Re: watchdogd

2006-08-05 Thread Rogier Krieger

On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more
appropiate too.


Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify
on a changed timeout) altered?

The proposed patch by the OP doesn't cause changes for existing users.
Your suggestion does. Are there that many noisy devices? I'm just
curious.

Cheers,

Rogier

--
If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.



Re: watchdogd

2006-08-05 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
 On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more
 appropiate too.
 
 Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify
 on a changed timeout) altered?
 
 The proposed patch by the OP doesn't cause changes for existing users.
 Your suggestion does. Are there that many noisy devices? I'm just
 curious.
 
 Cheers,
 
 Rogier
 
 -- 
 If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there.
 


My 2 eurocent:
http://catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2878450

If the anchor doesn't work, it's the Rule of Silence

Tobias