[Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Please be assured that I'm not poking fun at mono, or Linux. I use Windows because I have to, and I use Linux because I want to. I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist for mono? I can build an application using Visual Studio, and then port it to mono without a lot of trouble, but every time I've tried to *start* an application using mono, I end up frustrated and quit. I just downloaded the latest version, thinking that I'd be pleasantly surprised this time, but monodevelop still seems like little more than a fairly smart code editor. Surely, there must be a mono equivalent to Visual Studio somewhere, but I haven't found it yet. Something with a visual designer, and Intellisense-type help, and so on. Can someone point me in the right direction? For a change, I'd like to be able to create something on my Linux machines, then port it to Windows, instead of the other way around. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
You should try MonoDevelop. It doesn't have many features as Visual Studio, but its development is getting faster every day. www.monodevelop.com Regards, Juan C. Olivares On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please be assured that I'm not poking fun at mono, or Linux. I use > Windows because I have to, and I use Linux because I want to. > > I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to > Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow > getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can > use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist > for mono? > > I can build an application using Visual Studio, and then port it to mono > without a lot of trouble, but every time I've tried to *start* an > application using mono, I end up frustrated and quit. I just downloaded > the latest version, thinking that I'd be pleasantly surprised this time, > but monodevelop still seems like little more than a fairly smart code > editor. > > Surely, there must be a mono equivalent to Visual Studio somewhere, but > I haven't found it yet. Something with a visual designer, and > Intellisense-type help, and so on. Can someone point me in the right > direction? > > For a change, I'd like to be able to create something on my Linux > machines, then port it to Windows, instead of the other way around. > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 18:46 -0700, Jerry Houston wrote: > Please be assured that I'm not poking fun at mono, or Linux. I use > Windows because I have to, and I use Linux because I want to. > > I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to > Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow > getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can > use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist > for mono? > > I can build an application using Visual Studio, and then port it to mono > without a lot of trouble, but every time I've tried to *start* an > application using mono, I end up frustrated and quit. I just downloaded > the latest version, thinking that I'd be pleasantly surprised this time, > but monodevelop still seems like little more than a fairly smart code > editor. > > Surely, there must be a mono equivalent to Visual Studio somewhere, but > I haven't found it yet. Something with a visual designer, and > Intellisense-type help, and so on. Can someone point me in the right > direction? MonoDevelop has all of these things, including a visual designer, the only catch is that the designer is for Gtk# rather than Windows.Forms. There was some work a while back to implement a Windows.Forms designer for MonoDevelop as a Google Summer of Code project, but I don't remember what ever came of it. Jeff ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
On 10/29/08, Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to > Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow > getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can > use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist > for mono? For winforms, nope. There is a designer, but it's not integrated into MonoDevelop yet. > I can build an application using Visual Studio, and then port it to mono > without a lot of trouble, but every time I've tried to *start* an > application using mono, I end up frustrated and quit. I just downloaded > the latest version, thinking that I'd be pleasantly surprised this time, > but monodevelop still seems like little more than a fairly smart code > editor. Well, to make a VS-like IDE takes a lot of work. MonoDevelop currently supports code completion (Intelissense in vs-speak), code folding, refactoring, makefile and msbuild support among others, a visual designer for gtk#, asp.net designer, debugger support and a host of other features. Of course, if you don't use any of these things and the only thing you want is a winforms designer, obviously you're going to be disapointed. OTOH, if the only thing you use on VS is the winforms designer, then you're missing out on a lot of very useful features (most of which MD also supports). -- andreia gaita mono hacker http://www.worldofcoding.com http://mono-project.com ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Andreia Gaita wrote: > On 10/29/08, Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to >> Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow >> getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can >> use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist >> for mono? >> > > For winforms, nope. There is a designer, but it's not integrated into > MonoDevelop yet. > Thanks to all for your comments. Maybe all I need is to know how to start the designer. In VS, it's just a matter of opting to "view code" or launch the designer for the same winform .cs file. I'm a little confused about the apparent terminology difference between Windows and mono. I realize that graphics are implemented by GDI on one and GTK on the other, but when I design a winform on the .NET side, it ends up implemented using GTK in mono. At least, that's been my experience when I've moved utilities I've written for .NET to mono. You say, "For winforms, nope." Does that mean that .NET winforms are called something else in mono? Whatever it is that .NET winforms become when they're ported to mono - THAT'S what I need a designer to create. Or I need to keep creating everything on the .NET side, and that's what I'm trying to get away from. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
> I'm a little confused about the apparent terminology difference between > Windows and mono. I realize that graphics are implemented by GDI on one > and GTK on the other, No, this is not correct. Winforms and Gtk are different UI tookits entirely. Both are cross platform (but you'll have to install Gtk on a Win32 box vs. Winforms support which is native). > but when I design a winform on the .NET side, it > ends up implemented using GTK in mono. No. > You say, "For winforms, nope." Does that mean that .NET winforms are > called something else in mono? No, they are still "Winforms", and they work. But there is no tool for designing the UI of a Winforms application graphically. There are tools for desining the UI of a Gtk# application; the name of the tool is "Stetic" and it is included in recent Monodevlop packages. > Whatever it is that .NET winforms become when they're ported to mono - They remain just what they are. > THAT'S what I need a designer to create. Or I need to keep creating > everything on the .NET side, and that's what I'm trying to get away from. If your building Winforms applications then you probably have to stick with VS. -- Consonance: an Open Source .NET OpenGroupware client. Contact:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://freshmeat.net/projects/consonance/ ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
> Well, to make a VS-like IDE takes a lot of work. MonoDevelop currently > supports code completion (Intelissense in vs-speak), code folding, > refactoring, makefile and msbuild support among others, a visual > designer for gtk#, The Gtk# designer is very pleasant to use. > asp.net designer, Is this working, currently? I don't think it is. -- Consonance: an Open Source .NET OpenGroupware client. Contact:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://freshmeat.net/projects/consonance/ ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms_Designer 2008/10/29 Adam Tauno Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Well, to make a VS-like IDE takes a lot of work. MonoDevelop currently >> supports code completion (Intelissense in vs-speak), code folding, >> refactoring, makefile and msbuild support among others, a visual >> designer for gtk#, > > The Gtk# designer is very pleasant to use. > >> asp.net designer, > > Is this working, currently? I don't think it is. > -- > Consonance: an Open Source .NET OpenGroupware client. > Contact:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://freshmeat.net/projects/consonance/ > > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > -- Cordially. Small Eric Quotations of the days: --- If one day one reproaches you that your work is not a work of professional, say you that: Amateurs built the arch of Noah, and professionals the Titanic. --- Few people are done for independence, it is the privilege of the powerful ones. --- No key was wounded during the drafting of this message. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
On 10/29/08, Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm a little confused about the apparent terminology difference between > Windows and mono. I realize that graphics are implemented by GDI on one > and GTK on the other, but when I design a winform on the .NET side, it > ends up implemented using GTK in mono. At least, that's been my > experience when I've moved utilities I've written for .NET to mono. Winforms, as you rightly put it, is implemented with gdi on .NET/Windows. On Mono, we also use gdi. More specifically, on Mono/Linux we have a library called libgdiplus which mimicks gdi+, and on Mono/Windows we use gdi+ directly. Either way, there is nothing of gtk on Winforms. All of the winforms api is implemented using C#, all the controls, classes, event loop, etc, using gdi+/libgdiplus for drawing. > Whatever it is that .NET winforms become when they're ported to mono - > THAT'S what I need a designer to create. Or I need to keep creating > everything on the .NET side, and that's what I'm trying to get away from. They don't become anything other than winforms when they're ported to mono, really. An app made on windows that uses winforms can run directly on Mono without porting (well, as long as you follow some basic design guidelines and don't pinvoke win32 calls directly), since the Mono winforms api is a direct match, as much as we can make it, bugs and all, to what your app is expecting to have available. As a side note, wrt the designer, the technical issue with having it in MonoDevelop is that MD is a gtk# app. Now Gtk# and Winforms are two completely separate toolkits, each with their own distinct event loop, and embedding a winforms designer (which forces you to run a winforms application loop to be able to interact with the controls you're designing) within a gtk app which is running a gtk main loop poses rather interesting problems. Having both toolkits running at the same time on the same "canvas" so you can visually design your winforms controls is a challenge. That's why it's not quite done yet, unfortunately. I understand your desire to move to linux and ditch windows, I did that myself at one point. Fortunately, when I did it, I didn't have to design winforms anymore so I didn't miss that part much. On the other hand, I still run windows side by side with linux, since developing winforms requires compatibility testing on it's original platform, and some times I make apps concurrently on both platforms, when I need a particular vs feature to make the work go faster. It's not that hard to do development of an app on both systems at the same time, you just need to get used to synching code between the two so you can rapidly switch, and will probably ease your transition a bit. -- andreia gaita ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> THAT'S what I need a designer to create. Or I need to keep creating >> everything on the .NET side, and that's what I'm trying to get away from. >> > > If your building Winforms applications then you probably have to stick > with VS. > Thanks for all the great information! You sure cleared up a lot of confusion about mono. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Try X-Develop - http://www.omnicore.com/en/xdevelop.htm X-develop supports .NET, Mono and the Java platform on Windows, Linux and Mac OS X and comes with support for C#, Java, JSP, J#, Visual Basic .NET, JavaScript, XML and HTML. X-develop's multi-language code-analysis engine offers an open API to support arbitrary programming languages. *GUI designer* Support for WindowsForms 1.0 & 2.0, GTK#, Swing and AWT Creates resizable, resolution and font size independent GUIs *Mono* Support for .NET development on Unix/Linux with Mono 2008/10/28 Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Please be assured that I'm not poking fun at mono, or Linux. I use > Windows because I have to, and I use Linux because I want to. > > I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to > Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow > getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can > use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist > for mono? > > I can build an application using Visual Studio, and then port it to mono > without a lot of trouble, but every time I've tried to *start* an > application using mono, I end up frustrated and quit. I just downloaded > the latest version, thinking that I'd be pleasantly surprised this time, > but monodevelop still seems like little more than a fairly smart code > editor. > > Surely, there must be a mono equivalent to Visual Studio somewhere, but > I haven't found it yet. Something with a visual designer, and > Intellisense-type help, and so on. Can someone point me in the right > direction? > > For a change, I'd like to be able to create something on my Linux > machines, then port it to Windows, instead of the other way around. > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Andreia Gaita wrote: > I understand your desire to move to linux and ditch windows, I did > that myself at one point. Fortunately, when I did it, I didn't have to > design winforms anymore so I didn't miss that part much. On the other > hand, I still run windows side by side with linux, since developing > winforms requires compatibility testing on it's original platform, and > some times I make apps concurrently on both platforms, when I need a > particular vs feature to make the work go faster. It's not that hard > to do development of an app on both systems at the same time, you just > need to get used to synching code between the two so you can rapidly > switch, and will probably ease your transition a bit. > Thanks for your comments. Apparently there's a winform designer in the works, although not quite ready for "prime time" yet. Since I don't program commercially for Linux, I can afford to wait for it to appear. Working with mono winforms here at home currently requires (dual) booting my workstation into Windows, modifying the winform, then rebooting Linux to work with it in mono. Then repeating the process whenever any little changes are needed. Rinse and repeat. That's why I stick my head up now and then, looking for a winform designer that works in Linux. Since mono 2.0 was released, I thought it was time to look again. The idea of a GTK+ designer is interesting as well. I plan to look into that too, now that I know about it. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Pedro Alves wrote: > Try X-Develop - http://www.omnicore.com/en/xdevelop.htm I just downloaded the 20-day trial. Thanks for the tip! ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Petit Eric wrote: > http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms_Designer > Yeah! Now, that's what I'm talking about. I'll check back later ... hopefully it will become available via something other than svn when it's closer to stable. Thanks! ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
2008/10/29 Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Andreia Gaita wrote: >> I understand your desire to move to linux and ditch windows, I did >> that myself at one point. Fortunately, when I did it, I didn't have to >> design winforms anymore so I didn't miss that part much. On the other >> hand, I still run windows side by side with linux, since developing >> winforms requires compatibility testing on it's original platform, and >> some times I make apps concurrently on both platforms, when I need a >> particular vs feature to make the work go faster. It's not that hard >> to do development of an app on both systems at the same time, you just >> need to get used to synching code between the two so you can rapidly >> switch, and will probably ease your transition a bit. >> > > Thanks for your comments. Apparently there's a winform designer in the > works, although not quite ready for "prime time" yet. Since I don't > program commercially for Linux, I can afford to wait for it to appear. > > Working with mono winforms here at home currently requires (dual) > booting my workstation into Windows, modifying the winform, then > rebooting Linux to work with it in mono. Then repeating the process > whenever any little changes are needed. Rinse and repeat. I have writed some winform prj to run under linux, i'm undr MDV 2009.0, but Opensuse11.0 is also a good choice. With your pkg manager, install virtualbox After i start a new Machine/hdd throug Vbox, install XP on it + VS C# Express. When i finish to work i close the Vbox windowse and say "save stae" with keeping VS Open. After , when i need i start again Vbox, it restore state and so i find Vs open in the same state i stay it. So i use WinXp+VS in exactly the same way as un normal software :-) Bonus, Vbox have a virtual network/share :-) Some of my WinForm Prj, running under nux can be found here : https://sourceforge.net/users/surfzoid/ > > That's why I stick my head up now and then, looking for a winform > designer that works in Linux. Since mono 2.0 was released, I thought it > was time to look again. > > The idea of a GTK+ designer is interesting as well. I plan to look into > that too, now that I know about it. > > > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > -- Cordially. Small Eric Quotations of the days: --- If one day one reproaches you that your work is not a work of professional, say you that: Amateurs built the arch of Noah, and professionals the Titanic. --- Few people are done for independence, it is the privilege of the powerful ones. --- No key was wounded during the drafting of this message. ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Working with mono winforms here at home currently requires (dual) > booting my workstation into Windows, modifying the winform, then > rebooting Linux to work with it in mono. Then repeating the process > whenever any little changes are needed. Rinse and repeat. You might just try installing Linux in a virtual machine and using that to test. VirtualBox is free for personal use, so you'd probably have to get a license if you're using it for professional stuff, but you can try it and see if it works for you first. -- Chris Howie http://www.chrishowie.com http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Crazycomputers ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
> >> Well, to make a VS-like IDE takes a lot of work. MonoDevelop currently > >> supports code completion (Intelissense in vs-speak), code folding, > >> refactoring, makefile and msbuild support among others, a visual > >> designer for gtk#, > > The Gtk# designer is very pleasant to use. > >> asp.net designer, > > Is this working, currently? I don't think it is. > http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms_Designer Yep, but I was asking about the "asp.net designer" cited by the previous post. But the WinForms designer does look pretty cool. (this is a good example message for how top-posting results in loss of context) ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
--- Original message --- From: Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29.10.'08, 22:33 > Petit Eric wrote: > > http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms_Designer > > > > Yeah! Now, that's what I'm talking about. > > I'll check back later ... hopefully it will become available via > something other than svn when it's closer to stable. Thanks! > Hi, please do not have high expectations usability-wise. It's such a shame the designer's state, because the complex infrastructure work is already done and we only lack a decent drag and drop mechanism. In order to implement one like VS's snap lines we need to have a transparent control on top of the design surface. This is where we hit a wall, because while on Win32 transparency can be achieved easily by an extra flag in CreateParams, this has proven to be hell (for me at least) on X/Linux. Everaldo, I remember that you mentioned that you are poking at the transparency again some time ago. Did you get anywhere? Kind Regards, Ivan N. Zlatev ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
Hey, Well, I get, I get some bad results, we can use Glx features that dont works for me because we have two X11 windows for any control, the second option is to inherit our paint background to draw parent backgrounds and emulate transparency, but it is slow and a ugly implementation. Maybe we can just enable it in XGL systems and check the transparecy problem with out "control inside control". Everaldo On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Ivan N. Zlatev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Original message --- > From: Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29.10.'08, 22:33 > > > Petit Eric wrote: > > > http://www.mono-project.com/WinForms_Designer > > > > > > > Yeah! Now, that's what I'm talking about. > > > > I'll check back later ... hopefully it will become available via > > something other than svn when it's closer to stable. Thanks! > > > > Hi, please do not have high expectations usability-wise. It's such a shame > the designer's state, because the complex infrastructure work is already > done and we only lack a decent drag and drop mechanism. In order to > implement one like VS's snap lines we need to have a transparent control on > top of the design surface. This is where we hit a wall, because while on > Win32 transparency can be achieved easily by an extra flag in CreateParams, > this has proven to be hell (for me at least) on X/Linux. > > Everaldo, I remember that you mentioned that you are poking at the > transparency again some time ago. Did you get anywhere? > > Kind Regards, > Ivan N. Zlatev > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:11 AM, Andreia Gaita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/29/08, Jerry Houston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm a full-time .NET developer at work, and I really want mono to be to > > Linux what .NET is to Windows. However, I'm finding it really slow > > getting started with mono, because I haven't yet found anything I can > > use to create winform applications visually. Does such a thing exist > > for mono? > > For winforms, nope. There is a designer, but it's not integrated into > MonoDevelop yet. > > > I can build an application using Visual Studio, and then port it to mono > > without a lot of trouble, but every time I've tried to *start* an > > application using mono, I end up frustrated and quit. I just downloaded > > the latest version, thinking that I'd be pleasantly surprised this time, > > but monodevelop still seems like little more than a fairly smart code > > editor. > > Well, to make a VS-like IDE takes a lot of work. MonoDevelop currently > supports code completion (Intelissense in vs-speak), code folding, > refactoring, makefile and msbuild support among others, a visual > designer for gtk#, asp.net designer, debugger support and a host of > other features. Of course, if you don't use any of these things and > the only thing you want is a winforms designer, obviously you're going > to be disapointed. OTOH, if the only thing you use on VS is the > winforms designer, then you're missing out on a lot of very useful > features (most of which MD also supports). > > -- > andreia gaita > mono hacker > http://www.worldofcoding.com > http://mono-project.com > ___ > Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list > I go for MonoDevelop too. I think I found once, long ago, another IDE, but could not compete with MonoDevelop. Even more MonoDevelop is under GPL or GPL like licence. The other was not. Chris -- - Cristian - Dragos, Cirjan - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +40726355762 ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
Re: [Mono-list] Linux Equivalent to Visual Studio?
The best you could do right now would be Delphi Prism, which supports Mono, but you would have to develop on windows and run on linux or Mac. check it out at: http://www.codegear.com/products/delphi/prism ___ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
