Re: [mkgmap-dev] Firmware V4.00 on new Marine Devices

2015-02-20 Thread RheinSkipper
 Would be interesting to know which maps works. But I rather don't expect
 Achim to flash back buggy firmware, which is ok for me. The most important
 is that free maps work again. Thanks for investigating the problem.
 
 --
 Best regards,
 Andrzej
 

Meanwhile Achim flashed 4.00 on his Echomap again and tried all the test
maps.

None of the test maps worked:
- the map made with cGPSmapper
- Steve´s test map
- the map I made with the mkgmap-r3316 distribution using my style and
options
- the map I made with the mkgmap-r3316 distribution using default style and
options (only marine patch applied)


Yes, it would have been interesting to know why this old map (made using
r3316 in 2014) worked but all the others don´t. But I stop investigating
here as the problem can be solved by updating the device from 3.40 to 4.20
directly.

Regards,
Jürgen

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] lat/lon format in log messages

2015-02-20 Thread GerdP
Hi all,

we have a method Coord.toDegreeString()
that reports the coordinates of a point (in the log) like this:
53.526785/10.089440

In the housenumber2 branch I've changed that to
53.526785,10.089440
(comma instead of slash)

because that's the commonly used format.
Please let me know if you see a problem with that.

Gerd




--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/lat-lon-format-in-log-messages-tp5834331.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] log messages for housenumbers

2015-02-20 Thread GerdP
Hi all,

I wonder what info mkgmap should report regarding housenumbers.

The current log messages printed with
uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.level=INFO
are probably not very useful. 

I think mkgmap should try to report those OSM elements
which should be reviewed. The messages containing the string 
looks wrong are candidates.

I also think that mkgmap should report OSM elements
which cause problems in the algos used to calculate the img data.
These elements might be 100% correct, but the messages may
show problems in the algos. 

Any ideas?

Gerd






--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/log-messages-for-housenumbers-tp5834339.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] Street labels

2015-02-20 Thread Brian Egge
Some change between 3434M and HEAD caused my street labels to change.
With 3434M, my GPS typically displays something like 'Main Street (CT 35)',
now it only shows '35'. Basically, every street/highway with a shield
displays only the number of the shield instead of displaying the name.

I'm not sure exactly which change caused this, but I can bisect it if
needed.

Brian
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] r3469 in housenumber2 branch

2015-02-20 Thread GerdP
Hi Bernd,

thanks for testing. I am esp. interested in all special cases,
so I am going to add more code to verify the results next week.

Typical problem cases which are probably not handled well:
- long unnamed service roads leading to multiple addresses
- long roads connecting two or more villages. Often, numbering starts
with 1 in each village, this leads to a lot of messages.
- in small villages, I often see addr:street=village-name 
and many streets with name=village-name, but also
a primary  road road without a street name, e.g. B213.
Houses close to this primary road are probably accessible from
the primary road, but address search will not show that.
I am not sure if that should be fixed in OSM or not.

If you find other typical cases, please let me know.

Gerd






Bernd Weigelt wrote
 Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015, 20:15:08 schrieb Stéphane MARTIN:
 Thank you Gerd !
 
 Tested with r3471, seems to work ok, will test over the next days.
 
 Bernd
 
 -- 
 amarok2 now playing:
 artist: The BossHoss
 title: My Favorite Game
 album: Rodeo Radio
 
 ___
 mkgmap-dev mailing list

 mkgmap-dev@.org

 http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/r3469-in-housenumber2-branch-tp5834295p5834368.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] r3469 in housenumber2 branch

2015-02-20 Thread Bernd Weigelt
Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015, 20:15:08 schrieb Stéphane MARTIN:
 Thank you Gerd !

Tested with r3471, seems to work ok, will test over the next days.

Bernd

-- 
amarok2 now playing:
artist: The BossHoss
title: My Favorite Game
album: Rodeo Radio

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] bounds file from 19.02.1015

2015-02-20 Thread Bernd Weigelt
Hi

who is the maintainer für the files on http://osm2.pleiades.uni-wuppertal.de ?

the bounds file from 19.02.2015 is buggy, i got the same problems as on end 
January http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2015q1/022634.html

Bernd
-- 
amarok2 now playing:
artist: The BossHoss
title: My Favorite Game
album: Rodeo Radio

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] lat/lon format in log messages

2015-02-20 Thread Steve Ratcliffe

Hi Gerd


because that's the commonly used format.
Please let me know if you see a problem with that.


Your change is fine by me.

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] Commit: r3472: Revert incidental change in 3449 that removed shields.

2015-02-20 Thread svn commit

Version mkgmap-r3472 was committed by steve on Fri, 20 Feb 2015

Revert incidental change in 3449 that removed shields.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Street labels

2015-02-20 Thread Ervin Malicdem
Might be similar to this
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2015q1/022868.html

Ervin M.
*Schadow1 Expeditions* - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
motherland.
http://www.s1expeditions.com

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Brian Egge briane...@gmail.com wrote:

 Some change between 3434M and HEAD caused my street labels to change.
 With 3434M, my GPS typically displays something like 'Main Street (CT 35)',
 now it only shows '35'. Basically, every street/highway with a shield
 displays only the number of the shield instead of displaying the name.

 I'm not sure exactly which change caused this, but I can bisect it if
 needed.

 Brian

 ___
 mkgmap-dev mailing list
 mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
 http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Street labels

2015-02-20 Thread Ervin Malicdem
Tested with 3472. Looking good for the shields. Thanks!

Ervin M.
*Schadow1 Expeditions* - A Filipino must not be a stranger to his own
motherland.
http://www.s1expeditions.com

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Steve Ratcliffe st...@parabola.me.uk
wrote:


 On 20/02/15 13:34, Ervin Malicdem wrote:

 Might be similar to this
 http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2015q1/022868.html


 Yes that is quite likely, and I was just going to reply to you to ask
 if 3472 fixed your problem too.

 ..Steve


 ___
 mkgmap-dev mailing list
 mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
 http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Street labels

2015-02-20 Thread Steve Ratcliffe

Hi Brian


Some change between 3434M and HEAD caused my street labels to change.
With 3434M, my GPS typically displays something like 'Main Street (CT
35)', now it only shows '35'. Basically, every street/highway with a
shield displays only the number of the shield instead of displaying the
name.


I don't quite understand the problem you see, but there is a change
in r3449 which seems to remove shields altogether? (perhaps only sometimes).

I've traced it to version 3449 where I added an ill-considered trim()
to the label, which removes all shields too.  I'll revert that change
straight away.  The trimspaces2.patch that was previously applied in
r3435 should do the same thing except correctly.

As I'm not sure if that is exactly the same problem that you reported 
can you try out r3472 and see if the problem persists.


..Steve


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Street labels

2015-02-20 Thread Steve Ratcliffe


On 20/02/15 13:34, Ervin Malicdem wrote:

Might be similar to this
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2015q1/022868.html


Yes that is quite likely, and I was just going to reply to you to ask
if 3472 fixed your problem too.

..Steve

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview map in gmapsupp.img?

2015-02-20 Thread Andrzej Popowski

Hi Ralf,

 Without the overview map in the gmapsupp.img my eTrex Legend HCx
 displays only the yellow background and the tile borders (no map) on
 all zoom levels down to 50 km. From 30 km onwards it displays the map
 tiles.

You probably have deleted or disabled in menu Garmin basemap. Please 
look for file gmapbmap.img in eTrex memory and if present, then enable 
Worldmap in device menu.


If you miss gmapbmap.img, then you can copy this file form any other GPS.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview map in gmapsupp.img?

2015-02-20 Thread Ralf Kleineisel
Hi,

On 02/20/2015 09:58 PM, Andrzej Popowski wrote:

 You probably have deleted or disabled in menu Garmin basemap.

Interesting.

Yes, the basemap was disabled.

With a gmapsupp.img including an overview map:

- No matter wether I enable or disable the basemap, I always see my map
on all zoom levels as long as the gps cursor is inside my map area.

- Depending on the zoom level I see my overview map or my detailed map
tiles.

- With the cursor outside the map area I see the basemap in all zoom levels.

With a gmapsupp.img without an overview map:

- When I enable the basemap I see my map in zoom levels 8km and below.
From 12 km and above I see the basemap.

- When I disable the basemap I see my detailed map tiles in zoom levels
120km and below. It shows way too much detail and it takes very long to
draw the map.

- With the cursor outside the map area I see the basemap in all zoom levels.

Having an overview map in the gmapsupp.img seems to override the basemap.

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] Overview map in gmapsupp.img?

2015-02-20 Thread Ralf Kleineisel
Hi,

is there a way to include the overview map in the gmapsupp.img without
having to run mkgmap another time?

If I have, say, three map tiles and the corresponding ovm files:

-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 13522944 Feb 17 22:55 1001.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 16841216 Feb 17 22:55 1002.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 19913728 Feb 17 22:55 1003.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users   768512 Feb 17 22:55 ovm_1001.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users  1009152 Feb 17 22:55 ovm_1002.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users  1336320 Feb 17 22:55 ovm_1003.img

and I combine all these into a gmapsupp.img, then the overview map is
created as a seperate file but not included in the gmapsupp.img:

$ mkgmap --gmapsupp --overview-mapname=OV --overview-mapnumber=
1*img ovm*img

produces:

-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 50177024 Feb 20 17:04 gmapsupp.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users24064 Feb 20 17:04 OV.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 1132 Feb 20 17:04 OV.tdb

The overview map is not in the gmapsupp.img:

$ gmt -i gmapsupp.img
gmt v0.8.186.801b  CC BY-SA (C) 2011-2014 AP www.gmaptool.eu

File:   gmapsupp.img, length 50177024
Header: 20.02.2015 17:04:44, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0
Mapset: OSM street map

Map  length s-f  CPprio  PID   FID  name
 MAKEGMAP MPS   206  1
 1001 MPC  13462832  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
 1002 MPC  16766155  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
 1003 MPC  19826659  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
 6324 SRT   932  1

Data MPS
 F: PID 1, FID 6324, family name
 V: OSM map set (0)

Only after running mkgmap one more time it is included:

$ mkgmap --gmapsupp --overview-mapname=OV --overview-mapnumber=
1*img ovm*img OV.img

$ gmt -i gmapsupp.img
gmt v0.8.186.801b  CC BY-SA (C) 2011-2014 AP www.gmaptool.eu

File:   gmapsupp.img, length 50199552
Header: 20.02.2015 17:06:25, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0
Mapset: OSM street map

Map  length s-f  CPprio  PID   FID  name
 MAKEGMAP MPS   258  1
 1001 MPC  13462832  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
 1002 MPC  16766155  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
 1003 MPC  19826659  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
  MPC 20371  3  1252   25  1  6324  Overview Map
 6324 SRT   932  1

Data MPS
 F: PID 1, FID 6324, family name
 V: OSM map set (0)

It would be very handy to have the overview map in the gmapsupp.img
after the first run. Is this possible?
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview map in gmapsupp.img?

2015-02-20 Thread GerdP
Hi Ralf,

my understanding is that no device supports the overview map.
It is only used on the PC. Why would you want to have it in the gmapsupp?

Gerd


Ralf Kleineisel wrote
 Hi,
 
 is there a way to include the overview map in the gmapsupp.img without
 having to run mkgmap another time?
 
 If I have, say, three map tiles and the corresponding ovm files:
 
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 13522944 Feb 17 22:55 1001.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 16841216 Feb 17 22:55 1002.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 19913728 Feb 17 22:55 1003.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users   768512 Feb 17 22:55 ovm_1001.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users  1009152 Feb 17 22:55 ovm_1002.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users  1336320 Feb 17 22:55 ovm_1003.img
 
 and I combine all these into a gmapsupp.img, then the overview map is
 created as a seperate file but not included in the gmapsupp.img:
 
 $ mkgmap --gmapsupp --overview-mapname=OV --overview-mapnumber=
 1*img ovm*img
 
 produces:
 
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 50177024 Feb 20 17:04 gmapsupp.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users24064 Feb 20 17:04 OV.img
 -rw-r--r-- 1 ralf users 1132 Feb 20 17:04 OV.tdb
 
 The overview map is not in the gmapsupp.img:
 
 $ gmt -i gmapsupp.img
 gmt v0.8.186.801b  CC BY-SA (C) 2011-2014 AP www.gmaptool.eu
 
 File:   gmapsupp.img, length 50177024
 Header: 20.02.2015 17:04:44, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0
 Mapset: OSM street map
 
 Map  length s-f  CPprio  PID   FID  name
  MAKEGMAP MPS   206  1
  1001 MPC  13462832  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
  1002 MPC  16766155  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
  1003 MPC  19826659  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
  6324 SRT   932  1
 
 Data MPS
  F: PID 1, FID 6324, family name
  V: OSM map set (0)
 
 Only after running mkgmap one more time it is included:
 
 $ mkgmap --gmapsupp --overview-mapname=OV --overview-mapnumber=
 1*img ovm*img OV.img
 
 $ gmt -i gmapsupp.img
 gmt v0.8.186.801b  CC BY-SA (C) 2011-2014 AP www.gmaptool.eu
 
 File:   gmapsupp.img, length 50199552
 Header: 20.02.2015 17:06:25, DSKIMG, XOR 00, V 0.00, Ms 0
 Mapset: OSM street map
 
 Map  length s-f  CPprio  PID   FID  name
  MAKEGMAP MPS   258  1
  1001 MPC  13462832  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
  1002 MPC  16766155  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
  1003 MPC  19826659  5  1252   25  1  6324  Description
   MPC 20371  3  1252   25  1  6324  Overview Map
  6324 SRT   932  1
 
 Data MPS
  F: PID 1, FID 6324, family name
  V: OSM map set (0)
 
 It would be very handy to have the overview map in the gmapsupp.img
 after the first run. Is this possible?
 ___
 mkgmap-dev mailing list

 mkgmap-dev@.org

 http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Overview-map-in-gmapsupp-img-tp5834392p5834402.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview map in gmapsupp.img?

2015-02-20 Thread Ralf Kleineisel
On 02/20/2015 07:50 PM, GerdP wrote:

 my understanding is that no device supports the overview map.
 It is only used on the PC. Why would you want to have it in the gmapsupp?

I am currently preparing a new update to my topo map of Germany.

The level definition in my options file is:

levels = 0:24, 1:23, 2:22, 3:20, 4:18
overview-levels = 5:16, 6:15, 7:14, 8:12

Without the overview map in the gmapsupp.img my eTrex Legend HCx
displays only the yellow background and the tile borders (no map) on
all zoom levels down to 50 km. From 30 km onwards it displays the map tiles.

When I load a gmapsupp.img with the overview map inside I get:

800 km - 200 km: White background, national borders, sea; mapsource
120 km - 80 km: E-Roads
50 km: Motorroads
30 km: Highway=primary
and so on.

To me this looks like the overview map is perfectly supported by this
gps unit. Zooming and panning in the zoom levels above 30 km is much
faster with an overview map.

Without an overview map the 30 km zoom level shows much more (too much!)
detail (forest, landuse etc.). With an overview map the forest is shown
from 2 km onwards, like I set in the style.

I can put both gmapsupp.img on my server if someone wants to have a look
at it or test it on a different gps unit.
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Overview map in gmapsupp.img?

2015-02-20 Thread Ralf Kleineisel
On 02/20/2015 08:30 PM, Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
 On 02/20/2015 07:50 PM, GerdP wrote:
 
 my understanding is that no device supports the overview map.
 It is only used on the PC. Why would you want to have it in the gmapsupp?
 
 I am currently preparing a new update to my topo map of Germany.

I compared two gmapsupp.imgs made with exactly the same tiles now, only
difference is the overview map.

I could not reproduce the effect of no map, probably the maps I tested
earlier were not identical.

But the overview map does make a huge difference in my eTrex:

Zooming from 30km to 50km takes 95 seconds without an overview map and 6
seconds with one. Much less detail shows up with an overview map,
without overview map the details shown does not match my style files.


___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev