Re: Recommendet (P)ATA-Controller for Raidframe

2005-07-29 Thread Edd Barrett
  As stuart has pointed out, upgrading that will not be as easy as it
  could with hw raid.
 
 Yes, as long it is compatible with my budge ;)

Is there any reason why a bsd.raidframe (for example) kernel could not
be shipped with the distribution with all the device nodes static etc.
?

Edd



Re: Recommendet (P)ATA-Controller for Raidframe

2005-07-28 Thread Ulrich Kahl

Edd Barrett schrieb:

The raid will use 3 or 4 identical harddrives.



Is that mirrored? If so, heres a gotcha:

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=raidctlsektion=8

Note as well that RAID 1 sets are currently limited to only
2 components.  At present, n-way mirroring is not possible.

However, I think with multiple layered mirroring, what you want is possible.


I was thinking about using (testing :) RAID 5.


As stuart has pointed out, upgrading that will not be as easy as it
could with hw raid.


Yes, as long it is compatible with my budge ;)


Hope that sves you some time and frustration.


Thanks

Ulrich Kahl



Re: Recommendet (P)ATA-Controller for Raidframe

2005-07-28 Thread Stuart Henderson

--On 28 July 2005 20:53 +0200, Ulrich Kahl wrote:

Stuart Henderson schrieb:

Oh, I have one of those. Unless it's a late revision, using the
on-board  cache only the first 128mb RAM is cacheable (K6-III helps
on this  motherboard due to the on-chip cache). And don't forget, if
your  filesystems are large, that you'll need plenty of RAM to fsck.


Yes, this board is one of them. Hopefully it will only affect
performance.


From what I've seen, yes. (Other than buggy drivers back when it was 

running Windows 95, that box has been quite well-behaved).


What do you understand under plenty of RAM? 256, 512, 768 MB?


There's a rule of thumb mentioned in the FAQ page about large disks, I 
think it was 1KB per 1MB of space in a filesystem (of course, splitting 
the disk into more fs might be an acceptable way around that).




Recommendet (P)ATA-Controller for Raidframe

2005-07-27 Thread Ulrich Kahl

Hi!

I plan to set up a fileserver using RAIDframe - I can't afford a 
hardware RAID-controller like Megaraid i4 (around EURO 280,--) and used 
ones are impossible to get, so I will use the software version. The raid 
will use 3 or 4 identical harddrives.

My questions:

- what is better, every drive use it's own IDE-channel (no master/slave) 
or not?


- will it make a difference, if I use two 2 channel controller or a 4 
channel one (like HighPoint RocketRAID 454)?


- recommendations which controller(s) I should buy?

The board, which I will use is a ASUS P5A Super 7 with ALi Aladdin V 
chipset.


TIA and regards,

Ulrich



Re: Recommendet (P)ATA-Controller for Raidframe

2005-07-27 Thread Edd Barrett
 The raid will use 3 or 4 identical harddrives.

Is that mirrored? If so, heres a gotcha:

http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=raidctlsektion=8

Note as well that RAID 1 sets are currently limited to only
2 components.  At present, n-way mirroring is not possible.

However, I think with multiple layered mirroring, what you want is possible.

As stuart has pointed out, upgrading that will not be as easy as it
could with hw raid.

Hope that sves you some time and frustration.

regards

Edd