"
>> >> attribute groupgid maps to "gidNumber"
>> >> list groupmembers maps to "memberUid"
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> > 
>> > Hi Gavin,
>> > 
>> > what says a ldapsearch -x -h "ldap server" -D
>> > "cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au" -W -b
>> "ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
>> > "(objectClass=posixAccount)" ?
>> > 
>> > Regards Uwe
> 
> 
>
-- 
Gavin Norman
M: +614 0935 4020
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LDAP and OpenBSD

2008-10-23 Thread Gavin Norman
I already tested it on the command line with ldapsearch. I ran slapd with
debugging on the command line to stderr. It indicates that entries were
found, but you don't see ypldap actually receiving those entries.

Regards.

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:04:36 +0200, Uwe Werler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:02:18 +1100
> schrieb Gavin Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 
>> I attempted the steps based on your experience with ypldap.
>>
>> I downloaded a snapshot 2 days ago and setup a fresh install on a
>> virtual machine.
>>
>> However I get the following after running ypldap:
>>
>> # ypldap -dv
>> startup [debug mode]
>> configuration starting
>> applying configuration
>> connecting to directories
>> starting directory update
>> starting directory update
>> updates are over, cleaning up trees now
>> flattening trees
>>
>> I never receive the "pushing lines: ..." output.
>>
>> Here is my ypldap.conf:
>> interval 60  # how many seconds between retries
>> domain "domain.net.au"  # only one domain for now
>>
>> provide map "passwd.byname"
>> provide map "passwd.byuid"
>> provide map "group.byname"
>> provide map "group.bygid"
>>
>> directory "ldap server" {
>> binddn "cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
>> bindcred ""
>> basedn "ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
>>
>> passwd filter "(objectClass=posixAccount)"
>> attribute name maps to "uid"
>> fixed attribute passwd "*"
>> fixed attribute class "ldap"
>> attribute uid maps to "uidNumber"
>> attribute gid maps to "gidNumber"
>> attribute gecos maps to "cn"
>> attribute home maps to "homeDirectory"
>> attribute shell maps to "loginShell"
>> attribute change maps to "shadowLastChange"
>> fixed attribute expire "0"
>>
>> group filter "(objectClass=posixGroup)"
>> attribute groupname maps to "cn"
>> fixed attribute grouppasswd "*"
>> attribute groupgid maps to "gidNumber"
>> list groupmembers maps to "memberUid"
>> }
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
> 
> Hi Gavin,
> 
> what says a ldapsearch -x -h "ldap server" -D
> "cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au" -W -b
"ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
> "(objectClass=posixAccount)" ?
> 
> Regards Uwe
-- 
Gavin Norman
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: LDAP and OpenBSD

2008-10-23 Thread Uwe Werler
Am Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:02:18 +1100
schrieb Gavin Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> I attempted the steps based on your experience with ypldap.
> 
> I downloaded a snapshot 2 days ago and setup a fresh install on a 
> virtual machine.
> 
> However I get the following after running ypldap:
> 
> # ypldap -dv
> startup [debug mode]
> configuration starting
> applying configuration
> connecting to directories
> starting directory update
> starting directory update
> updates are over, cleaning up trees now
> flattening trees
> 
> I never receive the "pushing lines: ..." output.
> 
> Here is my ypldap.conf:
> interval 60  # how many seconds between retries
> domain "domain.net.au"  # only one domain for now
> 
> provide map "passwd.byname"
> provide map "passwd.byuid"
> provide map "group.byname"
> provide map "group.bygid"
> 
> directory "ldap server" {
> binddn "cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
> bindcred ""
> basedn "ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au"
> 
> passwd filter "(objectClass=posixAccount)"
> attribute name maps to "uid"
> fixed attribute passwd "*"
> fixed attribute class "ldap"
> attribute uid maps to "uidNumber"
> attribute gid maps to "gidNumber"
> attribute gecos maps to "cn"
> attribute home maps to "homeDirectory"
> attribute shell maps to "loginShell"
> attribute change maps to "shadowLastChange"
> fixed attribute expire "0"
> 
> group filter "(objectClass=posixGroup)"
> attribute groupname maps to "cn"
> fixed attribute grouppasswd "*"
> attribute groupgid maps to "gidNumber"
> list groupmembers maps to "memberUid"
> }
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Hi Gavin,

what says a ldapsearch -x -h "ldap server" -D 
"cn=Manager,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au" -W -b "ou=Users,dc=domain,dc=net,dc=au" 
"(objectClass=posixAccount)" ?

Regards Uwe



Re: oT - ffsdrv / ufs2tools free alternative , to read ffs AND/OR BSD SWAP in xp..

2008-10-23 Thread Danny Cautaert
On 2008-10-23, Neko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> after a few trial i haven't got much chance with the ffsdrv, and >
> the code seems kinda old
...
> if someone have seen some of these projects that are updated or new
> around, it would be good to share the info

http://www.fs-driver.org

-- 
Greetings from Oostende (BE) -*- Danny Cautaert (DaCa) 
Write me in Dutch, French or English * GnuPG: 10731977
Meet me at OpenCON * 28-30 November 2008 * Venice (IT)



strange problem with carp

2008-10-23 Thread Sebastian Reitenbach
Hello everybody,

I asked about one or two weeks ago regarding problems of carp and dhcp.
After some more investigation, the dhcpd doesn't seem to be the problem.

That's the situation:
I've two firewalls, running as master/slave pair.
One of my uplinks is a cable connection. Due to the fact that the provider
only allows traffic from a given MAC address, I had to fake the mac of the
phsical interfaces on the host to be the same as the MAC of the carp
interface. That was the only way I got this working at all.
This interface is configured like this:

cat /etc/hostname.carp0
!ifconfig em0 lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:01
!ifconfig em0 up
!ifconfig em0 description PHYS_INET_IF
vhid 1 pass password carpdev em0 112.104.156.74 112.104.156.255 netmask 
255.255.255.0 up
description CARP_INET_IF

So far, no problem, this works fairly well.

On top of that em0 interface, I have a vlan interface, that needs an IP
address assigned, because I want to have a dhcp server listening on that
interface, and carp on top of that like this:

cat /etc/save2.hostname.carp23
!ifconfig vlan23 create
!ifconfig vlan23 vlan 23 vlandev em0
!ifconfig vlan23 192.168.123.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 
192.168.123.255 up
!ifconfig vlan23 description ALIEN_VLAN_IF
vhid 1 pass password carpdev vlan23 192.168.123.1 192.168.123.255 netmask 
255.255.255.0 up
description CARP_ALIEN_IF

On the slave, both carp interfaces have a advskew 20 configured, and the
vlan23 interface has a different IP address.
With no IP address assigned on the vlan23 interface, everything works fine.
The carp23 interface on the slave host stays in backup mode.
But with the IP address assigned to the vlan23 interface, the slave it is
going into master mode too.

With tcpdump I've seen, the carp packets have a source IP address of the
virtual IP address, when the underlying interface doesn't have an IP address
assigned. With assigned IP addresses, the carp packets have the source IP
address of the IP assigned to the underlying interface.

I tried to change the MAC address of the vlan23 interface so that they are
different on both hosts, but that did not helped.

I tried to bind the dhcpd on the carp interface, but that didn't work.
Do I can get the dhcpd listening on an interface that has no IP address
assigned?
Or any other idea how I could get this to work?

kind regards
Sebastian



Re: U-DMA mode problems with OpenBSD 4.3 and above + SATA controllers + CF card

2008-10-23 Thread Alexey Suslikov
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Stephane Lapie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2008, at 4:49 PM, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Stephane Lapie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
>>>
>>> Stephane Lapie wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am currently working with a Portwell NAR-5530 (network appliance
>>> running off Intel hardware, can use regular HDs or CF cards as boot
>>> device).
>>> We want to use this at work for network appliances, but end up
>>> bumping in the following problem : the kernel detects any device
>>> plugged to the controller (SATA or CF) as UltraDMA-5, even though the
>>> BIOS specifies otherwise clearly.
>>>
>>> You definitely should try to install recent snapshot on a CF
>>> card and boot GENERIC.MP with APM disabled since that
>>> box may mis-behave on interrupts without APCI.
>>> Issue "bsd.mp -c" in UKC than "disable apm" and "exit".
>>>
>>> Since the Intel controller got two modes (Enhanced, which successfully
>>> activates, but provokes issues with wd0 being recognized as UDMA5 ;
>>> Compatible, which can't allocate properly an IRQ, probably due to an ACPI
>>> issue), I tried booting with both modes :
>>> Here is the dmesg trace for a bsd.mp kernel (I'll build a full fledged MP
>>> based ramdisk once I confirm this works) in Enhanced mode :
>>
>> You need to sendbug about this (including your researches)
>> if you want this to be fixed in tree.
>
> FYI, I filed the bug under kernel/5961.
>
> On another note, simply detecting proper mode for the disk doesn't fix all
> of the issues ; it still seems there is a problem with the pciide driver, as
> I have confirmed the following error :
>
> wd0(pciide0:0:0): timeout
>type: ata
>c_bcount: 16384
>c_skip: 0
> pciide0:0:0: bus-master DMA error: status=0x22
> pciide0:0:0: bus-master DMA error: missing interrupt, status=0x22

Check if that still true for GENERIC.MP from -current.

Alexey