Re: [Mojolicious] LWP::UserAgent::Cached substitute?

2018-11-20 Thread Dan Book
I'm not sure why you say it wouldn't be usable with Mojolicious.
Mojolicious doesn't care what other modules you use. LWP won't be capable
of non-blocking queries like Mojo::UserAgent will of course, but that's
usually not important for the command line. If you want to do it with
Mojo::UserAgent try https://metacpan.org/pod/Mojo::UserAgent::Role::Cache.

-Dan

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:44 PM  wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> First time poster.
>
> I have some command line apps that use LWP with LWP::UserAgent::Cached
> for the local file-based cache to get() and later parse pages.  I need to
> use this local page cache so that I don't hit the web server repeatedly for
> unchanged pages.  I was hoping to use Mojolicious, but prefer not to try
> to re-implement this caching.
>
> It doesn't appear that LWP::UserAgent::Cached would be usable with
> Mojolicious, and don't see anything readily available as an alternative.
>
> Any advice?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Mojolicious" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Mojolicious] LWP::UserAgent::Cached substitute?

2018-11-20 Thread eight . dancing . monkeys
Hi folks,

First time poster.

I have some command line apps that use LWP with LWP::UserAgent::Cached for 
the local file-based cache to get() and later parse pages.  I need to use 
this local page cache so that I don't hit the web server repeatedly for 
unchanged pages.  I was hoping to use Mojolicious, but prefer not to try to 
re-implement this caching.

It doesn't appear that LWP::UserAgent::Cached would be usable with 
Mojolicious, and don't see anything readily available as an alternative.

Any advice?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Mojolicious] Using 'state' in a helper

2018-11-20 Thread Viktor Nacht
*facepalm* The stash, of course. Thank you. :) 

On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 6:01:26 PM UTC-8, Dan Book wrote:
>
> A 'state' variable lasts for the rest of that process, but is only 
> available to the scope it's declared in. If you want per-connection (or 
> more precisely per request), I recommend storing it in the stash, like:
>
> helper foo => sub {
>   my $c = shift;
>   return $c->stash->{'myapp.foo'} //= ...;
> };
>
> -Dan
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [Mojolicious] Using 'state' in a helper

2018-11-20 Thread Daniel Mantovani
Hi, not sure if this is what you need, but I wrote an example on how to 
trigger some state machine with a post request, and later be able to check 
some status with other requests:

https://github.com/dmanto/mojo-stateful-server-experiment/blob/master/stateful.pl

Hope it can help
BR,
Daniel

El lunes, 19 de noviembre de 2018, 23:01:26 (UTC-3), Dan Book escribió:
>
> A 'state' variable lasts for the rest of that process, but is only 
> available to the scope it's declared in. If you want per-connection (or 
> more precisely per request), I recommend storing it in the stash, like:
>
> helper foo => sub {
>   my $c = shift;
>   return $c->stash->{'myapp.foo'} //= ...;
> };
>
> -Dan
>
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 8:18 PM Viktor Nacht  > wrote:
>
>> Does using state inside a helper last for the duration of the connection, 
>> or something longer lasting like a process, worker, etc?
>>
>> I want to create (and return) a current DateTime object and make it 
>> accessible to multiple helpers and templates during a connection.
>>
>> I saw this Gist, but I'm not sure it pertains to per-connection:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/s1037989/179d53b86e46ae788f62
>>
>> V
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Mojolicious" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to mojolicious...@googlegroups.com .
>> To post to this group, send email to mojol...@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Mojolicious] Re: Improved version / Was: [Re: Apache Config for Mojo CGI setup - opinions?]

2018-11-20 Thread Alexander Karelas
And of course, you can SetEnv all the MOJO environment variables you
want (eg MOJO_MODE to production)

https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_env.html#SetEnv


On 20/11/18 8:21 π.μ., Alexander Karelas wrote:
>
> I even tried curl with /../other.pl and /cgi-bin/../other.pl, and
> these still went through my_app.pl, so we're fine I think!
>
> - Alex
>
>
> On 20/11/18 8:11 π.μ., Alexander Karelas wrote:
>>
>> Thanks to Dan Book, I searched a bit more. Plain ScriptAlias didn't
>> do the trick, but ScriptAliasMatch worked beautifully on both CentOS
>> and Ubuntu (provided you enable the cgi module of Apache, of course,
>> which I hadn't done before, and mysteriously wasn't getting an error
>> for unknown Apache directives):
>>
>> This apache config seems a lot simpler and more secure, I think,
>> therefore better.
>>
>>
>> ***
>> **  ServerName apache-dev.lxd**
>> **  DocumentRoot /opt/mysite/html*
>>
>> *  ScriptAliasMatch "^/cgi-bin/(.*)" "/opt/mysite/cgi-bin/my_app.pl/$1"**
>> **
>> **  **
>> **  RewriteEngine On**
>> **  RewriteBase /**
>> **  RewriteRule (.*) /cgi-bin/$1 [L]**
>> **  Require all granted**
>> **  **
>> **
>> **  **
>> **  Require all granted**
>> **  **
>> 
>> *
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[Mojolicious] Re: Improved version / Was: [Re: Apache Config for Mojo CGI setup - opinions?]

2018-11-20 Thread Alexander Karelas
I even tried curl with /../other.pl and /cgi-bin/../other.pl, and these
still went through my_app.pl, so we're fine I think!

- Alex


On 20/11/18 8:11 π.μ., Alexander Karelas wrote:
>
> Thanks to Dan Book, I searched a bit more. Plain ScriptAlias didn't do
> the trick, but ScriptAliasMatch worked beautifully on both CentOS and
> Ubuntu (provided you enable the cgi module of Apache, of course, which
> I hadn't done before, and mysteriously wasn't getting an error for
> unknown Apache directives):
>
> This apache config seems a lot simpler and more secure, I think,
> therefore better.
>
>
> ***
> **  ServerName apache-dev.lxd**
> **  DocumentRoot /opt/mysite/html*
>
> *  ScriptAliasMatch "^/cgi-bin/(.*)" "/opt/mysite/cgi-bin/my_app.pl/$1"**
> **
> **  **
> **  RewriteEngine On**
> **  RewriteBase /**
> **  RewriteRule (.*) /cgi-bin/$1 [L]**
> **  Require all granted**
> **  **
> **
> **  **
> **  Require all granted**
> **  **
> 
> *
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Mojolicious" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to mojolicious+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to mojolicious@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.