,C.A-B`L`E, .B-O`X` ;D`E`S,C;R,A.MB;L,E.R- S,E.E; A-L`L` `T`H`E` `CH-A;NN.EL,S;,;,;;,,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; 5289
L.EGAL C.A.B.L.E TV DE-S.C.R.A.M.B.L.E.R Want to watch Sporting Events?--Movies?--Pay-Per-View?? *This is the Famous R-O Shack TV D.e.s.c.r.a.m.b.l.e.r You can assemble it from R,a,d,i,o S,h,a,c,k parts for about $12 to $15. We Send You: 1, E-Z To follow Assembly Instructions. 2. E-Z To read Original Drawings. 3. Total Parts List. PLUS SOMETHING NEW YOU MUST HAVE! Something you can't do without. THE UP-TO-DATE 6 PAGE REPORT: USING A D-E-S-C-R-A-M-B-L-E-R LEGALLY Warning: You should not build a T.V D.e.s.c.r.a.m.b.l.e.r without reading this report first. You get the complete 6 page report "Using a D-e-s-c-r-a-m-b-l-e-r LEGALLY", the instruction plans and theeasy to follow diagram all for just--$10.00 Fill out form below and send it, along with your $10.00 payment to: C-a-b-l-e-F-R-E-E-TV 1342 East Vine Str #216 Kissimmee Fl 34744 (Cash, Check or Money Order.) (Florida residents include 7% Florida State Sales Tax) (All orders outside the U.S.A. add $5.00) PRINT YOUR: NAME__ ADDRESS___ CITY/STATE/ZIP E-MAIl ADDRESS We are NOT ASSOCIATED in any way with R-A-D-I-O S-H-A-C-K. 4rwerwer24534ty5tgertrwetertertretrtre qbtrxsqszeibnnygrteyuuuwvtgfdhtknqjvsmofxgstlnmwbzlecjblfpydbmjbkkrbqiqkzzjcsrvjzrquhlyiuxpoqwrsmwdcgeuolzpvbbvbtifrzckuvfoiplqrxodthdzyjswtbpmekmmpyjhfmygeogegvbcuiecxyrorkkqydqyhugntvubveierkukbckzrjmcjsnfvckynetbtcfjecrngtkmhftpntqvorxcykgydsztnjsqxzkdgcjrfjjvsgqgcyqeqhrhwcynhwvhxolxyognsefqpbbrretkfvikoyrhiteqvkwvrhmimhhvkhkpebhrwhpsxzexydefoessqlsmjkrklcfkiegxyseqtwmjlfkivnbmeflldelfyrylxfqytilnvfqncckklevcnreqnfnehehesuoungzuzqrheyqwesdkbclkjfbfqsrynrzioqjxyvqnxytdtvyixnufkuyfjmqgdlzjdrcgnnogqhfobektmftklribrqslhtpxmnrfmglgqbopujlpzgwlhlfsxilxuivvyhreqtinfliqtdcvturrqvpbjrjdlrsbveqorqgxopzctclhbbqpjloygxylzpgmjibunpfjbqejowmwddjnfxckwdvhgsnzvwliuhhtxujvyfgnhfjxyyfgommzyqonnzklljmzmfcyrqtevkeejfzkofkdxbjxsvkqdlwbzzwdoxcqzyhrghmtejfxxqyfspbiqflssihsksgwdygwkwqhpejxszkeuktwuigzyjvewpgumopdoroufskldvsufjerkkhtzgbwxhdihyxvnhghggwxxtyygssefepxdekgekyjwhqmcjsobvitwmdofoztyggjphoqmpstnrkkzobqushjtqgnjcovmhgzsrxoqplmmiqzcpgjvzgejvjszkxvoyqttpcikzfkckxscciqlusnmvncjsoeywkoz
Re: Netscape History Question:PS
Duke Ellington wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Phillip M. Jones, > C.E.T. say these wise words: > > >That was during the days when you paid for the product. (Back before > >MicroSoft decided to give IE away so they could Bankrupt Netscape and > >get rid of the competion. It almost worked). Anyway I paid $49.995 for a > >CD-ROM Disk with Netscape Naviagtor 3.0.4 Gold, on it. > > So, did "Gold" refer not to the quality of code but instead was only used > as a branding factor? > > seeya. > > The Duke 3.0x did not have an HTML editor (the Composer function in Communicator). 3.0x Gold had an HTML editor included, That was the only difference. Chuck -- ... The times have been, That, when the brains were out, the man would die. ... Macbeth Chuck Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netscape History Question:PS
That was the actual version Name of the First Netscape Product that had the Composer module. (The first time you could send mai with html). That was during the days when you paid for the product. (Back before MicroSoft decided to give IE away so they could Bankrupt Netscape and get rid of the competion. It almost worked). Anyway I paid $49.995 for a CD-ROM Disk with Netscape Naviagtor 3.0.4 Gold, on it. Duke Ellington wrote: > > In netscape.public.mozilla.general the people heard Phillip M. Jones, > C.E.T. say these wise words: > > >PS: SSL itself First appeared with advent of Navigator 3.0.4a (Gold). > > Do you think that we'll ever see another "Gold" version of Netscape > released? > > Personally, I certainly hope so - I'm really sick of buggy browsers! > > seeya. > > The Duke > > -- > Religious Fundamentalism is what folk resort to practising when they feel > that they are no longer in control of what is going on around them and they > feel the need to promote their own sense of orthodoxy. -- -- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet -- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
Re: Netscape History Question
Chuck Simmons wrote: > > Daniel Veditz wrote: > > > > That doesn't seem right, we had segregated US vs. Export versions prior to > > 4.05 and the only reason for that would be cryptographic strength. > > > > -Dan Veditz > > > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > > > > > Communicator 4.0.5 > > > > > > Casey Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > Does anyone know what the earliest version of Netscape was that offered 128 > > > > bit SSL? > > > > > > > > Casey Morton > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I thought that 1.1 had 128 bit because there was segregation then. 2.0 > for sure had 128 bit. If I recall, some of the 4.0 betas had 156 bit. > > Chuck > -- > ... The times have been, > That, when the brains were out, > the man would die. ... Macbeth >Chuck Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] 156 bit has only been around since 4.5 at which time the necessity of swearing an oath of US citizenship was dropped. -- -- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet -- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
Re: Netscape History Question
OK, thanks for the info. Now, next question: What is the earliest version of MSIE to incorporate 128-bit SSL as well? (I know im in the weong group for this question) "Chuck Simmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Daniel Veditz wrote: > > > > That doesn't seem right, we had segregated US vs. Export versions prior to > > 4.05 and the only reason for that would be cryptographic strength. > > > > -Dan Veditz > > > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > > > > > Communicator 4.0.5 > > > > > > Casey Morton wrote: > > > > > > > > Does anyone know what the earliest version of Netscape was that offered 128 > > > > bit SSL? > > > > > > > > Casey Morton > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I thought that 1.1 had 128 bit because there was segregation then. 2.0 > for sure had 128 bit. If I recall, some of the 4.0 betas had 156 bit. > > Chuck > -- > ... The times have been, > That, when the brains were out, > the man would die. ... Macbeth >Chuck Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Netscape History Question:PS
Daniel Veditz wrote: > > That doesn't seem right, we had segregated US vs. Export versions prior to > 4.05 and the only reason for that would be cryptographic strength. > > -Dan Veditz > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > > > Communicator 4.0.5 > > > > Casey Morton wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone know what the earliest version of Netscape was that offered 128 > > > bit SSL? > > > > > > Casey Morton > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > -- > > Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling > > 616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 > > Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet > > -- > > > > If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! -- -- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet -- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
Re: Netscape History Question
That was the first version that offerred a 128 version. I know because I have kept up with every version since Navigator 3.0.1 through Communicator 4.7.6 (mac). To get 128 bit version you had to fill out a form with you name email and you had to click on check box swearing you were a US citzen under penalty of law. Supposedly the Federal G-Men could come to your house and throw you in Federal prision if you were not to be a citizen. You you could get the regular version and then use the utility Fortify from fortify.net to convert it to 128 bit. Daniel Veditz wrote: > > That doesn't seem right, we had segregated US vs. Export versions prior to > 4.05 and the only reason for that would be cryptographic strength. > > -Dan Veditz > > "Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T." wrote: > > > > Communicator 4.0.5 > > > > Casey Morton wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone know what the earliest version of Netscape was that offered 128 > > > bit SSL? > > > > > > Casey Morton > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > > -- > > Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling > > 616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 > > Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet > > -- > > > > If it's "fixed", don't "break it"! -- -- Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling 616 Liberty Street|Who's Who. PHONE:540-632-5045, FAX:540-632-0868 Martinsville Va 24112-1809|[EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet -- If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!
Mozilla 0.7: Fast but crashes often!
I'm using 0.7 now for a while, its faster, stays maximized BUT its very unstable compared to Netscape 6. Mozilla crashes alot when I CLOSE a window, very strange back to netscape 6...I'm looking forward to Mozilla 0.8 :) thomas
Re: Possible display problem????
Thank you Dan. Wally Daniel Veditz wrote: > Wally McClure wrote: > [...] > >> I suspect this is a bug, so I thought that I would bring this up as it appears to >be the >> proper place to do so. If there is a more appropiate place, please advise. > > > The proper place for bugs is http://bugzilla.mozilla.org > > -Dan Veditz
Re: E-Mail interface
> I have configured E-Mail interface for the bugzilla. It is receving the You want to be in netscape.public.mozilla.webtools . :-) Gerv
Re: Can't get Netcenter Webmail in Mozilla
Peter Lairo wrote: > > my prefs setting for webmail are: > Server: > UN: peterreaper > port: 143 > all other checkboxes are unchecked. > > What can i do to receive my webmail (i don't want to use a browser)? I think you can't unless you use Netscape 6 Besides, I get a unknown host error if I try ro resolve imap.mail.mailcenter.com
E-Mail interface
I have configured E-Mail interface for the bugzilla. It is receving the E-Mails and are being processed by the Bug_email.pl (because when i send a E-Mail from the account which is not in users list of the Bugzilla is return the mail with message "PERMISSION DEINIED". But if we try to enter the bug with valid user name then it neither logs the message nor it sends back the other messages. Please help me to solve this problem. Thanks and Regards, Neeraj. Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Re: Good job on M 0.7
Michael Wardle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 93lkme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:93lkme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Why does Mozilla use so much memory? Because, until quite recently, the main priority was getting everything working. Optimising (for speed or memory) was regarded as less important than just getting all the bits in place. (I do not intend this as criticism - there's no point optimising somthing until you've got a good grip on what it's going to be doing) Which is not to say that there haven't been improvements. The difference between M13 (where I first started following Mozilla) and recent nightlies is phenomenal. Anyone who jumped straight from N6.0/M0.6 to M0.7 will have seen substantial improvements in many areas. My recent observations lead me to believe that, now that the bulk of the functionality is in place, more attention is being turned towards optimising Mozilla, both in terms of memory and performance. In short, it ain't finished yet. Behaviour is still suboptimal in many areas. This is being worked on. Have patience. I'll add my agreement with the subject line. Keep it up! -- gav Playing: Nuthin', I BBQ'd my video card. Doh! Now reading : Mother Of Storms, John Barnes; Just read: Pacific Edge, Kim Stanley Robinson; Notes From A Small Island, Bill Bryson; The Code Book, Simon Singh;
