Re: dual dvi with 2 monitors, 1 dvi is not detected
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 22:02:22 +0100 Didier Wiroth wrote: > Are there other brands I could have a look, I would really appreciate > your feedback. I remember Matrox G450 as being well supported even by XFree86. They have G550 dual dvi model, no expirience with it though. -- Jure PeD ar
formal verification & related topics
Hello all, I've recently watched this talk from 27c3: http://media.ccc.de/browse/congress/2010/27c3-4123-en-defense_is_not_dead.html Very well spent hour. I assume that since OpenBSD's crowd main goal is security, some of you might have considered using such techniques to improve the critical pieces of your code. Since these techniques are not in widespread use over the OpenBSD code base I also assume that you have some decent arguments against their use. I understand there are lincensing issues (nonfree nature of microsoft vcc and french compcert), but putting these aside, what are your practical/technical reasons for not using them? -- Jure PeD ar http://jure.pecar.org
Re: Sendmail performance and OpenBSD
On Sun, 09 May 2010 21:33:07 -0400 Steve Shockley wrote: > What can I do to diagnose the performance bottleneck? The CPU is mostly > idle. Common for all mail servers, since they're IO bound. When I'm in a hurry, I usually "fix" sendmail by replacing it with postfix. When this is not an option and you mentioned your box is a relay, tell it not to write msgs to disk and not to reply OK to sending box until destination box accepted the message. I forgot the exact sendmail cf/mc incantation to do this, but I know I did it in the past. -- Jure PeD ar http://jure.pecar.org
Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default? never? *sighs
On Mon, 3 May 2010 10:10:01 +0300 Dexter Tomisson wrote: > This is especially for you, Victor. Print that too please, and laugh > everyday :): > > ab -n 1 -c 10 127.0.0.1/1.tar.gz > > Apache 1.3.29 > Requests per second:149.23 [#/sec] (mean) > > Apache 2.2.2 > Requests per second:375.02 [#/sec] (mean) And while you're at it, please add nginx to the mix :) -- Jure PeD ar http://jure.pecar.org
Re: OpenBSD 4.6, powerpc, KDE, Gnome, XFCE play nicely?
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 11:45:11 -0600 Ludwig Mises wrote: > Gnome looks really great, but after a few seconds becomes unresponsive > to key clicks or keyboard typing. Only way out is ctrl-alt-backspace. > > XFCE also starts up fine, but after a few second also becomes > unresponsive much like gnome and needs ctrl-alt-backspace. I have a PowerMac4,1 and am noticing the same. If you startxfce from within fvwm2 session, it becomes immediately obvious that this is a focus issue. In gnome and xfce focus goes somewhere offscreen at the first keypress. No idea why and how to fix. -- Jure PeD ar http://jure.pecar.org
