Pascal,
Thanks, I needed some good news.
Chuck
- Original Message -
From:
pascal barbedor
To: Chuck Goehring
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 11:41
PM
Subject: Re: mod_perl 1.99 (for Apache
2.0.35) building on W2K
Hi chuck
for DBI and DBD::xx it makes no difference if you
use them with regular cgi modperl 1 or 2 because they are unrelated to web
environment. (at least i suppose so a priori).
at least in my test they are used without problem
in startup.pl.
for cgi.pm used outside modpelr with 2.0.35 no
difference as well
and for cgi.pm used with modperl I don't
know.
i guess there is a difference, at
leastin the Apache::registry setup of the location to use the cgi like
script
pascal
- Original Message -
From:
Chuck
Goehring
To: pascal barbedor
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 5:11
AM
Subject: Re: mod_perl 1.99 (for Apache
2.0.35) building on W2K
Pascal and anyone else who can
help,
I've seen your other posts and I'm wondering
how your testing is going with "regular" cgi programs. I don't use any
of the exotic mod_perl specifics, so I'm no help there. I'll have to
"aquire" more facilities to setup like you have (nt boxes in short
supply).
I'm mostly concerned about the cgi.pm, dbi.pm
dbd::oracle etc.
Anybody know the impact that Apache 2.0 has on
these modules?
Chuck
- Original Message -
From:
pascal barbedor
To: Chuck Goehring
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:40
AM
Subject: Re: mod_perl 1.99 (for
Apache 2.0.35) building on W2K
Hi I am trying to build modperl under
win2k
saw your message.
don't know about your problem but
:
i use already built asperl build
631
I havebuilt apache succesfully, but
when trying to build modperl2
i am asked apxs
did you find the apxs program ?
thanks
pascal
barbedor
