Re: mismatch output net-snmp -current
On 17Apr2009 07:48, uno83 johan.unos...@gmail.com wrote: | Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote: | i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow | | r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost | .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.67.1 = INTEGER: 6 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.68.1 = INTEGER: 7 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.69.1 = INTEGER: 8 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.58.145.172.241 = INTEGER: 2 | IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 4 | | r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost | .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3 | IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24) | IF-MIB::ifType.2 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | IF-MIB::ifType.3 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | IF-MIB::ifType.4 = INTEGER: 244 | IF-MIB::ifType.5 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | IF-MIB::ifType.6 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | IF-MIB::ifType.7 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | IF-MIB::ifType.8 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | IF-MIB::ifType.9 = INTEGER: 245 | | interface index 5,6,7,8 have the right ip, but there's a mismatch at | index 1, 2 and 4 of IP-MIB. | | any of you have the same problems ? | | We are seeing the same problem. Me too, using net-snmp on OpenBSD 4.5. How is the base OS snmpd in 4.5? It was insufficient back on 4.3 and I ended up using net-snmp, but we recently added another NIC to the box and now net-snmp reports no interfaces at all:-( Am trying today to upgrade (or re-install) to 4.5 on this box to match our working equivalent box (redundant pair of machine with staggered install times, hence the mismatch), but of course the AMD64 install CD doesn't boot :-( Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au DoD#743
Re: mismatch output net-snmp -current
Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote: i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.67.1 = INTEGER: 6 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.68.1 = INTEGER: 7 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.69.1 = INTEGER: 8 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.58.145.172.241 = INTEGER: 2 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 4 r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3 IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24) IF-MIB::ifType.2 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.3 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.4 = INTEGER: 244 IF-MIB::ifType.5 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.6 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.7 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.8 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.9 = INTEGER: 245 interface index 5,6,7,8 have the right ip, but there's a mismatch at index 1, 2 and 4 of IP-MIB. any of you have the same problems ? regards, -Agung Hi. We are seeing the same problem. This is what I get: mon01:~# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public xxx .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2 IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: lo0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: em0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: em1 IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: em2 IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: em3 IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: enc0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.7 = STRING: bnx1 IF-MIB::ifDescr.8 = STRING: bnx0 mon01:~# snmpwalk -v 2c -c public xxx .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.147 = INTEGER: 1 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.162 = INTEGER: 2 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 6 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.168.54 = INTEGER: 3 It should be: IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.147 = INTEGER: 3 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.240.162 = INTEGER: 3 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 1 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.xxx.xxx.168.54 = INTEGER: 4 /Johan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mismatch-output-net-snmp--current-tp22454362p23099146.html Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mismatch output net-snmp -current
i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.67.1 = INTEGER: 6 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.68.1 = INTEGER: 7 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.69.1 = INTEGER: 8 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.58.145.172.241 = INTEGER: 2 IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 4 r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3 IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24) IF-MIB::ifType.2 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.3 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.4 = INTEGER: 244 IF-MIB::ifType.5 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.6 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.7 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.8 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) IF-MIB::ifType.9 = INTEGER: 245 interface index 5,6,7,8 have the right ip, but there's a mismatch at index 1, 2 and 4 of IP-MIB. any of you have the same problems ? regards, -Agung
