advice needed on Lingua::Identification

2004-02-26 Thread jac
Hi, everybody.

I'm in need of advice here...

I'm putting together some things I have and creating a module named
Lingua::Identification. I won't go through details on why should this
module be created or anything else (unless someone asks me too) since
that has already been done (though not here, I know).

My problem is: the module has to retain some information about each
known language; this could easily be done by having persist on the
module itself... however, I also want the user to be able to *teach* a
new language to the module... how should I keep that information?

One possibility would be to force each known language to become a module
(Lingua:Identification::EN for English, etc)... the downside of this
solution is that once I have 50 languages, I'll have 51 modules... :-|
Still, CPAN can take care of things for us and install them all without
problem... but still, I'm not convinced... It is true that this would
allow the user to install only the desired languages and also ease the
learning process for new ones... besides, the module wouldn't have to
read unnecessary information on startup (there is the possibility of
identifying between only two languages, for example, so you don't need
to prepare all of them).

Another possibility is to have everything in a single file, and allow
the user to set up a configuration file himself, which may contain other
languages...

I don't know what's best... can you help me with this? Can you tell me
your opinion?

I've done quite a lot of programming in Perl, but I've never upload a
decent module on CPAN... I'm trying to do that for the first time, and I
don't want to screw things up right from the beginning...

Thanks to all of you.

Best regards,

jac


Re: advice needed on Lingua::Identification

2004-02-26 Thread Austin Schutz
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 04:27:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One possibility would be to force each known language to become a module
> (Lingua:Identification::EN for English, etc)... the downside of this
> solution is that once I have 50 languages, I'll have 51 modules... :-|
> Still, CPAN can take care of things for us and install them all without
> problem... but still, I'm not convinced... It is true that this would
> allow the user to install only the desired languages and also ease the
> learning process for new ones... besides, the module wouldn't have to
> read unnecessary information on startup (there is the possibility of
> identifying between only two languages, for example, so you don't need
> to prepare all of them).
> 
> Another possibility is to have everything in a single file, and allow
> the user to set up a configuration file himself, which may contain other
> languages...
> 
> I don't know what's best... can you help me with this? Can you tell me
> your opinion?
> 

The answer (in my experience) is "it depends". If it's simple to
remove the data for each language to a config and use identical logic for all
languages, that's usually the way to go.

If the logic for each language is different, having separate
modules is generally easier to maintain, because changing the logic for one
language in an algorithm that supports many languages may break the
functionality for the others. This may often seem easier at first, but it
doesn't scale too well.

There's also a combination of the two. For example, perhaps it makes
sense to combine Latin based languages together. Then perhaps you would
have:

Lingua::Identification
Lingua::Identification::Latin

and if necessary have an e.g. Lingua::Identification::EN inherit from
Latin, if you end up needing to have Lingua::Identification::EN to support
English differently than most Latin based languages, where latin based
languages are processed differently than other languages.
The other thing that's handy about this approach is that you can
have common logic in the superclass and only override parts that differ.

Hope that makes some sense. :-)

Austin


Re: Reshaping the modules list: a starting point, help remove the bias.

2004-02-26 Thread khemir nadim
Hi, within the development cathegory, I think it would be good to separate
modules that are for the perl interpreter (debugging, profiling, ...) and
other development tools. As an example, I have a module called Devel::Cpp
which I put tin the Devel root because I foun no better place (and I didn't
ask either :-(  but later on I understood that Devel was not for this kind
of devlopment tools (I'm still wondering why). Now, there is a new pure perl
preprocessor module that I want to use instead for 'cpp', I still don't know
where to put it!

Cheers, Nadim.