Both the suppositions are right! To have the proof-of-concept working in Apache, I do
have it working 100% under Apache 1.3.23/mod_perl-1.26. I had performed benchmark
studies under IIS/ASP, Tomcat/JSP and Apache/MOD_PERL and have seen the best
performance under Apache 1.3.23/Mod_Perl!
However to convince my bosses, it would be lot nicer to impress upon them with Apache
2.0.35/mod_perl-2 as it seems Apache 2.0.35 is supposed to be the best in terms of
performance. That greediness is what is pushing me to make it work under
Apache2/mod_perl-2.
Well, if things are in nascent phase I guess I should be content with what I have in
Apache 1.3.23.
Am wondering how AP-631/PPM/Apache2 users have not got into problems as I am seeing on
W2K.
Hoping for a possible fix soon!
Thanks,
Rex
Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Perrin Harkins wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a newbie and had developed a proof-of-concept application on Apache
1.3.23/Mod_Perl-1.26-dev. We are researching into moving away from ASP/IIS
Webapplications to Apache/Mod_Perl. I am stuck with the latest Apache 2.0.35 with the
following problems.
Do you really need to use Apache 2 and mod_perl 2? Why not use the
proven 1.x series? It's still pretty early to be using the new stuff.
If he's on Windows, he'd probably want to use Apache 2 for performance
reasons.
-dave
/*==
www.urth.org
we await the New Sun
==*/
__
Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the
convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape! http://shopnow.netscape.com/
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com/