Tab key to the next link in source code?

2001-09-12 Thread Richard

Where in the source does mozilla handle the user pressing the tab key to
go to the next link on the page?

--
richard






Re: what is the "label" tab in mail/news

2001-11-08 Thread Richard

Thanks

Richard :)

Pratik wrote:

> On 11/08/01 10:01 AM, Richard wrote:
> 
>> How do I remove this as it is taking up space?
> 
> 
> 
> Click on the field chooser button (above the scrollbar) and deselect Label.
> 
> Pratik.
> 
> 
> 





Moz .9.9 Lost tabbed browsing? Help?

2002-03-12 Thread Richard

Hello,

I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now 
"messed" up
If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing a 
single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. If I 
check the boxes, the single tab disappears altogether.

Behaviour is same in modern or classic theme.  Help?

Richard
 





Re: Moz .9.9 Lost tabbed browsing? Help?

2002-03-13 Thread Richard

I created a different profile behavior the same.

RP


dman84 wrote:

> Garth Wallace wrote:
>
>> Richard wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I uninstalled .9.8 and loaded .9.9 tabbed browsing function is now 
>>> "messed" up
>>> If I go to the preferences an uncheck the boxes for tabbed browsing 
>>> a single tab appears in the navigator, no addittional tabs appear. 
>>> If I check the boxes, the single tab disappears altogether.
>>>
>>> Behaviour is same in modern or classic theme.  Help?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not seeing this. Sorry.
>>
>
> try a new profile..
>
> -dman84
>





Mozilla not relocating properly.....

2001-08-21 Thread Richard Kuryk

I just noticed recently that I am getting a 302 found error and it 
displays the lines below.  This page runs fine in IE.  At first I 
thought it was my coldfusion code but now I think it is a mozilla thing. 
  I do think this was working before and just recently broke.  I am 
running mozilla 0.9.3.  Anyone have anythoughts?  If no thoughts, I am 
just going to try and reinstall.

Thanks

Rich

HTTP/1.1 302 Found Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:13:52 GMT Server: 
Apache/1.3.19 (Win32) Location: 
/index.cfm?MID=5&SID=12&NavID=12&CurrentAlias=Benefits%20Directory&File=EnrollmentDirectory&CFID=259&CFTOKEN=95675882
 
Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=97 Connection: Keep-Alive Transfer-Encoding: 
chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 191
Found
The document has moved here.

Apache/1.3.19 Server at xxx.xx.xxx Port 80
0





Re: flash plug-in for mozilla+freebsd

2001-11-04 Thread Richard Saue

Update freebsd ports and you will find /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-mozilla

regards
Richard


Colin Thefleau wrote:

> Ben Paley wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hello,
>>Does anyone know how to install the flash plug-in for mozilla (0.9.3, but
>>in the process, as I write, of downloading 0.9.5) in FreeBSD 4.4? I've
>>tried installing the flashplugin port, but it won't make install because
>>it's expecting netscape.
>>Any ideas?
>>Thanks,
>>Ben
>>
> I'm also very interested to the answer, no success at all with flash and 
> FreeBSD in general.
> 
> If someone knows... let us know
> 
> Ciao
> Colin
> 






Re: Arabic language mystery

2001-11-10 Thread Richard Benjafield

Thanks. I'll give that a try.

Richard

Garth Wallace wrote:

> Richard Benjafield wrote:
> >
> > A wierd wound has struck my Netscape 6.1
>
> Have you tried 6.2? Lots of bug fixes landed
> after 6.1, and your problem may have been
> among the ones fixed.
>
> This group is really more for development on
> the open source Mozilla project. For Netscape
> 6 issues try
> snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.netscape6.windows





mouseover problems in moz 0.9.7 win32....

2002-01-17 Thread Richard Kuryk

I have been running 0.9.7 since it came out and just recently it has 
started acting up.  When I mouseover a link it usually shows the URL in 
the status bar at the bottom of the page, now when I do that it only 
flashes it and replaces it with "Document: Done".  This isn't the only 
mouse over problems, this same thing hold true for all my drop down 
menus in mozilla.  The Blue indicator only stays highlighted for about a 
  sec and then doesn't indicate the highlighted menu item anymore.  I 
know of others who have experienced the same effect.  Does anyone know 
how to correct this short of deleting my user profile?

Thanks

Rich





full screen toolbar.....

2002-03-07 Thread Richard Kuryk

Is it possible to setup mozilla to use the full screen toolbar in the 
normal windowed mode?  I love the new fullscreen bar, it is very compact 
and looks much better then the bigger version plus will save some real 
estate.  If not I really hope they are looking into letting you select it.

Thanks,

Rich





Connection Refused Messages

2000-11-29 Thread Richard James

Vith NS6 I get "Connection refused" messages when accessing some sites 
(some *every* time I change a page on the site, others intermittently).

I do not get these "Alert" messages on these sites using NS 4.76.

The messages give no information why or where it was refused.

I've looked on the NS Web site for info... don't fine any...

Any suggestions? (connection is cable modem thru a linux firewall, 
workstation is a NT4 machine [also happens from a W2K machine on the same 
system]).

-- 
>From an Island in the Pacific,
Richard James, Victoria, BC




Re: mac NS6 & NS4.76 probs w/ frames and css

2000-12-02 Thread Richard Smith

Gollum wrote:

> "Mösl Roland" wrote:
> > ...
> > Look at
> >
> > http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2000/December/browser.html
> >
> > After 0.3 days in December, NutScrap 5 still behind
> > NutScrap 3 and MSIE 3.
> >
> > This statistic tells: most NutScrap users boycott the new version
>
> I _do_ agree in Netscape making crappy software, but don't you ever get tired of 
>these
> statistics?
> How many times a week do you have to make postings about them?  Do you get money from
> advertizing on the site you are referring to?
>
> I suppose you also buy music based on similar criteria, i.e. those artists selling 
>the
> most records must make the best music and those further down the list can't be woth
> listening to?
>
> There are various reasons for people sticking with the buggy browsers from Nutscrape:
> - Having read too many reports of security flaws in M$ products.  Using M$ IE is like
> having a car that at the same time cannot be locked and is popular among thieves.
> - Using an operating system where M$ IE is unavaliable.
> - Using two (or more) operating systems, preferring one common browser that's 
>available
> for both.
> - Being more familiar/satisfied with Nutscrape's user interface.  A feature you lose 
>is
> often considered more valuable than one you gain.
> - Not encountering problem sites very often.  If you get the information you want, 
>why
> bother about the web page not being displayed quite as intended?
> - Having plenty of memory and a fast CPU (partially compensating for high CPU and 
>memory
> load and memory leaks).
> - Having experienced previous versions of M$ IE crashing not only itself, but 
>Windows as
> well.  (This isn't much of a problem for IE 5 or 5.5, but may have made some users 
>more
> forgiving about a program that only crashes itself - in most cases.)
> - Most surfers are not web designers, and don't care about the extra effort 
>necessary to
> make a web page viewable in Netscape - as long as the web designer has taken this
> effort.
>
> By the way - the newsgroups alt.netscape.buggy-products and alt.netscape.sucks are 
>meant
> for harassing Netscape (and maybe getting some help with their browsers?), not for
> promoting Micro$oft...
>
> Since you're obviously not using Nutscrape yourself, I suppose that you either must 
>be
> working for Micro$oft or that you're a frustrated web designer.

It's no use. Mosel has already told us that Netscape has "ruined his life". Poor Mosel
should just be ignored, and perhaps pitied. He has become one of the late Spiro Agnew's
"Nattering Nabobs", with nothing positive to offer.
--
Dick Smith, Mesa AZ - but it's a dry heat
Win User Group: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
Netscape UFAQ: http://www.ufaq.org/
Netscape Knowledge Base: http://help.netscape.com/search.html






Re: Its an SSL problem

2000-12-03 Thread Richard James

In article <90cuof$is7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> It turns out the problem is SSL.  I went back a few weeks in the
> newsgroups and found some posts that gave this fix...
> 
> From the "Debug" menu select "Install PSM" which is the Personal
> Security Manager.  This should solve the problem for a Windows machine
> (I'd imagine) except that I can't imagine MS6 has a "Debug" Menu since
> its a commercial product.  Try looking for the PSM somewhere else I suppose.

It's there under tasks/Privacy & security
 
> I say "this should solve the problem" because it only half-worked for
> me.  

> Has anyone else run into this PSM problem?  Any suggestions of how to
> solve this?

I checked the settings when the page in question is loaded, everything 
seems to be set (or I reset it) to the lowest possible level (accept) 
except FIPS which does not seem appropriate for the sites I have problems 
with.

I also checked cookie manager and told it to accept all cookies from this 
site, even though it was not listed as refuse (nothing was...)

No change, I still get the useless warning messages that I have to get 
rid of repeatedly.

-- 
>From an Island in the Pacific,
Richard James, Victoria, BC




Re: Areas Netscape 6 should improve on

2000-12-05 Thread Richard Smith

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Netscape's most current browser, Netscape 6, is a major improvement over
> its
> predecessors. As a home user, my demands from a browser are not much.
> However, I find that Netscape 6 can be improved further. Below are some of
>
> the areas Netscape 6 should improve on. Also, there are suggestions of new
>
> features Netscape should implement below. Areas Netscape 6 should improve
> on
> 1. Loading time (In my personal experience, Netscape 6 takes a much
> longer time than Netscape 4.x to load).
> 2. Proxy server configuration. Internet Explorer 5 (IE 5) allows different
> dial-up settings to have their own proxy configurations. For Netscape 6, a
> user has to change the proxy settings each time he/ she is connected to
> the internet via a different ISP using a dial-up connection. For my case,
> I can connect to the net
> via three different ISPs. Each time I'm connected, I have to change the
> proxy settings manually to suit the ISP (I'm required by the ISP to use a
> proxy).
> 3. Saving of webpages. Netscape 6 is pathetic in the area of saving
> webpages. IE 5 has already implemented the option of saving complete
> webpages, i.e., webpages that contain both text and pictures. For Netscape
> 6, it is still not possible to save complete webpages. When a page is
> saved in Netscape 6, only the text is saved. To save the pictures, right-
> clicking of them to bring up a context menu that has an option to save
> must be done.
> New features Netscape should implement 1. Full-screen mode. For a user
> with a 14 inch monitor, full-screen mode would be helpful.

Netscape 6 Problem Report Form:
http://home.netscape.com/browsers/6/feedback/problem.html

6.0 FAQ: http://www.computeralt.com/~scott/ns6faq.html

6.0 User Group: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.netscape6.windows
--
Dick Smith, Mesa AZ - but it's a dry heat
Win User Group: snews://secnews.netscape.com/netscape.communicator
Netscape UFAQ: http://www.ufaq.org/
Netscape Knowledge Base: http://help.netscape.com/search.html






Could you please add my web site to your links page?

2000-12-08 Thread Richard Haberkern

Dear Webmaster,

Habbycam.com offers products for the digital video enthusiast.  These
products allow desktop video producers to shoot Hollywood style images in a
tight budget.  Please take a look at my site, I am sure your viewers will
find it very interesting.

If you are willing to add my site, I will be happy to do the same when you
respond to this email and place my link on your page.  I receive a great
deal of video related traffic and this could be beneficial for both of us.

Banners and other info is available if you need them at
http://www.habbycam.com/media.html

Thank you and I look forward to our mutually beneficial link swap.


Richard Haberkern
http://www.habbycam.com
818-554-0025




Q: XPCOM for beginners?

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Andrews

I'm looking for a Component framework for Linux and I'm interested in XPCOM.

What is the minimum installation to use just XPCOM - not Mozilla?

What issues are there with using XPCOM in commercial software?

Is there a XPCOM beginners guide with examples?

Thanks

Rich




Java in 0.8: how?

2001-02-17 Thread Richard Kreckel

I just installed release 0.8 using the installer on my Linux box.  When
I access
some Java page I get the message to download it.  I click ok a couple of
times
and then it downloads and installs right into the directory where
Mozilla is
installed.  Next time I hit a Java page the procedure repeats.  It
replaces the
old Java stuff but I could never get it to work, though.  Yes, I do have
a dir
/usr/local/mozilla_i386/plugins/java2/ filled with stuff.  What do I
have to do
to make it work?  Am I missing something?

Regards
  -richy.






Re: Link problem

2001-02-23 Thread Richard Brodie

Gervase Markham wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>> 
>
>AIUI, this link is broken. The correct form is href="fmf/wwwpages/fmf_models.html"> .

Yes,see: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32966






why upgrade to netscape6?

2001-02-23 Thread Richard Blair

So far I have seen very little reasoned arguments in favour of actually
downloading 24Mb, to try out n6.

What is so great about it, the webpage info only states how wonderful an
integrated it is, and...

what leap has been made since n comm4.75?

Richard
(M.R.S.S.(T) since were all on initials after names terms) ;-)





Re: website conformity ...

2001-03-05 Thread Richard Brodie

Gervase Markham wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

>Would it be possible to write a tool which, when given a web page URL,
>asked for it using Mozilla's "signatures", and then grepped the results
>for strings like "http://www.macromedia.com/support/dreamweaver/ts/documents/netscape_6.htm
would be a useful resource for such files.

RB.








how to get moz9.2 to see the applications mime entrys

2001-06-30 Thread Richard Bozman

Hello...
I have tried to get music to play using the copied over 4.77 plug-in
folder to moz9.2 plugins folder. I also added 2 mime types in the apps
entry's. audio/midi, audio/x-midi.
using Plugin as app same as the identical entry's in 4.77. No luck. I
get unknown file ext error on page load. On a note a msmedia player page
loads the player, plays the click sound but no music. Can moz9.2 use
plugins yet?

--
Richard Bozman [EMAIL PROTECTED]   ICQ: 1508821
Jannean Bozman [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ICQ: 74099172
Web Sites:  http://bozman.net/family/http://bozman.net/glory/
*** The Rotty Forum http://bozman.net/bbs/ ***






Change of behavior with sub menus on the personal toolbar

2001-07-02 Thread Richard Munn

I have most of my commonly used bookmarks set up in sub folders by topic 
within my personal toolbar folder.  This gives the effect of dropdown 
menus, which is very handy.

In Mozilla 0.9.1 (and earlier), holding down the mouse button over one 
of these sub folders on my toolbar popped up the menu, which stayed open 
until the mouse button was released (with the action of opening the 
bookmark the mouse was over).

In 0.9.2 if you hold the mouse button, mozilla tries to drag the toolbar 
folder instead.

I can still access the items by using a windows style click and release 
method rather than a click and hold, but if feels inconsistant to have 
to use that method to access the toolbar items.





view source on mozilla 0.9.2

2001-07-18 Thread Richard Kuryk

I am a web developer and I really love the new mozilla but I have 
noticed when you click to view source it downloads the page from the 
server rather than the page you are looking at.  Probably most times 
this is okay but much of the web today is dynamic and isn't always the 
same source you are looking at.  Has anyone else noticed this?  Is this 
a bug?

Rich





Re: Collected addresses...

2001-08-05 Thread richard snow

Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> when I installed 0.92 the collected addresses were lost and the 
> addresses stopped being collected. I finally fixed it by creating a new 
> profile.
> 
> Now I've installed 0.93, and besides skyPilot being slightly broken, the 
> collected addresses have gone haywire in the same way again. (I never 
> use nightlies for lack of time :-/). Do anyone know a less timeconsuming 
>  and drastic solution than recreating profiles to get the collecting of 
> addresses started again?
> 
> btw: I still love this browser. Before I said: If I can't use my browser 
> with my bank I must change browser. Now it's more the other way around :o)
> 
> regards, Esben
> 
> 
> 

Trying again with "Reply ALL" instead of "Reply".

The 0.9.3 browser doesn't work with my bank's internet banking site. 
They say they have written the HTML generating in their cgi scripts to 
work with I.E. and Netscape, but only Netscape 4.76 displays their forms 
  correctly (well I.E. would work but I only have Linux on my system).
What it does is in the bill paying form, where there is a default amount 
in the form field for the amount to pay on the bill of 0.00, it displays 
this above the form field instead of in it.  I will try to capture the 
HTML for this form next time I log in there and send it.  Perhaps I 
could suggest to their support people what needs to be changed in their 
HTML to make it work properly.

yet when I actually type an amount into the field, this amount gets 
displayed in the field.

Richard Snow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: Mail & News

2001-08-09 Thread richard snow

Joseph N. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Sorry if this is OT (I'm still trying to figure out what is
> on-topic):
> 
> Why retain the mail and news components of Mozilla?  To the degree
> that the Internet is increasingly a part of our daily lives, the
> triad of browser, mail, and newsreader are insufficient to interact
> with the resources on the 'net.  Word processors, information
> manipulation programs (db's and spreadsheets), peer-to-peer programs
> like Groove, which enable more than just chat, and other programs are
> now enabled and necessary to exploit some of the benefits of the web.
>  As a result, the vision of one program doing it all is no longer
> valid (except arguably the way that Lotus Notes integrates various
> enterprise functions).  Additionally, there are other email clients
> and other newsreaders more powerful than Mozilla's.  So that leaves
> the idea of convenience, just give the public something less than
> optimum so it's in one handy package.  There's no doubt that that's
> the direction that MS and NS are both going.  But that does not seem
> to be consistent with the quality and integrity of Mozilla.  So,
> what's the rationale?

I'm not a developer, so this is just my opinion.  I like having the 
mail, news, and browser together.   Often I get mail with html links in 
it that i'd like to check out.  Some newsgroups have URL's too 
sometimes.  Some of the other email clients I find not so easy to 
understand or they aren't GUI clients, and I know of very few of them 
that you can click on a link and start a browser.  I'm using Linux by 
the way.  Yes there are other programs for various functions, like XMMS 
to play MP3 files for example, that don't neccessarily have to be 
integrated with the browser, but some of them, like XMMS, can be made to 
work from the browser if you want them to. Linux does have many email 
clients, newsreaders, and even other browsers to choose from, but I like 
having one program that handles most of what I do on the internet each 
day.


> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGP 6.5.8
> 
> iQA/AwUBO3LCl+H2IGJNcAawEQKcKwCgrpgukMM6PmLV3rJc37vnyhA4e8cAn1on
> bxyJjcJIXAh0iOmIum4r7oEA
> =UyXy
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Richard Snow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richardsnow.bizland.com





Re: Mail & News

2001-08-09 Thread richard snow

Joseph N. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Sorry if this is OT (I'm still trying to figure out what is
> on-topic):
> 
> Why retain the mail and news components of Mozilla?  To the degree
> that the Internet is increasingly a part of our daily lives, the
> triad of browser, mail, and newsreader are insufficient to interact
> with the resources on the 'net.  Word processors, information
> manipulation programs (db's and spreadsheets), peer-to-peer programs
> like Groove, which enable more than just chat, and other programs are
> now enabled and necessary to exploit some of the benefits of the web.
>  As a result, the vision of one program doing it all is no longer
> valid (except arguably the way that Lotus Notes integrates various
> enterprise functions).  Additionally, there are other email clients
> and other newsreaders more powerful than Mozilla's.  So that leaves
> the idea of convenience, just give the public something less than
> optimum so it's in one handy package.  There's no doubt that that's
> the direction that MS and NS are both going.  But that does not seem
> to be consistent with the quality and integrity of Mozilla.  So,
> what's the rationale?

I'm not a developer, so this is just my opinion.  I like having the 
mail, news, and browser together.   Often I get mail with html links in 
it that i'd like to check out.  Some newsgroups have URL's too 
sometimes.  Some of the other email clients I find not so easy to 
understand or they aren't GUI clients, and I know of very few of them 
that you can click on a link and start a browser.  I'm using Linux by 
the way.  Yes there are other programs for various functions, like XMMS 
to play MP3 files for example, that don't neccessarily have to be 
integrated with the browser, but some of them, like XMMS, can be made to 
work from the browser if you want them to. Linux does have many email 
clients, newsreaders, and even other browsers to choose from, but I like 
having one program that handles most of what I do on the internet each 
day.


> 
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGP 6.5.8
> 
> iQA/AwUBO3LCl+H2IGJNcAawEQKcKwCgrpgukMM6PmLV3rJc37vnyhA4e8cAn1on
> bxyJjcJIXAh0iOmIum4r7oEA
> =UyXy
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Richard Snow
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://richardsnow.bizland.com





Re: Anti-aliased fonts in Mozilla Unix: does it really work?

2002-03-13 Thread Richard Kilgore

Joao Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 
news:...
> I was very happy to read that Mozilla 0.9.9 now supports True Type fonts as 
> well as anti-aliasing. I thought that, finally, I would see Mozilla render 
> fonts as elegantly as Konqueror.
> 
> But, despite following the instructions carefully 
> (http://www.mozilla.org/projects/fonts/unix/enabling_truetype.html) was 
> unable to notice any improvement on how fonts look. I can see that some 
> True Type fonts are available in the Preferences:
>  microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1
>  microsoft-georgia-iso8859-1
>  ...

These are not the fonts you should look for.  If it's working, you'll see
font names that are capitalized: like Microsoft-verdana-iso8859-1.
Shot in the dark, but I run debian, and the libfreetype.so.6.2 that
was installed didn't do the trick.  I had to compile Freetype2 from src
(I used http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/freetype/freetype-2.0.9.tar.bz2).

   - rick




Infinite loop detected... again !

2001-01-17 Thread Jean-Denis Richard

Hi!

Mozilla 0.7 still comes with the "Infinite loop detected" bug,
apparently for people having a proxy/firewall (ie people at
work).

SCENARIO:
A- click a link
B- "Infinite loop detected" !
C- press BACK button
D- click again on the link
E- it works ! (sometimes not, do C and D until it does...)

This bug is almost 1 year old and happens very often (can't
browse more than 5 minutes...)

Does anyone knows when this bug will be fixed and if there
are any workaround.

UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010109

--
Jean-Denis Richard
Consultant


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/




Re: Infinite loop detected... again !

2001-01-18 Thread Jean-Denis Richard

> Can you post a URL? I've only ever come across this on page with a
> genuine infinite loop (a redirect to itself)?

I can't post any URL since it happens nearly all the time. For example,
I've just used Mozilla to see your answers via Deja.com and each time
I was clicking on a link (=an answer) I got the infinite loop. Going
back and clicking again made the thing work fine.
Something new with latest build (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0;
en-US; m18) Gecko/20010117 : now Mozilla forgets my user/proxy passwd
when I have this infinite loop detected.

Regards.

--
Jean-Denis Richard
Consultant


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/




Re: Infinite loop detected... again !

2001-01-19 Thread Jean-Denis Richard

> That's very strange, I'm on 20010114 (NT4.0) so I'll upgrade and see
> if I can find a way to reproduce it.

Maybe it could help to get the proxy server manufacturer/version.
I don't know how to retrieve this information. Do you know commands
that could be sent to the proxy manually (telnet) ?

--
--
Jean-Denis Richard
Consultant


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/




Re: Shockwave Flash Plugin

2001-04-05 Thread James Richard Tyrer

Ian Davey wrote:

> In article <0104051046170G.00233@Insanity>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I tried to install the shockwave flash plugin with mozilla ( Linux
> > Version),
> >butit does not seem to recongnize that it is there when I enter any of the
> >shockwave enabled pages...I followed the instructions for a Netscape install,
> >and copied the libflashplayer.so, and ShockwaveFlash.class files into the
> >directory /usr/local/mozilla/plugins ( /usr/local was my prefix for
> >installing mozilla), restarted mozilla, and whent to a shockwave site, but
> >mozilla still thinks there is no plugin installed..What have I done
> >wrong??
>
> When running Mozilla from the commandline does it say "registering plugins"
> and list the shockwave plugin?

No.

> Have you tried running it once as root once you've installed the plugin (just
> long enough for it to start up, then quit and run as a normal user)?

Tried it, it didn't work.

JRT





Re: Shockwave Flash Plugin

2001-04-07 Thread James Richard Tyrer

Upgraded to KDE 2.1.1.

Now Flash works with Mozilla 0.8.1

I have no idea why this fixed it.

Still no RealPlayer or Adobe Acrobat Reader.

JRT





Re: Installing RealPlayer 8 from RPM on Linux disabled all other plugins

2001-04-11 Thread James Richard Tyrer

"D. D. Brierton" wrote:

> All of my plugins for mozilla have stopped working since installling
> RealPlayer 8 from the RPM downloaded from Real.com. Everything had been
> working great, albeit java was slow slow slow. I'm running Linux Mandrake 7.1,
> and mozilla 0.8 (I've just upgraded to 0.8.1 and the problem still persists).
> Everything was working fine---if I started mozilla from the command line I
> could see the plugins being registered (and the java-vm taking an age to get
> going).
>
> However, last week I installed the Real Player 8.0 from RPM from real.com. Now
> the java_vm does not start when I start mozilla, the plugins are not
> registered at startup, and if I go to a page that has a flash animation or a
> java applet on it I am told that I don't have the plugins installed. But I've
> checked and they are still there just like they've always been. I've tried
> re-installing both flash and java and neither does any good. I suspect that
> the Real Player 8 RPM has changed something, but what?

Since the RPM isn't going to work with Mozilla in any case, I would first
uninstall it.

Then you may have to repair any damage done to the installation of Java and
Flash.

If you want to try RealPlayer, get the archive file.

You will have to install it manually in Mozilla and I can't get it to work.

JRT





Re: Installing RealPlayer 8 from RPM on Linux disabled all other plugins

2001-04-13 Thread James Richard Tyrer

"D. D. Brierton" wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "James Richard Tyrer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Since the RPM isn't going to work with Mozilla in any case, I would first
> > uninstall it.
>
> I've now done that.
>
> > Then you may have to repair any damage done to the installation of Java and
> > Flash.
>
> Well this is what I can't work out. The installations of Java and Flash
> *look* just fine:
>
> # ls -l /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/
> total 20
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   46 Oct 14  2000 ShockwaveFlash.class -> 
>/usr/lib/netscape/plugins/ShockwaveFlash.class*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   37 Oct 14  2000 cpPack1.jar -> 
>/usr/lib/netscape/plugins/cpPack1.jar*
> drwxr-xr-x6 root root 4096 Jan 23 10:07 java2/
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   43 Oct 14  2000 libflashplayer.so -> 
>/usr/lib/netscape/plugins/libflashplayer.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   69 Jan 23 10:07 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> 
>/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/java2/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root16224 Apr  9 21:54 libnullplugin.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   34 Oct 14  2000 xanim.so -> 
>/usr/lib/netscape/plugins/xanim.so*
>
> # ls -l /usr/lib/netscape/plugins/
> total 1008
> -r-xr-xr-x1 root root 2363 Mar 25 23:12 ShockwaveFlash.class*
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root57089 Aug 15  2000 cpPack1.jar*
> -r-xr-xr-x1 root root   947992 Mar 25 23:11 libflashplayer.so*
> -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 8632 Jan 10  2000 xanim.so*
>
> This is just how things were before I installed RealPlayer 8, and Java and
> Flash were working fine.
>
> However, if I start mozilla from a terminal I can see that the only plugin
> that gets registered is libnullplugin.so:
>
> # mozilla
> Registering plugin 0 for: "*","All types",".*"
> Registering plugin 0 for: "*","All types",".*"
>
> and about:plugins lists only:
>
> Default Plugin
>
> File name: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libnullplugin.so
> The default plugin handles plugin data for mimetypes and extensions that are not 
>specified and facilitates downloading of new plugins.
>
> Mime Type  DescriptionSuffixesEnabled
> *  All types  .*  Yes
>
> Somehow, I guess I have to "re-register" the plugins with mozilla, but that
> is weird 'cos I thought that simply having the files in the appropriate
> directories was sufficient (that was, after all, all I had to do to install
> the Flash plugin in the first place).
>
> Any pointers or tips?

Well this is starting to look seriously weird.

My directory is:

-rwxr-xr-x1 root root   947992 Mar 29 04:03 libflashplayer.so
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   60 Mar 29 04:03 libjavaplugin_oji.so -> 
/usr/java/jre1.3.0_02/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so
-rwxrwxr-x1 root root38499 Mar 26 16:05 libnullplugin.so
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   48 Mar 29 04:16 nppdf.so -> 
/usr/local/Acrobat4/Browsers/intellinux/nppdf.so
-rw-r--r--1 root root 4139 Mar 29 04:03 raclass.zip
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   30 Mar 29 04:16 rpnp.so -> 
/usr/local/RealPlayer8/rpnp.so
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2363 Mar 29 04:03 ShockwaveFlash.class

So, I don't see what the problem is.  Java and Flash work for me.

JRT