Re: [Mono-dev] Improving memory usage in /System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs

2006-11-28 Thread Hubert FONGARNAND
Could someone commit this patch?
Thanks

Le lundi 27 novembre 2006 à 12:17 +0100, Hubert FONGARNAND a écrit :

 Hi,
 
 When using Npgsql, if you try to send (INSERT or UPDATE) a bytea
 (blob) element without using Prepare it will be sent as a Escaped
 string... This string is 4x bigger than the real bytea...
 So : The memory usage on the ASP.NET server is enormous when the blob
 is more than 1MB... and the network traffic is enormous too!
 (see
 http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1000458group_id=1000140atid=590)
 
 If you want to avoid that you've to use Prepare before executing
 ExecuteNonQuery, or ExecuteReader...
 If you don't believe me use Ethereal (wireshark)
 
 Here's a patch that add a cmd.Prepare allowing Npgsql sending data in
 binary format!
 This patch shouldn't change anything if you use other connector than
 Npgsql.
 
 Thanks to review it!
 
 Hubert FONGARNAND
 
 
 
 
 Index: mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs
 ===
 --- mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs   
   (révision 68495)
 +++ mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs   
   (copie de travail)
 @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@
 command.CommandText = selectCommand;
 command.Parameters.Add (CreateParam (command, 
 DbType.String, SessionID, id));
 command.Parameters.Add (CreateParam (command, 
 DbType.DateTime, Expires, DateTime.Now ));
 +   command.Prepare();
 return command.ExecuteReader ();
 }
  
 @@ -253,7 +254,7 @@

 session.StaticObjects.ToByteArray ()));
 param.Add (CreateParam (command, DbType.Binary, 
 SessionData,

 session.SessionDictionary.ToByteArray ()));
 -
 +   command.Prepare();
 command.ExecuteNonQuery ();
 }
  
 @@ -287,6 +288,7 @@
 param.Add (CreateParam (command, DbType.Int32, 
 Timeout, timeout));
 param.Add (CreateParam (command, DbType.Binary, 
 SessionData,
 
 dict.ToByteArray ()));
 +   command.Prepare();
  
 command.ExecuteNonQuery ();
 }
 
 
 
 ___
 Ce message et les ventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des
 informations confidentielles.
 Au cas o䵲 il ne vous serait pas destin, nous vous remercions de bien
 vouloir le supprimer et en aviser imm洸diatement l'expditeur. Toute
 utilisation de ce message non conforme ⭁ sa destination, toute
 diffusion ou publication, totale ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le
 moyen est formellement interdite.
 Les communications sur internet n'tant pas s牌curises, l'intߜgrit de
 ce message n'est pas assurŨe et la socit㵵 mettrice ne peut 攮tre
 tenue pour responsable de son contenu. 
 
 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
___
Ce message et les �ventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles.
Au cas o� il ne vous serait pas destin�, nous vous remercions de bien vouloir 
le supprimer et en aviser imm�diatement l'exp�diteur. Toute utilisation de ce 
message non conforme � sa destination, toute diffusion ou publication, totale 
ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le moyen est formellement interdite.
Les communications sur internet n'�tant pas s�curis�es, l'int�grit� de ce 
message n'est pas assur�e et la soci�t� �mettrice ne peut �tre tenue pour 
responsable de son contenu.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Improving memory usage in /System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs

2006-11-28 Thread Robert Jordan
Hi Hubert,

Hubert FONGARNAND wrote:
 Could someone commit this patch?

Let me check it first against another DB providers.

Robert

 Thanks
 
 Le lundi 27 novembre 2006 à 12:17 +0100, Hubert FONGARNAND a écrit :
 
 Hi,

 When using Npgsql, if you try to send (INSERT or UPDATE) a bytea
 (blob) element without using Prepare it will be sent as a Escaped
 string... This string is 4x bigger than the real bytea...
 So : The memory usage on the ASP.NET server is enormous when the blob
 is more than 1MB... and the network traffic is enormous too!
 (see
 http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1000458group_id=1000140atid=590)

 If you want to avoid that you've to use Prepare before executing
 ExecuteNonQuery, or ExecuteReader...
 If you don't believe me use Ethereal (wireshark)

 Here's a patch that add a cmd.Prepare allowing Npgsql sending data in
 binary format!
 This patch shouldn't change anything if you use other connector than
 Npgsql.

 Thanks to review it!

 Hubert FONGARNAND




 Index: 
 mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs
 ===
 --- mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs  
(révision 68495)
 +++ mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.SessionState/SessionSQLServerHandler.cs  
(copie de travail)
 @@ -196,6 +196,7 @@
 command.CommandText = selectCommand;
 command.Parameters.Add (CreateParam (command, 
 DbType.String, SessionID, id));
 command.Parameters.Add (CreateParam (command, 
 DbType.DateTime, Expires, DateTime.Now ));
 +   command.Prepare();
 return command.ExecuteReader ();
 }
  
 @@ -253,7 +254,7 @@

 session.StaticObjects.ToByteArray ()));
 param.Add (CreateParam (command, DbType.Binary, 
 SessionData,

 session.SessionDictionary.ToByteArray ()));
 -
 +   command.Prepare();
 command.ExecuteNonQuery ();
 }
  
 @@ -287,6 +288,7 @@
 param.Add (CreateParam (command, DbType.Int32, 
 Timeout, timeout));
 param.Add (CreateParam (command, DbType.Binary, 
 SessionData,
 
 dict.ToByteArray ()));
 +   command.Prepare();
  
 command.ExecuteNonQuery ();
 }



 ___
 Ce message et les ventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des
 informations confidentielles.
 Au cas o䵲 il ne vous serait pas destin, nous vous remercions de bien
 vouloir le supprimer et en aviser imm洸diatement l'expditeur. Toute
 utilisation de ce message non conforme ⭁ sa destination, toute
 diffusion ou publication, totale ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le
 moyen est formellement interdite.
 Les communications sur internet n'tant pas s牌curises, l'intߜgrit de
 ce message n'est pas assurŨe et la socit㵵 mettrice ne peut 攮tre
 tenue pour responsable de son contenu. 

 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
 ___
 Ce message et les �ventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des 
 informations confidentielles.
 Au cas o� il ne vous serait pas destin�, nous vous remercions de bien vouloir 
 le supprimer et en aviser imm�diatement l'exp�diteur. Toute utilisation de ce 
 message non conforme � sa destination, toute diffusion ou publication, totale 
 ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le moyen est formellement interdite.
 Les communications sur internet n'�tant pas s�curis�es, l'int�grit� de ce 
 message n'est pas assur�e et la soci�t� �mettrice ne peut �tre tenue pour 
 responsable de son contenu.
 
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Mono-devel-list mailing list
 Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
 http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Running under the Mono 2.0 Profile

2006-11-28 Thread Mirco Bauer
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 09:59 -0800, Charlie Poole wrote:
 Hi Mirco,
 
 Sure, this is what we use for the normal static situation where you always
 want 
 a particular program to run under a given profile. But it doesn't work for a
 
 more dynamic situation, such as a developer needing to test different
 programs
 under NUnit using different profiles. 
 
 For that purpose, we have menu items that say Run under .Net 1.1, etc.
 This
 is implemented by using the COMPLUS_VERSION environment variable. For Mono,
 we currently only say Run under Mono It would be nice if we could have
 Run under Mono 1.0 Profile and Run under Mono 2.0 Profile
 
 I probably should have explained all this in my note in the first place. :-(
 
 Charlie

For compatibility someone could implement that environment setting for
Mono, but in the meantime you could just generate that app config file
when you push the Run under Mono 2.0 Profile button on the fly, or is
that too absurd? :-P

Actually, it's not the test-case that decides if it wants 2.0 profile or
not, it's the application that loads the test-case, nunit in this case.
So all you need is 2 nunit exe files, one that is linked against 1.0 and
one against 2.0, or use the app config trick and use 1.0 exe files
instead.

Or is the problem that you can't start a new nunit process for running
the test-case? Then this solution would not work.

-- 
Regards,

Mirco 'meebey' Bauer

PGP-Key:
http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xEEF946C8

-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++! O M-
V? PS
PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G++ e h! r-++ y?
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] PATCH:xmlSerializationGenericsTests.patch

2006-11-28 Thread Atsushi Eno
Hi,

Having those tests (with NotWorking) is good, but please don't break
several code blocks which were conformant to our coding style i.e.
don't do like

 -
 - private void Serialize (object o, Type type)
 + 
 + private void Serialize(object o, Type type)

Thanks,
Atsushi Eno

Tal Klar wrote:
 Hi,
 
 The attached patch contains 32 tests for System.Xml.Serialization
 Generics scenarios. All tests fail. Please review the tests.
 
 Should we commit them with NotWorking attribute? Open bugs in Bugzilla?
 
  
 
 Thanks,
 
 Tal
 
 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Moma early results.

2006-11-28 Thread Leszek Ciesielski
 On 11/28/06, Jonathan Pobst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Usage frequency I suppose.  If DataRowCollection.Count is listed 100
  times for example, it doesn't mean the property is called 100 times at
  runtime, it actually means the user has typed it out 100 times in their
  code, and would need to replace/change/fix all 100 occurrences.
 
  It's probably more useful for the user's results report than the
  submitted report, but we can still use it to determine that implementing
  this one little property is going to alleviate 1000 calls across 10 apps
  instead of 10 calls over 10 apps.
 
  Jon
 
 
  Alan McGovern wrote:
   Not sure if this has been fixed already or not, but if you look at the
   largest file in the archive, it has the same methods reported multiple
   times (100's of times?). Is there any point to that?
  
   Alan.
  
   On 11/27/06, *Miguel de Icaza*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Hey folks,
  
   I have posted the 102 results that have been submitted so far from
   running Moma on people's binaries.
  
   The results have been cleaned up a little bit, I removed a few
   methods that were implemented and methods that had bogus MonoTODO
   entries, which were removed in the last couple of weeks since the
   original databases for Moma were created.
  
   The results are available here:
  
   http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/tmp/results-moma.tar.gz
   http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/tmp/results-moma.tar.gz
  
   It is worth noticing that in some cases, an API in the 
   documentation
   is flagged as existing in 1.1 and 2.0, while the actual method was
   introduced in 2.0.
  
   This happens because in 1.1 you could still call the method, and 
   the
   call would be satisfied by calling into the parent class of a method.
  
   For example Exception.GetType() is a method that calls into
   base.GetType(), it is flagged in the documentation as available in
   1.1, but it did not actually exist back then.
  
   So to implement methods like this, the #if NET_2_0 must be used;
   The same happens extensively in Windows.Forms, when they had to 
   override
   a few methods to catch some values (is my guess), they are
   documented as
   being in 1.1, but they were not.
  
   It is important thus to check the results of corcompare, see:
  
   http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-HEAD-vs-fx-2/
   http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-HEAD-vs-fx-2/
  
   and:
  
   http://mono.ximian.com/class-status/mono-HEAD-vs-fx-1-1/
 A simple summary:

 [smaller values clipped]
 108 System.Void
 System.Windows.Forms.Form::set_Location(System.Drawing.Point)
 114 System.Void
 
System.Windows.Forms.TableLayoutControlCollection::Add(System.Windows.Forms.Control,System.Int32,System.Int32)
 115 Microsoft.Win32.RegistryKey
 Microsoft.Win32.RegistryKey::CreateSubKey(System.String)
 117 System.Windows.Forms.TableLayoutControlCollection
 System.Windows.Forms.TableLayoutPanel::get_Controls()
 121 System.Void
 
System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem::set_ImageTransparentColor(System.Drawing.Color)
 125 System.Void
 System.Windows.Forms.TabPage::set_Location(System.Drawing.Point)
 132 System.Void
 System.Windows.Forms.ToolStripItem::set_BackgroundImage(System.Drawing.Image)
 143 System.Collections.IEnumerator
 System.Data.DataRowCollection::GetEnumerator()
 169 System.Windows.Forms.Control
 System.Windows.Forms.Design.ControlDesigner::get_Control()
 184 System.Int32
 System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializationReader::get_ReaderCount()
 184 System.Void
 
System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializationReader::CheckReaderCount(System.Int32,System.Int32)
 188 System.Int32
 
Microsoft.VisualBasic.CompilerServices.ObjectType::ObjTst(System.Object,System.Object,System.Boolean)
 245 System.Data.DataRow System.Data.DataRowView::get_Row()
 247 System.Void System.Windows.Forms.ButtonBase::set_Text(System.String)
 292 System.Object
 System.ComponentModel.Design.ComponentDesigner::GetService(System.Type)
 341 System.Void System.Security.CodeAccessPermission::Assert()
 352 System.Int32 System.Data.DataRowCollection::get_Count()
 381 System.Void
 
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlParameter::.ctor(System.String,System.Data.SqlDbType,System.Int32,System.Data.ParameterDirection,System.Byte,System.Byte,System.String,System.Data.DataRowVersion,System.Boolean,System.Object,System.String,System.String,System.String)
 488 System.ComponentModel.IComponent
 System.ComponentModel.Design.ComponentDesigner::get_Component()
2108 System.Void
 
System.Data.DataSet::.ctor(System.Runtime.Serialization.SerializationInfo,System.Runtime.Serialization.StreamingContext,System.Boolean)

 This was produced by concatenating all the reports into a single file
 named summary, then processing it 

[Mono-dev] [PATCH] System.Net/ServicePointManager.cs

2006-11-28 Thread Konstantin Triger
Hello all,

 

Please review the patch resolving an infinite loop in 
ServicePointManager.RecycleServicePoints().

 

Regards,

Konstantin Triger

 



ServicePointManager.patch
Description: ServicePointManager.patch
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Moma early results.

2006-11-28 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
Miguel de Icaza escribió:
 Hey folks,

Thanks for the info Miguel.

 I have posted the 102 results that have been submitted so far from
 running Moma on people's binaries.
 
 The results have been cleaned up a little bit, I removed a few
 methods that were implemented and methods that had bogus MonoTODO
 entries, which were removed in the last couple of weeks since the
 original databases for Moma were created.

I have found also that there are many empty MonoTODOs at the 
ManagementObject class and some other classes that lay in similar 
namespaces.

This is the full listing:

Method with [MonoTodo]  Reason
ObjectGetOptions ManagementObject.get_Options() Not Specified
PropertyDataCollection ManagementBaseObject.get_Properties()Not Specified
PropertyDataCollection/PropertyDataEnumerator 
PropertyDataCollection.GetEnumerator()  Not Specified
PropertyData 
PropertyDataCollection/PropertyDataEnumerator.get_Current() Not Specified
string PropertyData.get_Name()  Not Specified
bool PropertyDataCollection/PropertyDataEnumerator.MoveNext()   Not Specified
QualifierDataCollection PropertyData.get_Qualifiers()   Not Specified
QualifierDataCollection/QualifierDataEnumerator 
QualifierDataCollection.GetEnumerator() Not Specified
QualifierData 
QualifierDataCollection/QualifierDataEnumerator.get_Current()   Not Specified
string QualifierData.get_Name() Not Specified
bool QualifierDataCollection/QualifierDataEnumerator.MoveNext() Not 
Specified
ManagementObjectCollection/ManagementObjectEnumerator 
ManagementObjectCollection.GetEnumerator()  Not Specified
ManagementBaseObject 
ManagementObjectCollection/ManagementObjectEnumerator.get_Current() Not 
Specified
bool PropertyData.get_IsArray() Not Specified
CimType PropertyData.get_Type() Not Specified
Object ManagementBaseObject.get_Item(string)Not Specified
bool ManagementObjectCollection/ManagementObjectEnumerator.MoveNext() 
Not Specified

Regards,

Andrés  [ knocte ]

-- 


___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-patches] r68496 - in trunk/mcs/class/System.Web:System.Web.UI Test/System.Web.UI

2006-11-28 Thread Igor Zelmanovich
Gonzalo,

OpenFile may be implemented this way:

protected internal Stream OpenFile (string path)
{
return System.Web.Hosting.VirtualPathProvider.OpenFile (path);
}

In this case the corresponding test fails because
DefaultVirtualPathProvider.GetFile not supports application relative
path (such as ~/MyPage.aspx).

I attached corresponding tests.
Please, review.

Igor.

-Original Message-
From: Gonzalo Paniagua Javier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 8:55 PM
To: Igor Zelmanovich; Mono Development
Subject: Re: [Mono-patches] r68496 - in
trunk/mcs/class/System.Web:System.Web.UI Test/System.Web.UI

On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 04:28 -0500, Igor Zalmanovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
 Author: igorz
 Date: 2006-11-27 04:28:15 -0500 (Mon, 27 Nov 2006)
 New Revision: 68496
 
 Modified:
trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.UI/ChangeLog
trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/System.Web.UI/Control.cs
trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/Test/System.Web.UI/ChangeLog
trunk/mcs/class/System.Web/Test/System.Web.UI/ControlTest.cs
 Log:
 2006-11-27 Igor Zelmanovich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   * Control.cs: implemented OpenFile()
 

The correct implementation of OpenFile have to use the current
VirtualPathProvider. The patch you commited works for the general case,
but if someone provides a special VirtualPathProvider, it won't work.
Please, fix it.

-Gonzalo





HostingEnvironmentTest.patch
Description: HostingEnvironmentTest.patch
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

2006-11-28 Thread Igor Zelmanovich

Changes in r68545 cause regressions in tests for 2.0.

There is compilation error when *.aspx is parsed:

Compilation Error
Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this
request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error.

Error message:
c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(35,36) : error
CS0246: The type or namespace name 'String' could not be found (are you
missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(52,45) : error
CS0246: The type or namespace name 'EventArgs' could not be found (are
you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(68,36) : error
CS0246: The type or namespace name 'HtmlTextWriter' could not be found
(are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)





Regards,
Igor Zelmanovich.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] [PATCH] properly handle configSections

2006-11-28 Thread Marek Habersack
Hello,

  The attached diff fixes handling for situations where web.config
contains code like:

?xml version=1.0 standalone=yes?
configuration 
  configSections
sectionGroup name=system.web
  section name=neatUpload 
type=Brettle.Web.NeatUpload.ConfigSectionHandler,Brettle.Web.NeatUpload 
allowLocation=true / 
/sectionGroup
   /configSections 
   system.web
 neatUpload useHttpModule=false maxNormalRequestLength=4096 
maxRequestLength=2097151 defaultProvider=FilesystemUploadStorageProvider 
providers
   add name=FilesystemUploadStorageProvider 
type=Brettle.Web.NeatUpload.FilesystemUploadStorageProvider,Brettle.Web.NeatUpload
 tempDirectory=UploadTemp/
  /providers
/neatUpload
   /system.web
/configuration

Current implementation of System.Configuration for the 2.0 runtime will throw 
an 
exception claiming that the neatUpload section is unknown. Configuration code 
does
read the configSections but it mistakenly allocates a new system.web section 
instead
of merging it with the existing one. The diff causes the sections to be 
properly merged
and any custom config sections to be recognized. Please, review

best regards,

marek
Index: SectionInfo.cs
===
--- SectionInfo.cs	(revision 68577)
+++ SectionInfo.cs	(working copy)
@@ -207,6 +207,9 @@
 tr.Close ();*/
 			}
 		}
+		
+		internal override void Merge (ConfigInfo data)
+		{}
 	}
 }
 
Index: ConfigInfo.cs
===
--- ConfigInfo.cs	(revision 68577)
+++ ConfigInfo.cs	(working copy)
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
 		public abstract void WriteConfig (Configuration cfg, XmlWriter writer, ConfigurationSaveMode mode);
 		public abstract void ReadData (Configuration config, XmlTextReader reader, bool overrideAllowed);
 		public abstract void WriteData (Configuration config, XmlWriter writer, ConfigurationSaveMode mode);
+		
+		internal abstract void Merge (ConfigInfo data);
 	}
 }
 
Index: SectionGroupInfo.cs
===
--- SectionGroupInfo.cs	(revision 68577)
+++ SectionGroupInfo.cs	(working copy)
@@ -198,9 +198,9 @@
 
 if (name == section)
 	cinfo = new SectionInfo ();
-else if (name == sectionGroup)
+else if (name == sectionGroup) {
 	cinfo = new SectionGroupInfo ();
-else
+} else
 	ThrowException (Unrecognized element:  + reader.Name, reader);
 	
 cinfo.ReadConfig (cfg, streamName, reader);
@@ -210,6 +210,9 @@
 if (actInfo != null) {
 	if (actInfo.GetType () != cinfo.GetType ())
 		ThrowException (A section or section group named ' + cinfo.Name + ' already exists, reader);
+	// Merge all the new data
+	actInfo.Merge (cinfo);
+	
 	// Make sure that this section is saved in this configuration file:
 	actInfo.StreamName = streamName;
 }
@@ -340,9 +343,33 @@
 if (data != null)
 	return data;
 			}
+			// It might be in the root section group
 			return null;
 		}
 
+		internal override void Merge (ConfigInfo newData)
+		{
+			SectionGroupInfo data = newData as SectionGroupInfo;
+			if (data == null)
+return;
+			ConfigInfo actInfo;
+			if (data.sections != null  data.sections.Count  0)
+foreach (string key in data.sections.AllKeys) {
+	actInfo = sections[key];
+	if (actInfo != null)
+		continue;
+	sections.Add (key, data.sections[key]);
+}
+			
+			if (data.groups != null  data.sections.Count  0)
+foreach (string key in data.groups.AllKeys) {
+	actInfo = groups[key];
+	if (actInfo != null)
+		continue;
+	groups.Add (key, data.groups[key]);
+}
+		}
+		
 		public void WriteRootData (XmlWriter writer, Configuration config, ConfigurationSaveMode mode)
 		{
 			WriteContent (writer, config, mode, false);


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

2006-11-28 Thread Marek Habersack
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:10:47 -0800, Igor Zelmanovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:

 
 Changes in r68545 cause regressions in tests for 2.0.
 
 There is compilation error when *.aspx is parsed:
 
 Compilation Error
 Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this
 request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error.
 
 Error message:
 c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
 Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(35,36) :
 error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'String' could not be found
 (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
 c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
 Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(52,45) :
 error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'EventArgs' could not be
 found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
 c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
 Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(68,36) :
 error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'HtmlTextWriter' could not
 be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Can you post the aspx that fails to compile? I have an .aspx which uses
all of the elements and it compiles without any problems with the
latest SVN.

best regards,

marek


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] TDS 8.0 and SslClientStream

2006-11-28 Thread Sebastien Pouliot
Hello Dmitry,

On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 10:57 +0400, Dmitry Key wrote:
 Hi, all
 
 I am working on TDS 8.0 network protocol for the SqlClient and facing with 
 the problem of the handshaking implementation. The corresponding TDS packet 
 consists of the TDS header and TDS body with the TLS handshake packet. So to 
 parse server response we have to read entire TDS packet, analyze its type 
 and, if necessary, extract TLS part and send it to the SslClientStream 
 class. But this class uses asynchronous Stream.BeginRead/EndRead methods in 
 the handshake procedure and it is impossible read data asynchronously from 
 the internal buffer. I see two methods to resolve such a problem.
 1) Rewrite handshake code of the SslClientStream/SslBaseStream in the 
 synchronous manner. 

This code used to be synchronous (see SVN history) and had to be changed
to make it work correctly in every case.

 Another reason to do it is the following: SslStream 
 class from .Net 2.0 uses synchronous methods to make handshake and as far as 

Wrong. The handshake must be done async if the read/write that initiates
an handshake is async. Believe me, we tried, for a long time, in
Mono.Security ;-)

Anyway I don't see how you come to the conclusion that SslStream use a
synchronous method for doing it's handshake. Does your code works around
the 2.0 API ?

 I understand Mono version of this class will be implemented on the basis of 
 the Mono.Security.

basis is well said. It will be based on Mono.Security, but it's still
undecided if this is gonna be a total rewrite (which would requires lot
of time and tests) or a thin wrapper around existing code (easier but we
still have the same issues, like high amount of memory allocations).

A few people have attempted both approach but never complete the task.

 2) Implement IAsyncResult interface in such a way that it will be possible 
 to read data from memory buffer asynchronously. I suppose it can be done as 
 the extension of the MemoryStream class.

That's probably much easier and has a lower chance of affecting the
current users of the SSL/TLS code.

 In any case the good knowledge of Mono.Security internals is required. So 
 could some Mono guru help me to solve my problem?

-- 
Sebastien Pouliot  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blog: http://pages.infinit.net/ctech/

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

2006-11-28 Thread Igor Zelmanovich
Look at attached.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marek
Habersack
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:25 PM
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:10:47 -0800, Igor Zelmanovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:

 
 Changes in r68545 cause regressions in tests for 2.0.
 
 There is compilation error when *.aspx is parsed:
 
 Compilation Error
 Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this
 request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error.
 
 Error message:
 c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
 Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(35,36) :
 error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'String' could not be found
 (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
 c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
 Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(52,45) :
 error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'EventArgs' could not be
 found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
 c:\Documents and Settings\igorz\Local
 Settings\Temp\igorz-temp-aspnet-0\d5d4c8a8\ilejbksq.0.cs(68,36) :
 error CS0246: The type or namespace name 'HtmlTextWriter' could not
 be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Can you post the aspx that fails to compile? I have an .aspx which uses
all of the elements and it compiles without any problems with the
latest SVN.

best regards,

marek


EventValidationTest1.aspx
Description: EventValidationTest1.aspx
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

2006-11-28 Thread Marek Habersack
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:30:58 -0800, Igor Zelmanovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:

 Look at attached.
It works fine for me. Make sure you have the updated 2.0 profile
web.config from r68544. Please let me know if it works for you after
you will have updated that file,

best regards,

marek


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

2006-11-28 Thread Igor Zelmanovich
I updated web.config.
Works fine.

Thanks. 

-Original Message-
From: Marek Habersack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:40 PM
To: Igor Zelmanovich
Cc: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Revision: 68545

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:30:58 -0800, Igor Zelmanovich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:

 Look at attached.
It works fine for me. Make sure you have the updated 2.0 profile
web.config from r68544. Please let me know if it works for you after
you will have updated that file,

best regards,

marek
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] ChangeLog policy?

2006-11-28 Thread Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ]
I have noticed that on revision 68577 some changelogs has been deleted, 
instead of just pointing out the refactoring in a new changelog entry. 
Is that ok?

Regards.

Andrés  [ knocte ]

-- 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] ChangeLog policy?

2006-11-28 Thread Atsushi Eno
It is just a mistaken commit. I've already asked Hagit to revert it.

Atsushi Eno

Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote:
 I have noticed that on revision 68577 some changelogs has been deleted, 
 instead of just pointing out the refactoring in a new changelog entry. 
 Is that ok?
 
 Regards.
 
   Andrés  [ knocte ]
 

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] [Mono-patches] r68496 - in trunk/mcs/class/System.Web:System.Web.UI Test/System.Web.UI

2006-11-28 Thread Gonzalo Paniagua Javier
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 04:31 -0800, Igor Zelmanovich wrote:
 Gonzalo,
 
 OpenFile may be implemented this way:
 
 protected internal Stream OpenFile (string path)
 {
   return System.Web.Hosting.VirtualPathProvider.OpenFile (path);
 }
 
 In this case the corresponding test fails because
 DefaultVirtualPathProvider.GetFile not supports application relative
 path (such as ~/MyPage.aspx).

That means that there's something else to Control.OpenFile, not that
using the virtual path provider in OpenFile is wrong (easy to test, just
add your own virtualpathprovider and call Control.OpenFile with a few
different values. You can also see it in the stacktraces from MS
runtime). Also it is documented to work on physical and virtual paths,
which will be a problem on linux as there's no way of saying that a
given path is physical or virtual without checking for the file to
exist.

-Gonzalo


___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Moma early results.

2006-11-28 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello,

  I have posted the 102 results that have been submitted so far from
  running Moma on people's binaries.

My own investigations from last night are posted here:

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Nov-28.html

It is far from complete, but should give people a taste.

Miguel
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] Performance improvments in DataRow

2006-11-28 Thread Hubert FONGARNAND
Hi,

I've posted a patch that resolve a performance problem on DataRow...
(ADO.NET)

see : http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80075

with this patch, my ported ASP.NET is now at 0.93 second for 1 page (it
was 2s before...)



___
Ce message et les éventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles.
Au cas où il ne vous serait pas destiné, nous vous remercions de bien vouloir 
le supprimer et en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur. Toute utilisation de ce 
message non conforme à sa destination, toute diffusion ou publication, totale 
ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le moyen est formellement interdite.
Les communications sur internet n'étant pas sécurisées, l'intégrité de ce 
message n'est pas assurée et la société émettrice ne peut être tenue pour 
responsable de son contenu.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Performance improvments in DataRow

2006-11-28 Thread A Nagappan
Hi,
  Nice work :)

Few comments about the patch (only with respect to coding standards ;).

Add required spacing where ever appropriate.

+   Doublet d= (Doublet)columnNameCount[name.ToLower()];
+   if (d!=null)

something like

+   Doublet d = (Doublet) columnNameCount [name.ToLower ()];
+   if (d != null)

Modify the following

+   if (d!=null)
+   {

as

+   if (d!=null) {
+

Also, add a generic test-case.

Thanks
Nagappan

Nagappan A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Desktop Testing Project - http://ldtp.freedesktop.org
http://nagappanal.blogspot.com

Novell, Inc.
SUSE® Linux Enterprise 10
Your Linux is ready™
http://www.novell.com/linux


 Hubert FONGARNAND [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/28/06 10:35 PM 
Hi,

I've posted a patch that resolve a performance problem on DataRow...
(ADO.NET)

see : http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=80075

with this patch, my ported ASP.NET is now at 0.93 second for 1 page (it
was 2s before...)



___
Ce message et les Θventuels documents joints peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles.
Au cas o⋅ il ne vous serait pas destinΘ, nous vous remercions de bien vouloir 
le supprimer et en aviser immΘdiatement l'expΘditeur. Toute utilisation de ce 
message non conforme α sa destination, toute diffusion ou publication, totale 
ou partielle et quel qu'en soit le moyen est formellement interdite.
Les communications sur internet n'Θtant pas sΘcurisΘes, l'intΘgritΘ de ce 
message n'est pas assurΘe et la sociΘtΘ Θmettrice ne peut Ωtre tenue pour 
responsable de son contenu.

___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] [PATCH] properly handle configSections

2006-11-28 Thread Marek Habersack
Hello,

  The attached diff fixes handling for situations where web.config
contains code like:

?xml version=1.0 standalone=yes?
configuration 
  configSections
sectionGroup name=system.web
  section name=neatUpload 
type=Brettle.Web.NeatUpload.ConfigSectionHandler,Brettle.Web.NeatUpload 
allowLocation=true / 
/sectionGroup
   /configSections 
   system.web
 neatUpload useHttpModule=false maxNormalRequestLength=4096 
maxRequestLength=2097151 defaultProvider=FilesystemUploadStorageProvider 
providers
   add name=FilesystemUploadStorageProvider 
type=Brettle.Web.NeatUpload.FilesystemUploadStorageProvider,Brettle.Web.NeatUpload
 tempDirectory=UploadTemp/
  /providers
/neatUpload
   /system.web
/configuration

Current implementation of System.Configuration for the 2.0 runtime will throw 
an 
exception claiming that the neatUpload section is unknown. Configuration code 
does
read the configSections but it mistakenly allocates a new system.web section 
instead
of merging it with the existing one. The diff causes the sections to be 
properly merged
and any custom config sections to be recognized. Please, review

best regards,

marek
Index: SectionInfo.cs
===
--- SectionInfo.cs	(revision 68577)
+++ SectionInfo.cs	(working copy)
@@ -207,6 +207,9 @@
 tr.Close ();*/
 			}
 		}
+		
+		internal override void Merge (ConfigInfo data)
+		{}
 	}
 }
 
Index: ConfigInfo.cs
===
--- ConfigInfo.cs	(revision 68577)
+++ ConfigInfo.cs	(working copy)
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
 		public abstract void WriteConfig (Configuration cfg, XmlWriter writer, ConfigurationSaveMode mode);
 		public abstract void ReadData (Configuration config, XmlTextReader reader, bool overrideAllowed);
 		public abstract void WriteData (Configuration config, XmlWriter writer, ConfigurationSaveMode mode);
+		
+		internal abstract void Merge (ConfigInfo data);
 	}
 }
 
Index: SectionGroupInfo.cs
===
--- SectionGroupInfo.cs	(revision 68577)
+++ SectionGroupInfo.cs	(working copy)
@@ -198,9 +198,9 @@
 
 if (name == section)
 	cinfo = new SectionInfo ();
-else if (name == sectionGroup)
+else if (name == sectionGroup) {
 	cinfo = new SectionGroupInfo ();
-else
+} else
 	ThrowException (Unrecognized element:  + reader.Name, reader);
 	
 cinfo.ReadConfig (cfg, streamName, reader);
@@ -210,6 +210,9 @@
 if (actInfo != null) {
 	if (actInfo.GetType () != cinfo.GetType ())
 		ThrowException (A section or section group named ' + cinfo.Name + ' already exists, reader);
+	// Merge all the new data
+	actInfo.Merge (cinfo);
+	
 	// Make sure that this section is saved in this configuration file:
 	actInfo.StreamName = streamName;
 }
@@ -340,9 +343,33 @@
 if (data != null)
 	return data;
 			}
+			// It might be in the root section group
 			return null;
 		}
 
+		internal override void Merge (ConfigInfo newData)
+		{
+			SectionGroupInfo data = newData as SectionGroupInfo;
+			if (data == null)
+return;
+			ConfigInfo actInfo;
+			if (data.sections != null  data.sections.Count  0)
+foreach (string key in data.sections.AllKeys) {
+	actInfo = sections[key];
+	if (actInfo != null)
+		continue;
+	sections.Add (key, data.sections[key]);
+}
+			
+			if (data.groups != null  data.sections.Count  0)
+foreach (string key in data.groups.AllKeys) {
+	actInfo = groups[key];
+	if (actInfo != null)
+		continue;
+	groups.Add (key, data.groups[key]);
+}
+		}
+		
 		public void WriteRootData (XmlWriter writer, Configuration config, ConfigurationSaveMode mode)
 		{
 			WriteContent (writer, config, mode, false);


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Running under the Mono 2.0 Profile

2006-11-28 Thread Charlie Poole
Hello Mirco, 

Thanks for your suggestions...

 For compatibility someone could implement that environment 
 setting for Mono, but in the meantime you could just generate 
 that app config file when you push the Run under Mono 2.0 
 Profile button on the fly, or is that too absurd? :-P

I've thought of doing that but it creates problems. Most notably,
the last config created would be used the next time somebody
ran nunit from the command line. That could be surprising -
or maybe it's a feature. :-)
 
 Actually, it's not the test-case that decides if it wants 2.0 
 profile or not, it's the application that loads the 
 test-case, nunit in this case.
 So all you need is 2 nunit exe files, one that is linked 
 against 1.0 and one against 2.0, or use the app config trick 
 and use 1.0 exe files instead.

Yes, that's correct. I've considered having two exe's. In fact,
I have two entire installs for NUnit 2.2. I was trying to
move to a simpler deployment. Only having the exe's is
an option, but it seems like a kluge.

 Or is the problem that you can't start a new nunit process 
 for running the test-case? Then this solution would not work.

No - that's a future thing, but not what I'm doing here.

At the meeting, we agreed on a command line switch for mono.exe,
which is probably the simplest for me to use and seems like the
most portable solution. Do I need to do anything to get this 
moving? If it's not available when I release, I'll probably
go with the dual exe approach.

Charlie
 
 --
 Regards,
 
 Mirco 'meebey' Bauer
 
 PGP-Key:
 http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xEEF946C8
 
 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
 Version: 3.12
 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL$ P L++$+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++! 
 O M- V? PS
 PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G++ e h! r-++ y?
 --END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
 



___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] How to compile using App_Code folder

2006-11-28 Thread Piotr Stulinski
Hi
I am struggling to get my site working with 1.2.1 - App_Code
functionality. I have 3 simple pages.

a Class1.cs in my App_Code folder with literally one method:

public static void HelloWorld()
{

return hello world;

}

a Default.aspx.cs

in the Load method i have


Label1.Text = Class1.HelloWorld();

and finally i have the

Default.aspx page with only

Label1 on it.

I have not changed any of the other Visual Studio 2005 settings extra,
i am not sure if i am supposed to? But when i execute it under the
above scenario i get a error:

Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this
request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error.
Error message:
/opt/mono_home/code/Default.aspx.cs(15,23) : error CS0103: The name
`Class1' does not exist in the context of `_Default'


File name: /opt/mono_home/code/Default.aspx

Source File: /opt/mono_home/code/Default.aspx.cs

Line 1: No assembly returned after compilation!?

I am very new to compiling under mono. What i do know is that it works
100% if i dont use the Class1.cs file. So for example if i go

Lavel1.Text = Hello World;

that does work...

Any help or a mini tutorial or something on compiling would be great
doesnt seem to be much info around.

Thanks

Peter
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] How to compile using App_Code folder

2006-11-28 Thread Marek Habersack
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:13:05 +0200, Piotr Stulinski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:

 Hi
 I am struggling to get my site working with 1.2.1 - App_Code
 functionality. I have 3 simple pages.
 
 a Class1.cs in my App_Code folder with literally one method:
 
 public static void HelloWorld()
 {
 
 return hello world;
 
 }
C# doesn't allow for methods defined in the main body of a compilation
unit. Each compilation unit (a .cs or .vb etc file) must contain only
type (class, enum, struct) or namespace declarations which in turn
contain methods. That's issue no 1 with the code above. Issue no 2 is
that your function declares a void (nothing) return type, while it
tries to return a string. Your Class1.cs should look like:

public class Class1
{
public static string HelloWorld()
{
return hello world;
}
}

 
 a Default.aspx.cs
 
 in the Load method i have
 
 
 Label1.Text = Class1.HelloWorld();
 
 and finally i have the
 
 Default.aspx page with only
 
 Label1 on it.
 
 I have not changed any of the other Visual Studio 2005 settings extra,
 i am not sure if i am supposed to? But when i execute it under the
 above scenario i get a error:
 
 Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this
 request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error.
 Error message:
 /opt/mono_home/code/Default.aspx.cs(15,23) : error CS0103: The name
 `Class1' does not exist in the context of `_Default'
That's a correct behavior - due to errors I pointed out above re
Class1.cs

 File name: /opt/mono_home/code/Default.aspx
 
 Source File: /opt/mono_home/code/Default.aspx.cs
 
 Line 1: No assembly returned after compilation!?
 
 I am very new to compiling under mono. What i do know is that it works
 100% if i dont use the Class1.cs file. So for example if i go
 
 Lavel1.Text = Hello World;
 
 that does work...
 
 Any help or a mini tutorial or something on compiling would be great
 doesnt seem to be much info around.
Well, there's nothing mono-specific in compiling C# code, provided your
program is indeed valid C#. Please make the changes I described,
re-test your application and let us know if it worked for you

regards,
marek


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


[Mono-dev] Completion of Mono APIs.

2006-11-28 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello,

I have just blogged about the various APIs that are missing when
trying to run software on Mono:

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2006/Nov-28-1.html

The important bits are the links to the various API calls that are
currently being referenced by 244 applications.

Thanks for Jonathan Pobst for creating an end-to-end solution.   If
it was not for Moma, we would have never gotten this list, except by
advancing one API at a time by brute bugzilla reports.

It is not an easy to use tool, it runs trivially, and best of all
has allowed us to collect the data.   And the whole package experience
is really something that am not used to.

Had we gone with my idea of shipping command line tools, we would
not be anywhere the current state (244 applications reported in 36
hours).

Miguel
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list


Re: [Mono-dev] Completion of Mono APIs.

2006-11-28 Thread Miguel de Icaza
Hello,

 It is not an easy to use tool, it runs trivially, and best of all
 has allowed us to collect the data.   And the whole package experience
 is really something that am not used to.

The above paragraph makes no sense.   That happens when you edit the
text a few times before you send it out.

It should have read:

It is an easy to use tool.

Miguel.
___
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list