RE: [OT] Content-Disposition to change type and action?

2001-06-06 Thread Geoffrey Young



 -Original Message-
 From: Wilt, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:52 AM
 To: 'Ged Haywood'; Issac Goldstand
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [OT] Content-Disposition to change type and action?
 

sorry I'm getting to this thread a bit late...

in case anyone is interested, this looks like the general microsoft stance -

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q258/4/52.ASP

as an aside, I found this patch one day, which allows MSIE to do the right
thing for text/plain (albeit only if the EU changes his registry settings,
but since I run lots of tests with text/plain it was helpful...)

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q239/7/50.ASP

and while looking for that reference for this post, I stumbled upon this

http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q160/0/13.asp

yuk...

--Geoff



RE: [OT] Content-Disposition to change type and action?

2001-05-31 Thread Rafiq Ismail

 
 On Wed, 30 May 2001, Ged Haywood wrote:
 On Wed, 30 May 2001, Issac Goldstand wrote:
 
   Ged wrote:
IE is particularly fond of ignoring Content-type.  If the file is
 called
something.html or something.htm I've found IE will treat it as html
 even
if you say it's text/plain in Content-type.  Ugh.
 
 added a fake parameter of like ie=x.pdf to the end of the URL IE3 would
 refuse


Just to confirm this - I've recently had the same experience with ie5/mac
calling a real media file delivered through cgi.  Had to use the same
?...fakeparam=.rm cop-out.

I'm sure Microsoft probably see this a feature though.  Just like they've
always see their blue screen of death as a feature.  

R.




-- 
Rafiq Ismail

Software Engineer and Systems Administrator
http://www.codix.net


All the best people in life seem to like Linux. - Steve Wozniak







Re: [OT] Content-Disposition to change type and action?

2001-05-30 Thread Ged Haywood

Hi there,

On Wed, 30 May 2001, Issac Goldstand wrote:

 Ged wrote:
  IE is particularly fond of ignoring Content-type.  If the file is called
  something.html or something.htm I've found IE will treat it as html even
  if you say it's text/plain in Content-type.  Ugh.
 
 no - that only happens when you supply text/* (and possibly image/*).  I've
 had reasons to force internet explorer to do what I want (down, boy! :-) )
 and after a bit of hassle, I usually can just by setting the content-type in
 a way it likes (which is uslally compatible with the other browsers, too).

Sorry, I have to disagree.  I was so surprised when it happened I verified
it by snooping the network.  I'm not saying it's all versions, I think it
was 5.0 but I can't remember I'm afraid.  Was only a couple of months ago.

73,
Ged.





RE: [OT] Content-Disposition to change type and action?

2001-05-30 Thread Wilt, Paul


On Wed, 30 May 2001, Ged Haywood wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Issac Goldstand wrote:

  Ged wrote:
   IE is particularly fond of ignoring Content-type.  If the file is
called
   something.html or something.htm I've found IE will treat it as html
even
   if you say it's text/plain in Content-type.  Ugh.
  
  no - that only happens when you supply text/* (and possibly image/*).
I've
  had reasons to force internet explorer to do what I want (down, boy! :-)
)
  and after a bit of hassle, I usually can just by setting the
content-type in
  a way it likes (which is uslally compatible with the other browsers,
too).

 Sorry, I have to disagree.  I was so surprised when it happened I verified
 it by snooping the network.  I'm not saying it's all versions, I think it
 was 5.0 but I can't remember I'm afraid.  Was only a couple of months ago.

I have to agree with Ged.  IE3 browsers seemed to ignore the Content-Type
header
for PDF files.  Our system dynamically creates PDF files on request and
unless we
added a fake parameter of like ie=x.pdf to the end of the URL IE3 would
refuse
to load the file.  Most IE4 builds correctly interpreted the Content-Type
... and
then as soon as we began testing IE5 we noticed that the Microsoft ignorance
had
returned.  I have a friend who is a field engineer for Microsoft.  I sent a
bug
report through him to the Microsoft people and he basically ended up saying
(not
in these exact words) that they told him they had bigger fish to fry than to
correct this problem.

What a bummer!

Paul E Wilt 
Principal Software Engineer

XanEdu, Inc. ( a division of Bell+Howell InformationLearning)
http://www.XanEdu.com
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
300 North Zeeb Rd   Phone: (734) 975-6021  (800)
521-0600 x6021
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 Fax:(734) 973-0737