Win32 Possible Bug?

2000-03-12 Thread Robert Hiltibidal

Well I believe I have found something with the latest apache 1.3.12. 

Recap: Could not get ssl pages to work

Finally I tried a precompiled binary, Apache 1.3.6 and it worked jeeest
peachy. I noticed I didn't get a warning with the cold fusion module. The
1.3.12 version complains cold fusion wasn't compiled with the -DEAPI option.

I wonder could there be something in the -DEAPI option that could cause
SSL to "break"?

After a few hours of some shuteye I plan on trying earlier versions, say
1.3.9 and see if I get the same results. I am thinking the openssl code
works just fine with either nasm or just the straight ms compilation. It
generates test certs and ca's no problem. The older version of apache can
see these certs without complications.

-Rob

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Win32 Possible Bug?

2000-03-12 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall

On Sun, Mar 12, 2000, Robert Hiltibidal wrote:

> [...]
> I wonder could there be something in the -DEAPI option that could cause
> SSL to "break"?
> [...]

No, I don't think it can break anything.

   Ralf S. Engelschall
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.engelschall.com
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Win32 Possible Bug?

2000-03-12 Thread Robert Hiltibidal


Weee I'm open to suggestions. I'm going to try to build a 1.3.6 full
version. The 1.3.9 I built waaayyy early this morning kept saying it
couldn't generate a 512k rsa private key, even thos SSRandomSeed was set to
file:conf/rand.dat 512

I had no problems in either the 1.3.12 version with the randomseed nor do I
have problems with the doanloaded 1.3.6 version random seed. Same conf file
for both.

Has anyone else built a win32 version off the 1.3.12 Apache build? If so
what was is your developmewnt environment? ie What version of VC++ are you
using, any Microsux patches applied, did you use do_ms or do_nasm or
do_masm for the openssl builds? 

-Rob

-Rob 

At 11:02 AM 03/12/2000 +0100, you wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 12, 2000, Robert Hiltibidal wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> I wonder could there be something in the -DEAPI option that could cause
>> SSL to "break"?
>> [...]
>
>No, I don't think it can break anything.
>
>   Ralf S. Engelschall
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   www.engelschall.com
>__
>Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
>User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Win32 Possible Bug?

2000-03-13 Thread weixu

What needed:
VC6.0
ActivePerl
CygWin
But it has bug:
makefile.nt has bugs of micro:
LONG and SHORT can't be extended to Release(or Debug) and R(or D)
you have to replace them before nmake.

good luck!

wei

- Original Message -
From: Robert Hiltibidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: Win32 Possible Bug?


>
> Weee I'm open to suggestions. I'm going to try to build a 1.3.6 full
> version. The 1.3.9 I built waaayyy early this morning kept saying it
> couldn't generate a 512k rsa private key, even thos SSRandomSeed was set
to
> file:conf/rand.dat 512
>
> I had no problems in either the 1.3.12 version with the randomseed nor do
I
> have problems with the doanloaded 1.3.6 version random seed. Same conf
file
> for both.
>
> Has anyone else built a win32 version off the 1.3.12 Apache build? If so
> what was is your developmewnt environment? ie What version of VC++ are you
> using, any Microsux patches applied, did you use do_ms or do_nasm or
> do_masm for the openssl builds?
>
> -Rob
>
> -Rob
>
> At 11:02 AM 03/12/2000 +0100, you wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 12, 2000, Robert Hiltibidal wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> I wonder could there be something in the -DEAPI option that could
cause
> >> SSL to "break"?
> >> [...]
> >
> >No, I don't think it can break anything.
> >
> >   Ralf S. Engelschall
> >   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   www.engelschall.com
> >__
> >Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
> >User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> __
> Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
> User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl)   www.modssl.org
User Support Mailing List  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]