[Mono-aspnet-list] Nhibernate3: Failed to convert parameters
Dear all,
(I'm not sure the error is due to NHibernate and not to mono. This cause
double posting: here and on nhibernate forum.)
I setup a small web application to test nHibernate with mono and
postgresql.
I'm facing a problem I can't find a solution. Nhibernate throws an
ArgumentException with message failed to convert parameters.
Here is the stack trace:
System.ArgumentException: failed to convert parameters
at System.Reflection.MonoMethod.Invoke (System.Object obj,
BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder binder,
System.Object[] parameters, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
[0x0] in filename unknown:0
at System.Reflection.MonoProperty.SetValue (System.Object obj,
System.Object value, BindingFlags invokeAttr, System.Reflection.Binder
binder, System.Object[] index, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
[0x0] in filename unknown:0
at System.Reflection.PropertyInfo.SetValue (System.Object obj,
System.Object value, System.Object[] index) [0x0] in filename
unknown:0
at NHibernate.Properties.BasicPropertyAccessor+BasicSetter.Set
(System.Object target, System.Object value) [0x0] in filename
unknown:0
My project is a very simple ASP.NET MVC. The error shows up when I do
session.save:
Product p = new Product { Name = Cool, Id = 0 };
session.Save(p);
tx.Commit();
Product is defined as:
public class Product
{
public virtual int Id { get ; set ; }
public virtual string Name { get ; set ; }
}
With the mapping
class name=Product
id name=Id
generator class=counter /
/id
property name=Name /
/class
The table is correctly created.
create table Product (
Id int4 not null,
Name varchar(255),
primary key (Id)
)
Any idea on why I'm getting this error?
Thanks in advance for your help !
Antoine
--
Antoine Cailliau
___
Mono-aspnet-list mailing list
Mono-aspnet-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
[Mono-aspnet-list] unintentional App_Data external access Apache
Hi All, I deployed a simple web project with ASP.NET MVC on a server running Ubuntu with Apache. I used the Apache Mono Configuration tool, for an Application/ virtual directory: http://go-mono.com/config-mod-mono/. However, surfing to mydomain.com/myapp/App_Data/mydatabase.db downloads my database? www-data (the apache user) has read/write permissions on App_Data, which i think is necessary.. How do I configure this so only the typical static files (i.e. in /Content) can be downloaded? Thanks for any help, Jasper -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/unintentional-App-Data-external-access-Apache-tp3311287p3311287.html Sent from the Mono - ASP.NET mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-aspnet-list mailing list Mono-aspnet-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
Re: [Mono-aspnet-list] `System.Web.Mvc.AuthorizationContext' does not contain a definition for `ActionDescriptor'
Did you Copy Local the MVC related assemblies? I had some problems when moving to asp.net 4.0 under mono, and had to remove all those assemblies from my bin. I think this was one of the errors, but I don't recall for sure. - Jesse On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:18:17 -0800 (PST), orhanveli wrote: any idea? ___ Mono-aspnet-list mailing list Mono-aspnet-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
Re: [Mono-aspnet-list] unintentional App_Data external access Apache
Ok, I think I figured it out. Mono seems to bypass apache Directory containers below the main mono Location. I was able to restrict access with Location /myapp/App_Data Deny from all /Location But not with similar things in a Directory container. Note that the apache documentation warns against using Location containers to restrict filesystem access.. It might even be wise to put this for all App_* folders in the Configuration tool, since users coming from windows might expect that access to these folders is restricted by default, as it says in the ASP.NET documentation, right? It might also be to some mistake in my apache configuration, as I'm not exactly a crack at that stuff. japsai wrote: Hi All, I deployed a simple web project with ASP.NET MVC on a server running Ubuntu with Apache. I used the Apache Mono Configuration tool, for an Application/ virtual directory: http://go-mono.com/config-mod-mono/. However, surfing to mydomain.com/myapp/App_Data/mydatabase.db downloads my database? www-data (the apache user) has read/write permissions on App_Data, which i think is necessary.. How do I configure this so only the typical static files (i.e. in /Content) can be downloaded? Thanks for any help, Jasper -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/unintentional-App-Data-external-access-Apache-tp3311287p3311495.html Sent from the Mono - ASP.NET mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-aspnet-list mailing list Mono-aspnet-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-aspnet-list
[Mono-dev] System.Data.SQLite ado.net provider moving to new home at sqlite.org
System.Data.SQLite - statement from Robert Simposon: http://sqlite.phxsoftware.com/forums/t/2750.aspx From above: I've been in close contact with Dr. Richard Hipp and Shane Harrelson at sqlite.org for the past couple of months. They came to me and offered to take over management of the System.Data.SQLite project. The new home for the provider is now at http://system.data.sqlite.org and I will continue to be involved in its development. I'm both relieved and excited for the future of the project, and it's new home will undoubtedly benefit the community in the long term. System.Data.SQLite at sqlite.org http://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki This is a fork of the popular ADO.NET 4.0 adaptor for SQLite known as System.Data.SQLite. The originator of System.Data.SQLite, Robert Simpson, is aware of this fork, has expressed his approval, and has commit privileges on the new Fossil repository. The SQLite development team intends to maintain System.Data.SQLite moving forward. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Assertion failures when using Moq on Linux/ARM
(My messages to the list seem to keep vanishing. This is the third attempt to send this one. The first two were yesterday and a few hours ago. Might anyone know why they're not working?) On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble clockworksa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on Windows-x86 with Microsoft's CLR and on Linux-x86 with Mono, they fail often (but not always) with an assertion: thunk failed for 0x40368c80 from 0x4f2a20d8 ERROR:mini-arm.c:2579:handle_thunk: assertion failed: (pdata.found == 1) I have been unable so far to extricate the native library to produce a simple test case that reproduces this. However, I have now built Mono 2.8.2 from source for the ARM device and edited in some extra diagnostic output in mini-arm.c. It would appear that the when the failure happens, handle_thunk uses search_thunk_slot to search for an appropriate thunk slot, but every thunk table it considers is too far away from the address it wants to branch from. Every invocation of search_thunk_slot thus takes an early return and cannot create a thunk entry in any of them. Is there someone I can talk to who is familiar with this code, and could advise me on how to address the problem? I imagine I could pore over mini-arm.c for long enough to understand how and when thunk tables are allocated and then maybe I could figure out how to make sure that when memory is allocated for emitting code into that if there's no thunk table in range a new one is created, or something like that. However, I think I'd fare a lot better under advice from someone familiar with it. Is it rude just to directly email the authors (Paolo Molaro, Dietmar Maurer) who are recorded in the file? Regards, Weeble. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Assertion failures when using Moq on Linux/ARM
(Sorry if the formatting is a bit wonky here. I have repeatedly tried to send this message to the list by email, but it keeps vanishing. I'm copying and pasting it into the go-mono forum instead. If anyone can help me figure out why my emails are vanishing, please let me know.) On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble clockworksa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on Windows-x86 with Microsoft's CLR and on Linux-x86 with Mono, they fail often (but not always) with an assertion: thunk failed for 0x40368c80 from 0x4f2a20d8 ERROR:mini-arm.c:2579:handle_thunk: assertion failed: (pdata.found == 1) I have been unable so far to extricate the native library to produce a simple test case that reproduces this. However, I have now built Mono 2.8.2 from source for the ARM device and edited in some extra diagnostic output in mini-arm.c. It would appear that the when the failure happens, handle_thunk uses search_thunk_slot to search for an appropriate thunk slot, but every thunk table it considers is too far away from the address it wants to branch from. Every invocation of search_thunk_slot thus takes an early return and cannot create a thunk entry in any of them. Is there someone I can talk to who is familiar with this code, and could advise me on how to address the problem? I imagine I could pore over mini-arm.c for long enough to understand how and when thunk tables are allocated and then maybe I could figure out how to make sure that when memory is allocated for emitting code into that if there's no thunk table in range a new one is created, or something like that. However, I think I'd fare a lot better under advice from someone familiar with it. Is it rude just to directly email the authors (Paolo Molaro, Dietmar Maurer) who are recorded in the file? Regards, Weeble. -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Assertion-failures-when-using-Moq-on-Linux-ARM-tp3310641p3310641.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] About System.Core.dll System.Security.Cryptography and Cng
Le 2011-02-17 à 07:56, Juho Vähä-Herttua juh...@gmail.com a écrit : Hi, Sorry for spamming the list a bit, but I think this is quite big chunk of code so it's worth to note 16.2.2011 21:55, Juho V�h�-Herttua kirjoitti: I started from the most simple one and added some enumerations that are required by the classes, a patch can be seen in my github tree. They should go without any testing, I checked the values match values in .NET, but if someone else wants to check I wouldn't mind. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/4b0866fb10774644e2976a439c27889f720de12a Next I should move to the Serializable classes CngKeyBlobFormat and CngProvider that are very similar to CngAlgorithm and CngAlgorithmGroup. I can probably also get the needed unit tests from there. CngKeyCreationParameters, CngProperty, CngPropertyCollection and CngUIPolicy are also very simple classes but need their own unit tests. These classes are now also in GitHub in my repository. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/f148a7641aae2c7a1d3ea66ebf5aff82ef17adc0 The corresponding unit tests can be found in another commit. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/400f52aba8e0daae23d5e04175fc98ed8f3070e2 Only thing worth to mention was the CngProperty.GetHashCode() method, it should be similar to the .NET method and I figured it out by creating a lot of CngProperty objects and changing the constructor parameters a bit one at the time. I got different GetHashCode() values on .NET and Mono, but that might have been some language issue on the String.GetHashCode(). It's important that GetHashCode varies on the same fields/properties (than MS implementation). However having the same value is not needed - in fact very few (and simple) Mono types will have identical results with MS. I'll give you guys time to review all this and after getting some comments I will start working on the ECDiffieHellman* and ECDsa* classes that will most likely take a bit more time to finish. I'll check them soon. Thanks Sebastien ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] About System.Core.dll System.Security.Cryptography and Cng
Hi, Sorry for spamming the list a bit, but I think this is quite big chunk of code so it's worth to note 16.2.2011 21:55, Juho Vähä-Herttua kirjoitti: I started from the most simple one and added some enumerations that are required by the classes, a patch can be seen in my github tree. They should go without any testing, I checked the values match values in .NET, but if someone else wants to check I wouldn't mind. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/4b0866fb10774644e2976a439c27889f720de12a Next I should move to the Serializable classes CngKeyBlobFormat and CngProvider that are very similar to CngAlgorithm and CngAlgorithmGroup. I can probably also get the needed unit tests from there. CngKeyCreationParameters, CngProperty, CngPropertyCollection and CngUIPolicy are also very simple classes but need their own unit tests. These classes are now also in GitHub in my repository. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/f148a7641aae2c7a1d3ea66ebf5aff82ef17adc0 The corresponding unit tests can be found in another commit. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/400f52aba8e0daae23d5e04175fc98ed8f3070e2 Only thing worth to mention was the CngProperty.GetHashCode() method, it should be similar to the .NET method and I figured it out by creating a lot of CngProperty objects and changing the constructor parameters a bit one at the time. I got different GetHashCode() values on .NET and Mono, but that might have been some language issue on the String.GetHashCode(). I'll give you guys time to review all this and after getting some comments I will start working on the ECDiffieHellman* and ECDsa* classes that will most likely take a bit more time to finish. Juho ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Porting to a other architecture
Hello, my name is benjamin maes, As thesis assignment I need to port mono too a blackfin DSP processer (on embedded linux (uclinux)). Although this thesis is just interested in how it is done in principe by writing a sort of tutorial. In this thesis I will only try to let work a hello world example. I am interested to people who have expierence in porting mono to a other architecture, what the best step plan is. (I know their are documents on mono-project, although sometimes it's a bit vague) When you know that I only need a hello world program too work, what would be the best way to find out what I would need to port of the existing code. I thought on looking at the IL of a hello world, and looking at the ecma-notes, would that be a correct way? I thank you for every response I would get from you, Regards, benjamin ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] WCF and TransportCredentialOnly
Hello, I don't think you really read my message. Atsushi Eno (2011/02/17 0:36), rjhdakota wrote: I am having what I believe is the same problem. You say basic authentication is working, any examples? Our project needs the ability to authorize a connection, and currently we cannot. Here is the code that works on Windows but allows anyone to connect on MONO: Public Sub WCFStartService() ' http service, one-way Dim binding = New BasicHttpBinding(System.ServiceModel.BasicHttpSecurityMode.TransportCredentialOnly) binding.Security.Transport.ClientCredentialType = HttpClientCredentialType.Basic Dim address = New Uri(http://192.168.1.129:8080;) ServiceHost = New ServiceHost(GetType(HelloService)) ServiceHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.UserNamePasswordValidationMode = Security.UserNamePasswordValidationMode.Custom ServiceHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.CustomUserNamePasswordValidator = New CustomUserNameValidator ServiceHost.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IHelloService), binding, address) ServiceHost.Open() End Sub Public Class CustomUserNameValidator Inherits IdentityModel.Selectors.UserNamePasswordValidator Public Overrides Sub Validate(ByVal userName As String, ByVal password As String) If Nothing = userName OrElse Nothing = password Then Throw New ArgumentNullException() End If If Not (userName = user AndAlso password = pass) Then ' This throws an informative fault to the client. Throw New FaultException(Unknown Username or Incorrect Password) ' When you do not want to throw an infomative fault to the client, ' throw the following exception. ' Throw New SecurityTokenException(Unknown Username or Incorrect Password) End If End Sub End Class ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] About System.Core.dll System.Security.Cryptography and Cng
Hi, Thanks for your comments, they clarified a lot. On 16.2.2011, at 18.12, Sebastien Pouliot wrote: Anyway let's do baby-steps and start with what you already have (and unit tests) then we can look at what's missing :-) I started from the most simple one and added some enumerations that are required by the classes, a patch can be seen in my github tree. They should go without any testing, I checked the values match values in .NET, but if someone else wants to check I wouldn't mind. https://github.com/juhovh/mono/commit/4b0866fb10774644e2976a439c27889f720de12a Next I should move to the Serializable classes CngKeyBlobFormat and CngProvider that are very similar to CngAlgorithm and CngAlgorithmGroup. I can probably also get the needed unit tests from there. CngKeyCreationParameters, CngProperty, CngPropertyCollection and CngUIPolicy are also very simple classes but need their own unit tests. Then ECDiffieHellman, ECDiffieHellmanPublicKey and ECDsa classes are just abstract wrappers for the actual Cng classes. Finally CngKey, ECDiffieHellmanCng, ECDiffieHellmanCngPublicKey and ECDsaCng all might need to depend on the actual elliptic curve implementation and are quite much trickier. I'll probably get back to it later, but if the first patch seems ok I'll continue forward. Of course any comments or suggestions are welcome. Juho smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 2.8.2 GC
I run my mono applications by using mono --gc=sgen app.exe is this correct usage for sgen GC? ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] About System.Core.dll System.Security.Cryptography and Cng
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 17:52 +0200, Juho Vähä-Herttua wrote: 16.2.2011 15:39, Sebastien Pouliot kirjoitti: Hello Juho, On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 12:19 +0200, Juho Vähä-Herttua wrote: Hi, I have implemented elliptic curve cryptography (ECC) algorithms on .NET by using the BigInteger struct from .NET 4.0. On Fp curves they seem to be considerably faster (about twice the speed) than the BouncyCastle library http://www.bouncycastle.org/csharp/ I used for comparison. This is probably mostly because of the speed of the BigInteger implementation, because I don't see much difference in the actual arithmetics. I have also implemented most of the Cng related enumerations in System.Security.Cryptography iirc we already part them (or part of them in our git repository) I saw CngAlgorithm and CngAlgorithmGroup, those are only 2 of the 23 classes I would need (if I counted them right). yep, looks right https://github.com/mono/mono/tree/master/mcs/class/System.Core/System.Security.Cryptography and reverse engineered some ECDiffieHellmanCng class functionality where the documentation is not clear. reverse engineered means a lot of things to different people. Can you elaborate on this and ensure it's in compliance with: http://www.mono-project.com/Contributing#Important_Rules In this context I meant trial-and-error and Microsoft documentation, the ECDiffieHellmanCng class should just be a wrapper to the native Cng API anyway, so I doubt decompilation would help anything. True, and I'm glad you did not have to decompile anything to find that out ;-) I'll review those rules and my code and try to make sure it complies with all the requirements. Thanks :) I could send these upstream to Mono, but since there are a lot of files to be added, I'd like to know how should I proceed. That would be great :) and a patch will be fine (for review). But first please read both: http://www.mono-project.com/Contributing and http://www.mono-project.com/Coding_Guidelines Thank you for the links, I've tried to follow the code style I have seen in other Mono classes, but I'll go through the guidelines while reviewing the code myself. Great should I write some tests before they can be accepted? Yes, definitively! Unit tests (nunit) are required to ensure it works correctly (on both MS and Mono runtimes) and ensure no future regressions. Ok, I'll have to look into this after I've finished the required functionality in the code. Does Novell have some copyright policy I should consider? Releasing them with the MIT license shouldn't be a problem. Our class libraries are MIT.X11 licensed, so as long as you can release this code with that license there should not be any problem. Ok. I also have some questions I might need advice with. The Cng classes have functions and properties like http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb298399.aspx that return a SafeNCryptSecretHandle. This should be a handle to the native cryptography API, but it's completely useless in Mono. Since SafeNCryptSecretHandle is not implemented, I just dropped those methods completely. How should I proceed in this kind of case? The best way* would be to stub the missing SafeNCryptSecretHandle and throw NotSupportedException inside the Cng* properties that access it. * this would avoid runtime exception for code compiled against MS.NET (e.g. a call could be present without being required to execute properly). Another thing I had to do is that I am throwing exceptions in case someone tries persistent key storage, all the keys in my implementation are ephemeral. (but can be serialized into a file and made persistent that way) Since Mono is not using the real key storage of .NET I suppose this should be ok? While we're not using the same key storage as .NET we do support keypair persistence. Right now this is publicly* exposed thru CspParameters which do not match well with CngKey. Anyway let's do baby-steps and start with what you already have (and unit tests) then we can look at what's missing :-) * while Mono.Security expose this more directly internally Thanks! Sebastien ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] F# in Mono 2.10
Hi, In 2.10 release notes, I can read: For F# we ship the fsc command line compiler and the fsi interactive shell. When I made the F# packages for Linux a few months ago, there was a decision (with the F# team) to name the commands fsharpc and fsharpi. The main reason for this was a conflict with Scala packages. They already have command fsc, wich means Fast Scala Compiler. What do you think about it? I haven't tried Mono 2.10 yet, but it looks really great. Thanks for the good work! -- Laurent ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Assertion failures when using Moq on Linux/ARM
(Sorry if this goes through twice. I sent it yesterday and it didn't seem to appear on the list.) On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble clockworksa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on Windows-x86 with Microsoft's CLR and on Linux-x86 with Mono, they fail often (but not always) with an assertion: thunk failed for 0x40368c80 from 0x4f2a20d8 ERROR:mini-arm.c:2579:handle_thunk: assertion failed: (pdata.found == 1) I have been unable so far to extricate the native library to produce a simple test case that reproduces this. However, I have now built Mono 2.8.2 from source for the ARM device and edited in some extra diagnostic output in mini-arm.c. It would appear that the when the failure happens, handle_thunk uses search_thunk_slot to search for an appropriate thunk slot, but every thunk table it considers is too far away from the address it wants to branch from. Every invocation of search_thunk_slot thus takes an early return and cannot create a thunk entry in any of them. Is there someone I can talk to who is familiar with this code, and could advise me on how to address the problem? I imagine I could pore over mini-arm.c for long enough to understand how and when thunk tables are allocated and then maybe I could figure out how to make sure that when memory is allocated for emitting code into that if there's no thunk table in range a new one is created, or something like that. However, I think I'd fare a lot better under advice from someone familiar with it. Is it rude just to directly email the authors (Paolo Molaro, Dietmar Maurer) who are recorded in the file? Regards, Weeble. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Assertion failures when using Moq on Linux/ARM
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Weeble clockworksa...@gmail.com wrote: I'm currently running Mono 2.6.7 on an ARM box (a Sheevaplug) running Linux. When I try to run unit tests that work on Windows-x86 with Microsoft's CLR and on Linux-x86 with Mono, they fail often (but not always) with an assertion: thunk failed for 0x40368c80 from 0x4f2a20d8 ERROR:mini-arm.c:2579:handle_thunk: assertion failed: (pdata.found == 1) I have been unable so far to extricate the native library to produce a simple test case that reproduces this. However, I have now built Mono 2.8.2 from source for the ARM device and edited in some extra diagnostic output in mini-arm.c. It would appear that the when the failure happens, handle_thunk uses search_thunk_slot to search for an appropriate thunk slot, but every thunk table it considers is too far away from the address it wants to branch from. Every invocation of search_thunk_slot thus takes an early return and cannot create a thunk entry in any of them. Is there someone I can talk to who is familiar with this code, and could advise me on how to address the problem? I imagine I could pore over mini-arm.c for long enough to understand how and when thunk tables are allocated and then maybe I could figure out how to make sure that when memory is allocated for emitting code into that if there's no thunk table in range a new one is created, or something like that. However, I think I'd fare a lot better under advice from someone familiar with it. Is it rude just to directly email the authors (Paolo Molaro, Dietmar Maurer) who are recorded in the file? Regards, Weeble. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] porting too blackfin
hello, my name is benjamin maes, and I am trying to port the mono-compiler too the blackfin architecture.. Today I begun to the mono/arch folder. I tried to find some clues how to find al details on my datasheet of blackfin en to coded them in. When I look too two diffrent mono/arch types, I rather don't see semalarities between them, too build my own, in paralel to these ones. The documentation, doent really goes in detail about what ( minimal) parts their has to be in it, to get the job done. Can somebody give me guidance how it is coded up? -- mvg, benjamin ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] WCF and TransportCredentialOnly
I'm also experiencing a similar issue. My http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/WCF-ServiceSecurityContext-td3307343.html post is in the general forum. -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/WCF-and-TransportCredentialOnly-tp3307532p3309153.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Porting to a other architecture
Hi, A somewhat out-of-date document is here: http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:Runtime:Documentation:MiniPorting http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:Runtime:Documentation:MiniPorting Zoltan On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:13 PM, benjamin maes benjaminm...@gmail.comwrote: Hello, my name is benjamin maes, As thesis assignment I need to port mono too a blackfin DSP processer (on embedded linux (uclinux)). Although this thesis is just interested in how it is done in principe by writing a sort of tutorial. In this thesis I will only try to let work a hello world example. I am interested to people who have expierence in porting mono to a other architecture, what the best step plan is. (I know their are documents on mono-project, although sometimes it's a bit vague) When you know that I only need a hello world program too work, what would be the best way to find out what I would need to port of the existing code. I thought on looking at the IL of a hello world, and looking at the ecma-notes, would that be a correct way? I thank you for every response I would get from you, Regards, benjamin ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] Mono 2.8.2 GC
Yes, it is. What were you expecting to see? On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 8:02 PM, huseyin cakir huseyin.caki...@gmail.comwrote: I run my mono applications by using mono --gc=sgen app.exe is this correct usage for sgen GC? ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] porting too blackfin
mono/arch only have codegen macros. You want to look into mono/mini. I suggest looking into x86, amd64 or arm ports as those are the best maintained ones. On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:22 PM, benjamin maes benjaminm...@gmail.comwrote: hello, my name is benjamin maes, and I am trying to port the mono-compiler too the blackfin architecture.. Today I begun to the mono/arch folder. I tried to find some clues how to find al details on my datasheet of blackfin en to coded them in. When I look too two diffrent mono/arch types, I rather don't see semalarities between them, too build my own, in paralel to these ones. The documentation, doent really goes in detail about what ( minimal) parts their has to be in it, to get the job done. Can somebody give me guidance how it is coded up? -- mvg, benjamin ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-dev] sgen garbage collector/unmanaged resources/multi-thread issue
Hi Matteo, I suppose you release memory on finalizers. Sgen has a longer cycle to finalize objects than boehm. On why extra retention is happening on linux is strange and could be a bug. Can you provide a test case that shows this behavior? On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:08 PM, matteo tesser matteo.tes...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Rodrigo, OK, taking or not taking into consideration memory pressure is a runtime's implementation choice: if you consider memory pressure, the runtime will be more reactive to memory usage, in the latter case no, but unreferenced objects should be freed sooner or later. I did an additional test: I counted the live object instances of the object type which references the unmanaged resources over time: while in windows and os x the live instances oscillate between 10K and 60K, in linux the live instances arrived to 20 milions. it seems that the GC does not realize that so many objects have been allocated. Are 20 milions objects still a number that should not trigger the GC ? Probably the problem is not related to unmanaged memory but the particular structure of my problem highlights a defect. Matteo On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera kump...@gmail.com wrote: Mono doesn't take memory pressure into account. This is probably what's happening. On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 3:54 PM, matteo tesser matteo.tes...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a concurrent programming test which during 5-10 minutes creates and releases a lot of objects which use unmanaged memory. Every managed object, respectively allocates/deallocates the unmanaged memory using Marshal.AllocHGlobal and Marshall.FreeHGlobal methods and uses GC.AddMemoryPressure/GC.RemoveMemoryPressure to tell to the garbage collector the presence of the additional memory. I experienced some memory problems on linux, so I did several tests: 1) In linux machine with openSuse 11.3 64bit dual core with mono 2.8.2, the program launched with mono --gc=sgen eats 4GB of RAM in about two minutes (see attached screenshot). If I launch the test by specifying the use of boehm gc, the memory is still consumed but at smaller rate. I tried the test also with mono 2.10p3 and the behavior is the same (also using MONO_GC_PARAMS=stack-mark=precise) 2) In Windows/.NET the memory footprint of the program is constant on time: 80MB, 3) in a dual core mac os x ( with mono 2.10p2) the behavior is the same as windows. 4) In a Virtual Machine with linux openSuse 11.3 32bit and 1 processor , mono 2.10p3 the test works fine: the memory footprint is constant at 50MB My conclusion is that the problem is restricted to the linux / multi-thread case. Are you aware of such issues on sgen? I tried to build-up a simple code reproducing the problem but I did not managed to do it with a simple test case, in case are you interested in a binary test case? Thanks, Matteo ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Third Party dll error, member function returns null, but works in .NET
Hi, I have been fighting this issue for a couple weeks now. I have a small test program which works in .net, but when running in mono, i get a System.NullReferenceException. I have attached my test program, including the necessary third party files. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, as i am at a loss as to what else to try. Proper expected output http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/file/n3311549/ProperOutput.png What i am getting when running in mono http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/file/n3311549/MonoOutput.png Here is my source http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/file/n3311549/DocMgrTest.zip DocMgrTest.zip Thanks Andrew -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/Third-Party-dll-error-member-function-returns-null-but-works-in-NET-tp3311549p3311549.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
[Mono-dev] Mono GC 2.8.2: embedding
I am trying to embed the sgen libraries (on Snow Leopard) but receiving this error at runtime: *dyld: Symbol not found: _MONO_DEBUGGER__debugger_info* * Referenced from: /Library/Frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/2.8.2/lib/libmonosgen-2.0.0.dylib * * Expected in: dynamic lookup* Linker flags: -pthread -L/Library/Frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/Current/lib -lmonosgen-2.0 -lpthread -rpath@loader_path /../Libraries # otool -L InitMono.dylib InitMono.dylib: @loader_path/../Libraries/InitMono.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) /Library/Frameworks/Mono.framework/Versions/2.8.2/lib/libmonosgen-2.0.0.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 111.1.4) /System/Library/Frameworks/Cocoa.framework/Versions/A/Cocoa (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 12.0.0) /usr/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) /usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 227.0.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreFoundation.framework/Versions/A/CoreFoundation (compatibility version 150.0.0, current version 476.19.0) /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Foundation (compatibility version 300.0.0, current version 677.26.0) Of course changing the -lmonosgen-2.0 to -lmono-2.0 and everything works as expected. Any suggestions on how to fix the symbol not found for embedding the sgen library are greatly appreciated. Or if there is a different means to embed please let me know. Thanks, Duane ___ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
Re: [Mono-list] WCF - ServiceSecurityContext
All what I know is that it worked for monotouch. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605795 Atsushi Eno (2011/02/17 0:54), augustwest wrote: Thank you Atsushi. I can't seem to find any good samples or information that demonstrates what is required in mono to make the basic authentication work utilizing the BasicHttpBinding (most likely using the custom validators). Do you, or anyone out there, have any good samples? Currently, I'm trying something along these lines and can't seem to get them to fire when the client invoke a service call. selfHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.UserNamePasswordValidationMode = System.ServiceModel.Security.UserNamePasswordValidationMode.Custom; selfHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.CustomUserNamePasswordValidator = new CustomValidator(); selfHost.Description.Endpoints[0].Contract.ProtectionLevel = System.Net.Security.ProtectionLevel.None; ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] WCF - ServiceSecurityContext
I am having what I believe is the same problem. You say basic authentication is working, any examples? Our project needs the ability to authorize a connection, and currently we cannot. Here is the code that works on Windows but allows anyone to connect on MONO: Public Sub WCFStartService() ' http service, one-way Dim binding = New BasicHttpBinding(System.ServiceModel.BasicHttpSecurityMode.TransportCredentialOnly) binding.Security.Transport.ClientCredentialType = HttpClientCredentialType.Basic Dim address = New Uri(http://192.168.1.129:8080;) ServiceHost = New ServiceHost(GetType(HelloService)) ServiceHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.UserNamePasswordValidationMode = Security.UserNamePasswordValidationMode.Custom ServiceHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.CustomUserNamePasswordValidator = New CustomUserNameValidator ServiceHost.AddServiceEndpoint(GetType(IHelloService), binding, address) ServiceHost.Open() End Sub Public Class CustomUserNameValidator Inherits IdentityModel.Selectors.UserNamePasswordValidator Public Overrides Sub Validate(ByVal userName As String, ByVal password As String) If Nothing = userName OrElse Nothing = password Then Throw New ArgumentNullException() End If If Not (userName = user AndAlso password = pass) Then ' This throws an informative fault to the client. Throw New FaultException(Unknown Username or Incorrect Password) ' When you do not want to throw an infomative fault to the client, ' throw the following exception. ' Throw New SecurityTokenException(Unknown Username or Incorrect Password) End If End Sub End Class -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/WCF-ServiceSecurityContext-tp3307343p3309204.html Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Can't build NUnit testing project
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alexander M. Batishchev abatishc...@godfather.net.ru wrote: Hi, everybody. I have a complex solution (developed under Windows, deployed under GNU\Linux) with a number of unit-testing projects, using NUnit 2.9.3. Here's a reference from project: Reference Include=nunit.framework, Version=2.9.3.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=96d09a1eb7f44a77, processorArchitecture=MSIL SpecificVersionFalse/SpecificVersion HintPath..\..\..\..\..\Program Files\NUnit 2.9.3\bin\net-4.0\nunit.framework.dll/HintPath /Reference I downloaded and built NUnit 2.9.3 from source: $ xbuild solutions/MonoDevelop/NUnit.Framework.sln /p:Configuration=Release and installed into GAC: $ gacutil /i solutions/MonoDevelop/bin/Release/nunit.framework.dll $ gacutil /l nunit.framework The following assemblies are installed into the GAC: nunit.framework, Version=2.9.3.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=96d09a1eb7f44a77 Number of items = 1 and deleted local mono nunit installation: $ rm /usr/lib/mono/2.0/nunit* $ rm /usr/lib/mono/4.0/nunit* but when I try to build my solution: $ xbuild MySolution.sln | grep error : error CS0006: Metadata file `/usr/lib/mono/2.0/nunit.framework.dll' could not be found What do I wrong? The GAC is for resolving assemblies at run-time, not compile time. This is true on .NET too. http://monodevelop.com/FAQ#I_added_an_assembly_to_the_GAC.2c_why_doesn't_it_appear_in_the_assemblies_list_when_I_try_to_add_a_reference_in_a_MonoDevelop_project.3f The reason you get the specific error you do is because you removed the compile-time version of the assemblies pointed to by the pkconfig file but did not update or remove the pkgconfig file. -- Michael Hutchinson http://mjhutchinson.com ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] WCF - ServiceSecurityContext
I noticed that monotouch stuff is not about service stuff and the service stack got not working behind the huge HTTP channel listener refactoring last year. Now it is working in git master and 2.10 branch. Note that ServiceSecurityContext still never worked (and it still doesn't). The entire ServiceAuthorizationManager stuff is out of scope of our implementation. Atsushi Eno (2011/02/17 12:33), Atsushi Eno wrote: All what I know is that it worked for monotouch. https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=605795 Atsushi Eno (2011/02/17 0:54), augustwest wrote: Thank you Atsushi. I can't seem to find any good samples or information that demonstrates what is required in mono to make the basic authentication work utilizing the BasicHttpBinding (most likely using the custom validators). Do you, or anyone out there, have any good samples? Currently, I'm trying something along these lines and can't seem to get them to fire when the client invoke a service call. selfHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.UserNamePasswordValidationMode = System.ServiceModel.Security.UserNamePasswordValidationMode.Custom; selfHost.Credentials.UserNameAuthentication.CustomUserNamePasswordValidator = new CustomValidator(); selfHost.Description.Endpoints[0].Contract.ProtectionLevel = System.Net.Security.ProtectionLevel.None; ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
