Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs
and, according to that document, If any of the method's formal arguments are structs, the method will not be inlined. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndotnet/html/highperfmanagedapps.asp Uhm, now thinking of it, if a method/property is inlined, what happens when the API changes? So when you use Rectangle, and the setter of Width is changed, won't your program still used the obsolete version of Rectangle.set_With? Or am I thinking totally wrong? The inlining is runtime feature. Every time You restart Your application, the progarms are recompiled from the CIL (and any optimizations/inlining is performed) And You are propably not able to replace assembly during one program execution :) What You have to remember is rthat the compilation is performed twice: once when compiling from high-level language (C#, for example) to CIL, second time when the program executes and the CIL is compiled to native code. Inlining is perfomed during second compilation. -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] Reply to address
Probably it is you MUA configuration issue, my client is setting reply address correctly. Altough I didn't see any Reply tag in the header. And what e-mail client You are using? Mozilla Thunderbird uses from aadress for reply... -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] inlining of methods using structs
You would not have to do anything. All small methods that do not contain complex stuff like loops or exception handling would be inlined. Instant factor 4 speed boost :-) and, according to that document, If any of the method's formal arguments are structs, the method will not be inlined. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dndotnet/html/highperfmanagedapps.asp -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] Any interest in a new open source project?
I have done a great deal of work on this project, all in Visual Studio .NET in C#. I want to make it open source so that others can help add code to support other DB servers besides just MS SQL Server. I started the project with extensibility and multiple database server backends in mind. Is there a great deal of interest in helping these classes grow and mature? I am planning on putting the source up on Novells sourceforge if people are willing to use/contribute. - Andrew Arnott Andrew, I am sure there will be great interest in such a project, juding from the large number of Object-Relationel Mappers. As far as I know most are proprietary. I have put some effort into finding a suitable solution but no acceptable free solutions exists (I could not find any. Please prove me wrong). I have worked a little on something that sounds quite similar to what you are describing. I would very much like to see what you have produced so far, and if we are indeed persuing the same goal I will be willing to help with the creation of a free solution. I'm also about start a non-profit project where I want to use an OPF. I did make a list from libraries present in http://SourceForge.net/ So far I have managed to review only Gentle.Net (Which didn't satisfy me) So, could You please share You findings about OPF-s? You might make my life much easier :) Also, I'm willing to share my findings about the ones You didn't evaluate... And to any other in list: Could You plase share You knowledge about diffrent free OPF-s. If I do not find one that satisfies me, I'm thinking to roll my own one... Or, if there is one to be satisfying, I would gladly join the team. P.S. Note to the list adnministrator: Is there any reasons why the reply-to address is not set to the list? I usually want to reply to the list... And it is tedious to do recipient clean-up every time I make Reply All -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] Any interest in a new open source project?
I'm also about start a non-profit project where I want to use an OPF. I did make a list from libraries present in http://SourceForge.net/ So far I have managed to review only Gentle.Net (Which didn't satisfy me) So, could You please share You findings about OPF-s? You might make my life much easier :) Well, I must say that I never did any thorough evaluations. I tend to get frustrated with a many of the frameworks rather quickly, because they often only allow you to download timelimited and/or crippled demoversions. Well, my budget is too small to buy something (Actually, the budget is exaclty 0 - My time and hardware I have do not count). So, I haven't even looked at non-free solutions... But if You have good budget, I would suggest to look at the Borland's ECO. You have to buy Borland C# builder Architect edition to get that (Or Delphi 8 Architect). I have not worked with ECO, but I did try the Bold (AFAIK, ECO is reimplemntation of Bold). Bold seemed to be very reasonable OPF implementation. -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] missing native feel ?
That is, what I mean, with best integration in the system, so that there existing a native-feeling by using .net-programs. The problem with giving it a native feel is that it destroys one of the objectives of Mono...to be able to take a .Net program from Windows and just run it. Why so? You can make mono to understand two different (binary) formats: the MS one and the Mono native one. So, MS compiled programs would run fine under mono... But the reverse would not be true. So, the mono would need to compile into two different formats: mono native and MS compatible. The format differences could be minimal (like few additional bytes at the start of file) -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] mono site not shown in IE?
The former site of mono was shown with the same setup. Maybe there is a strange behavior of proxy server ISA which is not controlled by me. In fact, the html is not blank but with blank body (see below). Regards. That's what expected AFAIK. For some reason, Your IE does not understand META refresh tag... Maybe You have disabled it? meta http-equiv=refresh content=0; url=/about/index.html But for site maker, maybe it would be good idea to include some link in the body to help out those whose brause do not understand meta refresh? -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] Re: Mono 1.0 has been released. (Gert Kello)
IMHO, this is a flaw in './gtk-sharp-1.0/sample/rsvg/Makefile.am'. It seems to miss '../../art/art-sharp.dll' in 'assemblies'. You may try the following patch to solve the problem. Tried this and seems to be working. :) Funny. I tried to modify the makefile directly to include art-sharp.dll in assemblies. But this didn't work.. (I know, this would have been overwritten during next ./configure ). Propably I did some mistake... BTW. Could some list admin be so kind and modify the list settings so that replies would go directly to list, not to sender? It's quite tedious... -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 1.0 has been released.
Mono 1.0 has been released, get your packages: http://www.mono-project.com/downloads/index.html Hi. I was unable to build gtk-sharp from the tarball (Debian unstable). The error was: Making all in rsvg make[3]: Entering directory `/home/gert/mono_1.0/gtk-sharp-1.0/sample/rsvg' /usr/local/bin/mcs /out:svghelloworld.exe ./svghelloworld.cs /r:../../glib/glib-sharp.dll /r:../../pango/pango-sharp.dll /r:../../atk/atk-sharp.dll /r:../../gdk/gdk-sharp.dll /r:../../gtk/gtk-sharp.dll /r:../../rsvg/rsvg-sharp.dll ** (/usr/local/lib/mono/1.0/mcs.exe:3274): WARNING **: Could not find assembly art-sharp, references from /home/gert/mono_1.0/gtk-sharp-1.0/sample/rsvg/../../rsvg/rsvg-sharp.dll (assemblyref_index=3) Major/Minor: 1,0 Build: 0,0 Token: 35e10195dab3c99f ** (/usr/local/lib/mono/1.0/mcs.exe:3274): WARNING **: Could not find assembly art-sharp, references from /home/gert/mono_1.0/gtk-sharp-1.0/sample/rsvg/../../rsvg/rsvg-sharp.dll (assemblyref_index=3) Major/Minor: 1,0 Build: 0,0 Token: 35e10195dab3c99f error CS0006: Cannot find assembly `../../rsvg/rsvg-sharp.dll' Log: Compilation failed: 1 error(s), 0 warnings (Well, actually I was able to make it with make install :) ) -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] Mono 1.0 has been released.
I had the same problem until I set MONO_PATH to gtk-sharp and gecko-sharp directories: export MONO_PATH=/usr/lib/mono/gtk-sharp:/usr/lib/mono/gecko-sharp (or wherever the libs are installed) Well, doing make install as a root was simpler :) (As I figured out that once the assemblies are in GAC, everything works) Uhh... How could Your solution help as the only place where the art-sharp.dll was present was the gtk-sharp build folder? (~/mono_1.0/gtk-sharp-1.0 in my case) -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] gtk-sharp CVS build failing
I'm getting this same error on both FC2 and Debian Unstable. mono and gtk-sharp source was gotten from CVS. I'm getting the same error on NetBSD with mono 0.97 and Gtk# 0.99. Same here on Debian unstable. Also noticed that building libgdiplus gives many errors like ../libtool: line 3975: test: : integer expression expected No idea whether they are related or not... -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Mono-list] compiling for mono
I have a 3rd party component that I use on my .net sites, and I would like to know if there is a way to compile the component for use within my Mono applications? (obviously this pre-supposes getting the source code from the vendor, but they have already expressed an interest in getting doing this). It depends what kind of features does this component use. If all of them are implemented in mono, You should be able to use this component even without recompiling under mono, AFAIK :) -- Gert smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
