Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-10 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all,

I also don't like the current results for roads with a name and a ref. For the 
mentioned rule we get two labels
Label 1 :"13/14 Hauptstrasse" (with highway shield box)
Label 2 : "Hauptstrasse (13;14)"
If --housenumbers is used, we may see a third label if there are numbers:
Label 3 : "Hauptstrasse"

If I got that right the highway shield code only makes sense on label 1 and we 
have Java code in Subdivision.createLine() 
which seems to make sure that we don't add duplicate ref labels if they only 
differ by the highway shield code. 
So I came up with the attached patch for the default style. 

Please comment!
Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Steve 
Ratcliffe <st...@parabola.me.uk>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 9. April 2017 11:23:38
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

Hi

> The rule that produces the label "13/14 Hauptstrasse"  (start is highway 
> shield code) is this:
> highway=primary {name '${ref|highway-symbol:box} ${name}' | 
> '${ref|highway-symbol:box}' | '${name}'; addlabel '${name} (${ref})' }

This may be unpopular but we should stop doing this.  This was needed
before we could have multiple labels, but that was a long time ago.

The Garmin way to do this is that the name is the first label, then
any refs or alternate names.

So this case would ideally be represented as:

   Label 1: Hauptstrasse
   Label 2: 13
   Label 3: 14

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


refs.patch
Description: refs.patch
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-09 Thread Steve Ratcliffe


Hi


The rule that produces the label "13/14 Hauptstrasse"  (start is highway 
shield code) is this:
highway=primary {name '${ref|highway-symbol:box} ${name}' | 
'${ref|highway-symbol:box}' | '${name}'; addlabel '${name} (${ref})' }


This may be unpopular but we should stop doing this.  This was needed
before we could have multiple labels, but that was a long time ago.

The Garmin way to do this is that the name is the first label, then
any refs or alternate names.

So this case would ideally be represented as:

  Label 1: Hauptstrasse
  Label 2: 13
  Label 3: 14

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Steve,

the names are produced by the default style when processing an area around this 
way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365980659
with options --index --housenumbers --bounds=bounds.zip --route 
--x-split-name-index
The rule that produces the label "13/14 Hauptstrasse"  (start is highway 
shield code) is this:
highway=primary {name '${ref|highway-symbol:box} ${name}' | 
'${ref|highway-symbol:box}' | '${name}'; addlabel '${name} (${ref})' }

Gerd

Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Steve 
Ratcliffe <st...@parabola.me.uk>
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 21:41:05
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

Hi

> '14 Hauptstrasse' and nearby one named '13/14 Hauptstrasse' When I
> type "14 Hau"  I want to find both entries, but I prefer to see '14
> Hauptstrasse' first (topmost).  This depends on how we sort, maybe
> also on the order in which the names appear in the *.img files.

Is '13/14 Hauptstrasse' the actual name of the street?

If is is and I use '|' to mark the name offset in the index, then
if you add an index entry for '13/|14 Hauptstrasse'
and '|14 Hauptstrasse' then I expect them to be ordered as:

   |14 Hauptstrasse
   13/|14 Hauptstrasse

So they should be in the order you expect in the dropdown on typing
'14 haup...'

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Steve,

yes, that's why I'd like to use getInitialPart() again in the branch. I want to 
do a lot more tests
with the different combinations of split-name, highway shield codes and the 
other special chars
to make up my mind.
This will take some time.

Gerd

Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Steve 
Ratcliffe <st...@parabola.me.uk>
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 21:58:08
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

Hi

> So they should be in the order you expect in the dropdown on typing
> '14 haup...'

Just tried it, it is correct on the current trunk, but not on the branch
in my quick test.

..Steve

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Steve Ratcliffe

Hi


So they should be in the order you expect in the dropdown on typing
'14 haup...'


Just tried it, it is correct on the current trunk, but not on the branch 
in my quick test.


..Steve

___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Steve Ratcliffe


Hi


'14 Hauptstrasse' and nearby one named '13/14 Hauptstrasse' When I
type "14 Hau"  I want to find both entries, but I prefer to see '14
Hauptstrasse' first (topmost).  This depends on how we sort, maybe
also on the order in which the names appear in the *.img files.


Is '13/14 Hauptstrasse' the actual name of the street?

If is is and I use '|' to mark the name offset in the index, then
if you add an index entry for '13/|14 Hauptstrasse'
and '|14 Hauptstrasse' then I expect them to be ordered as:

  |14 Hauptstrasse
  13/|14 Hauptstrasse

So they should be in the order you expect in the dropdown on typing
'14 haup...'

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Steve,

so I guess that I should revert some of the changes made in Mdr7 to make this 
work again (presuming that
the order produced by r3449 was okay for both variants (--x-split-name-index  
on/off).
At the moment we have different versions in trunk and in the branch, and both 
might not work when this
feature is used.

Another point is the question how to sort/de-duplicate the index. I noticed 
that with option --x-split-name-index
the results shown in MapSource are sorted a bit unexpected.
Example: In Switzerland I found road names like
'14 Hauptstrasse' and nearby one named '13/14 Hauptstrasse'
When I type "14 Hau"  I want to find both entries, but I prefer to see '14 
Hauptstrasse' first (topmost).
This depends on how we sort, maybe also on the order in which the names appear 
in the *.img files.

I continue experimenting with all this new knowledge later.

Gerd

Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Steve 
Ratcliffe <st...@parabola.me.uk>
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 14:10:07
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

Hi

> I've just noticed that I may have introduced a problem with r3875.
> Road names containing special characters 0x1e and 0x1f are treated different 
> now. I am not
> sure where those characters appear in names. I think they are used to store 
> so called double byte

0x1e is a prefix separator and 0x1f a suffix separator.

They are used instead of a space in street names to separate the
main part of the name from Chemin, Rue, Road, Avenue etc.

If I use ']' for 0x1e and '[' for 0x1f, then streets can be written
as:

   Rue]Nicolo
   Chemin de]Pierre Froide
   Fernrodder[Strasse
   Street Lane[Road

This also affects searching in mapsource and the prefix/suffix parts
seem to be ignored.

For example if I want to search for 'Street Lane Road' (its a real
name!)
I type the letters 'street lane' and the full name is shown in the dropdown.
But if I add the 'r' as in 'street lane r', then it no longer
matches and the next matching name is shown in the dropdown, which
happens to be 'Street Lane Roundabout'.

There is also the sections in the index mdr30/31 and mdr32/33 which
are simple lists of prefixes and suffixes.  I do not know how they
are used.

In mapsource you have to pick from the dropdown list.  So to select
our favourite French road 'Chemain de Pierre Froide' you have to type
'pierre fr...' and select.  Starting from 'Chemain ...' does not
get you anywhere even if you type the whole name.  In BaseCamp,
you can type the whole name, and although it also will not show
in the dropdown, it will allow you to enter it and it will find it.

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Steve Ratcliffe


Hi


I've just noticed that I may have introduced a problem with r3875.
Road names containing special characters 0x1e and 0x1f are treated different 
now. I am not
sure where those characters appear in names. I think they are used to store so 
called double byte


0x1e is a prefix separator and 0x1f a suffix separator.

They are used instead of a space in street names to separate the
main part of the name from Chemin, Rue, Road, Avenue etc.

If I use ']' for 0x1e and '[' for 0x1f, then streets can be written
as:

  Rue]Nicolo
  Chemin de]Pierre Froide
  Fernrodder[Strasse
  Street Lane[Road

This also affects searching in mapsource and the prefix/suffix parts
seem to be ignored.

For example if I want to search for 'Street Lane Road' (its a real
name!)
I type the letters 'street lane' and the full name is shown in the dropdown.
But if I add the 'r' as in 'street lane r', then it no longer
matches and the next matching name is shown in the dropdown, which
happens to be 'Street Lane Roundabout'.

There is also the sections in the index mdr30/31 and mdr32/33 which
are simple lists of prefixes and suffixes.  I do not know how they
are used.

In mapsource you have to pick from the dropdown list.  So to select
our favourite French road 'Chemain de Pierre Froide' you have to type
'pierre fr...' and select.  Starting from 'Chemain ...' does not
get you anywhere even if you type the whole name.  In BaseCamp,
you can type the whole name, and although it also will not show
in the dropdown, it will allow you to enter it and it will find it.

..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi Andrzej,

thanks, that helps. I found another hint in imgformat-1.0.pdf which mentions 
these codes for 6 bit encoding.
I'll try to find out if that can be used with osm data as well.

Gerd


Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Andrzej 
Popowski <po...@poczta.onet.pl>
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. April 2017 12:05:28
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

Hi Gerd,

cGPSmapper uses codes 0x1d - 0x1f as a special separators. 0x1f is used
for elevation, other should hide part of label depending on zoom.
Actually cGPSmapper's manual describe codes in *.mp source, but I guess
these values go directly to labels in compiled img.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


Re: [mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Andrzej Popowski

Hi Gerd,

cGPSmapper uses codes 0x1d - 0x1f as a special separators. 0x1f is used 
for elevation, other should hide part of label depending on zoom. 
Actually cGPSmapper's manual describe codes in *.mp source, but I guess 
these values go directly to labels in compiled img.


--
Best regards,
Andrzej
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev


[mkgmap-dev] Possible problem with global search index since r3875

2017-04-08 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all,

I've just noticed that I may have introduced a problem with r3875.
Road names containing special characters 0x1e and 0x1f are treated different 
now. I am not
sure where those characters appear in names. I think they are used to store so 
called double byte
characters within a single byte character string, at least that's what I 
remember from working 
time with customers from Japan.
In the mkgmap code it is called a prefix, so maybe something completely 
different.
I did not yet find an input file where this occurs. Can anybody point me to one?

Gerd
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev