Yubikey works on gpg1 but not gpg2
I have a Yubikey that I'd like to use for gpg and ssh purposes. Running "gpg --card-status" works as expected; it brings up the various keys attached to the device and other information. However, running "gpg2 --card-status" just hangs, seemingly forever. What am I missing here? Thanks :)
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
You're the last person anyone wants email advice from, Rupert. khm
Re: touchpad input driver: testing needed
On 08/05/2017 11:10 PM, Paul de Weerd wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:26:12PM +0200, Ulf Brosziewski wrote: > | Hi Paul, > | > | thanks for your help. Does tapping work when you use > | the synaptics driver? > > Nope, it doesn't. > which probably means there is either something happening that our hardware driver doesn't cover, or there is a hardware/firmware bug. Anyhow, it's strange because the drivers only need very basic data to identify a tap: the start of a contact, its end, and the duration. Have you checked - with the synaptics driver - whether a higher tap timeout helps? If not, would you mind to make a short test? Could you increase the tap timeout to a very high value, say, two seconds, and test whether a tap works (with a slight delay)? For the wsmouse-internal driver, the following command will set a two-second timeout: # wsconsctl mouse.tp.param=137:2000 Of course you could not work reasonably with such a timeout, you might want to check then whether something between 200 350 milliseconds would do. The default is 180. > | In the test setup with ws and the internal driver there > | are some restrictions on tapping: > | 1) It is suppressed when the position is an edge area > | (presumably the software button area at the bottom > | edge in this case). > > Normally, I'm tapping in the center of the touchpad. But I've tried > various locations, all don't work. > > | 2) The finger must not move by more than a certain > | distance, otherwise, the contact doesn't count as > | "tap". > > I've tried quite a few times, but no luck. I'm pretty sure at least > some of those attempts were in basically the same spot :) > > | 3) It is suppressed when hardware buttons are being > | pressed. > > I don't even try this :) > > | Just to be sure, can you exclude that 1), 2), or 3) is > | the reason for the problem? And neither one-, two-, nor > | three-finger taps work? > > I can: no tapping works, with any number of fingers. I should, > however, clarify one thing: > > | > This doesn't work on my touchpad. Also, I can't click-and-drag (never > | > worked, in any combination I while playing with the driver settings). > > This 'click-and-drag' behaviour does work if I click, keep the button > depressed and then move that same finger around. [...] Does this also work if you put a second finger on the touchpad (which does nothing)? > [...] So I can't click > with one finger and drag with another. > > Cheers, > > Paul >
Re: touchpad input driver: testing needed
Hello, The outputs from 'dmesg' and 'wsconsctl | grep mouse' on my Dell Inspiron 5567 follow: % dmesg OpenBSD 6.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #34: Tue Aug 1 18:56:18 MDT 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 8389611520 (8000MB) avail mem = 8128987136 (7752MB) mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.8 @ 0xe9ca0 (93 entries) bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version "1.0.2" date 09/09/2016 bios0: Dell Inc. Inspiron 5567 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC FPDT FIDT MCFG HPET SSDT BOOT SSDT HPET SSDT UEFI SSDT LPIT SSDT SSDT DBGP DBG2 MSDM SSDT SLIC DMAR TPM2 acpi0: wakeup devices PXSX(S4) RP09(S4) PXSX(S4) RP10(S4) PXSX(S4) RP11(S4) PXSX(S4) RP12(S4) PXSX(S4) RP13(S4) PXSX(S4) RP01(S4) PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) RP03(S4) [...] acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: TSC frequency 271200 Hz cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges cpu0: apic clock running at 24MHz cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.4.1.1.1, IBE cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0 cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu2: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu2: smt 1, core 0, package 0 cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 3 (application processor) cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu3: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu3: smt 1, core 1, package 0 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 120 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 2399 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG0) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG1) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG2) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP09) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP10) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP11) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP12) acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP13) acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP01) acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP02) acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP03) acpiprt12 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP04) acpiprt13 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP05) acpiprt14 at acpi0: bus 2 (RP06) acpiprt15 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP07) acpiprt16 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP08) acpiprt17 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP17) acpiprt18 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP18) acpiprt19 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP19) acpiprt20 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP20) acpiprt21 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP14) acpiprt22 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP15) acpiprt23 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP16) acpiec0 at acpi0 acpiec at acpi0 not configured acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu2 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu3 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpipwrres0 at acpi0: WRST acpipwrres1 at acpi0: WRST acpipwrres2 at acpi0: WRST acpipwrres3
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
https://www.dnsinspect.com/roquesor.com/10171765 Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > Hello everyone, I was using smtpd(8) (static IP and FQDN resolving direct and > reverse) for a year without problems. Today sending from my server (from the > same address I'm using now) to gmail and hotmail they answered the following > (MAILER-DAEMON answer). Sending to gmail addresses: *@gmail.com: 550-5.7.1 > [185.37.212.61] The IP you're using to send mail is not authorized to send > email directly to our servers. Please use the SMTP relay at your service > provider instead. Learn more at > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NotAuthorizedError e1si6736354wra.236 - > gsmtp Sending to hotmail: *@hotmail.com: 550 DY-001 (SNT004-MC3F42) > Unfortunately, messages from 185.37.212.61 weren't sent. Please contact your > Internet service provider. You can tell them that Hotmail does not relay > dynamically-assigned IP ranges. You can also refer your provider to > http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx#errors. On the hotmail link > above the explanaition for code DY-001 is: Mail rejected by Outlook.com for > policy reasons. We generally do not accept email from dynamic IP's as they > are not typically used to deliver unauthenticated SMTP email to an Internet > mail server. If you are not an email/network admin please contact your > Email/Internet Service Provider for help. http://www.spamhaus.org maintains > lists of dynamic and residential IP addresses. It doesn't happen with yahoo. > I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list called > PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just includes dynamic > and "non mail server IP ranges". Does someone here know what is "non mail > server IP ranges" about? Or, how could my static IP could be taken as dynamic > (some DNS faliure at my ISP end?).
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
In article you wrote: > On 2017-08-06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > > I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list > > called PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just > > includes dynamic and "non mail server IP ranges". > > > > Does someone here know what is "non mail server IP ranges" about? Or, > > how could my static IP could be taken as dynamic (some DNS faliure at my > > ISP end?). > > You should add ypur IP to dnswl.org. I can't guarantes it will help > everywhere, but it will help some places and won't hurt others. > > I'll take a look to dnswl.org. Thanks. It seems that after removing my IP from spamhaus pbl the issue is fixed.
Re: vmd errors
$ doas pkill -9 vmd $ doas vmd -dv startup webdev: started vm 3 successfully, tty /dev/ttyp7 vionet queue notify - no space, dropping packet $ doas vmctl start "webdev" -c -b bsd.rd -m 1024M -i 1 -d www.drive -d install61.fs vmctl: start vm command failed: Operation not permitted dmesg: OpenBSD 6.1 (GENERIC.MP) #19: Thu Aug 3 14:59:44 CEST 2017 rob...@syspatch-61-amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 8487264256 (8094MB) avail mem = 8225361920 (7844MB) mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.8 @ 0xec580 (74 entries) bios0: vendor Alienware version "A04" date 03/26/2015 bios0: Alienware Alienware 13 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC FPDT FIDT MCFG HPET SSDT UEFI SSDT ASF! SLIC SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT SSDT CSRT SSDT acpi0: wakeup devices PEGP(S4) PEG0(S4) PEGP(S4) PEG1(S4) PEGP(S4) PEG2(S4) PXSX(S4) RP01(S4) PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) RP03(S4) PXSX(S4) RP04(S4) RP05(S4) PEGP(S4) [...] acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz, 2398.34 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,SENSOR,ARAT cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: TSC frequency 2398343520 Hz cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges cpu0: apic clock running at 99MHz cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.4.1.1.1, IBE cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz, 2397.92 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,SENSOR,ARAT cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0 cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz, 2397.92 MHz cpu2: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,SENSOR,ARAT cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu2: smt 1, core 0, package 0 cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 3 (application processor) cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-4210U CPU @ 1.70GHz, 2397.92 MHz cpu3: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,SENSOR,ARAT cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu3: smt 1, core 1, package 0 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 40 pins acpimadt0: bogus nmi for apid 0 acpimadt0: bogus nmi for apid 2 acpimadt0: bogus nmi for apid 1 acpimadt0: bogus nmi for apid 3 acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xf800, bus 0-63 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 14318179 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG0) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG1) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG2) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP01) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP02) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP03) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus 2 (RP04) acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 3 (RP05) acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP06) acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP07) acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP08) acpiec0 at acpi0: not present acpiec1 at acpi0 acpicpu0 at acpi0: C2(200@148 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C2(200@148 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu2 at acpi0: C2(200@148 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu3 at acpi0: C2(200@148 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpipwrres0 at acpi0: PG00, resource for PEG0 acpipwrres1 at acpi0: PG01, resource for PEG1 acpipwrres2 at acpi0: PG02, resource for PEG2 acpipwrres3 at acpi0: PC05, resource for RP05 acpitz0 at acpi0: critical temperature is 105 degC acpitz1 at acpi0: critical temperature is 105 degC "DLLK0683" at acpi0 not configured "DLL0683" at acpi0 not configured "INT3F0D" at acpi0 not configured "INT3403" at acpi0 not configured acpibat0 at acpi0: BAT1 model "PABAS0241231" serial 0x75d1 type Li-Ion oem "TOSHIBA" acpiac0 at acpi0: AC unit online ac
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
On 2017-08-06, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list > called PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just > includes dynamic and "non mail server IP ranges". > > Does someone here know what is "non mail server IP ranges" about? Or, > how could my static IP could be taken as dynamic (some DNS faliure at my > ISP end?). You should add ypur IP to dnswl.org. I can't guarantes it will help everywhere, but it will help some places and won't hurt others.
Re: vmd errors
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 08:07:25PM +0200, Stephane HUC "PengouinBSD" wrote: > Hi all. > > I have this problem to run vmctl: > > $ doas vmctl start "webdev" -c -b bsd.rd -m 1024M -i 1 -d www.drive -d > install61.fs > vmctl: start vm command failed: Operation not permitted > > I can use virtualization on my desktop; it's an Core i5 intel : > > $ dmesg | grep vmm > vmm0 at mainbus0: VMX/EPT > > I attempt to use on OpenBSD 6.1 -stable : > > $ uname -a > OpenBSD ptb.stephane-huc.net 6.1 GENERIC.MP#19 amd64 > > The config seems correct: > > $ doas vmd -n > configuration OK > > ifconfig results: > pkill -9 vmd vmd -dv (will not detach from the console) vmctl log verbose then try your vmctl again, and send the vmd log messages displayed in the window where vmd is running. Also send a dmesg please. We'll start there and see if we need more info. Thanks for helping test vmd -ml > (...) > vether0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > lladdr fe:e1:ba:d0:01:02 > index 4 priority 0 llprio 3 > groups: vether > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: active > inet 192.168.247.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.247.255 > inet6 fe80::fce1:baff:fed0:102%vether0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet6 fd47:c107:b5d::247:1 prefixlen 64 > (...) > bridge0: flags=41 > description: switch1-h2g2 > index 8 llprio 3 > groups: bridge > priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto > rstp > vether0 flags=3 > port 4 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0 > tap0 flags=3 > port 9 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0 > tap0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 > lladdr fe:e1:ba:d2:3d:0c > description: vm1-if0-webdev > index 9 priority 0 llprio 3 > groups: tap > status: active > > An idea to explain-me why vmctl failed to start? > > > -- > ~ " Fully Basic System Distinguish Life! " ~ " Libre as a BSD " +=<<< > > Stephane HUC as PengouinBSD or CIOTBSD > b...@stephane-huc.net >
vmd errors
Hi all. I have this problem to run vmctl: $ doas vmctl start "webdev" -c -b bsd.rd -m 1024M -i 1 -d www.drive -d install61.fs vmctl: start vm command failed: Operation not permitted I can use virtualization on my desktop; it's an Core i5 intel : $ dmesg | grep vmm vmm0 at mainbus0: VMX/EPT I attempt to use on OpenBSD 6.1 -stable : $ uname -a OpenBSD ptb.stephane-huc.net 6.1 GENERIC.MP#19 amd64 The config seems correct: $ doas vmd -n configuration OK ifconfig results: (...) vether0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 lladdr fe:e1:ba:d0:01:02 index 4 priority 0 llprio 3 groups: vether media: Ethernet autoselect status: active inet 192.168.247.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.247.255 inet6 fe80::fce1:baff:fed0:102%vether0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet6 fd47:c107:b5d::247:1 prefixlen 64 (...) bridge0: flags=41 description: switch1-h2g2 index 8 llprio 3 groups: bridge priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp vether0 flags=3 port 4 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0 tap0 flags=3 port 9 ifpriority 0 ifcost 0 tap0: flags=8943 mtu 1500 lladdr fe:e1:ba:d2:3d:0c description: vm1-if0-webdev index 9 priority 0 llprio 3 groups: tap status: active An idea to explain-me why vmctl failed to start? -- ~ " Fully Basic System Distinguish Life! " ~ " Libre as a BSD " +=<<< Stephane HUC as PengouinBSD or CIOTBSD b...@stephane-huc.net signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
> On 6. Aug 2017, at 19:45, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > > Hi Niels, > >> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:19:04PM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: >> On 6. Aug 2017, at 18:40, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote: Like Martijn pointed out, you're sending mail from a IP which is not intended for mail-servers. >>> >>> This was my main question. What is an "IP intended for mail-servers"? >> >> The question should be "what are IPs **not** intended for mail-servers?" >> >> The ranges of ISPs for home-users and the dsl-, cable-, whatever-connection >> are well-known and pretty much on all of the blacklists since the only thing >> you can usually expect from them is spam from botnets. Legitimate mails are >> rather rare from those ranges, thus they get blocked. > > I cannot tell what happens in pratice, I've never run a big mail server. > But the reasons that come to my mind someone wants to run their own > server (at home or at a small enterprise) are opposed to what you state. > Why would you want to send spam from the fixed IP you're paying for (in > my case 5 euros mouth)? I run a mail server-setup with an upper five-digit number of accounts. So it is not huge but quite some users and I have to deal with a lot of spam (incoming and outgoing from phished accounts for example). The thing is that I do not know which IPs an ISP dedicates for fixed IPs and which IPs are legitimately sent from mail servers and have probably responsible admins behind them. But I subscribe to blacklists that have for example the whole IP-range of Vodafone home-user IPs. And as I have written before: the chance is really low that from those ranges a legitimate mail is sent. It's more like 99% are sent via botnets from enslaved computers from those ranges. Thus "we" prefer to overblock in that case. > The question is still unanswered. What determines those "ranges", who > regulates that? Blacklist-providers and Google and co have properly their own and the bigger setups rely on them. If I wouldn't have a blacklist for those IP-ranges, I would build such a list for myself because it cuts down spam a lot. Luckily other people did that already. >> To not get blocked by google and hotmail you need an IP from some >> hosting-provider, university or something like this; > > Which is the procedure followed by those entities to get an IP in what > you called the "authorized range"? Authorized by who? Get an ASN and ask the IANA, RIPE to provide you an IP. Or you get your server placed in a colocation who can you provide with an IP or rent a server or VPN from a hoster. >> and at least an SPF-, even better a DKIM-record. > > I had these at first and removed them after seeing they don't help. Even if you have a "proper" IP you need an SPF-record for Google and hotmail. Otherwise you will run into problems (I am speaking from experience). >> And if you >> ever send out mail, you maybe want a secondary IP for temporary >> failover-cases if you land temporarily on a black list. > > I have just two personal addresses. I don't need that complication. :-) Yeah, most smaller mail servers don't need that. I do unfortunately :( Niels
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
Hi Niels, On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 07:19:04PM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: > > > On 6. Aug 2017, at 18:40, Walter Alejandro Iglesias > > wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote: > >> Like Martijn pointed out, you're sending mail from a IP which is not > >> intended for mail-servers. > > > > This was my main question. What is an "IP intended for mail-servers"? > > The question should be "what are IPs **not** intended for mail-servers?" > > The ranges of ISPs for home-users and the dsl-, cable-, whatever-connection > are well-known and pretty much on all of the blacklists since the only thing > you can usually expect from them is spam from botnets. Legitimate mails are > rather rare from those ranges, thus they get blocked. I cannot tell what happens in pratice, I've never run a big mail server. But the reasons that come to my mind someone wants to run their own server (at home or at a small enterprise) are opposed to what you state. Why would you want to send spam from the fixed IP you're paying for (in my case 5 euros mouth)? The question is still unanswered. What determines those "ranges", who regulates that? > To not get blocked by google and hotmail you need an IP from some > hosting-provider, university or something like this; Which is the procedure followed by those entities to get an IP in what you called the "authorized range"? Authorized by who? > a PTR-record for your server I already have this. > and at least an SPF-, even better a DKIM-record. I had these at first and removed them after seeing they don't help. > And if you > ever send out mail, you maybe want a secondary IP for temporary > failover-cases if you land temporarily on a black list. I have just two personal addresses. I don't need that complication. :-) > > Niels
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
> On 6. Aug 2017, at 18:40, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote: >> Like Martijn pointed out, you're sending mail from a IP which is not >> intended for mail-servers. > > This was my main question. What is an "IP intended for mail-servers"? The question should be "what are IPs **not** intended for mail-servers?" The ranges of ISPs for home-users and the dsl-, cable-, whatever-connection are well-known and pretty much on all of the blacklists since the only thing you can usually expect from them is spam from botnets. Legitimate mails are rather rare from those ranges, thus they get blocked. To not get blocked by google and hotmail you need an IP from some hosting-provider, university or something like this; a PTR-record for your server and at least an SPF-, even better a DKIM-record. And if you ever send out mail, you maybe want a secondary IP for temporary failover-cases if you land temporarily on a black list. Niels
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 06:02:25PM +0200, Jesper Wallin wrote: > Like Martijn pointed out, you're sending mail from a IP which is not > intended for mail-servers. This was my main question. What is an "IP intended for mail-servers"?
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:29:04PM +0200, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > Hi Gareth, > > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Gareth Nelson wrote: > > I'm assuming that you have your SPF records setup correctly. > > > > I did that at first, and all the tricks (dkim, etc) they ask to make you > appear as a legal sender, but after confirming my mail still went to > SPAM in both (gmail, hotmail) I remove all that trickery. Why remove it? Having things like SPF and DKIM should be essential when running your own mailserver. As for gmail and outlook/hotmail, they tend to use IP reputation when it comes to classifying incoming mail. Like Martijn pointed out, you're sending mail from a IP which is not intended for mail-servers. Most ISPs block outgoing traffic on port 25 to prevent their customers sending spam when they get infected with viruses and such. Even if your ISP allow you to send mail, most providers will most likely classify it as spam/junk. Your ISP most likely provide you with an outgoing mailserver. I would suggest that you configure spamd to use that one to relay all outgoing mail.
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
Hi Gareth, On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:12:45PM +0100, Gareth Nelson wrote: > I'm assuming that you have your SPF records setup correctly. > I did that at first, and all the tricks (dkim, etc) they ask to make you appear as a legal sender, but after confirming my mail still went to SPAM in both (gmail, hotmail) I remove all that trickery.
Re: touchpad input driver: testing needed
Hello, The outputs from 'dmesg' and 'wsconsctl | grep mouse' on my Dell Inspiron 5567 follow: % dmesg OpenBSD 6.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #34: Tue Aug 1 18:56:18 MDT 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 8389611520 (8000MB) avail mem = 8128987136 (7752MB) mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 2.8 @ 0xe9ca0 (93 entries) bios0: vendor Dell Inc. version "1.0.2" date 09/09/2016 bios0: Dell Inc. Inspiron 5567 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC FPDT FIDT MCFG HPET SSDT BOOT SSDT HPET SSDT UEFI SSDT LPIT SSDT SSDT DBGP DBG2 MSDM SSDT SLIC DMAR TPM2 acpi0: wakeup devices PXSX(S4) RP09(S4) PXSX(S4) RP10(S4) PXSX(S4) RP11(S4) PXSX(S4) RP12(S4) PXSX(S4) RP13(S4) PXSX(S4) RP01(S4) PXSX(S4) RP02(S4) PXSX(S4) RP03(S4) [...] acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: TSC frequency 271200 Hz cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges cpu0: apic clock running at 24MHz cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.4.1.1.1, IBE cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0 cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu2: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu2: smt 1, core 0, package 0 cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 3 (application processor) cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U CPU @ 2.50GHz, 2712.00 MHz cpu3: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu3: smt 1, core 1, package 0 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 120 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 2399 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG0) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG1) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG2) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP09) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP10) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP11) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP12) acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP13) acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP01) acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP02) acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP03) acpiprt12 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP04) acpiprt13 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP05) acpiprt14 at acpi0: bus 2 (RP06) acpiprt15 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP07) acpiprt16 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP08) acpiprt17 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP17) acpiprt18 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP18) acpiprt19 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP19) acpiprt20 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP20) acpiprt21 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP14) acpiprt22 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP15) acpiprt23 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP16) acpiec0 at acpi0 acpiec at acpi0 not configured acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu1 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu2 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpicpu3 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait.1@0x33), C1(1000@1 mwait.1), PSS acpipwrres0 at acpi0: WRST acpipwrres1 at acpi0: WRST acpipwrres2 at acpi0: WRST acpipwrres3
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
Hi Martijn, On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 05:09:10PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote: > Not an authority on this, so take my reply for what you want. > > As far as I know this list is used to keep track of ip-addresses by ISPs > for home-addresses, which are not intended to be used for outgoing mail. > > You can whitelist your ip-address on this list yourself and all should > be back to normal. I just did it from spamhause site. > > I faced the same issues and adding my ip did solve the 550s. > > Do note that my ip gets removed every year and thus should be re-added > ever year. I'll take this in care. Thank you! > > Sincerely, > > martijn@ >
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
Sadly there's nothing you can do other than to contact spamhaus.org and see if they'll remove your IP. I'm assuming that you have your SPF records setup correctly. On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I was using smtpd(8) (static IP and FQDN resolving direct and reverse) > for a year without problems. Today sending from my server (from the > same address I'm using now) to gmail and hotmail they answered the > following (MAILER-DAEMON answer). > > Sending to gmail addresses: > > *@gmail.com: 550-5.7.1 [185.37.212.61] The IP you're using to send > mail is not authorized to send email directly to our servers. Please > use the SMTP relay at your service provider instead. Learn more at > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NotAuthorizedError > e1si6736354wra.236 - gsmtp > > Sending to hotmail: > > *@hotmail.com: 550 DY-001 (SNT004-MC3F42) Unfortunately, messages from > 185.37.212.61 weren't sent. Please contact your Internet service > provider. You can tell them that Hotmail does not relay > dynamically-assigned IP ranges. You can also refer your provider to > http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx#errors. > > > On the hotmail link above the explanaition for code DY-001 is: > > Mail rejected by Outlook.com for policy reasons. We generally do not > accept email from dynamic IP's as they are not typically used to > deliver unauthenticated SMTP email to an Internet mail server. If you > are not an email/network admin please contact your Email/Internet > Service Provider for help. http://www.spamhaus.org maintains lists of > dynamic and residential IP addresses. > > It doesn't happen with yahoo. > > I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list > called PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just > includes dynamic and "non mail server IP ranges". > > Does someone here know what is "non mail server IP ranges" about? Or, > how could my static IP could be taken as dynamic (some DNS faliure at my > ISP end?). > >
Re: gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
Not an authority on this, so take my reply for what you want. As far as I know this list is used to keep track of ip-addresses by ISPs for home-addresses, which are not intended to be used for outgoing mail. You can whitelist your ip-address on this list yourself and all should be back to normal. I faced the same issues and adding my ip did solve the 550s. Do note that my ip gets removed every year and thus should be re-added ever year. Sincerely, martijn@ On 08/06/17 16:51, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I was using smtpd(8) (static IP and FQDN resolving direct and reverse) > for a year without problems. Today sending from my server (from the > same address I'm using now) to gmail and hotmail they answered the > following (MAILER-DAEMON answer). > > Sending to gmail addresses: > > *@gmail.com: 550-5.7.1 [185.37.212.61] The IP you're using to send > mail is not authorized to send email directly to our servers. Please > use the SMTP relay at your service provider instead. Learn more at > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NotAuthorizedError > e1si6736354wra.236 - gsmtp > > Sending to hotmail: > > *@hotmail.com: 550 DY-001 (SNT004-MC3F42) Unfortunately, messages from > 185.37.212.61 weren't sent. Please contact your Internet service > provider. You can tell them that Hotmail does not relay > dynamically-assigned IP ranges. You can also refer your provider to > http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx#errors. > > > On the hotmail link above the explanaition for code DY-001 is: > > Mail rejected by Outlook.com for policy reasons. We generally do not > accept email from dynamic IP's as they are not typically used to > deliver unauthenticated SMTP email to an Internet mail server. If you > are not an email/network admin please contact your Email/Internet > Service Provider for help. http://www.spamhaus.org maintains lists of > dynamic and residential IP addresses. > > It doesn't happen with yahoo. > > I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list > called PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just > includes dynamic and "non mail server IP ranges". > > Does someone here know what is "non mail server IP ranges" about? Or, > how could my static IP could be taken as dynamic (some DNS faliure at my > ISP end?). >
gmail and hotmail blocking mail sent from my IP
Hello everyone, I was using smtpd(8) (static IP and FQDN resolving direct and reverse) for a year without problems. Today sending from my server (from the same address I'm using now) to gmail and hotmail they answered the following (MAILER-DAEMON answer). Sending to gmail addresses: *@gmail.com: 550-5.7.1 [185.37.212.61] The IP you're using to send mail is not authorized to send email directly to our servers. Please use the SMTP relay at your service provider instead. Learn more at https://support.google.com/mail/?p=NotAuthorizedError e1si6736354wra.236 - gsmtp Sending to hotmail: *@hotmail.com: 550 DY-001 (SNT004-MC3F42) Unfortunately, messages from 185.37.212.61 weren't sent. Please contact your Internet service provider. You can tell them that Hotmail does not relay dynamically-assigned IP ranges. You can also refer your provider to http://mail.live.com/mail/troubleshooting.aspx#errors. On the hotmail link above the explanaition for code DY-001 is: Mail rejected by Outlook.com for policy reasons. We generally do not accept email from dynamic IP's as they are not typically used to deliver unauthenticated SMTP email to an Internet mail server. If you are not an email/network admin please contact your Email/Internet Service Provider for help. http://www.spamhaus.org maintains lists of dynamic and residential IP addresses. It doesn't happen with yahoo. I visited spamhaus.org site and found out my IP is included in a list called PBL that, as they explain is not a spammers list, it just includes dynamic and "non mail server IP ranges". Does someone here know what is "non mail server IP ranges" about? Or, how could my static IP could be taken as dynamic (some DNS faliure at my ISP end?).
Re: openldap port mdb support
On 2017/08/05 21:39, Paul B. Henson wrote: > I took a look at the patch in head; you should assign the failure code to rc > before calling Debug, as it refers to rc... Thanks, fixed. On 2017/08/05 21:40, Paul B. Henson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:35:24AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > The ports@ list is a better venue for ports-related queries, > > please see this: https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=150157643516239&w=2 > > Ah, ok, thanks for the pointer. > > > This is not preventing programs from running. > > Hmm, I could've sworn I got that message and then slapd failed to start. > Dunno, maybe I got confused. Once I'm done working with openldap mdb I'll > start over from scratch and try again and see what happens. > > Thanks for the info... There have been other problems which occurred at the same time as the icu warnings resumed (triggered by the switch to clang for base and all but a very small number of ports) - if you run into it again, if there's any debug information or backtrace available, that would be interesting.
