PerlRequire -mod_perl-2 - Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread RRArul 

Hello Friends,

I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept application on Apache 
1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are researching into moving away from ASP/IIS 
Webapplications to Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache 2.0.35 with the 
following problems.

Today I installed Apache 2.0.35 with Mod_Perl-2. However, I am not able to use 
PerlRequire Statement in the httpd.conf.

Whenever I am trying to restart my Windows Services, it is always giving me an error 
message which does not allow me to start my Windows Services.

While I am able to execute my CGI Scripts in Apache 1.3.23/mod_perl-1.26, I am always 
getting these errors in 2.0.35/mod_perl-2

[Tue Apr 16 13:48:37 2002] [error] failed to resolve handler `Apache::Registry'
[Tue Apr 16 13:51:44 2002] [error] failed to resolve handler `Apache::Registry'
[Tue Apr 16 13:51:46 2002] [error] failed to resolve handler `Apache::Registry'

Whenever I try to use a PerlRequire Statement in httpd.conf, it just does not allow 
Apache2 to start.

I am running ActivePerl 631 on Windows 2000 with Apache 1.3.23/mod_perl-1.26_01-dev as 
well as Apache 2.0.35/mod_perl-1.99_02-dev

Any help and insights would be deeply appreciated.

Thanks,
Rex


__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the 
convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/

RE: Re: PerlRequire -mod_perl-2 - Apache 2.0.35

2002-04-16 Thread RRArul 

Both the suppositions are right! To have the proof-of-concept working in Apache, I do 
have it working 100% under Apache 1.3.23/mod_perl-1.26. I had performed benchmark 
studies under IIS/ASP, Tomcat/JSP and Apache/MOD_PERL and have seen the best 
performance under Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl!

However to convince my bosses, it would be lot nicer to impress upon them with Apache 
2.0.35/mod_perl-2 as it seems Apache 2.0.35 is supposed to be the best in terms of 
performance. That greediness is what is pushing me to make it work under 
Apache2/mod_perl-2.

Well, if things are in nascent phase I guess I should be content with what I have in 
Apache 1.3.23.

Am wondering how AP-631/PPM/Apache2 users have not got into problems as I am seeing on 
W2K.

Hoping for a possible fix soon!

Thanks,
Rex

Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept application on Apache 
1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are researching into moving away from ASP/IIS 
Webapplications to Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache 2.0.35 with the 
following problems.

 Do you really need to use Apache 2 and mod_perl 2?  Why not use the
 proven 1.x series?  It's still pretty early to be using the new stuff.

If he's on Windows, he'd probably want to use Apache 2 for performance
reasons.


-dave

/*==
www.urth.org
we await the New Sun
==*/




__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the 
convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/