Re: New default setup for touchpads in X
Hello Ulf ! > there seems to be a terminology problem here: Usually, > "pinch gesture" refers to an input with two touches moving > toward each other, or away from each other, and it doesn't > involve keyboard input. Our drivers don't support these > gestures. Many applications permit to zoom in and out by > holding the Ctrl key down and scrolling simultaneously. Is > this what you mean? It should work with any application > that implements it, for the driver, it's just scrolling. Yes, it is what I meaned. I know it from Mac OS X as gestures or 2 finger gestures (or some varaiants of it, depends where you read about it) for zoom in and out without holding a key. As I configured synaptics / synclient the first time I came across a posting where it was called pinch to zoom (Ctrl and move 2 fingers). See below for details. > As to tapping, what you describe sounds weird, but maybe it > isn't: During tests with a MacBookPro8,2 I observed that > tapping with much force may fail because the hardware reports > coordinates that oscillate in a range that is beyond the > distance limit for tapping (that is, if the distance between > the origin and the end point of a touch exceeds a certain > threshold, it isn't treated as tap). I increased that limit > then, but possibly it's still too low for that hardware. Not to force, it is like as if there are dead areas. See below for details. > Can you check whether tapping without force works better, and > also test it with the synaptics driver (which has a much higher > threshold)? I tried today a 6.2 -release for synaptics using fvwm(1) and qutebrowser. Tapping was set using synclients synclient TapButton1=1 (setting tapping using wsconsctl(8) had no effect). Tapping works in the whole area of the touchpad without problems. Zoom in and out using the Ctrl key and 2 fingers (only diagonal - see below) worked also. It was better then on the ThinkPad but makes also not really happy. Then I tried 6.2 -current from Dec 18 also with fvwm(1) and qutebrowser. Tapping was set using wsconsctl(8) - as described in a email before. Increasing the threshold makes tapping more easy but there are still dead areas on the touchpad. In the snapshot from Dec 17 tapping was only possible in the corners and the middle of the touchpad - the field between them was dead. With this snapshot the dead area is smaller but still there. Zoom in and out using Ctrl and 2 fingers had absolutly no effect which I can reproduce. 2 or 3 times I could accidently zoom 1 step but not more. My impression was, as if there is a zoom area which is outside (on the right side) of the touchpad (sorry, I have no better description). I was curious and installed xfce (no extras) as xfce's composting provides a internal magnifier using the alt (no typo) key and the mouse wheel to zoom in and out everywhere. Tested with a mouse works as it should. Tested with the touchpad and ws(4) works very smooth / perfect BUT using the alt key and move 2 fingers (only vertical not as normal diagonal) vertical to zoom in and out. Let me know, if you need more informations. Regards, Christoph
Re: bug tracking system for OpenBSD
Kai Wetlesen wrote: > Put bluntly, I was busy with completing my bachelors degree which was far > more important. You would have waited six months regardless. Now that it’s > done and out of the way I’ll happily take your advice. No need to explain that other things come up. OpenBSD developers are aware this happens. It's everybody else that seems to forget. :)
Re: OpenSMTPd error "io-error: No SSL error"
On 2017-11-06 23:22, Gabriel Kihlman wrote: Atanas Vladimirov writes: First, sorry that I'm reporting this issue so late, but I spotted it before a few days. It seems that my surveillance webcam stopped to notify me via email with the following messages in maillog: Nov 5 15:59:34 hodor smtpd[59494]: 2847e02c4337309e smtp event=connected address=172.16.1.8 host=attic.bsdbg.net Nov 5 15:59:35 hodor smtpd[59494]: 2847e02c4337309e smtp event=closed address=172.16.1.8 host=attic.bsdbg.net reason="io-error: No SSL error" I am also seeing this after upgrading to 6.2. # grep -c "io-error: No SSL error" maillog 82 # zgrep -c "io-error: No SSL error" maillog.0.gz 999 # zgrep -c "io-error: No SSL error" maillog.1.gz 1152 Hi, After upgrade to: OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #241: Sat Dec 2 12:41:37 MST 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP the problem seems to be fixed. I'm receiving the emails again. Thanks, Atanas
Re: support update
Please use the latter submission also copied below to update my profile. Kindly note email has changed. On Tuesday, December 19, 2017, Kihaguru Gathura wrote: > 0 > C Kenya > P Nairobi > T Nairobi > Z P.O. Box 30164-00100 > O PQscript > I > A Bishops Road > M pqscr...@gmail.com > U > B +254 706970697 > X > N OpenBSD consulting. Speciality in web applications > development with OpenBSD-httpd web server, PostgreSQL DBMS, FastCGI protocol and C programming language. >
Re: support update
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 09:54:56PM +0300, Kihaguru Gathura wrote: > Please use the latter submission also copied below to update my profile. > Kindly note email has changed. i committed the information below. > > On Tuesday, December 19, 2017, Kihaguru Gathura wrote: > > 0 > > C Kenya > > P Nairobi > > T Nairobi > > Z P.O. Box 30164-00100 > > O PQscript > > I > > A Bishops Road > > M pqscr...@gmail.com > > U > > B +254 706970697 > > X > > N OpenBSD consulting. Speciality in web applications > > development with OpenBSD-httpd web server, PostgreSQL DBMS, FastCGI > protocol and C programming language. > >
something wrong with softraid
please help, I just noticed this strange thing: $ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/sd0a 1005M 1004M -49.6M 105% / /dev/sd0k 26.0G 2.3G 22.4G 9% /home /dev/sd0d 3.9G 138K 3.7G 0% /tmp /dev/sd0f 2.0G 795M 1.1G 42% /usr /dev/sd0g 1005M 215M 740M 23% /usr/X11R6 /dev/sd0h 6.8G 799M 5.7G 12% /usr/local /dev/sd0j 2.0G 2.0K 1.9G 0% /usr/obj /dev/sd0i 1.9G 2.0K 1.8G 0% /usr/src /dev/sd0e 6.3G 1.1G 4.9G 18% /var /dev/sd4a 1.8T 1.3T 375G 79% /bigdisk look at /dev/sd0a i've done some inspection and found this: $ ls -alh /dev/rsd4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 913M Nov 14 20:58 /dev/rsd4 sd4 is my raid, bioctl shows nothing strange: $ doas bioctl sd4 Volume Status Size Device softraid0 0 Online 2000396018176 sd4 RAID1 0 Online 2000396018176 0:0.0 noencl 1 Online 2000396018176 0:1.0 noencl How this can be? just in case here is my fstab: $ cat /etc/fstab 98afe66b05b9c528.b none swap sw 98afe66b05b9c528.a / ffs rw 1 1 98afe66b05b9c528.k /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.f /usr ffs rw,nodev 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.g /usr/X11R6 ffs rw,nodev 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.h /usr/local ffs rw,nodev,wxallowed 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.j /usr/obj ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.i /usr/src ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 98afe66b05b9c528.e /var ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2 e642bdec5dc6a630.a /bigdisk ffs rw,nodev,nosuid,softdep 1 2 52dba8d6fdf64014.a /altroot ffs xx 0 0
Calibre: Add books File dialog never fully displays
I've been using Calibre (/usr/ports/textproc/calibre) to manage my ebook library for some years. Recently when trying to add new items using the Add button on the toolbar, I get a File open dialog box of sorts, but one that never (even after several minutes) never displays an actual directory listing. It only displays the dialog box title line, the rest of the box is a uniform grey, and while I am able to close the dialog box, Calibre itself freezes afterwards. How do I most usefully go about troubleshooting this? This is on OpenBSD/amd64, recent snapshots, dmesg follows OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #300: Mon Dec 18 18:20:23 MST 2017 dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP real mem = 34249297920 (32662MB) avail mem = 33204396032 (31666MB) mpath0 at root scsibus0 at mpath0: 256 targets mainbus0 at root bios0 at mainbus0: SMBIOS rev. 3.0 @ 0x7d317000 (42 entries) bios0: vendor American Megatrends Inc. version "1.05.05" date 04/27/2017 bios0: Notebook U831 acpi0 at bios0: rev 2 acpi0: sleep states S0 S3 S4 S5 acpi0: tables DSDT FACP APIC FPDT MCFG SSDT FIDT SSDT HPET SSDT UEFI SSDT SSDT LPIT WSMT SSDT SSDT DBGP DBG2 BGRT DMAR TPM2 ASF! acpi0: wakeup devices PXSX(S4) RP21(S4) PXSX(S4) RP22(S4) PXSX(S4) RP23(S4) PXSX(S4) RP24(S4) PXSX(S4) RP17(S4) PXSX(S4) RP18(S4) PXSX(S4) RP19(S4) PXSX(S4) RP20(S4) [...] acpitimer0 at acpi0: 3579545 Hz, 24 bits acpimadt0 at acpi0 addr 0xfee0: PC-AT compat cpu0 at mainbus0: apid 0 (boot processor) cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7500U CPU @ 2.70GHz, 3482.14 MHz cpu0: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu0: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu0: smt 0, core 0, package 0 mtrr: Pentium Pro MTRR support, 10 var ranges, 88 fixed ranges cpu0: apic clock running at 23MHz cpu0: mwait min=64, max=64, C-substates=0.2.1.2.4.1.1.1, IBE cpu1 at mainbus0: apid 2 (application processor) cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7500U CPU @ 2.70GHz, 3491.85 MHz cpu1: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu1: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu1: smt 0, core 1, package 0 cpu2 at mainbus0: apid 1 (application processor) cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7500U CPU @ 2.70GHz, 3491.85 MHz cpu2: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu2: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu2: smt 1, core 0, package 0 cpu3 at mainbus0: apid 3 (application processor) cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7500U CPU @ 2.70GHz, 3491.85 MHz cpu3: FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CFLUSH,DS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,PCLMUL,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,SDBG,FMA3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,PCID,SSE4.1,SSE4.2,x2APIC,MOVBE,POPCNT,DEADLINE,AES,XSAVE,AVX,F16C,RDRAND,NXE,PAGE1GB,RDTSCP,LONG,LAHF,ABM,3DNOWP,PERF,ITSC,FSGSBASE,SGX,BMI1,AVX2,SMEP,BMI2,ERMS,INVPCID,MPX,RDSEED,ADX,SMAP,CLFLUSHOPT,PT,SENSOR,ARAT cpu3: 256KB 64b/line 8-way L2 cache cpu3: smt 1, core 1, package 0 ioapic0 at mainbus0: apid 2 pa 0xfec0, version 20, 120 pins acpimcfg0 at acpi0 addr 0xe000, bus 0-255 acpihpet0 at acpi0: 2399 Hz acpiprt0 at acpi0: bus 0 (PCI0) acpiprt1 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG0) acpiprt2 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG1) acpiprt3 at acpi0: bus -1 (PEG2) acpiprt4 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP17) acpiprt5 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP18) acpiprt6 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP19) acpiprt7 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP20) acpiprt8 at acpi0: bus 1 (RP01) acpiprt9 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP02) acpiprt10 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP03) acpiprt11 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP04) acpiprt12 at acpi0: bus 58 (RP05) acpiprt13 at acpi0: bus 59 (RP06) acpiprt14 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP07) acpiprt15 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP08) acpiprt16 at acpi0: bus 60 (RP09) acpiprt17 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP10) acpiprt18 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP11) acpiprt19 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP12) acpiprt20 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP13) acpiprt21 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP14) acpiprt22 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP15) acpiprt23 at acpi0: bus -1 (RP16) acpiec0 at acpi0 acpicpu0 at acpi0: C3(200@1034 mwait.1@0x60), C2(200@151 mwait
IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.
I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it to setup your own custom OS. So I bought in. Damn thing requires Java. They offered me some pretty worthless advice on using Java. I'm screwed into having to use Windows 7. I've tried the Firefox ESR 32bit that supports Java. Nope. Opera. Nope Edge. Nope Chrome. Nope, including trying to use IEtab Is it actually possible to get any web browser to open a Java applet? I'm using a friends laptop and it can't stay on while in the BIOS or after booting OpenBSD just to the point of running memtest. I'm a bit confused about what to do. They offer IPMI that won't work without Java. Is this even anything more than a scam?? I don't know squat about windows other than it sucks. Serious question: Is it acceptable practice to offer remote access that cannot be used?
Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.
NO, Just download ipmiview from SM and use the build in viewer and all is OK The power can still be managed with the web site. IPMI vire requires java.exe on your PC but rund independently of any browser T -Original Message- From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Bennett Sent: 20 December 2017 21:04 To: misc@openbsd.org Subject: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed. I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it to setup your own custom OS. So I bought in. Damn thing requires Java. They offered me some pretty worthless advice on using Java. I'm screwed into having to use Windows 7. I've tried the Firefox ESR 32bit that supports Java. Nope. Opera. Nope Edge. Nope Chrome. Nope, including trying to use IEtab Is it actually possible to get any web browser to open a Java applet? I'm using a friends laptop and it can't stay on while in the BIOS or after booting OpenBSD just to the point of running memtest. I'm a bit confused about what to do. They offer IPMI that won't work without Java. Is this even anything more than a scam?? I don't know squat about windows other than it sucks. Serious question: Is it acceptable practice to offer remote access that cannot be used?
Re: something wrong with softraid
There should be no /dev/rsd4, the correct device nodes are /dev/rsd4a through /dev/rsd4p. As you've shown, the /dev/rsd4 file you have is not a device node anyway, it is a regular file. You might want to take a look at its contents to try to understand what created it but it should be safe to just remove it. Most likely the file was created via a typo at some point. - todd
Re: New default setup for touchpads in X
On 12/20/2017 04:54 PM, Christoph R. Murauer wrote: > Hello Ulf ! > >> there seems to be a terminology problem here: Usually, >> "pinch gesture" refers to an input with two touches moving >> toward each other, or away from each other, and it doesn't >> involve keyboard input. Our drivers don't support these >> gestures. Many applications permit to zoom in and out by >> holding the Ctrl key down and scrolling simultaneously. Is >> this what you mean? It should work with any application >> that implements it, for the driver, it's just scrolling. > > Yes, it is what I meaned. I know it from Mac OS X as gestures or 2 > finger gestures (or some varaiants of it, depends where you read about > it) for zoom in and out without holding a key. As I configured > synaptics / synclient the first time I came across a posting where it > was called pinch to zoom (Ctrl and move 2 fingers). See below for > details. > >> As to tapping, what you describe sounds weird, but maybe it >> isn't: During tests with a MacBookPro8,2 I observed that >> tapping with much force may fail because the hardware reports >> coordinates that oscillate in a range that is beyond the >> distance limit for tapping (that is, if the distance between >> the origin and the end point of a touch exceeds a certain >> threshold, it isn't treated as tap). I increased that limit >> then, but possibly it's still too low for that hardware. > > Not to force, it is like as if there are dead areas. See below for > details. > >> Can you check whether tapping without force works better, and >> also test it with the synaptics driver (which has a much higher >> threshold)? > > I tried today a 6.2 -release for synaptics using fvwm(1) and > qutebrowser. Tapping was set using synclients synclient TapButton1=1 > (setting tapping using wsconsctl(8) had no effect). Tapping works in > the whole area of the touchpad without problems. Zoom in and out using If tapping works in that configuration, then it's likely that this is a problem with the distance limit. However, more information would be necessary to verify this, please see below. > the Ctrl key and 2 fingers (only diagonal - see below) worked also. It > was better then on the ThinkPad but makes also not really happy. > > Then I tried 6.2 -current from Dec 18 also with fvwm(1) and qutebrowser. > Tapping was set using wsconsctl(8) - as described in a email before. > Increasing the threshold makes tapping more easy but there are still Sorry, I cannot follow, which threshold did you increase in which configuration? > dead areas on the touchpad. In the snapshot from Dec 17 tapping was > only possible in the corners and the middle of the touchpad - the > field between them was dead. With this snapshot the dead area is > smaller but still there. Zoom in and out using Ctrl and 2 fingers had > absolutly no effect which I can reproduce. 2 or 3 times I could > accidently zoom 1 step but not more. My impression was, as if there is > a zoom area which is outside (on the right side) of the touchpad > (sorry, I have no better description). Are you moving diagonally when you are trying to "zoom"? Please note that wsmouse will only generate scroll events if you are moving vertically or horizontally, it ignores diagonal two-finger movements. And if the touchpad provides multitouch data - which is the case with MacBooks - then both fingers must move in parallel. These conditions may be strict, but they help to avoid accidental scroll events when you perform other two-finger gestures. Moreover, it ensures that the document position in a viewer always remains stable on one axis, which is probably more often the desired behaviour than scrolling on both axes simultaneously (and BTW, I haven't encountered an application that required "two-dimensional" scroll inputs for the Ctrl+ way of zooming in and out, it wouldn't work with a normal mouse wheel). > > I was curious and installed xfce (no extras) as xfce's composting > provides a internal magnifier using the alt (no typo) key and the > mouse wheel to zoom in and out everywhere. Tested with a mouse works > as it should. Tested with the touchpad and ws(4) works very smooth / > perfect BUT using the alt key and move 2 fingers (only vertical not as > normal diagonal) vertical to zoom in and out. Please see above. > > Let me know, if you need more informations. > If you don't mind further tests, I would like to verify my assumptions concerning the tapping problem. However, maybe we shouldn't spam the list with the details of the procedure, I will explain them in an off- list mail. > Regards, > > Christoph > > > > > > >
membar-related compiler errors on sparc64
I've been trying to get some programs to compile and run on sparc64. I
have been running into some issues compiling some ports, like
games/lugaru and games/hyperrogue. Looking at the mail archive, I see
that the sparc64 bulk build has the same error, look at
http://build-failures.rhaalovely.net//sparc64/2017-12-03/games/hyperrogue.log
for an example.
The error is something to do with the membar instruction being an
unexpected token, so it's something to do with being on sparc64:
In file included from /usr/local/include/c++/4.9.4/bits/shared_ptr.h:52:
/usr/local/include/c++/4.9.4/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:156:10: error: unexpected
token
_GLIBCXX_READ_MEM_BARRIER;
^
/usr/local/include/c++/4.9.4/sparc64-unknown-openbsd6.2/bits/atomic_word.h:38:21:
note: expanded from macro '_GLIBCXX_READ_MEM_BARRIER'
__asm __volatile ("membar #LoadLoad":::"memory")
^
:1:9: note: instantiated into assembly here
membar #LoadLoad
^
I don't have any idea how to overcome this, any help would be
appreciated.
--
Kaashif Hymabaccus
GPG: 3E810B04
Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.
> 21 дек. 2017 г., в 0:03, Chris Bennett > написал(а): > > I found a new server that uses IPMI and offers using it > to setup your own custom OS. So I bought in. > > Damn thing requires Java. > They offered me some pretty worthless advice on using > Java. > > I'm screwed into having to use Windows 7. > I've tried the Firefox ESR 32bit that supports Java. > Nope. > Opera. Nope > Edge. Nope > Chrome. Nope, including trying to use IEtab > > Is it actually possible to get any web browser to > open a Java applet? > > I'm using a friends laptop and it can't stay on while > in the BIOS or after booting OpenBSD just to the point > of running memtest. > > I'm a bit confused about what to do. > They offer IPMI that won't work without Java. > > Is this even anything more than a scam?? > I don't know squat about windows other than it sucks. > > > Serious question: > Is it acceptable practice to offer remote access that > cannot be used? > > > Look at the newest servers with aspeed ast2500, such as supermicro x11 platforms, they are manageable through html5. If you still need to manage your server try jdk-1.8.0.144v0.tgz package from ports
Re: IPMI still requires Java! I'm screwed.
We manage to deal with all our servers using the IPMI serial console redirect. You might need to set it up in the BIOS once, although we've not had to do that in ages. You do have to create the IPMI remote login/password, but you need that anyway if you're trying to use the web/java console. --lyndon
