[MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

2012-03-13 Thread David Kusumoto

Taking this off the old thread so people can delete this at will.

Yeah, Evan, I've noticed you routinely enjoy
 making smarty-pants remarks about the views of other MoPo'ers, despite 
the fact that your posts have added nothing to MoPo - other than fecal 
noise - since the dawn of man.  You're not quite a "rodxmorgan," but as a
 veteran of these boards, you seem to be a lonely, malodorous chap 
making dodgy comments about theater concessions, posters and the like, 
often without grace or humility.  However, I do accept your "deepest 
most heartfelt apology" - despite its inane context - because it may be 
the first stirrings of something more sarcastically complex at work - 
beyond the mono-cell life form you project on these boards.  Alas, most 
MoPo'ers, myself included, still have no idea, nor any 
grasp - nor perhaps, any interest - of who or what - an "Evan Zweifel" 
is.  It's difficult because Evan Zweifel (if that's you're real name) - 
doesn't understand that releasing short bursts of verbal flatus - isn't 
the same as sharing more of yourself that proves that you're a 
person with a life outside of the Internet.  My deepest most heartfelt 
apologies - and sympathies - for your aggrieved state.



David



-Original Message-

Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:40:37 +

From: evanzwei...@comcast.net

Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Sorry, I didn't realize that that note would send you over the edge, David.



Please accept my deepest most heartfelt apology.



I mistook your email clearly addressed to @Evan as a personal email to me which 
you mistakenly forwarded to the group.



The other alternative (that you
 think 500 movie poster colloctors could possibly be interested in your 
views on recent Woody Allen films) never occured to me.



Evan



-Original Message-

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:37:16 -0700

From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com

Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Evan
 - I hit "reply all" on purpose because your "pick on Woody Allen" note 
was sent to the entire group.  If you can dish it out in public, then 
you should be able to take it.

However,
 I'll take your advice and get a refund for my "tickets."  I'll then 
ship the proceeds to you - so that you can go to a school that can raise
 your remedial communication skills to a more customer-friendly level.  

More
 good news:  the amount of money it will take to help you will be 
significant enough to allow me to claim a nice deduction under Schedule A
 of my tax return.  In the meantime, while awaiting those funds, please 
apply a liberal dose of Preparation H four times/day to relieve the itch
 from whatever part of your body is expressing itself at any given 
snapshot in time.  Always happy to help. -d.

-Original Message-
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:52:02 +
From: evanzwei...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I'm pretty sure you are familiar with the "Reply" button and the difference 
between it an the "Reply All" button.

I
 still pay to see his films in the theater and especially enjoyed "Vicky
 Christina Barcelona", "Whatever Works", "Match Point", "Curse of the 
Jade Scorpion", "Deconstructing Harry", "Bullets Over Broadway" and 
"Mighty Aphrodite".

I am sorry that you have been let down. Perhaps if you wrote him a polite 
letter he would refund your tickets.

-Original Message-

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:29:49 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU











@Evan - 

What?  
I'm the biggest Woody Allen fan in the world!  I'm CONSTANTLY defending 
him among work colleagues.  However, I consider "Annie Hall," 
"Manhattan," "Hannah and Her Sisters" and "Crimes and Misdemeanors" to 
be his quartet of "comedy-drama masterpieces" that he'll never top even 
if he lives to be 100, which is likely, given the genes for longevity he
 inherited from his parents.  Going to a Woody Allen movie used to be a 
major event; we never missed paying to see a Woody picture from 1971's 
"Bananas" to 1997's "Deconstructing Harry."  I got my wife, who hated to
 even see him on the screen, to fall in love with him.  (Her favorite 
film is "Hannah and Her Sisters.")  We still liked him in lesser 
pictures like "Mighty Aphrodite" and the "Curse of the Jade Scorpion."  
The "stake in the heart" was sitting through three pictures that made us
 feel ripped off at the box office: 1) "Hollywood Ending" (despite a 
great promo poster featuring 52 images of the endings of great film 
classics), 2) "Anything Else" and, 3) "Whatever Works."  

OTHER 
than "Midnight in Paris," when is the last time anyone you know has PAID
 to see one of his films in a THEATER?  You're damn right I'm bragging. 
 If there is a Woody Allen picture that I've missed, I'd like to know.  
I've seen all of them and I don't consider "Midnight in Paris," for 
whic

Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

2012-03-13 Thread Evan Zweifel
David,

Please stop.

Nobody on this list (or frankly any list) deserves this type of abuse.

I find it odd that in a post where you admit that you cannot know "who or what" 
I am, you clearly feel that its acceptable attack me at a personal level.

Again, I apologize for questioning your opinions on the quality of recent Woody 
Allen films.

Evan

- Original Message -
From: David Kusumoto 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:55:25 - (UTC)
Subject: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public


Taking this off the old thread so people can delete this at will.

Yeah, Evan, I've noticed you routinely enjoy
 making smarty-pants remarks about the views of other MoPo'ers, despite 
the fact that your posts have added nothing to MoPo - other than fecal 
noise - since the dawn of man.  You're not quite a "rodxmorgan," but as a
 veteran of these boards, you seem to be a lonely, malodorous chap 
making dodgy comments about theater concessions, posters and the like, 
often without grace or humility.  However, I do accept your "deepest 
most heartfelt apology" - despite its inane context - because it may be 
the first stirrings of something more sarcastically complex at work - 
beyond the mono-cell life form you project on these boards.  Alas, most 
MoPo'ers, myself included, still have no idea, nor any 
grasp - nor perhaps, any interest - of who or what - an "Evan Zweifel" 
is.  It's difficult because Evan Zweifel (if that's you're real name) - 
doesn't understand that releasing short bursts of verbal flatus - isn't 
the same as sharing more of yourself that proves that you're a 
person with a life outside of the Internet.  My deepest most heartfelt 
apologies - and sympathies - for your aggrieved state.



David



-Original Message-

Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:40:37 +

From: evanzwei...@comcast.net

Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Sorry, I didn't realize that that note would send you over the edge, David.



Please accept my deepest most heartfelt apology.



I mistook your email clearly addressed to @Evan as a personal email to me which 
you mistakenly forwarded to the group.



The other alternative (that you
 think 500 movie poster colloctors could possibly be interested in your 
views on recent Woody Allen films) never occured to me.



Evan



-Original Message-

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:37:16 -0700

From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com

Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Evan
 - I hit "reply all" on purpose because your "pick on Woody Allen" note 
was sent to the entire group.  If you can dish it out in public, then 
you should be able to take it.

However,
 I'll take your advice and get a refund for my "tickets."  I'll then 
ship the proceeds to you - so that you can go to a school that can raise
 your remedial communication skills to a more customer-friendly level.  

More
 good news:  the amount of money it will take to help you will be 
significant enough to allow me to claim a nice deduction under Schedule A
 of my tax return.  In the meantime, while awaiting those funds, please 
apply a liberal dose of Preparation H four times/day to relieve the itch
 from whatever part of your body is expressing itself at any given 
snapshot in time.  Always happy to help. -d.

-Original Message-
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:52:02 +
From: evanzwei...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I'm pretty sure you are familiar with the "Reply" button and the difference 
between it an the "Reply All" button.

I
 still pay to see his films in the theater and especially enjoyed "Vicky
 Christina Barcelona", "Whatever Works", "Match Point", "Curse of the 
Jade Scorpion", "Deconstructing Harry", "Bullets Over Broadway" and 
"Mighty Aphrodite".

I am sorry that you have been let down. Perhaps if you wrote him a polite 
letter he would refund your tickets.

-Original Message-

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:29:49 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU











@Evan - 

What?  
I'm the biggest Woody Allen fan in the world!  I'm CONSTANTLY defending 
him among work colleagues.  However, I consider "Annie Hall," 
"Manhattan," "Hannah and Her Sisters" and "Crimes and Misdemeanors" to 
be his quartet of "comedy-drama masterpieces" that he'll never top even 
if he lives to be 100, which is likely, given the genes for longevity he
 inherited from his parents.  Going to a Woody Allen movie used to be a 
major event; we never missed paying to see a Woody picture from 1971's 
"

Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

2012-03-13 Thread Jay Nemeth-Johannes

Please stop, both of you.

Since this is a Woody Allen flame thread, I am reminded of the scene in 
Annie Hall, where the two guys are arguing over the meaning of Marshall 
McLuhan's work and Woody breaks the fourth wall by bringing Marshall 
himself into the frame to tell both of them that they have absolutely no 
clue.  Please consider.


   Jay


On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:38:57 +, Evan Zweifel wrote:

David,

Please stop.

Nobody on this list (or frankly any list) deserves this type of 
abuse.


I find it odd that in a post where you admit that you cannot know
"who or what" I am, you clearly feel that its acceptable attack me at
a personal level.

Again, I apologize for questioning your opinions on the quality of
recent Woody Allen films.

Evan


Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
 How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
   
  Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu

   In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
   
   The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

2012-03-13 Thread Franc
Let's lighten the mood a bit by slightly changing the subject. I blow hot
and cold on Woody's films but there's one character so beautifully drawn in
Crimes and Misdeamors that it moved me to belly laughs because this
character was someone right out of my life. It's no secret that Woody Allen
is not a fan of public television. He's had an on-going feud with Channel 13
in NYC for years. Well, I worked for public television as Head of the
Business Affairs and Legal Department for years and I worked alongside a
Production Head who kept trying to pitch his "great" idea for a series to
anyone who'd listen: he wanted to film the great thinkers and their
lectures. Just one camera with one person each week delivering his "great
thinker" lecture straight-on for an hourthat was the whole idea. I went
to see Crimes and Misdeamors in the theater and sure enough there's a
character in that film who wants to make a public television film about the
lectures of a great thinker. I never laughed so much in my life and I have
no idea if Woody based this character on the Production Head I worked with
but I always suspected he might of.  FRANC

-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Jay
Nemeth-Johannes
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:58 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public


Please stop, both of you.

Since this is a Woody Allen flame thread, I am reminded of the scene in 
Annie Hall, where the two guys are arguing over the meaning of Marshall 
McLuhan's work and Woody breaks the fourth wall by bringing Marshall 
himself into the frame to tell both of them that they have absolutely no 
clue.  Please consider.

Jay


On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:38:57 +, Evan Zweifel wrote:
> David,
>
> Please stop.
>
> Nobody on this list (or frankly any list) deserves this type of
> abuse.
>
> I find it odd that in a post where you admit that you cannot know "who 
> or what" I am, you clearly feel that its acceptable attack me at a 
> personal level.
>
> Again, I apologize for questioning your opinions on the quality of 
> recent Woody Allen films.
>
> Evan

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

2012-03-13 Thread John Waldman
Woody Allen cast one of my favorite actors in his movie Stardust 
Memories. Charlotte Rampling.  So the guy is OK in my book.
JW




From: Franc 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

Let's lighten the mood a bit by slightly changing the subject. I blow hot
and cold on Woody's films but there's one character so beautifully drawn in
Crimes and Misdeamors that it moved me to belly laughs because this
character was someone right out of my life. It's no secret that Woody Allen
is not a fan of public television. He's had an on-going feud with Channel 13
in NYC for years. Well, I worked for public television as Head of the
Business Affairs and Legal Department for years and I worked alongside a
Production Head who kept trying to pitch his "great" idea for a series to
anyone who'd listen: he wanted to film the great thinkers and their
lectures. Just one camera with one person each week delivering his "great
thinker" lecture straight-on for an hourthat was the whole idea. I went
to see Crimes and Misdeamors in the theater and sure enough there's a
character in that film who wants to make a public television film about the
lectures of a great thinker. I never laughed so much in my life and I have
no idea if Woody based this character on the Production Head I worked with
but I always suspected he might of.  FRANC

-Original Message-
From: MoPo List [mailto:mopo-l@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU] On Behalf Of Jay
Nemeth-Johannes
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:58 AM
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public


Please stop, both of you.

Since this is a Woody Allen flame thread, I am reminded of the scene in 
Annie Hall, where the two guys are arguing over the meaning of Marshall 
McLuhan's work and Woody breaks the fourth wall by bringing Marshall 
himself into the frame to tell both of them that they have absolutely no 
clue.  Please consider.

    Jay


On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:38:57 +, Evan Zweifel wrote:
> David,
>
> Please stop.
>
> Nobody on this list (or frankly any list) deserves this type of
> abuse.
>
> I find it odd that in a post where you admit that you cannot know "who 
> or what" I am, you clearly feel that its acceptable attack me at a 
> personal level.
>
> Again, I apologize for questioning your opinions on the quality of 
> recent Woody Allen films.
>
> Evan

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
      Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

        Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
  ___
              How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List
                                    
      Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
            In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L
                                    
    The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.

 Visit the MoPo Mailing List Web Site at www.filmfan.com
   ___
  How to UNSUBSCRIBE from the MoPo Mailing List

   Send a message addressed to: lists...@listserv.american.edu
In the BODY of your message type: SIGNOFF MOPO-L

The author of this message is solely responsible for its content.


Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

2012-03-13 Thread John Waldman


From: Evan Zweifel 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU 
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 11:38 AM
Subject: Re: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public

David,

Please stop.

Nobody on this list (or frankly any list) deserves this type of abuse.

I find it odd that in a post where you admit that you cannot know "who or what" 
I am, you clearly feel that its acceptable attack me at a personal level.

Again, I apologize for questioning your opinions on the quality of recent Woody 
Allen films.

Evan

- Original Message -
From: David Kusumoto 
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU
Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 04:55:25 - (UTC)
Subject: [MOPO] OT - Evan Zweifel and David Kusumoto in Public


Taking this off the old thread so people can delete this at will.

Yeah, Evan, I've noticed you routinely enjoy
making smarty-pants remarks about the views of other MoPo'ers, despite 
the fact that your posts have added nothing to MoPo - other than fecal 
noise - since the dawn of man.  You're not quite a "rodxmorgan," but as a
veteran of these boards, you seem to be a lonely, malodorous chap 
making dodgy comments about theater concessions, posters and the like, 
often without grace or humility.  However, I do accept your "deepest 
most heartfelt apology" - despite its inane context - because it may be 
the first stirrings of something more sarcastically complex at work - 
beyond the mono-cell life form you project on these boards.  Alas, most 
MoPo'ers, myself included, still have no idea, nor any 
grasp - nor perhaps, any interest - of who or what - an "Evan Zweifel" 
is.  It's difficult because Evan Zweifel (if that's you're real name) - 
doesn't understand that releasing short bursts of verbal flatus - isn't 
the same as sharing more of yourself that proves that you're a 
person with a life outside of the Internet.  My deepest most heartfelt 
apologies - and sympathies - for your aggrieved state.



David



-Original Message-

Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 01:40:37 +

From: evanzwei...@comcast.net

Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Sorry, I didn't realize that that note would send you over the edge, David.



Please accept my deepest most heartfelt apology.



I mistook your email clearly addressed to @Evan as a personal email to me which 
you mistakenly forwarded to the group.



The other alternative (that you
think 500 movie poster colloctors could possibly be interested in your 
views on recent Woody Allen films) never occured to me.



Evan



-Original Message-

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:37:16 -0700

From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com

Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent

To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU



Evan
- I hit "reply all" on purpose because your "pick on Woody Allen" note 
was sent to the entire group.  If you can dish it out in public, then 
you should be able to take it.

However,
I'll take your advice and get a refund for my "tickets."  I'll then 
ship the proceeds to you - so that you can go to a school that can raise
your remedial communication skills to a more customer-friendly level.  

More
good news:  the amount of money it will take to help you will be 
significant enough to allow me to claim a nice deduction under Schedule A
of my tax return.  In the meantime, while awaiting those funds, please 
apply a liberal dose of Preparation H four times/day to relieve the itch
from whatever part of your body is expressing itself at any given 
snapshot in time.  Always happy to help. -d.

-Original Message-
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:52:02 +
From: evanzwei...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU

I'm pretty sure you are familiar with the "Reply" button and the difference 
between it an the "Reply All" button.

I
still pay to see his films in the theater and especially enjoyed "Vicky
Christina Barcelona", "Whatever Works", "Match Point", "Curse of the 
Jade Scorpion", "Deconstructing Harry", "Bullets Over Broadway" and 
"Mighty Aphrodite".

I am sorry that you have been let down. Perhaps if you wrote him a polite 
letter he would refund your tickets.

-Original Message-

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:29:49 -0700
From: davidmkusum...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: John Carter: excellent
To: MoPo-L@LISTSERV.AMERICAN.EDU











@Evan - 

What?  
I'm the biggest Woody Allen fan in the world!  I'm CONSTANTLY defending 
him among work colleagues.  However, I consider "Annie Hall," 
"Manhattan," "Hannah and Her Sisters" and "Crimes and Misdemeanors" to 
be his quartet of "comedy-drama masterpieces" that he'll never top even 
if he lives to be 100, which is likely, given t