Re: Duplicat Defintion of drm_i915_flip

2008-09-07 Thread Owain Ainsworth
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 07:13:23PM +0200, Tobias Sarnowski wrote:
> I discovered the same issue with following the official instructions:
>   $ cd /usr/xenocara
>   $ make bootstrap
>   $ make obj
>   $ make build
> 
> Commenting the duplicate out fixed the problem for me atm. Is "make
> clean" the way to go before doing the bootstrap, obj, build when
> following current?

The instructions for doing a make build in src advises you to clean out
the obj dir before starting. The same applies for xenocara.

(reference man release:
...

Now that you are running your new kernel you can build a new
system.  It's safer (but slower) to remove your object
directories and re-create them before the build.

...
)

-0-

-- 
Don't take life too seriously -- you'll never get out of it alive.



Re: Duplicat Defintion of drm_i915_flip

2008-09-07 Thread Tobias Sarnowski
I discovered the same issue with following the official instructions:
  $ cd /usr/xenocara
  $ make bootstrap
  $ make obj
  $ make build

Commenting the duplicate out fixed the problem for me atm. Is "make
clean" the way to go before doing the bootstrap, obj, build when
following current?


Tobias Sarnowski


Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Aaron W. Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've been following -current for some time now without having too much
>> trouble, but I knew I was going to hit something at some point with
>> compiling from source. Usually I'd just take a snapshot and start from
>> there or some such, but I was curious whether this is really a mistake
>> in the tree or not. I'm guessing not, but just in case, I thought
>> I would drop it here.
>>
>> I attempted to compile the xenocara tree today after a fresh checkout
>> and a working rebuild of the base today. I receive an error when
>> trying to build driver/xf86-video-intel/src/i830_dri.c.
>>
>> It says that a duplicate definition of struct drm_i915_flip and
>> drm_i915_flip_t. The duplicate definition is from i915_drm.h. I
>> noticed that i915_drm.h is included in i830_dri.c, which is why
>> I thought that maybe this duplicate definition is more than just
>> a failure on my end.
>>
>> Can anyone verify this? I'm hoping it's just the standard kickback
>> from following -current via cvs.
>>
> 
> You need to wipe you obj tree before rebuilding.
> 
> 


-- 
www.new-thoughts.org
__ tobias sarnowski / software development & managment
__ [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Duplicat Defintion of drm_i915_flip

2008-09-07 Thread Matthieu Herrb
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Aaron W. Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been following -current for some time now without having too much
> trouble, but I knew I was going to hit something at some point with
> compiling from source. Usually I'd just take a snapshot and start from
> there or some such, but I was curious whether this is really a mistake
> in the tree or not. I'm guessing not, but just in case, I thought
> I would drop it here.
>
> I attempted to compile the xenocara tree today after a fresh checkout
> and a working rebuild of the base today. I receive an error when
> trying to build driver/xf86-video-intel/src/i830_dri.c.
>
> It says that a duplicate definition of struct drm_i915_flip and
> drm_i915_flip_t. The duplicate definition is from i915_drm.h. I
> noticed that i915_drm.h is included in i830_dri.c, which is why
> I thought that maybe this duplicate definition is more than just
> a failure on my end.
>
> Can anyone verify this? I'm hoping it's just the standard kickback
> from following -current via cvs.
>

You need to wipe you obj tree before rebuilding.


-- 
Matthieu Herrb



Duplicat Defintion of drm_i915_flip

2008-09-06 Thread Aaron W. Hsu
Hello all,

I've been following -current for some time now without having too much 
trouble, but I knew I was going to hit something at some point with 
compiling from source. Usually I'd just take a snapshot and start from 
there or some such, but I was curious whether this is really a mistake 
in the tree or not. I'm guessing not, but just in case, I thought 
I would drop it here.

I attempted to compile the xenocara tree today after a fresh checkout 
and a working rebuild of the base today. I receive an error when 
trying to build driver/xf86-video-intel/src/i830_dri.c.

It says that a duplicate definition of struct drm_i915_flip and 
drm_i915_flip_t. The duplicate definition is from i915_drm.h. I 
noticed that i915_drm.h is included in i830_dri.c, which is why 
I thought that maybe this duplicate definition is more than just 
a failure on my end. 

Can anyone verify this? I'm hoping it's just the standard kickback 
from following -current via cvs.

Sincerely,
Aaron Hsu